Recombinant Danio rerio NEDD4 family-interacting protein 1-like (ndfip1l) is a recombinant protein derived from zebrafish (Danio rerio). It is part of the NEDD4 family-interacting proteins, which play crucial roles in ubiquitination pathways and protein trafficking. The ndfip1l protein is specifically designed for research purposes, often used in studies related to protein interactions, cellular processes, and signaling pathways.
Species: The protein is derived from Danio rerio (zebrafish), a common model organism in biological research.
Expression Region: The protein sequence spans from amino acid 1 to 210.
Uniprot Number: Q6DGP4.
Storage Conditions: Typically stored in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C. Repeated freezing and thawing should be avoided.
Function: Interacts with NEDD4 family proteins to facilitate their incorporation into exosomes and influence cellular processes such as ubiquitination and protein trafficking.
Ndfip1l, similar to its mammalian counterpart Ndfip1, is involved in recruiting NEDD4 family proteins into exosomes. Exosomes are small vesicles that play a crucial role in intercellular communication and the removal of unwanted proteins from cells. Studies have shown that Ndfip1 enhances exosome secretion and facilitates the transport of NEDD4 proteins, which are important for ubiquitination and protein degradation pathways .
Ndfip1 has been associated with neuroprotection and apoptosis in mammals. Given the conserved nature of these proteins across species, ndfip1l might also play roles in neuroprotection and apoptosis in zebrafish, but specific studies are lacking.
KEGG: dre:436776
UniGene: Dr.109068
Research indicates significant functional conservation of Ndfip1 proteins across vertebrate species, though with some species-specific adaptations. In mammals, Ndfip1 has been shown to function as an adaptor protein that facilitates the interaction between NEDD4 family ubiquitin ligases and their substrates .
The role of Ndfip1 in neuronal function appears conserved, as studies in rats have shown that Ndfip1 expression correlates with learning ability. Fast learners in water maze tasks demonstrate decreased Ndfip1 mRNA and protein expression compared to slow learners . Similarly, spatial training in rats decreases Ndfip1 mRNA and protein expression levels .
In mice, genetic studies using conditional heterozygous (cHet) mice for Ndfip1 have shown enhanced spatial memory performance compared to controls, further supporting the protein's conserved role in cognitive function .
While zebrafish ndfip1l shares these fundamental functions, its specific expression patterns during embryonic development may differ from mammals. The zebrafish model offers unique advantages for studying ndfip1l function due to the transparent nature of embryos and rapid development, allowing for in vivo visualization of protein dynamics .
When designing experiments to study ndfip1l in zebrafish, researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:
Gene expression analysis:
qRT-PCR for quantifying ndfip1l mRNA levels at different developmental stages
In situ hybridization to visualize spatial expression patterns in embryos
RNA-seq for genome-wide expression analysis in the context of ndfip1l manipulation
Protein detection methods:
Western blotting using antibodies specific to zebrafish ndfip1l
Immunohistochemistry for spatial localization in tissue sections
Live imaging using fluorescently tagged ndfip1l in transgenic lines
Functional studies:
Morpholino-mediated knockdown targeting ndfip1l
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate knockout or knock-in lines
Transgenic overexpression of wild-type or mutant forms
Protein interaction studies:
Yeast two-hybrid screening as demonstrated for other zebrafish proteins
Co-immunoprecipitation assays to validate interactions
Proximity ligation assays for in situ detection of protein-protein interactions
For developmental studies, utilizing zebrafish embryos at specific time points (e.g., 48 hpf, 72 hpf, and 96 hpf) allows for systematic analysis of ndfip1l function throughout early development .
When designing genetic manipulation experiments for ndfip1l in zebrafish, follow these methodological guidelines:
Knockout strategy:
Design CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNAs targeting conserved exons of ndfip1l
Inject a mixture of sgRNA and Cas9 mRNA/protein into one-cell stage embryos
Validate editing efficiency through sequencing
Establish stable lines through outcrossing and genotyping
Conditional knockout approach:
Similar to the strategy used for Ndfip1 in mice , researchers can:
Insert loxP sites flanking critical exons (e.g., Exon 3) of ndfip1l
Cross with tissue-specific Cre-expressing lines
Validate conditional deletion through tissue-specific PCR
Knockdown strategy:
Design morpholinos targeting the translation start site or splice junctions
Inject morpholinos at the 1-4 cell stage
Include appropriate controls (standard control morpholino)
Validate knockdown efficiency by Western blot
Genotyping protocol:
PCR amplification using specific primers flanking the target region
Expected products: wild-type band at expected size, mutant bands showing deletions or insertions
Essential controls:
Include wild-type siblings as controls
Use rescue experiments with mRNA co-injection to confirm specificity
Consider generating multiple independent mutant lines to confirm phenotypes
Based on research methodologies applied to similar proteins, the following approaches are recommended for studying ndfip1l protein-protein interactions:
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Use zebrafish ndfip1l as bait protein in the pGBKT7 vector
Create a cDNA library from zebrafish embryos at relevant developmental stages (48-96 hpf)
Transform bait and prey plasmids into yeast
Select positive colonies on selection media and validate through sequencing
This approach has been successfully used to identify protein interactions in zebrafish, yielding libraries with titers of approximately 1.12 × 10^7 CFU/mL and recombination rates of 100% .
Co-immunoprecipitation:
Express tagged versions of ndfip1l in zebrafish embryos or cell lines
Immunoprecipitate with tag-specific antibodies
Analyze co-precipitating proteins by Western blot or mass spectrometry
Validate interactions through reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation
Proximity-based methods:
BioID or TurboID fusion with ndfip1l to identify proximal proteins
FRET or BRET assays for direct interaction analysis
Split-GFP complementation to visualize interactions in vivo
Based on studies of mammalian Ndfip1, potential interaction partners to investigate include Nedd4, Nedd4-2, and Itch ubiquitin ligases, as these have been shown to be recruited by Ndfip1 into exosomes .
Based on studies of Ndfip1 in other systems, ndfip1l likely plays a significant role in exosome biology in zebrafish. Research has shown that Ndfip1:
Is detectable in exosomes secreted from transfected cells and primary neurons
Increases exosome secretion compared to control conditions
Recruits Nedd4 family proteins (Nedd4, Nedd4-2, and Itch) into exosomes, which are normally absent from these vesicles
To investigate ndfip1l's role in exosome biology in zebrafish, researchers should consider:
Methodological approach:
Express tagged ndfip1l in zebrafish embryos or derived cell lines
Isolate exosomes through differential ultracentrifugation or size exclusion chromatography
Characterize exosome content with and without ndfip1l manipulation
Analyze exosome size distribution and number using nanoparticle tracking analysis
Perform proteomics on isolated exosomes to identify cargo proteins
Exosomes are small vesicles (50-90 nm diameter) originating from late endosomes and multivesicular bodies (MVBs) that provide a rapid means of shedding obsolete proteins and facilitating cell-to-cell communication . The ndfip1l protein likely influences which proteins are sorted into these vesicles through its ability to interact with ubiquitin ligases.
Since exosome secretion provides a novel route for rapid sequestration and removal of proteins during stress , studying ndfip1l's role in this process could reveal mechanisms of cellular response to stress in zebrafish.
Zebrafish offer unique advantages for studying ndfip1l's role in ubiquitination pathways through their transparency and rapid development. Based on the predicted functions of ndfip1l in protein ubiquitination , researchers can:
Experimental approach for studying ubiquitination:
Generate transgenic zebrafish expressing fluorescently tagged ubiquitin
Manipulate ndfip1l expression through knockdown or overexpression
Visualize ubiquitination patterns in vivo through confocal microscopy
Isolate specific tissues for biochemical analysis of ubiquitinated proteins
Biochemical assays:
Ubiquitination assays using zebrafish embryo lysates with wild-type or manipulated ndfip1l
Mass spectrometry to identify differentially ubiquitinated proteins
Analysis of ubiquitin chain topology (K48 vs. K63 linkages) to distinguish between degradative and non-degradative ubiquitination
Target protein analysis:
Based on mammalian studies, potential targets to investigate include:
From the literature, we know that siRNA-mediated knockdown of Ndfip1 has been used to study its effects on Beclin 1 and PTEN ubiquitination in mammalian cells . Similar approaches could be adapted for zebrafish studies, potentially using cell lines derived from zebrafish or direct manipulation in embryos.
Based on the product information for recombinant Danio rerio ndfip1l, researchers should follow these storage and handling recommendations:
Storage conditions:
Store at -20°C for standard use
For extended storage, conserve at -20°C or -80°C
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing
Buffer composition:
Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol, optimized for protein stability
The specific buffer composition should be maintained when diluting the protein
Handling precautions:
Thaw aliquots on ice
Avoid vigorous vortexing which may cause protein denaturation
Centrifuge briefly after thawing to collect contents
Use low-protein binding tubes for storage and dilution
The recombinant protein is typically provided at a quantity of 50 μg, though other quantities may be available through special request . When designing experiments using this protein, researchers should carefully calculate the appropriate concentration based on their specific assay requirements.
Based on experimental approaches in zebrafish and studies of Ndfip1 in other model systems, researchers may encounter these challenges when creating and analyzing ndfip1l knockout models:
Common challenges and solutions:
| Challenge | Methodological Solution |
|---|---|
| Early lethality | Use conditional knockout strategies with tissue-specific or inducible Cre expression |
| Compensatory upregulation of paralogs | Consider double knockouts or use transcriptome analysis to identify compensatory mechanisms |
| Off-target effects in CRISPR editing | Design multiple guide RNAs and validate with sequencing; use rescue experiments to confirm specificity |
| Phenotypic variability | Establish multiple founder lines and analyze F2 generation; standardize genetic background |
| Incomplete knockdown with morpholinos | Validate knockdown efficiency by Western blot; use appropriate controls and test multiple morpholinos |
Genotyping considerations:
For reliable genotyping of ndfip1l mutants, design primers that can distinguish between wild-type and mutant alleles. Based on similar approaches for Ndfip1 in mice, the PCR parameters should include:
95°C for 30 s
60°C for 30 s
72°C for 10 s for 36 cycles
Final elongation at 72°C for 90 s
Phenotypic assessment:
When analyzing ndfip1l knockout phenotypes, consider examining:
Developmental timing and morphology
Ubiquitination patterns in relevant tissues
Exosome production and content
Neuronal development and cognitive function
Protein trafficking in the secretory pathway
When confronted with contradictory findings regarding ndfip1l function, researchers should apply these methodological approaches:
Systematic analysis framework:
Evaluate experimental design differences between studies
Model systems used (cell lines vs. whole organisms)
Developmental timing of manipulations
Methods of gene/protein manipulation (knockout, knockdown, overexpression)
Assay sensitivities and specificities
Consider context-dependent functions
Tissue-specific effects
Developmental stage-specific roles
Stress or stimulus-dependent activities
Assess potential technical confounders
Antibody specificity issues
Off-target effects of genetic manipulations
Interference from compensatory mechanisms
Reconciliation strategies:
Direct comparison experiments that reproduce contradictory conditions side-by-side
Collaboration with labs reporting different results
Meta-analysis of multiple datasets
Development of more sensitive or specific assays
Example scenario:
If one study shows ndfip1l promotes exosome secretion while another suggests inhibition, consider that:
Effects may differ based on cell type or developmental stage
Baseline levels of Nedd4 family proteins might influence outcomes
Acute vs. chronic manipulation may yield different results
Specific cargo proteins might be differently affected
This approach is supported by research on Ndfip1 showing its diverse functions in protein trafficking, ubiquitination, and exosome secretion that may manifest differently depending on cellular context .
Zebrafish ndfip1l research offers valuable translational insights that can enhance our understanding of human NDFIP1 function through these methodological approaches:
Comparative analysis framework:
Sequence homology analysis between zebrafish ndfip1l and human NDFIP1
Structural modeling to identify conserved functional domains
Cross-species rescue experiments (human NDFIP1 expression in zebrafish ndfip1l mutants)
Parallel manipulation of orthologous pathways
The zebrafish model offers specific advantages for translational research:
Rapid development allows for high-throughput screening
Transparency enables in vivo visualization of protein dynamics
Conservation of core molecular pathways with mammals
Feasibility of generating genetic models at lower cost and time investment
Specific translational applications:
Neurological disorders - Based on Ndfip1's role in learning and memory , zebrafish models could help understand cognitive disorders
Protein trafficking diseases - Given ndfip1l's predicted role in protein transport , findings could inform understanding of trafficking disorders
Stress response mechanisms - Ndfip1's involvement in exosome-mediated protein removal during stress suggests applications in stress-related pathologies
The zebrafish larva has been validated as an attractive translational vertebrate screening model that bridges the gap between cell culture-based test systems and pharmacokinetic experiments in higher vertebrates , making it particularly valuable for studying ndfip1l/NDFIP1 function in a physiologically relevant context.
When leveraging ndfip1l research in zebrafish for drug discovery applications, researchers should follow these experimental design principles:
Screening framework design:
Define clear molecular or phenotypic endpoints based on ndfip1l function
Establish quantifiable readouts (e.g., fluorescent reporters for ubiquitination or exosome secretion)
Develop appropriate positive and negative controls
Optimize assay conditions for reproducibility and statistical power
Consider both target-based and phenotypic screening approaches
Key experimental design elements:
Pharmacological considerations:
Assess compound solubility, stability, and toxicity in zebrafish
Determine optimal administration routes (bath exposure vs. injection)
Evaluate ADME properties in the zebrafish system
Consider potential off-target effects
For in vivo imaging of drug effects, confocal microscopy approaches as described for zebrafish studies can be employed, using:
Sequential line scanning
Excitation wavelengths of 488 and 561 nm
Emission wavelengths of 500-540 and 570-620 nm
By following these principles, researchers can develop robust drug discovery platforms targeting ndfip1l-related pathways while ensuring scientific rigor and translational relevance.