KEGG: dha:DEHA2G10362g
Subcellular Fractionation: Isolate mitochondria using differential centrifugation (1,000 × g to pellet debris, followed by 12,000 × g to collect mitochondria) . Validate purity via marker enzymes (e.g., cytochrome c oxidase for mitochondria, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase for cytosol).
Western Blotting: Use antibodies specific to FYV4 alongside mitochondrial markers (e.g., porin) and cytosolic controls (e.g., glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). If FYV4 co-localizes with mitochondrial markers, this confirms localization .
Fluorescence Tagging: Fuse FYV4 with GFP under a constitutive promoter (e.g., TEF1 from Arxula adeninivorans) and visualize via confocal microscopy with MitoTracker Red staining .
Compare results across strains (e.g., CBS767 vs. salt-tolerant variants) to rule out strain-specific artifacts .
Media Composition: Test salt-rich media (1 M NaCl, pH 4) to leverage D. hansenii’s halophilic behavior, which enhances stress tolerance and protein stability .
Induction Timing: Use time-course experiments (0–72 hr) with samples harvested every 12 hr. Monitor FYV4 levels via SDS-PAGE and densitometry.
Carbon Sources: Compare lignocellulosic hydrolysates (xylose, arabinose) vs. glucose. Salt (1 M NaCl) improves arabinose assimilation by 8.2% in some strains .
| NaCl (M) | OD₆₀₀ (48 hr) | FYV4 Yield (mg/L) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 12.4 ± 0.3 | 45 ± 2 | Baseline growth |
| 1 | 18.1 ± 0.5 | 68 ± 3 | Optimal salt for expression |
| 2 | 9.8 ± 0.2 | 22 ± 1 | Growth inhibition observed |
Mitochondrial Isolation: Purify mitochondria from FYV4-knockout strains using sucrose density gradients .
PT Assays: Measure PT via swelling assays (absorbance at 540 nm) in buffers containing 0.6 M Na⁺ (mimicking seawater). Compare wild-type and knockout strains.
Electrophysiology: Use patch-clamp techniques to characterize FYV4’s role in ion channel regulation. Note that Na⁺/K⁺ promotes respiratory control in D. hansenii mitochondria, unlike other yeasts .
If FYV4 deletion inconsistently affects PT, assess strain ploidy (haploid vs. diploid) via flow cytometry, as diploid strains show heterozygosity loss .
Cryo-EM Analysis: Resolve FYV4’s structure at <3 Å resolution under 1 M NaCl conditions. Compare with low-salt conformations.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Model FYV4’s interaction with Na⁺ ions over 100-ns trajectories. Identify conserved electrostatic surfaces.
Site-Directed Mutagenesis: Target predicted ion-binding residues (e.g., aspartate/glutamate clusters). Test mutants in NaCl-supplemented media for growth defects.
Salt bridges between D134 and R297 in FYV4 may stabilize the protein’s tertiary structure under high Na⁺ .
Tolerance Screening: Grow FYV4-overexpressing strains in media with vanillin (1–26 mM). Monitor growth (OD₆₀₀) and ATP synthesis (luciferase assays) .
Transcriptomics: Perform RNA-seq to identify FYV4-linked pathways (e.g., oxidative phosphorylation, stress response).
Metabolite Profiling: Quantify tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates via LC-MS. FYV4 may upregulate succinate dehydrogenase under vanillin stress .
If FYV4 expression reduces vanillin tolerance, check for off-target interactions with phenolic detoxification pathways (e.g., glutathione transferases) .
Clade-Specific NUMTs: Screen FYV4 loci for nuclear mitochondrial DNA (NUMT) insertions, which vary between clades and alter gene expression . Use PCR with clade-specific primers.
Heterozygosity Checks: For diploid strains, employ allele-specific qPCR to quantify FYV4 copy number variation .
| Clade | NUMT Insertion Sites | FYV4 mRNA Level (vs. CBS767) |
|---|---|---|
| I | None | 1.0 ± 0.1 (Reference) |
| II | NUMT-12, NUMT-15 | 0.6 ± 0.05 |
| III | NUMT-03 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
CRISPR-Cas9: Use the D. hansenii-optimized system to generate FYV4 mutants. Co-transform with repair templates containing 30-bp homology arms for in vivo assembly.
Robotic Screening: Employ automated liquid handling to test 1,920 conditions (e.g., salt, pH, inhibitors) in 384-well plates. Use GFP-tagged FYV4 for real-time tracking .