Pseudouridine synthases are enzymes responsible for the conversion of uridine to pseudouridine in RNA. These enzymes are crucial for the proper functioning of tRNA, as pseudouridylation enhances the stability and efficiency of tRNA during translation. In bacteria, pseudouridine synthases are involved in various cellular processes, including stress response and adaptation to environmental conditions.
Desulfotalea psychrophila is a psychrophilic, sulfate-reducing bacterium found in permanently cold marine sediments. Its genome has been sequenced, revealing insights into its metabolic capabilities and adaptations to cold environments . The bacterium's ability to grow at temperatures below 0°C makes it an interesting subject for studying cold-adapted enzymes and their potential applications.
While specific applications of Recombinant Desulfotalea psychrophila tRNA pseudouridine synthase A 1 (truA1) are not well-documented, enzymes from psychrophilic organisms like Desulfotalea psychrophila are of interest for biotechnological applications due to their unique properties. These enzymes often exhibit high activity at low temperatures, which can be advantageous in certain industrial processes.
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. If you require a specific format, please specify this in your order notes.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested and confirmed in advance. Additional charges will apply for dry ice shipping.
The tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its inclusion.
This protein catalyzes the formation of pseudouridine at positions 38, 39, and 40 within the anticodon stem-loop of transfer RNAs.
KEGG: dps:DP1324
STRING: 177439.DP1324
Desulfotalea psychrophila truA1 is a pseudouridine synthase that catalyzes the site-specific isomerization of uridine to pseudouridine in tRNA molecules. D. psychrophila is a marine sulfate-reducing delta-proteobacterium found in permanently cold Arctic sediments, capable of growing at temperatures below 0°C . The truA1 enzyme belongs to the TruA family of pseudouridine synthases, which typically modify positions 38-40 in the anticodon stem-loop of tRNAs.
The pseudouridylation of tRNAs contributes to their structural stability and proper function in protein synthesis, particularly under cold conditions. This modification is especially important for psychrophilic organisms like D. psychrophila that must maintain functional translation machinery at low temperatures.
D. psychrophila strain LSv54 has a genome consisting of a 3,523,383 bp circular chromosome with 3,118 predicted genes and two plasmids of 121,586 bp and 14,663 bp . The genome encodes various RNA modification enzymes, including pseudouridine synthases that contribute to tRNA maturation and stability.
The genome sequence reveals that D. psychrophila contains genes for specialized RNA modifications that may contribute to cold adaptation. For instance, it possesses selenocysteine incorporation machinery, including the specialized tRNA (selC) and associated proteins (selA, selB, and selD) . This suggests sophisticated RNA modification systems that may work in concert with pseudouridine synthases to maintain cellular function in cold environments.
Based on information from similar recombinant proteins from D. psychrophila, the recommended storage conditions are:
When designing experiments to study D. psychrophila truA1 activity, researchers should consider both the enzyme's psychrophilic nature and its RNA substrate specificity:
Temperature-dependent activity studies:
Use a factorial design testing enzyme activity across a temperature range (0-37°C)
Include appropriate controls at each temperature point to account for spontaneous RNA degradation
Incorporate time-course measurements to determine optimal reaction times at each temperature
As emphasized by Campbell and Stanley, proper experimental design should address threats to internal validity including history, maturation, testing, instrumentation, statistical regression, selection bias, experimental mortality, and selection-maturation interaction . For truA1 studies specifically:
Use randomized complete block designs when comparing different RNA substrates
Employ pre-test/post-test control group designs when studying enzyme kinetics
Consider Solomon four-group designs when testing enzyme inhibitors to control for testing effects
Remember to match your study design with appropriate statistical analysis methods to avoid discrepancies that could invalidate your findings .
Using Arctic Express E. coli strains that co-express cold-adapted chaperonins
Lowering induction temperatures to 10-15°C to improve folding
Extending expression times to 24-48 hours to compensate for slower protein synthesis at lower temperatures
Purification Protocol:
Lyse cells in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitors
For His-tagged constructs, use immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)
Include a secondary purification step such as ion exchange or size exclusion chromatography
Verify purity via SDS-PAGE (aim for >85% purity as typically reported for commercial recombinant D. psychrophila proteins)
Several complementary methods can be employed to detect and quantify pseudouridine formation:
CMC-primer extension assay:
This method involves treatment with N-cyclohexyl-N'-(2-morpholinoethyl)carbodiimide metho-p-toluenesulfonate (CMC), which selectively modifies pseudouridine residues followed by primer extension to identify modification sites . This approach allows site-specific detection of pseudouridine.
In vitro enzymatic activity assay:
Incubate purified recombinant truA1 with radiolabeled tRNA substrates
Digest RNA to nucleotides and separate by thin-layer chromatography
Quantify pseudouridine formation by phosphorimaging
HPLC-based methods:
HPLC separation of nucleosides after enzymatic digestion of RNA allows quantitative measurement of pseudouridine formation.
The psychrophilic nature of D. psychrophila requires its enzymes, including truA1, to function efficiently at low temperatures (below 0°C). Key structural adaptations likely include:
Increased flexibility through reduced intramolecular hydrogen bonding
Lower arginine/lysine ratio compared to mesophilic homologs
Decreased hydrophobicity in the protein core
Longer surface loops that maintain flexibility at low temperatures
These adaptations typically result in lower thermal stability but higher catalytic efficiency at low temperatures. When working with recombinant D. psychrophila truA1, researchers should expect optimal activity at temperatures significantly lower than those of mesophilic homologs (10-15°C vs. 30-37°C).
The cold adaptation of D. psychrophila truA1 makes it potentially valuable for biotechnological applications requiring RNA modification at low temperatures, such as structural probing of temperature-sensitive RNA conformations.
When facing contradictory results in pseudouridylation experiments with recombinant D. psychrophila truA1, systematically investigate the following factors:
Enzyme-related factors:
Based on studies of related pseudouridine synthases, several factors likely influence the substrate specificity of D. psychrophila truA1:
Sequence determinants:
TruA family enzymes typically recognize target uridines at positions 38-40 in the anticodon stem-loop of tRNAs. Specific nucleotides flanking these positions may serve as recognition elements.
Structural determinants:
The three-dimensional structure of the tRNA substrate is crucial for recognition. The anticodon stem-loop must adopt a conformation that positions target uridines correctly within the enzyme's active site.
Species-specific adaptations:
As a psychrophilic organism, D. psychrophila truA1 may have evolved unique specificity determinants compared to mesophilic homologs, potentially including:
Broader substrate recognition to compensate for reduced kinetic energy at low temperatures
Altered protein-RNA interaction surfaces that maintain affinity despite cold-induced conformational changes
Modified catalytic mechanisms optimized for function in cold environments
Studies of other pseudouridine synthases like TRUB1 have employed massively parallel reporter assays to map specificity determinants . Similar approaches could be applied to D. psychrophila truA1 to systematically identify sequence and structural elements governing its specificity.
In the context of a psychrophilic organism living in permanently cold Arctic sediments, truA1 likely plays a crucial role in cold adaptation through several mechanisms:
tRNA stabilization: Pseudouridine modifications can enhance the structural stability of tRNAs through additional hydrogen bonding capacity, which may be essential for maintaining functional translation machinery at low temperatures.
Translational fidelity: By ensuring proper tRNA structure, truA1-mediated modifications may help maintain translational accuracy under cold conditions that could otherwise reduce the specificity of codon-anticodon interactions.
Regulatory functions: Beyond its canonical role in tRNA modification, truA1 may have RNA binding functions independent of its pseudouridylation activity, similar to how TRUB1 can promote miRNA processing through RNA binding independently of its enzymatic activity .
The genome of D. psychrophila contains adaptations for cold environments, including nine putative cold shock proteins and nine potentially cold shock-inducible proteins . The truA1 enzyme may work in concert with these proteins as part of a coordinated cold-adaptation strategy.
While specific information about D. psychrophila truA1 is limited in the literature, comparative analysis with other pseudouridine synthases reveals important distinctions:
Recombinant D. psychrophila truA1 has several potential applications in RNA biology and biotechnology research:
Cold-active RNA modification tool: The enzyme's ability to function at low temperatures makes it valuable for RNA modification experiments where maintaining RNA structure is critical.
Structural biology investigations: Crystal structures of D. psychrophila truA1 could provide insights into cold adaptation mechanisms of RNA-modifying enzymes.
Comparative enzymology: Comparing the kinetics and specificity of D. psychrophila truA1 with mesophilic homologs can illuminate evolutionary adaptations to extreme environments.
RNA-protein interaction studies: Based on findings with TRUB1, which can bind RNA and influence miRNA processing independent of its enzymatic activity , D. psychrophila truA1 could be used to study cold-adapted RNA-protein interactions.
Biotechnological applications: The cold-active nature of the enzyme could be exploited for biotechnological processes requiring RNA modification at low temperatures, such as preservation of RNA samples or cold-adapted in vitro translation systems.
Implementing convergent design principles, as described by Sage Publishing , can enhance research quality when working with recombinant D. psychrophila truA1:
Quantitative + Qualitative approach:
Combine quantitative enzyme kinetics measurements with qualitative structural analyses
Use both high-throughput screening methods and detailed mechanistic studies
Integrate computational predictions with experimental validation
Practical implementation:
Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with recombinant D. psychrophila truA1:
Protein stability issues: As a psychrophilic enzyme, truA1 may exhibit reduced stability at room temperature or during purification steps.
Solution: Maintain low temperatures (4°C or lower) throughout purification and minimize exposure to room temperature.
Solubility problems: Cold-adapted proteins often contain more hydrophilic residues on their surface, which can lead to unexpected solubility behavior.
Solution: Test multiple buffer systems with various salt concentrations and consider adding stabilizing agents like glycerol.
Activity measurement complications: Standard assays developed for mesophilic enzymes may not work optimally for cold-adapted truA1.
Solution: Modify incubation times and temperatures for activity assays, and include controls at multiple temperatures.
RNA substrate preparation: Ensuring proper folding of RNA substrates at low temperatures can be challenging.
Solution: Include slow cooling steps during RNA preparation and verify folding using temperature-controlled native gel electrophoresis.
While CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in D. psychrophila itself may be challenging due to limited genetic tools for this organism, CRISPR techniques can be applied in several ways to study truA1 function:
Heterologous expression systems: Use CRISPR to generate knockout cell lines lacking endogenous pseudouridine synthases, then complement with D. psychrophila truA1 to study its function without background activity.
Domain mapping: Generate CRISPR-mediated precise mutations in recombinant D. psychrophila truA1 expression constructs to map functional domains and critical residues.
Substrate identification: Apply CRISPR screens to identify RNA targets affected by D. psychrophila truA1 activity, particularly when expressed in mesophilic host cells.
Regulatory network analysis: Use CRISPR activation/interference approaches to modulate expression of genes involved in RNA modification pathways and study their functional relationship with D. psychrophila truA1.
When facing discrepancies between in vitro results with recombinant D. psychrophila truA1 and in vivo pseudouridylation patterns, consider these methodological approaches:
Sequential approach to experimentation: As suggested by Campbell and Stanley , use a systematic progression from controlled in vitro studies to increasingly complex in vivo systems.
Multifactorial experimental design: Design experiments that simultaneously vary multiple parameters (temperature, ionic conditions, protein cofactors) to identify interaction effects that might explain discrepancies.
Technical considerations:
Verify that RNA substrate folding in vitro mimics in vivo conditions
Test for cofactors or interacting proteins that might be present in vivo
Consider post-translational modifications that might affect enzyme activity
Examine differences in cellular compartmentation that could affect substrate accessibility
Statistical analysis:
Apply appropriate statistical methods that match the experimental design
Use sufficient replication (n≥3) for quantitative comparisons
Perform power analysis to ensure adequate sample size for detecting biologically meaningful differences By systematically addressing these factors, researchers can reconcile apparent contradictions and develop a more accurate model of D. psychrophila truA1 function in its native context.