Argininosuccinate synthase (ASS), encoded by the argG gene, catalyzes the ATP-dependent condensation of citrulline and aspartate to form argininosuccinate in the penultimate step of arginine biosynthesis . Key features include:
Conserved motifs: Two ATP-binding motifs (AHGCTGKGN and RAGAQGVGR) critical for enzymatic activity .
Molecular weight: ~44 kDa in Corynebacterium glutamicum, with high sequence similarity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (71%) and Streptomyces clavuligerus (67%) .
Studies on argG heterologous expression in Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus plantarum highlight its role in acid stress tolerance:
Enhanced acid resistance: Recombinant argG expression increased ASS activity by 11-fold under acidic conditions (pH 3.7) .
Amino acid regulation: Upregulation of argG elevated intracellular arginine, aspartate, and glutamate levels, supporting the arginine deiminase (ADI) pathway .
Although D. reducens’s genome encodes metabolic pathways for sulfate/metal reduction and sporulation , no explicit mention of argG or arginine biosynthesis is documented in the provided sources. Comparative genomic analyses suggest:
Metabolic priorities: Energy conservation in D. reducens centers on Fe(III) and sulfate reduction rather than amino acid biosynthesis .
Uncharacterized redox proteins: Proteomic studies identified heterodisulfide reductase-associated proteins (e.g., Dred_0633-4) but no ASS homologs .
KEGG: drm:Dred_0277
STRING: 349161.Dred_0277
Argininosuccinate synthase (encoded by the argG gene) catalyzes the penultimate step in the arginine biosynthetic pathway, combining citrulline and aspartate to form argininosuccinate. In sulfate-reducing bacteria like Desulfotomaculum reducens, this enzyme plays a critical role in nitrogen metabolism and may be particularly important under stress conditions. The enzyme's activity directly affects arginine production, which is essential for protein synthesis and potentially for stress responses. Similar to findings in other bacteria, the enzyme likely functions as part of the urea cycle, affecting levels of metabolites including citrulline, argininosuccinate, arginine, and ornithine .
For efficient expression of recombinant Desulfotomaculum reducens Argininosuccinate synthase, consider implementing a systematic approach to expression system selection:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli BL21(DE3) | High yield, easy manipulation, well-established protocols | Potential protein folding issues with anaerobic proteins | Initial screening, structure studies |
| E. coli Rosetta | Enhanced expression of proteins with rare codons | Added metabolic burden | Proteins with rare codon usage |
| Cell-free systems | Rapid results, avoids toxicity issues | Limited post-translational modifications | Toxic proteins, screening |
| Anaerobic expression systems | Better folding of oxygen-sensitive proteins | More complex setup, lower yields | Maintaining native structure |
The expression method should be selected based on downstream applications. For structural studies requiring large protein quantities, BL21(DE3) may be optimal despite potential folding challenges. For functional studies where proper folding is critical, anaerobic expression systems might be more appropriate despite their technical complexity .
Purifying active Argininosuccinate synthase presents several methodological challenges that require careful optimization:
Oxygen sensitivity: As the protein originates from an anaerobic organism, exposure to oxygen during purification may lead to structural changes or loss of activity. Implement oxygen-free buffers and consider using anaerobic chambers for critical purification steps.
Stability concerns: The enzyme may exhibit limited stability in standard buffer conditions. Test multiple buffer compositions varying in pH (7.0-8.5), salt concentration (100-500 mM NaCl), and stabilizing agents (5-10% glycerol, 1-5 mM DTT).
Protein solubility: Recombinant expression often leads to inclusion body formation. Address this by:
Testing multiple induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration)
Using solubility-enhancing fusion tags (MBP, SUMO)
Developing effective refolding protocols if extraction from inclusion bodies is necessary
Preservation of enzymatic activity: Activity loss during purification is common. Monitor enzyme activity throughout the purification process using the citrulline-aspartate conversion assay to identify steps that compromise function .
To systematically investigate the regulatory mechanisms controlling argG expression in Desulfotomaculum reducens, implement a multi-faceted experimental design that addresses both transcriptional and post-translational regulation:
Promoter analysis and transcription factor identification:
Perform 5' RACE to precisely map the transcription start site
Construct reporter gene fusions (e.g., lacZ, gfp) with varying lengths of the argG promoter region
Use electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with cell extracts from different growth conditions to identify DNA-binding proteins
Verify binding sites through DNase I footprinting or ChIP-seq
Environmental condition matrix:
Design a factorial experimental approach testing argG expression across multiple variables:
| Environmental Factor | Test Conditions | Measurement Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Sulfate availability | 0, 5, 20, 50 mM | RT-qPCR, Western blot |
| Nitrogen source | NH4+, NO3-, organic N | RT-qPCR, enzyme activity |
| Growth phase | Early, mid, late exponential, stationary | Time-course sampling |
| Oxidative/nitrosative stress | Various H2O2 or NO concentrations | Stress-response profiling |
| Carbon source | Lactate, pyruvate, H2/CO2 | Metabolic profiling |
Post-transcriptional regulation analysis:
Evaluate mRNA stability through rifampicin chase experiments
Assess ribosome binding through polysome profiling
Investigate possible small RNA regulators through co-immunoprecipitation with RNA-binding proteins
Post-translational regulation:
Develop assays to detect potential ubiquitination sites similar to the K234 residue identified in homologous enzymes
Use phosphoproteomic approaches to identify regulatory phosphorylation sites
Implement site-directed mutagenesis to verify the functional significance of identified post-translational modifications
This experimental design adheres to the core principles of randomization and controlled variable manipulation to ensure valid results .
A comprehensive kinetic characterization of recombinant Desulfotomaculum reducens Argininosuccinate synthase requires a multi-step methodology that enables meaningful cross-species comparison:
Enzyme preparation and quality control:
Purify to >95% homogeneity using affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion
Verify purity by SDS-PAGE and identity by mass spectrometry
Confirm native conformation through circular dichroism
Determine oligomeric state by analytical ultracentrifugation
Steady-state kinetic analysis:
Implement a high-throughput spectrophotometric assay measuring argininosuccinate formation
Determine Km and kcat values for both substrates (citrulline and aspartate) through initial velocity measurements
Calculate catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) under varying pH and temperature conditions
Pre-steady-state kinetics:
Use stopped-flow spectroscopy to identify rate-limiting steps
Characterize product release by analyzing burst kinetics
Determine binding order through product inhibition studies
Cross-species comparison:
| Parameter | D. reducens | E. coli | Mammalian | Archaea |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Km (Citrulline) | X mM | Y mM | Z mM | W mM |
| Km (Aspartate) | X mM | Y mM | Z mM | W mM |
| kcat | X s-1 | Y s-1 | Z s-1 | W s-1 |
| pH optimum | X | Y | Z | W |
| Temperature optimum | X°C | Y°C | Z°C | W°C |
| Allosteric regulators | To be determined | Known factors | Known factors | Known factors |
Structural basis for kinetic differences:
Generate homology models based on crystal structures from other organisms
Identify active site residues that might account for kinetic differences
Verify through site-directed mutagenesis and kinetic analysis of mutant enzymes
This methodological framework enables researchers to systematically characterize the enzyme and place findings in an evolutionary context .
Investigating post-translational modifications (PTMs) of Argininosuccinate synthase in Desulfotomaculum reducens requires a systematic multi-technique approach:
Identification of potential PTM sites:
Perform in silico analysis using prediction algorithms for ubiquitination, phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation sites
Compare conserved residues with known modification sites in homologous proteins, particularly focusing on the K234 residue identified as a ubiquitination site in other systems
Detection methodologies:
| Modification Type | Detection Method | Technical Considerations | Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubiquitination | Immunoprecipitation with anti-ubiquitin antibodies followed by Western blot | Include proteasome inhibitors during extraction | Use K-to-R mutants as negative controls |
| Phosphorylation | LC-MS/MS with phosphopeptide enrichment | Consider multiple enrichment strategies (TiO2, IMAC) | Include phosphatase treatment controls |
| Acetylation | Anti-acetyllysine antibodies and MS | Extract proteins in deacetylase inhibitors | Use established acetylation sites as positive controls |
| Redox modifications | Differential alkylation followed by MS | Perform extraction under anaerobic conditions | Include oxidation and reduction controls |
Functional impact assessment:
Generate site-directed mutants mimicking modified states (e.g., K→Q for acetylation, S→E for phosphorylation)
Measure enzyme kinetics of wild-type vs. modified-mimic proteins
Assess protein stability through thermal shift assays and limited proteolysis
Determine half-life differences in vivo using pulse-chase experiments
Regulatory context exploration:
Identify the E3 ligases potentially responsible for ubiquitination through BioID or proximity labeling approaches
Characterize the kinases/phosphatases involved in dynamic phosphorylation using inhibitor studies and protein interaction analysis
Investigate environmental conditions that alter the PTM profile
This methodological framework allows researchers to not only identify PTMs but also understand their functional significance in regulating Argininosuccinate synthase activity in response to changing cellular conditions .
Developing a robust high-throughput screening (HTS) system for Argininosuccinate synthase modulators requires careful assay design and validation:
Primary assay development:
Adapt the enzymatic reaction to a colorimetric or fluorometric readout suitable for microplate format
Options include:
Coupling to pyrophosphate release using commercial enzyme systems
Detecting argininosuccinate formation through selective chemistry
Using fluorescently-labeled substrates to track reaction progress
Optimize buffer conditions, enzyme concentration, and reaction time for maximum signal-to-noise ratio
Implement Z'-factor analysis to validate assay quality (aim for Z' > 0.7)
Assay miniaturization and automation:
Scale to 384 or 1536-well format with automated liquid handling
Develop stable reagent preparations that maintain activity during screening campaigns
Establish robust positive (known inhibitors) and negative controls
Implement quality control metrics for day-to-day and plate-to-plate variability
Compound library selection and screening strategy:
| Library Type | Advantages | Considerations | Follow-up Testing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diversity-based | Broad chemical space | Lower hit rate expected | Structural clustering of hits |
| Fragment-based | Efficient exploration of chemical space | Requires sensitive detection | Fragment growing/linking strategies |
| Natural product | Novel scaffolds, evolved inhibitors | Extract complexity | Fractionation and structure determination |
| Focused libraries | Higher hit rate | Limited chemical diversity | SAR development |
Counter-screening cascade:
Implement a hierarchical screening funnel:
Primary HTS → Dose-response confirmation → Orthogonal assay validation
Counter-screen against related enzymes to assess selectivity
Evaluate compound aggregation potential through detergent sensitivity
Assess compound interference with detection system
Hit validation and characterization:
Determine mechanism of inhibition through kinetic studies
Evaluate binding using biophysical methods (SPR, ITC, thermal shift)
Assess cellular activity in bacterial systems
Use structure-based approaches to guide optimization if structural data is available
This comprehensive screening strategy leverages principles of experimental design, including randomization, proper controls, and systematic variable manipulation, to ensure robust identification of genuine modulators .
Establishing reliable in vitro assay conditions for Argininosuccinate synthase requires methodical optimization and systematic troubleshooting:
Standard assay conditions:
Buffer composition: 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT
Substrate concentrations: 1-5 mM citrulline, 1-5 mM aspartate, 1-2 mM ATP
Temperature: 30°C for mesophilic bacteria (adjust for thermophiles)
Reaction time: Establish linear range (typically 10-30 minutes)
Activity detection methods:
| Method | Principle | Sensitivity | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coupled spectrophotometric | Links ATP hydrolysis to NADH oxidation | Moderate (μM range) | Interference from coupling enzymes |
| Radioactive | [14C]-citrulline or [14C]-aspartate incorporation | High (nM range) | Requires radioisotope handling |
| HPLC-based | Direct detection of argininosuccinate | Moderate-high | Lower throughput |
| Colorimetric | Specific detection of reaction products | Moderate | Potential interference |
| Mass spectrometry | Direct product quantification | High | Specialized equipment needed |
Common troubleshooting strategies:
| Issue | Potential Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low/no activity | Enzyme denaturation | Add stabilizers (glycerol, BSA), check pH |
| Oxygen exposure | Prepare reagents anaerobically, add reducing agents | |
| Inhibitory contaminants | Purify enzyme further, test alternative buffer components | |
| High background | Contaminating enzymatic activities | Include control without substrate, increase purification stringency |
| Non-enzymatic reactions | Run controls without enzyme | |
| Poor reproducibility | Enzyme instability | Aliquot and store at -80°C, avoid freeze-thaw cycles |
| Variable substrate quality | Use freshly prepared substrates | |
| Substrate inhibition | High substrate concentrations | Determine optimal concentration ranges through kinetic analysis |
Validation approaches:
Verify enzyme identity using mass spectrometry or immunodetection
Confirm assay specificity using known inhibitors or substrate analogs
Demonstrate linear relationship between enzyme concentration and activity
Compare wild-type enzyme with catalytically inactive mutants (e.g., K165Q and K176Q in homologous systems)
This methodological framework provides researchers with robust protocols and troubleshooting strategies to ensure reliable measurement of Argininosuccinate synthase activity .
Obtaining sufficient quantities of properly folded recombinant Desulfotomaculum reducens Argininosuccinate synthase for structural studies requires a systematic optimization approach:
Expression system selection and optimization:
Construct multiple expression vectors with different fusion tags (His6, MBP, SUMO, GST)
Compare expression levels in various E. coli strains (BL21(DE3), C41(DE3), SHuffle, Rosetta)
Screen expression conditions using a factorial design approach:
| Parameter | Variables to Test | Monitoring Method |
|---|---|---|
| Induction temperature | 16°C, 25°C, 30°C, 37°C | SDS-PAGE analysis |
| IPTG concentration | 0.1 mM, 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM | Western blot |
| Media composition | LB, TB, auto-induction | Total protein yield |
| Induction duration | 4h, 8h, 16h, 24h | Soluble vs. insoluble fraction |
| Additives | Glycylglycine, ethanol, sorbitol | Enhancement of soluble fraction |
Large-scale expression protocol:
Implement best conditions from optimization screens
Consider using bioreactor cultivation for increased biomass
For anaerobic proteins, evaluate expression under microaerobic conditions
Include protease inhibitors during harvest to prevent degradation
Multi-step purification strategy:
Initial capture: Affinity chromatography based on fusion tag
Tag removal: Site-specific protease cleavage (PreScission, TEV, or SUMO protease)
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography
Polishing: Size exclusion chromatography
Concentrate to 5-15 mg/mL for crystallization trials
Quality control assessments:
Purity: SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry
Homogeneity: Dynamic light scattering and analytical SEC
Structural integrity: Circular dichroism and thermal shift assays
Functionality: Enzymatic activity compared to native enzyme
Specific considerations for structural studies:
For X-ray crystallography: Screen for crystallization using commercial sparse matrix screens
For cryo-EM: Evaluate sample on negative stain EM before proceeding to cryo conditions
For NMR studies: Establish expression in minimal media with isotope labeling
This methodological approach incorporates principles of experimental design including variable manipulation and systematic optimization to maximize the likelihood of obtaining properly folded, active protein suitable for structural studies .
Investigating the structural determinants of substrate specificity in Argininosuccinate synthase requires an integrated approach combining computational, biochemical, and structural methods:
Sequence and structural analysis:
Perform multiple sequence alignment of Argininosuccinate synthase across diverse organisms
Identify conserved and variable residues in substrate-binding regions
Generate homology models based on existing crystal structures
Use computational docking to predict substrate interactions
Site-directed mutagenesis strategy:
Design a panel of mutants targeting:
Absolutely conserved residues (likely catalytic)
Residues that differ between Desulfotomaculum and other species (specificity-determining)
Second-shell residues that may influence active site geometry
| Residue Type | Experimental Approach | Expected Outcome | Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalytic residues | Conservative and non-conservative mutations | Complete activity loss | Wild-type enzyme |
| Specificity-determining | Swap with residues from other species | Altered substrate preference | Wild-type kinetics |
| Second-shell | Systematic alanine scanning | Subtle kinetic effects | Structural analysis |
Substrate analog studies:
Synthesize or obtain structural analogs of citrulline and aspartate
Perform competitive inhibition studies to map binding determinants
Use isothermal titration calorimetry to measure binding thermodynamics
Protein engineering approaches:
Create chimeric enzymes combining domains from different species
Implement directed evolution with selection for altered specificity
Test rational design based on computational predictions
Structural validation:
Pursue co-crystallization with substrates, products, or substrate analogs
Use hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map conformational changes upon binding
Implement FRET-based assays to monitor substrate-induced conformational changes
Correlation with enzyme function:
Measure kinetic parameters (Km, kcat) for each mutant with natural substrates
Test activity with non-native substrates to assess specificity changes
Evaluate product distribution when multiple reaction pathways are possible
This multi-faceted experimental approach provides comprehensive insights into the structural basis of substrate recognition and catalysis, guiding potential protein engineering efforts for biotechnological applications .
When confronted with contradictory data regarding Argininosuccinate synthase in Desulfotomaculum reducens, implement a systematic approach to data analysis and interpretation:
Methodological validation and troubleshooting:
Re-evaluate experimental techniques for potential systematic errors
Verify reagent quality and experimental conditions
Implement positive and negative controls for each assay system
Assess reproducibility through multiple independent replicates
Systematic approach to contradictory findings:
| Data Contradiction Type | Analysis Approach | Resolution Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Enzyme activity discrepancies | Compare assay conditions | Standardize methods or explain context-dependency |
| Expression level inconsistencies | Evaluate growth conditions | Map regulatory networks in different conditions |
| Metabolic flux contradictions | Perform isotope tracing studies | Quantify actual metabolic contributions |
| Phenotypic variations | Genetic background verification | Sequence verification and strain validation |
Integration of multi-omics data:
Combine transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data to build a holistic view
Implement correlation network analysis to identify consistent patterns amid contradictions
Use principal component analysis to identify major sources of variation
Apply Bayesian statistical approaches for conflicting datasets
Alternative hypothesis generation:
Formulate multiple working models that could explain apparently contradictory results
Design critical experiments to differentiate between alternative hypotheses
Consider context-dependent regulation and moonlighting functions
Evaluate post-translational modifications that might explain functional differences
Literature-based resolution approaches:
Perform systematic review of related enzymes in other organisms
Identify experimental conditions that might explain divergent results
Consider evolutionary context and metabolic adaptations in anaerobic bacteria
This methodological framework enables researchers to systematically address contradictory data, potentially revealing important regulatory mechanisms or novel enzyme functions that explain the apparent contradictions .
Statistical analysis of enzyme kinetic parameters requires rigorous methodological approaches to ensure valid comparisons across experimental conditions:
Statistical treatment of initial velocity data:
Fit raw kinetic data to appropriate models (Michaelis-Menten, Hill, etc.) using non-linear regression
Apply weighting schemes based on experimental error structure
Calculate confidence intervals for all derived parameters
Use information criteria (AIC, BIC) to select the most appropriate kinetic model
Comparing kinetic parameters across conditions:
| Parameter Comparison | Statistical Approach | Required Sample Size | Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single parameter, two conditions | Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney | n ≥ 3 per condition | Normality (for t-test) |
| Single parameter, multiple conditions | ANOVA with post-hoc tests | n ≥ 3 per condition | Normality, equal variance |
| Multiple parameters, multiple conditions | MANOVA | n ≥ 5 per condition | Multivariate normality |
| Complex experimental designs | Mixed-effects models | Depends on design | Model-specific |
Accounting for experimental variability:
Implement bootstrap or jackknife resampling for robust error estimation
Use global fitting approaches for datasets with shared parameters
Account for both random and systematic errors in uncertainty propagation
Consider Bayesian approaches with informative priors for small datasets
Graphical representation of statistical results:
Create forest plots for comparing parameter values across conditions
Use volcano plots to visualize both magnitude and statistical significance
Implement spider/radar plots for multiparameter comparisons
Create interactive visualizations for exploring multidimensional parameter spaces
Addressing common statistical pitfalls:
Correct for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni, Holm, or false discovery rate methods
Assess the influence of outliers through sensitivity analysis
Validate statistical assumptions through residual analysis
Implement power analysis to ensure adequate sample sizes
This statistical framework ensures robust analysis of enzyme kinetic data while maintaining experimental design integrity through proper randomization and variable control .
The study of Recombinant Desulfotomaculum reducens Argininosuccinate synthase opens several promising research avenues that integrate metabolic engineering, systems biology, and environmental microbiology:
Systems-level metabolic integration:
Map the connectivity between arginine biosynthesis and central metabolic pathways in sulfate-reducing bacteria
Investigate metabolic flux redistribution under varying environmental stressors
Develop genome-scale metabolic models incorporating enzyme kinetics and regulation
Explore metabolic interactions in mixed microbial communities containing Desulfotomaculum reducens
Stress response mechanisms:
Characterize the role of arginine biosynthesis in nitrite stress tolerance, similar to that observed in Desulfovibrio species
Investigate potential connections between arginine metabolism and sulfate reduction under limiting conditions
Explore the role of post-translational modifications in rapid adaptation to changing environments
Develop experimental designs to test the relationship between arginine biosynthesis and biofilm formation
Biotechnological applications:
Engineer Argininosuccinate synthase variants with enhanced catalytic efficiency
Develop biosensors based on Argininosuccinate synthase regulation for environmental monitoring
Explore applications in bioremediation of metal-contaminated sites
Investigate potential antimicrobial targets based on differences between bacterial and human enzymes
Evolutionary perspectives:
Conduct comparative genomic and structural analyses across diverse bacterial phyla
Investigate horizontal gene transfer events affecting argG distribution
Reconstruct the evolutionary history of the urea cycle and arginine metabolism in anaerobic bacteria
Explore functional divergence of Argininosuccinate synthase orthologs
Methodological innovations:
Develop improved expression systems for oxygen-sensitive enzymes from anaerobic bacteria
Create advanced biophysical techniques for studying enzyme dynamics under anaerobic conditions
Implement synthetic biology approaches to create minimal systems for studying arginine metabolism
Develop computational models predicting enzyme behavior under varying environmental conditions
This research agenda incorporates experimental design principles including factorial approaches, controlled variable manipulation, and randomization to ensure robust and reproducible findings in this emerging field .
Advancing our understanding of structure-function relationships in Desulfotomaculum reducens Argininosuccinate synthase requires integration of diverse methodological approaches across multiple disciplines:
Structural biology integration:
Combine X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM, and NMR spectroscopy for multi-scale structural insights
Implement hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map conformational dynamics
Use small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to study solution behavior and conformational ensembles
Apply computational approaches including molecular dynamics simulations to explore conformational landscapes
Chemical biology approaches:
| Approach | Application | Expected Insights | Technical Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activity-based protein profiling | Identify active site residues | Catalytic mechanism | Requires specific probe design |
| Click chemistry | Track post-translational modifications | Regulatory mechanisms | May require genetic code expansion |
| Crosslinking mass spectrometry | Map protein-protein interactions | Metabolic complexes | Optimization of crosslinker chemistry |
| Photoaffinity labeling | Identify allosteric sites | Regulatory hotspots | Probe design affects specificity |
Systems biology integration:
Combine transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to map regulatory networks
Implement flux balance analysis to quantify metabolic contributions
Develop kinetic models incorporating structural constraints
Use network analysis to identify key regulatory nodes
Computational approaches:
Implement machine learning for prediction of functional sites from sequence/structure
Use quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) to study reaction mechanisms
Apply evolutionary coupling analysis to identify co-evolving residue networks
Develop integrative modeling approaches combining diverse experimental data
Emerging technologies:
Apply single-molecule techniques to study conformational dynamics
Implement microfluidic platforms for high-throughput functional screening
Use synthetic biology to create minimal systems for hypothesis testing
Develop biosensors based on Argininosuccinate synthase for real-time activity monitoring
This interdisciplinary framework enables researchers to connect molecular-level structural insights with cellular function, providing a comprehensive understanding of how Argininosuccinate synthase contributes to Desulfotomaculum reducens metabolism and adaptation to environmental challenges .
Researchers investigating Recombinant Desulfotomaculum reducens Argininosuccinate synthase should utilize these essential resources organized by research phase:
Sequence and structural information:
UniProt for protein sequence and annotation
Protein Data Bank (PDB) for related enzyme structures
BRENDA enzyme database for biochemical and molecular information
KEGG for metabolic pathway mapping
PFAM and InterPro for domain analysis and functional annotation
Genomic and transcriptomic resources:
| Resource Type | Recommended Databases | Information Provided | Usage Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial genomes | NCBI RefSeq, MicrobesOnline | Complete genome sequence | Compare genomic context across species |
| Transcriptomics | GEO, ArrayExpress | Expression profiles | Identify co-regulated genes |
| Regulon databases | RegPrecise, RegulonDB | Predicted regulatory sites | Map potential regulatory networks |
| Metagenomic resources | IMG/M, MG-RAST | Environmental distribution | Ecological context of enzyme variants |
Specialized sulfate-reducing bacteria resources:
DvH Database (Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough resources)
SRB Web Server for comparative genomics of sulfate-reducing bacteria
Anaerobic microorganism collection databases (DSMZ, ATCC)
Desulfotomaculum comparative genomics databases
Experimental design and methodological resources:
Bioinformatics and analysis tools:
PyMOL, UCSF Chimera for structural visualization and analysis
MEGA for phylogenetic analysis
I-TASSER for protein structure prediction
HMMER for sensitive sequence searches
DynaFit or KinTek Explorer for enzyme kinetics analysis
Literature resources:
Regular monitoring of specialized journals:
Journal of Bacteriology
Environmental Microbiology
FEMS Microbiology Reviews
Biochemistry
Structure
Citation alerts for key papers on argininosuccinate synthase and sulfate-reducing bacteria
Conference proceedings from American Society for Microbiology and enzymology conferences