GMP synthase (guaA) belongs to the glutamine amidotransferase (GAT) family, which couples glutamine hydrolysis with ammonia transfer to catalyze the ATP-dependent amination of xanthosine monophosphate (XMP) to GMP . Key features include:
Dual active sites:
Allosteric regulation: Substrate binding (ATP·Mg²⁺ and XMP) induces conformational changes that activate the GATase domain .
Ammonia channeling: A conserved 10–40 Å tunnel directs ammonia from glutamine hydrolysis to the ATPPase active site, preventing equilibration with the external environment .
| Domain | Function | Key Residues/Features |
|---|---|---|
| GATase | Glutamine hydrolysis | Catalytic triad (Cys, His, Glu) |
| ATPPase | XMP adenylation and amination | ATP·Mg²⁺ binding site |
| Interdomain linker | Allosteric communication | Conformational flexibility |
Essentiality in pathogens: guaA is vital in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, C. difficile, and other pathogens, making it a drug target . Inhibitors targeting the guanine riboswitch or catalytic sites could disrupt nucleotide synthesis .
Industrial applications: Recombinant GMPS variants are used in enzymatic screens for antibiotic development. For instance, guanine analogs that bind riboswitches inhibit C. difficile growth and gut colonization .
Structural gaps: No full-length structure of D. salexigens GMPS is available. Partial constructs may hinder mechanistic studies of interdomain communication .
Functional assays: Activity assays with recombinant guaA could clarify its kinetic parameters and response to inhibitors. For example, Mycobacterium tuberculosis GMPS shows 90% activity loss upon acivicin treatment .
KEGG: dsa:Desal_1552
STRING: 526222.Desal_1552
GMP synthase (EC 6.3.5.2), encoded by the guaA gene in Desulfovibrio salexigens, is a critical enzyme that catalyzes the amination of xanthosine 5'-monophosphate (XMP) to form guanosine monophosphate (GMP) in the presence of glutamine and ATP. This reaction represents the final step in the de novo synthesis of guanine nucleotides.
The reaction can be summarized as:
ATP + XMP + L-glutamine + H₂O → AMP + diphosphate + GMP + L-glutamate
The enzyme contains two functional domains that work in coordination:
The glutaminase domain (N-terminal): Responsible for glutamine hydrolysis to produce the necessary amino group
The synthetase domain (C-terminal): Responsible for ATP hydrolysis and the transfer of the amino group to XMP
In D. salexigens, GMP synthase plays a crucial role in purine metabolism, which is essential for genetic material synthesis, energy transfer processes, and various signaling pathways. Unlike in some organisms, D. salexigens must efficiently manage its nucleotide synthesis under anaerobic conditions, making the study of its GMP synthase particularly interesting for understanding metabolic adaptations in sulfate-reducing bacteria .
The structural characteristics of D. salexigens GMP synthase show both conserved elements and unique adaptations compared to other bacterial homologs:
Conserved Features:
Like other GMP synthases, it contains both glutaminase and synthetase domains
The catalytic triad in the Class I amidotransferase domain (typically Cys, His, Glu) is preserved
The ATP-binding P-loop motif in the synthetase domain is structurally conserved
Distinctive Features:
Amino acid composition analysis between D. salexigens and other bacteria reveals statistically significant substitutions in several amino acids, particularly aspartic acid (D), glutamic acid (E), lysine (K), asparagine (N), serine (S) and tyrosine (Y)
These amino acid preferences likely reflect adaptations to D. salexigens' unique marine and anaerobic lifestyle
| Amino Acid | % Substitution in D. salexigens | Statistical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Lysine (K) | 13.10% | P<0.0005 |
| Asparagine (N) | 8.10% | P<0.0005 |
| Glutamic acid (E) | 6.82% | P<0.0005 |
| Serine (S) | 5.30% | P<0.0005 |
| Aspartic acid (D) | 2.33% | P<0.0005 |
| Tyrosine (Y) | 1.57% | P<0.0005 |
These differences likely contribute to optimized enzyme function under the specific physiological conditions of D. salexigens, including potential adaptations for anaerobic environments and marine salinity .
For successful expression of recombinant D. salexigens GMP synthase, several expression systems have been evaluated, with E. coli-based systems showing particular promise:
E. coli Expression Systems:
Bactosome expression systems in E. coli have demonstrated excellent results for recombinant enzyme production
E. coli BL21(DE3) RIL strains are particularly effective as they provide additional tRNAs for rare codons that may be present in D. salexigens genes
Key Methodological Considerations:
Vector selection: pET-based vectors with T7 promoters provide high-level expression control
Induction parameters: Optimal results typically achieved with 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG induction at OD₆₀₀ of 0.6-0.8
Growth temperature: Post-induction temperature reduction to 16-20°C often improves soluble protein yield
Anaerobic considerations: Since D. salexigens is anaerobic, expression under microaerobic conditions may improve proper folding
Purification Approach:
Metal affinity chromatography using His-tagged constructs yields high purity
Size exclusion chromatography can further enhance homogeneity
Enzyme activity is best preserved when purification buffers contain:
10-20% glycerol
1-5 mM DTT or other reducing agents
Protease inhibitors during initial extraction
Importantly, when expressing recombinant D. salexigens proteins in E. coli, researchers should verify that no endogenous ligands are co-purified, as mass spectrometry analysis has revealed that E. coli expression can sometimes result in co-purification of native metabolites .
Measuring enzyme kinetics of D. salexigens GMP synthase under anaerobic conditions requires specialized techniques due to the oxygen sensitivity of this sulfate-reducing bacterium:
Experimental Setup:
Anaerobic chamber preparation: Use an anaerobic chamber with N₂/H₂/CO₂ atmosphere (typically 85:10:5)
Buffer degassing: All reaction buffers must be thoroughly degassed and equilibrated in the anaerobic chamber for at least 24 hours
Enzyme stabilization: Include reducing agents like DTT (1-5 mM) or sodium dithionite to maintain reducing conditions
Kinetic Measurement Methods:
Coupled enzyme assays:
Monitor AMP production by coupling with adenylate kinase and pyruvate kinase/lactate dehydrogenase
Follow NADH oxidation spectrophotometrically at 340 nm
Direct product quantification:
HPLC analysis of GMP production using anion exchange chromatography
Mass spectrometry for precise quantification of reaction products
Important Considerations:
Control experiments must verify that coupled enzymes remain active under anaerobic conditions
Desulfovibrio enzymes may show inactivation during oxygen exposure, similar to NADH oxidase inactivation observed in D. salexigens Mast1
Enzyme activity should be measured immediately after purification as storage can lead to activity loss
Data Analysis Table Example:
| Substrate | K<sub>m</sub> (μM) | k<sub>cat</sub> (s<sup>-1</sup>) | k<sub>cat</sub>/K<sub>m</sub> (M<sup>-1</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATP | 120-150 | 2.5-3.0 | 1.7-2.5 × 10⁴ |
| XMP | 40-60 | 2.5-3.0 | 4.2-7.5 × 10⁴ |
| L-glutamine | 150-200 | 2.5-3.0 | 1.3-2.0 × 10⁴ |
Note: Values are representative ranges based on typical bacterial GMP synthases and should be experimentally determined for D. salexigens specifically
Conserved cysteine residues play crucial roles in the catalytic mechanism of D. salexigens GMP synthase, particularly in the glutaminase domain:
Catalytic Mechanism:
The glutaminase domain contains a conserved catalytic triad, with a cysteine residue (equivalent to Cys104 in human GMP synthase) as the key nucleophile
This cysteine initiates glutamine hydrolysis by nucleophilic attack on the amide carbon of glutamine
The resulting intermediate releases the amino group, which is then channeled to the synthetase domain
The amino group subsequently attacks XMP (activated by ATP) to form GMP
Evidence for Cysteine Importance:
Studies with recombinant GMP synthase have shown that modification of the equivalent cysteine with acivicin (a glutamine analog) irreversibly inhibits the glutaminase activity
Mass spectrometry and Edman sequence analysis have confirmed that this cysteine is the site of acivicin modification
Mutation studies demonstrate that altering this cysteine residue (e.g., Cys to Ala) abolishes glutaminase activity
Domain Coordination:
The cysteine-dependent glutaminase activity is tightly coordinated with the synthetase domain
Inorganic pyrophosphate can inhibit the synthetase activity and uncouple the two domain functions, allowing glutamine hydrolysis to proceed without GMP formation
This suggests that the cysteine-mediated glutamine hydrolysis can operate independently but is normally regulated by the activity of the synthetase domain
This mechanism is likely conserved in D. salexigens GMP synthase, though specific studies on this organism's enzyme would be needed to confirm the exact position and role of the catalytic cysteine.
Cyclic dimeric GMP (c-di-GMP) is a widespread bacterial second messenger that controls various cellular functions, and there are several potential interactions between c-di-GMP signaling and GMP synthase activity in D. salexigens:
Potential Regulatory Interactions:
Substrate Competition:
GMP is required for c-di-GMP synthesis by diguanylate cyclases (DGCs)
GMP synthase activity may therefore directly impact c-di-GMP pool availability
Under conditions of high c-di-GMP synthesis, feedback inhibition of GMP synthase could occur
Transcriptional Regulation:
c-di-GMP binding proteins like FleQ function as transcription regulators in many bacteria
Similar regulators in D. salexigens could potentially control guaA gene expression
Recent discoveries of c-di-GMP receptor proteins such as ComFB (present in many bacteria) suggest additional regulatory possibilities
Metabolic Coordination:
c-di-GMP levels in bacteria are known to respond to environmental conditions such as osmolarity
D. salexigens, as a halophilic organism, may coordinate GMP synthase activity with osmotic stress responses
This coordination would ensure appropriate nucleotide availability during stress adaptation
Experimental Evidence from Related Systems:
In other bacteria, c-di-GMP binds to specific motifs in various proteins, affecting their function
FRET-based c-di-GMP biosensors have demonstrated variable affinity (KD ranging across 100-fold differences) in different bacterial species
Environmental factors such as NaCl concentration can significantly impact c-di-GMP levels in bacteria, potentially affecting all GMP-dependent pathways
While direct evidence for c-di-GMP regulation of GMP synthase in D. salexigens is currently limited, the interconnection between these pathways presents an interesting area for future investigation, particularly given D. salexigens' requirements for adaptation to osmotic stress.
Assessing substrate specificity of D. salexigens GMP synthase requires a multi-faceted approach combining biochemical, structural, and computational methods:
Biochemical Approaches:
Alternative Substrate Screening:
Test activity with XMP analogs (e.g., 8-azaXMP, 6-thioXMP)
Evaluate different amino group donors beyond glutamine (e.g., ammonia, methylamine)
Examine ATP analogs (e.g., GTP, CTP) as phosphate donors
Kinetic Parameter Determination:
Measure Km, kcat, and kcat/Km for each potential substrate
Compare catalytic efficiency ratios to establish preference hierarchy
Evaluate competitive inhibition patterns between substrate analogs
Structural Methods:
X-ray Crystallography:
Obtain crystal structures with various bound substrates or substrate analogs
Identify key binding residues and interaction patterns
Compare active site architecture with other characterized GMP synthases
NMR Studies:
Characterize protein-substrate interactions in solution
Examine dynamic changes upon substrate binding
Identify allosteric effects of substrate binding
Computational Approaches:
Molecular Docking:
In silico screening of potential substrates
Calculation of binding energies and interaction patterns
Prediction of productive binding modes
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Model substrate entry and product release pathways
Evaluate conformational changes during catalysis
Identify water-mediated interactions critical for specificity
Example Data Presentation:
| Substrate Variant | Relative Activity (%) | Km (μM) | kcat (s-1) | kcat/Km (M-1s-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMP (natural) | 100 | 50 | 2.8 | 5.6 × 104 |
| 8-azaXMP | 45 | 120 | 1.5 | 1.3 × 104 |
| 6-thioXMP | 12 | 210 | 0.6 | 2.9 × 103 |
| IMP | <1 | - | - | - |
Note: Table contains representative values; actual measurements for D. salexigens GMP synthase would need to be experimentally determined
These complementary approaches provide a comprehensive understanding of substrate specificity, which is particularly important for D. salexigens as it may exhibit adaptations in substrate preference related to its unique ecological niche.
The amino acid composition of D. salexigens GMP synthase reflects specific adaptations to marine environments, particularly related to salt tolerance and pressure adaptation:
Halophilic Adaptations:
Acidic Residue Enrichment:
D. salexigens shows statistically significant substitution patterns favoring acidic amino acids (glutamic acid, aspartic acid)
These negatively charged residues create a hydration shell that maintains protein solubility in high-salt conditions
The exact substitution percentages (glutamic acid: 6.82%, aspartic acid: 2.33%) suggest moderate halophilic adaptation
Lysine Preference:
Structural Stability Features:
Comparative Analysis:
Phylogenetic studies place D. salexigens in an isolated branch within the Desulfovibrio genus, suggesting unique evolutionary adaptations . When comparing amino acid compositions between D. salexigens and non-marine Desulfovibrio species, clear patterns emerge:
| Adaptation Feature | D. salexigens | Terrestrial Desulfovibrio spp. | Functional Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acidic residues (Asp+Glu) | Higher proportion | Lower proportion | Salt tolerance, water binding |
| Basic/Acidic ratio | Lower | Higher | Electrostatic balance in high salt |
| Hydrophobic residues | Modified distribution | More clustered | Prevents salt-induced aggregation |
| Serine content | 5.30% higher | Lower | Enhanced hydrogen bonding, flexibility |
These compositional differences likely extend to GMP synthase, allowing the enzyme to function efficiently in the marine environment where D. salexigens naturally occurs. This adaptation is crucial for maintaining essential nucleotide synthesis pathways under conditions that might otherwise compromise enzyme structure and function.
Recombinant expression of D. salexigens GMP synthase can significantly impact its post-translational modifications (PTMs), affecting both structural integrity and enzymatic function:
PTM Considerations in Native vs. Recombinant Systems:
Phosphorylation Patterns:
Disulfide Bond Formation:
The reducing environment in D. salexigens (anaerobic sulfate-reducer) differs from expression hosts
Critical cysteine residues in the glutaminase domain may form inappropriate disulfide bonds in aerobic expression systems
This could significantly impact the nucleophilic activity of catalytic cysteines
Proteolytic Processing:
N-terminal or C-terminal processing that occurs in D. salexigens may be absent in recombinant systems
Fusion tags (His, GST, etc.) may interfere with native folding or processing
Terminal extensions could disrupt domain interactions critical for coordinated enzyme function
Experimental Approaches to Address PTM Differences:
Mass Spectrometry Analysis:
Compare PTM profiles between native and recombinant enzymes
Identify specific modification sites that differ between systems
Quantify modification stoichiometry at each site
Activity Restoration Strategies:
In vitro modification to mimic native PTMs (e.g., treatment with specific kinases)
Co-expression with D. salexigens modification enzymes
Expression under conditions that promote native-like modifications
Expression System Optimization:
Use of anaerobic expression conditions
Expression in related Desulfovibrio species rather than E. coli
Development of cell-free expression systems with controlled redox environments
Methodological Table for PTM Analysis:
| PTM Type | Detection Method | Functional Impact Assessment | Restoration Approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphorylation | LC-MS/MS with phospho-enrichment | Phosphomimetic mutations (D/E) | Co-expression with kinases |
| Disulfide bonds | Non-reducing SDS-PAGE, mass shifts | Mutation of non-catalytic Cys | Expression under controlled redox |
| Proteolytic processing | N-terminal sequencing | Construct with native termini | Targeted protease treatment |
| Metal incorporation | ICP-MS, activity with metal add-back | Metal chelation studies | Reconstitution with specific metals |
Understanding and addressing these PTM differences is critical for ensuring that recombinant D. salexigens GMP synthase accurately represents the native enzyme's properties and activities in experimental studies.
Comparative genomic analysis of guaA genes across the Desulfovibrionaceae family provides valuable insights into evolutionary relationships, functional conservation, and adaptative strategies:
Phylogenetic Relationships:
The Desulfovibrionaceae family contains several distinct lineages with varying degrees of relatedness
D. salexigens forms an isolated branch in phylogenetic analyses, suggesting a unique evolutionary history
guaA gene sequences can be used as molecular markers to clarify taxonomic relationships within this complex bacterial family
Gene Structure and Organization:
Analysis of guaA and surrounding genomic regions reveals conservation patterns:
Variations in operon structure across species
Presence/absence of regulatory elements
Co-occurrence with specific metabolic genes
D. gigas, a related species, has a remarkably compact genome with a gene density of 1128 bp per gene and average gene length of 993 bp , providing context for analyzing guaA organization in D. salexigens
Functional Adaptations:
Horizontal Gene Transfer Analysis:
Examination of guaA codon usage and GC content can reveal potential horizontal gene transfer events
The presence of unique insertion sequences or mobile genetic elements near guaA in some species suggests evolutionary dynamics
Comparison with plasmid sequences (like D. gigas' 101,949 bp plasmid ) can identify potential mobilization of metabolic genes
Adaptive Variation:
Amino acid substitution patterns in GMP synthase reflect environmental adaptations:
Halophilic adaptations in marine species
Temperature adaptations in thermophilic members
Pressure adaptations in deep-sea isolates
These patterns provide insight into the evolutionary pressures shaping nucleotide metabolism in different ecological niches
This comparative analysis not only clarifies the evolutionary history of D. salexigens and related species but also provides insights into the functional adaptation of fundamental metabolic enzymes across diverse environments.
Investigating interactions between D. salexigens GMP synthase and potential inhibitors requires a multi-faceted approach combining biophysical, biochemical, and computational methods:
High-Throughput Screening Approaches:
Targeted Screening of Compound Libraries:
Utilize differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) to monitor thermal shifts upon inhibitor binding
Develop activity-based assays suitable for 96/384-well format
Screen focused libraries based on known inhibitors of GMP synthases
Fragment-Based Screening:
Use NMR-based methods to identify small molecule fragments that bind
Employ surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to quantify binding kinetics
Combine fragments to develop higher-affinity inhibitors
Detailed Interaction Analysis:
Structural Characterization:
X-ray crystallography of enzyme-inhibitor complexes
Cryo-EM for larger complexes or dynamic states
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify binding-induced conformational changes
Binding Affinity Determination:
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters
Microscale thermophoresis for solution-based affinity measurements
Fluorescence-based binding assays for high-sensitivity detection
Functional Consequence Assessment:
Inhibition Mechanism Studies:
Determine inhibition type (competitive, non-competitive, uncompetitive, mixed)
Measure IC₅₀ and K<sub>i</sub> values under various substrate concentrations
Evaluate time-dependent inhibition and reversibility
Domain-Specific Inhibition Analysis:
Test inhibitors specific to glutaminase domain (like acivicin)
Evaluate ATP-competitive inhibitors for synthetase domain
Investigate allosteric inhibitors that disrupt domain communication
Example Inhibition Data Format:
| Inhibitor | IC₅₀ (μM) | Inhibition Type | Binding Domain | Reversibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acivicin | 0.5-2.0 | Irreversible | Glutaminase | Irreversible |
| Compound X | 15-25 | Competitive with ATP | Synthetase | Reversible |
| Compound Y | 50-100 | Mixed | Interface | Partially reversible |
Note: Values are representative based on typical GMP synthase inhibitors; actual measurements for D. salexigens GMP synthase would need to be experimentally determined
Special Considerations for D. salexigens:
Account for potential redox sensitivity due to D. salexigens' anaerobic nature
Consider salt tolerance when designing buffer systems for inhibitor testing
Evaluate inhibitor effectiveness under varying ionic strength conditions to reflect the organism's native environment
This methodological framework enables comprehensive characterization of inhibitor interactions and provides a foundation for potential applications in antimicrobial development or basic research tools.
Site-directed mutagenesis represents a powerful approach for elucidating the catalytic mechanism of D. salexigens GMP synthase by systematically altering specific amino acid residues:
Strategic Target Selection:
Catalytic Triad Residues:
Substrate Binding Residues:
ATP-binding P-loop motif residues
XMP coordination residues
Glutamine recognition pocket amino acids
Domain Interface Residues:
Amino acids at the glutaminase-synthetase domain junction
Residues involved in ammonia channeling
Interface stabilization amino acids
Mutagenesis Strategy and Workflow:
Alanine Scanning:
Initial replacement of targeted residues with alanine
Identifies essential vs. non-essential residues
Provides baseline for further targeted mutations
Conservative Substitutions:
Replace with chemically similar amino acids to probe specific properties
Cys→Ser to test importance of sulfhydryl vs. hydroxyl
Asp→Glu to evaluate precise spatial requirements
Radical Substitutions:
Charge reversal mutations (Asp→Arg) to test electrostatic requirements
Hydrophobic to polar substitutions to probe solvent interactions
Proline introductions to test conformational flexibility requirements
Functional Analysis of Mutants:
Kinetic Parameter Determination:
Measure Km, kcat, and kcat/Km for each substrate with each mutant
Evaluate changes in catalytic efficiency
Determine substrate specificity alterations
Domain Communication Assessment:
Test for uncoupling of glutaminase and synthetase activities
Measure glutamine hydrolysis in absence of XMP/ATP
Evaluate ammonia channeling efficiency
Example Mutagenesis Results Table:
| Mutation | Glutaminase Activity (% WT) | Synthetase Activity (% WT) | Catalytic Coupling | Structural Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C104A | <1 | 90-100 | Uncoupled | Minimal |
| C104S | 5-10 | 90-100 | Partially uncoupled | Minimal |
| H181A | <1 | 90-100 | Uncoupled | Minimal |
| E183A | 10-20 | 90-100 | Partially uncoupled | Minimal |
| R185E | 80-90 | <5 | Maintained | Moderate |
| R334E | 80-90 | 10-20 | Maintained | Significant |
Note: Table contains representative values based on similar studies; actual measurements for D. salexigens GMP synthase would need to be experimentally determined
Advanced Applications:
Double and Triple Mutants:
Evaluate synergistic effects
Test compensatory mutations
Reconstruct evolutionary trajectories
Insertion of Chemical Crosslinkers:
Introduce unnatural amino acids with photoactivatable groups
Map spatial relationships during catalysis
Capture transient interaction states
pH-Dependent Activity Profiles:
Compare pH optima of wild-type and mutants
Identify residues involved in proton transfers
Determine ionization states critical for catalysis
This systematic mutagenesis approach, combined with thorough functional characterization, can provide detailed insights into the molecular mechanism of D. salexigens GMP synthase and reveal potential adaptations specific to this organism's unique ecological niche.
As D. salexigens is an anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacterium, oxygen exposure has significant impacts on the stability and activity of its recombinant GMP synthase:
Oxygen Sensitivity Mechanisms:
Cysteine Oxidation:
The catalytic cysteine in the glutaminase domain is highly susceptible to oxidation
Formation of sulfenic, sulfinic, or sulfonic acid derivatives inactivates the enzyme
Potential disulfide bond formation between non-catalytic cysteines disrupts structure
Metal Center Destabilization:
If present, metal cofactors may undergo redox changes upon oxygen exposure
Oxidation of iron or other transition metals could affect structural integrity
Metal loss following oxidation may irreversibly inactivate the enzyme
Structural Alterations:
Oxidative modifications to amino acid side chains beyond cysteines
Potential formation of carbonyl derivatives on sensitive residues
Conformational changes that disrupt domain coordination
Experimental Evidence from Related Systems:
Studies with D. salexigens Mast1 demonstrated that oxidation rates were highest at air saturation (up to 40 nmol of O₂ min⁻¹ mg of protein⁻¹) and declined with decreasing oxygen concentrations. Notably, oxidation activity in D. salexigens was found to be entirely dependent on NADH oxidase, which was prone to inactivation as soon as it catalyzed NADH oxidation .
Protective Strategies for Handling Recombinant Enzyme:
Buffer Optimization:
Include reducing agents (5-10 mM DTT, 2-5 mM β-mercaptoethanol)
Add oxygen scavengers (glucose oxidase/catalase system)
Include metal chelators to prevent Fenton chemistry (EDTA at 1-2 mM)
Anaerobic Handling Techniques:
Purification under strict anaerobic conditions
Use of anaerobic chambers for enzyme manipulation
Degassing all buffers with inert gas (N₂ or Ar)
Stabilizing Additives:
Glycerol (20-30%) to enhance conformational stability
Osmolytes that preferentially hydrate the protein surface
Specific substrates or substrate analogs that protect active sites
Activity Recovery Approaches:
| Inactivation Condition | Activity Loss (%) | Recovery Method | Activity Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 hour air exposure | 70-90 | 10 mM DTT treatment | 40-60 |
| 24 hours at 4°C, aerobic | >95 | Anaerobic reconstitution with substrates | 10-30 |
| Freeze-thaw cycle, aerobic | 60-80 | Thiol-disulfide exchange with glutathione | 30-50 |
Note: Values are representative based on typical oxygen-sensitive enzymes; actual measurements for D. salexigens GMP synthase would need to be experimentally determined
The unique sensitivity of D. salexigens enzymes to oxygen highlights the importance of proper handling techniques when working with recombinant GMP synthase from this organism. These considerations are essential for obtaining reliable activity measurements and structural data.
Recombinant D. salexigens GMP synthase offers several promising applications in synthetic biology, leveraging its unique properties as an enzyme from a specialized anaerobic marine bacterium:
Engineered Pathway Applications:
Nucleotide Production Systems:
Integration into cell-free systems for sustainable GMP/GTP production
Creation of artificial metabolic modules for purine salvage
Development of biosensors for nucleotide pool monitoring
Osmoregulation Engineering:
Harnessing D. salexigens' salt tolerance mechanisms
Creating systems that link nucleotide metabolism to osmotic stress responses
Engineering crops with improved salt tolerance using bacterial osmoregulatory components
Anaerobic Production Platforms:
Designing oxygen-independent nucleotide synthesis pathways
Creating metabolic modules functional in anaerobic industrial fermentation
Developing bioremediation tools for anaerobic environments
Enzyme Engineering Opportunities:
Substrate Specificity Modification:
Engineering GMP synthase to accept non-canonical substrates
Creating variants that produce nucleotide analogs for drug development
Developing enzymes with broader or narrower substrate profiles
Environmental Adaptation Transfer:
Identifying and transferring salt-tolerance features to enzymes from non-halophilic organisms
Engineering oxygen tolerance while maintaining catalytic efficiency
Creating hybrid enzymes with combined beneficial properties
Protein Architecture Applications:
Using the two-domain architecture as a scaffold for enzyme engineering
Developing synthetic signaling systems based on domain communication principles
Creating novel biocatalysts with coordinated sequential activities
Research Tool Development:
c-di-GMP Signaling Studies:
Tools for manipulating bacterial second messenger pathways
Biosensors for monitoring cellular nucleotide dynamics
Model systems for studying regulatory networks
Extremophile Enzyme Models:
Platforms for understanding enzyme adaptation to harsh conditions
Templates for engineering robust biocatalysts
Systems for studying evolutionary trajectories of specialized enzymes
Potential Implementation Approaches:
| Application Area | Implementation Strategy | Expected Advantages | Technical Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell-free nucleotide production | Coupled enzyme systems with regeneration cycles | Controlled environment, simplified purification | Cofactor regeneration, enzyme stability |
| Salt-tolerant metabolic modules | Transfer of halophilic enzyme features to model organisms | Improved process robustness in high salt | Compatibility with host metabolism |
| Anaerobic bioremediation | Integration into synthetic microbial communities | Functional in oxygen-limited environments | Maintaining activity in complex matrices |
| Nucleotide analog production | Structure-guided engineering of substrate binding pocket | Novel compounds for therapeutic development | Maintaining catalytic efficiency |