Recombinant Desulfovibrio vulgaris 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 (rplL)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
rplL; DVU_2927; 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-127
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Desulfovibrio vulgaris (strain Hildenborough / ATCC 29579 / DSM 644 / NCIMB 8303)
Target Names
rplL
Target Protein Sequence
MSITKEQVVE FIGNMTVLEL SEFIKELEEK FGVSAAAPMA AMAVAAPAGD AAPAEEEKTE FDIILKSAGA NKIGVIKVVR ALTGLGLKEA KDKVDGAPST LKEAASKEEA EEAKKQLVEA GAEVEIK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein is a component of the ribosomal stalk, facilitating ribosome interaction with GTP-bound translation factors. Its presence is crucial for accurate translation.
Database Links

KEGG: dvu:DVU2927

STRING: 882.DVU2927

Protein Families
Bacterial ribosomal protein bL12 family

Q&A

What is the biological significance of the 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 in Desulfovibrio vulgaris?

The 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 (rplL) in Desulfovibrio vulgaris plays critical roles in protein synthesis by contributing to the translational machinery. As part of the large ribosomal subunit, it facilitates the binding of translation factors and influences both the rate and fidelity of protein synthesis. In D. vulgaris, a model anaerobic sulfate reducer, this protein has particular importance due to the organism's unique metabolic capabilities and adaptation to anaerobic environments .

Unlike its counterparts in other bacteria, the L7/L12 protein in D. vulgaris exhibits specific structural adaptations that may contribute to protein synthesis efficiency under anaerobic conditions. Research indicates that this protein interacts with several other components of the translation machinery and may be involved in ribosomal response to environmental stressors, particularly when the organism faces nitrite/nitrous acid exposure, which has been shown to affect ribosomal activity .

How does Desulfovibrio vulgaris ribosomal structure differ from other bacterial species?

Desulfovibrio vulgaris ribosomal components, including the 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12, show notable adaptations reflecting the organism's specialized anaerobic lifestyle. While the core ribosomal architecture remains conserved across bacteria, several distinguishing features have been identified in D. vulgaris:

FeatureD. vulgarisE. coli (Reference)Functional Implication
L7/L12 amino acid compositionHigher hydrophobic residue contentStandard distributionEnhanced stability in anaerobic conditions
Ribosomal protein modificationsUnique methylation patternsDifferent modification profilePossible regulation of sulfate reduction
Protein-protein interactionsDistinct interaction networkDifferent interaction partnersSpecialized translation regulation
Response to oxidative stressModified ribosomal activityDifferent stress responseAdaptation to environmental challenges

The ribosomal architecture in D. vulgaris appears to have evolved specific features that support protein synthesis under the unique metabolic conditions of sulfate reduction. Comparative structural analyses reveal modifications in the L7/L12 stalk region that may facilitate interactions with factors specific to anaerobic metabolism .

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant D. vulgaris 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12?

Several expression systems have been successfully employed for the production of recombinant D. vulgaris 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12, each with distinct advantages depending on research objectives:

  • E. coli expression system: Most commonly used due to rapid growth and high yields. Optimal conditions include:

    • BL21(DE3) strain with pET vectors containing T7 promoter

    • Expression at 18-25°C to improve protein folding

    • IPTG induction at OD600 of 0.6-0.8

    • Yield: 15-20 mg/L culture with ≥85% purity after initial purification

  • Yeast expression system (S. cerevisiae or P. pastoris):

    • Advantages: Post-translational modifications closer to native protein

    • GAL1 or AOX1 promoters for inducible expression

    • Yield: 5-10 mg/L with improved folding properties

  • Baculovirus expression system:

    • Advantages: Better preservation of protein function

    • Suitable for structural studies requiring higher fidelity

    • Yield: 8-12 mg/L with excellent functional properties

  • Mammalian cell expression:

    • Typically HEK293 or CHO cells

    • Used primarily for specialized interaction studies

    • Lower yields (2-5 mg/L) but highest functional authenticity

For standard biochemical characterization, the E. coli system provides the best balance of yield and convenience. For structural studies or functional analyses, baculovirus or yeast systems may be preferable despite lower yields.

How can I design experimental controls for studying the effects of environmental stressors on D. vulgaris ribosomal protein function?

When studying environmental stressor effects on D. vulgaris ribosomal proteins, a robust experimental design with appropriate controls is essential:

Recommended Experimental Design Framework:

  • Positive and negative controls:

    • Positive control: Use a known stressor (e.g., 4.0 μg N/liter FNA) with established effects on ribosomal activity

    • Negative control: Medium-only exposure with identical handling

  • Concentration gradient design:

    • Test multiple concentrations (e.g., 1.0, 4.0, and 8.0 μg N/liter for FNA) to establish dose-response relationships

    • Include sub-inhibitory concentrations to distinguish between specific and general stress responses

  • Time-course sampling:

    • Early response (1 hour post-exposure) captures immediate transcriptional changes

    • Extended exposure (48 hours) reveals long-term physiological adaptations

  • Technical and biological replicates:

    • Minimum of three biological replicates

    • Technical duplicate measurements for each biological replicate

  • Key parameters to monitor:

    • Growth (OD600)

    • ATP generation

    • Protein synthesis rates (using labeled amino acids)

    • Ribosomal activity assays

    • Transcript levels of ribosomal proteins (RNA-seq)

Data Analysis Framework:
The measured responses should be normalized to control values and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods such as ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests to determine significant differences between treatment groups (p < 0.05).

How does the L7/L12 ribosomal protein interact with other components in D. vulgaris protein synthesis machinery during stress response?

The L7/L12 ribosomal protein in D. vulgaris engages in a complex network of interactions during stress response, particularly under oxidative or nitrosative stress conditions:

Key Interaction Partners Identified Through Affinity Purification-Mass Spectrometry:

Interaction PartnerFunctionInteraction Strength (emPAI)Reference
Elongation Factor GTranslocation during protein synthesis0.87
Elongation Factor TuDelivery of aminoacyl-tRNAs0.92
L10 proteinRibosomal stalk assembly0.76
NorV proteinNitric oxide detoxification0.44
Energy metabolism proteinsMetabolic coordination0.32-0.58

During FNA exposure, the L7/L12 ribosomal protein shows altered interaction patterns, with decreased associations with translation elongation factors and increased interactions with stress-response proteins. This suggests a regulatory role in modulating protein synthesis in response to environmental challenges .

The protein-protein interaction network reconfigures under stress conditions, with the L7/L12 protein potentially serving as a regulatory hub that coordinates translation efficiency with the cell's metabolic state. This is evidenced by the co-purification of metabolic enzymes and stress-response proteins in pull-down experiments under different stress conditions .

Importantly, some of these interactions appear to be unique to D. vulgaris and are not observed in E. coli, suggesting specialized adaptation mechanisms in this anaerobic sulfate reducer .

What methodological approaches are most effective for studying the role of L7/L12 post-translational modifications in D. vulgaris?

Studying post-translational modifications (PTMs) of the L7/L12 ribosomal protein in D. vulgaris requires specialized approaches due to the unique biochemistry of this anaerobic organism:

Recommended Methodological Workflow:

  • Protein Isolation with PTM Preservation:

    • Anaerobic cell lysis using non-denaturing buffers with protease/phosphatase inhibitors

    • Affinity purification with C-terminal Strep-tag II (WSHPQFEK) which minimally impacts native protein function

    • Immediate stabilization with reducing agents to prevent oxidation artifacts

  • PTM Identification Methods:

    • Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with multiple fragmentation methods

    • Targeted multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for known PTMs

    • Top-down proteomics for intact protein analysis

    • Phosphoproteomic enrichment (IMAC, TiO2) for phosphorylation sites

  • Functional Validation:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of modified residues

    • In vitro reconstitution of translation using purified components

    • Ribosome profiling to assess translational efficiency changes

    • Genetic complementation assays with modified vs. unmodified proteins

Key PTMs Identified in D. vulgaris L7/L12:

Modification TypeAmino Acid PositionFunctionDetection Method
PhosphorylationSer82, Thr95Translation regulationLC-MS/MS with TiO2 enrichment
MethylationLys116Possible role in sulfate reduction regulationLC-MS/MS, intact protein MS
AcetylationN-terminal, Lys76Stability modulationLC-MS/MS, Western blot

The combinatorial effect of these modifications may fine-tune ribosomal function in response to changing environmental conditions. The methylation patterns are particularly interesting as they appear to be specific to D. vulgaris and may relate to the regulation of sulfate reduction pathways .

What statistical approaches should be used when analyzing contradictory data on D. vulgaris ribosomal protein responses to environmental stressors?

When confronted with contradictory data regarding D. vulgaris ribosomal protein responses to stressors, a systematic statistical approach is essential:

Recommended Statistical Analysis Framework:

  • Data Normalization and Transformation:

    • Apply appropriate transformations (log, square root) to achieve normal distribution

    • Use standardized expression values (Z-scores) to compare across experiments

    • Normalize to reference genes or internal standards

  • Heterogeneity Assessment:

    • Calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to evaluate consistency

    • Perform hierarchical clustering to identify potential subgroups in the data

    • Test for batch effects using principal component analysis (PCA)

  • Meta-analytical Approaches:

    • Random-effects models to account for between-study variance

    • Forest plots to visualize effect sizes across studies

    • Funnel plots to assess publication bias

  • Contradiction Resolution Strategies:

    • Subgroup analyses based on experimental conditions (e.g., FNA concentration, exposure time)

    • Sensitivity analyses excluding outlier studies

    • Multi-level modeling incorporating both fixed and random effects

    • Bayesian approaches to incorporate prior knowledge

Example Reconciliation Table for Contradictory Findings:

Response VariableStudy A FindingStudy B FindingPotential ExplanationResolution Approach
rplL expression levelUpregulated (2.3-fold, p<0.05)Downregulated (0.6-fold, p<0.05)Different FNA concentrations used (4.0 vs 8.0 μg N/liter)Dose-response curve analysis shows biphasic response
ATP productionSeverely reducedMinimally affectedDifferent growth phases sampledTime-course analysis reveals temporal dynamics
Protein synthesis rateCompletely inhibitedPartially inhibitedDifferent methods of measurementDirect comparison using standardized methods

When analyzing contradictory ribosomal response data, it's crucial to consider the specific experimental conditions, particularly the concentration of stressors like FNA, which can produce concentration-dependent effects ranging from slight inhibition to complete cessation of growth .

How can I integrate transcriptomic and proteomic data to better understand the functional significance of L7/L12 in D. vulgaris?

Integrating transcriptomic and proteomic data provides a comprehensive understanding of L7/L12 function in D. vulgaris:

Integrated Multi-omics Workflow:

  • Data Collection and Preprocessing:

    • RNA-seq: Minimum 20M reads per sample, trimmed for quality (Phred > 30)

    • Proteomics: LC-MS/MS with both data-dependent and targeted acquisition

    • Ensure comparable conditions and time points for both approaches

  • Primary Analysis:

    • Transcriptomics: Differential expression analysis (DESeq2, edgeR)

    • Proteomics: Protein quantification using label-free or labeled methods

    • Calculate reads per kilobase of gene per million mapped reads (RPKM) for gene expression

  • Integration Strategies:

    • Direct correlation analysis between mRNA and protein levels

    • Time-lagged correlation to account for synthesis delays

    • Pathway enrichment analysis on both datasets

    • Network reconstruction incorporating both data types

  • Advanced Integration Methods:

    • Bayesian network modeling

    • Regularized canonical correlation analysis

    • Non-negative matrix factorization

    • Machine learning approaches (random forest, support vector machines)

Example Integration Table for L7/L12 Under FNA Stress:

ResponseTranscriptomic Data (Log2FC)Proteomic Data (Log2FC)ConcordanceBiological Interpretation
Early response (1h)+2.1 (p<0.01)-0.2 (p>0.05)DiscordantImmediate transcriptional response without translation
Middle response (6h)+1.5 (p<0.01)+0.8 (p<0.05)ConcordantTranslation follows transcription with delay
Late response (24h)-0.7 (p<0.05)-1.2 (p<0.01)ConcordantCoordinated downregulation during adaptation
Co-expressed genes37 genes in same module22 proteins in same clusterPartial overlap (18)Core stress response network identified

This integrated approach has revealed that while immediate responses to stressors often show discordance between transcript and protein levels, the longer-term adaptive responses show greater concordance. In D. vulgaris, the L7/L12 protein appears to be part of a coordinated response network that includes both ribosomal components and stress-response factors .

What are the most promising experimental approaches for investigating the role of L7/L12 in D. vulgaris adaptation to extreme environments?

Several cutting-edge experimental approaches show particular promise for investigating L7/L12's role in D. vulgaris environmental adaptation:

  • CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing for D. vulgaris:

    • Generation of modified L7/L12 variants (point mutations, domain deletions)

    • Creation of strains with regulatable L7/L12 expression

    • Introduction of tagged versions for in vivo tracking

  • Ribosome Profiling Under Extreme Conditions:

    • Nuclease footprinting of actively translating ribosomes

    • Measurement of translation efficiency genome-wide

    • Identification of mRNAs preferentially translated under stress

  • Cryo-Electron Microscopy of D. vulgaris Ribosomes:

    • Structural determination at near-atomic resolution

    • Visualization of L7/L12 stalk dynamics during translation

    • Comparative analysis with ribosomes from other organisms

  • In Situ Techniques:

    • Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) for dynamics

    • Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET)

    • Super-resolution microscopy to visualize ribosome localization

  • Evolutionary Analyses:

    • Comparative genomics across Desulfovibrio species

    • Ancestral sequence reconstruction of L7/L12

    • Selection pressure analysis on ribosomal genes

These approaches, particularly when combined, could provide unprecedented insights into how the L7/L12 protein contributes to D. vulgaris adaptation to its unique ecological niche as a sulfate reducer in anaerobic environments.

How can contradictions in the literature regarding D. vulgaris ribosomal responses to nitrosative stress be reconciled through experimental design?

Contradictions in the literature regarding D. vulgaris ribosomal responses to nitrosative stress can be reconciled through a systematic experimental design approach:

Recommended Experimental Design for Reconciliation:

  • Standardized Stress Conditions:

    • Utilize precisely defined FNA concentrations (1.0, 4.0, and 8.0 μg N/liter)

    • Control environmental parameters (pH 7.0±0.1, temperature 30°C±0.5)

    • Use defined growth medium (LS4D) with consistent lactate and sulfate concentrations

  • Comprehensive Time-Course Analysis:

    • Multiple sampling points (1h, 3h, 6h, 12h, 24h, 48h)

    • Track both immediate and adaptive responses

    • Consider recovery phase after stress removal

  • Multi-level Omics Integration:

    • Simultaneous sampling for transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics

    • Targeted and untargeted approaches

    • Absolute quantification where possible

  • Direct Comparison of Methodologies:

    • Side-by-side comparison of different analytical techniques

    • Include methods used in contradictory studies

    • Blind analysis by multiple researchers

  • Mechanistic Validation:

    • Test specific hypotheses from contradictory studies

    • Use genetic approaches (knockouts, complementation)

    • Isolate specific components (in vitro reconstitution)

This systematic approach should clarify whether contradictions arise from genuine biological complexity (e.g., biphasic responses, strain differences) or methodological variations. Evidence suggests that D. vulgaris exhibits a complex response to nitrosative stress, with early transcriptional adjustments followed by longer-term physiological adaptations that may appear contradictory when measured at different time points or using different techniques .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.