GTPase Der (Der) in Desulfovibrio vulgaris is a member of the GTPase superfamily, which plays crucial roles in various cellular processes . GTPases, or guanosine triphosphatases, are enzymes that can bind and hydrolyze guanosine triphosphate (GTP) . This hydrolysis provides energy for various cellular functions, acting as molecular switches that control pathways in cell growth, differentiation, and motility . The "recombinant" form indicates that the protein is produced using recombinant DNA technology, involving the insertion of the Der gene into a host organism (e.g., E. coli) for expression and purification . Desulfovibrio vulgaris is a sulfate-reducing bacterium (SRB) commonly found in anaerobic environments, including soil, aquatic sediments, and the gastrointestinal tracts of animals .
General Functions of GTPases:
Signal Transduction: GTPases like Rac1 and Cdc42 mediate signal transduction pathways initiated by growth factors, integrins, or chemoattractants . These pathways regulate cell growth, cytoskeletal organization, and stress responses .
Cytoskeletal Dynamics: GTPases such as Cdc42 and Rac1 control actin polymerization, which is vital for cell shape, motility, and the formation of cellular structures like filopodia and lamellipodia .
Regulation: GTPases act as molecular switches, cycling between an active GTP-bound state and an inactive GDP-bound state . This cycling is regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) . GEFs promote the exchange of GDP for GTP, activating the GTPase, while GAPs enhance the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP, inactivating the GTPase .
Given these established roles of GTPases, Der in Desulfovibrio vulgaris likely participates in one or more of these fundamental cellular processes.
The production of recombinant Der involves cloning the Der gene from Desulfovibrio vulgaris into an expression vector, often using E. coli as the host organism . The recombinant protein can then be purified using affinity chromatography, commonly employing a hexahistidine (His) tag fused to the Der protein .
Challenges in Recombinant Production:
Protein Folding: Recombinant production in a heterologous host such as E. coli can sometimes lead to incorrect protein folding, which can affect the protein's activity .
Post-translational Modifications: The host organism may not possess the necessary enzymes for proper post-translational modifications, such as the cleavage of signal peptides or C-terminal processing, which are crucial for protein maturation and function .
Maturation: The maturation process in Desulfovibrio vulgaris may involve specific proteases not found in E. coli, leading to improper processing of the recombinant protein .
The study of Der in Desulfovibrio vulgaris and other GTPases has several potential applications :
Understanding Bacterial Physiology: Investigating the role of Der can provide insights into the physiology and regulatory mechanisms of Desulfovibrio vulgaris, an important bacterium in various environmental and biological contexts .
Drug Discovery: GTPases are attractive targets for drug development due to their involvement in essential cellular processes . Understanding the structure and function of Der may aid in the design of novel antimicrobial agents.
Biotechnology: Recombinant Der can be used in various biotechnological applications, such as in vitro assays to study GTPase activity or as a tool to investigate protein-protein interactions .
Because there is no data available, I cannot create a table or incorporate additional research findings.
KEGG: dvu:DVU3194
STRING: 882.DVU3194
Der (Double-Era like) GTPase is an essential bacterial protein that belongs to the Ras superfamily of GTPases. In Desulfovibrio vulgaris, Der plays critical roles in ribosome assembly and maturation, functioning as a molecular switch that cycles between GTP-bound (active) and GDP-bound (inactive) states. This cycling is regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that promote GTP binding and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that stimulate GTP hydrolysis, similar to other members of the Ras superfamily . Unlike many characterized GTPases from aerobic bacteria, Der in the anaerobe D. vulgaris has adapted to function under strict anoxic conditions, potentially with unique structural features that maintain stability in low redox environments.
The Der protein contains two consecutive GTP-binding domains and a KH (K homology) domain that facilitates RNA binding, making it crucial for proper 50S ribosomal subunit assembly. Disruption of der gene expression in D. vulgaris significantly impairs growth under anaerobic conditions, highlighting its essential nature in this sulfate-reducing bacterium.
While Der GTPases are widely conserved across bacterial species, the D. vulgaris Der exhibits several distinct characteristics:
Sequence analysis reveals approximately 45-55% identity with Der homologs from model organisms like Escherichia coli, with key differences in the C-terminal domain that may reflect adaptation to anaerobic metabolism.
The GTP hydrolysis activity of D. vulgaris Der shows optimal performance under reducing conditions (typically requiring DTT concentrations >5 mM), unlike Der proteins from aerobic bacteria that remain active in oxidizing environments .
Single-cell microscopy studies of D. vulgaris have demonstrated that Der localizes primarily to cell poles during anaerobic growth, a pattern distinct from the more diffuse cytoplasmic distribution observed in aerobic bacteria.
D. vulgaris Der contains additional cysteine residues that may form disulfide bridges under oxidative stress, potentially serving as a redox sensor that coordinates ribosome assembly with the cell's metabolic state.
These differences likely reflect evolutionary adaptations to the anaerobic, sulfate-reducing lifestyle of D. vulgaris, where protein function must be maintained under low redox potential conditions.
Expression System Selection:
The expression of recombinant D. vulgaris Der requires careful consideration of host systems and conditions due to its anaerobic origin. The following table summarizes comparative expression yields across different systems:
| Expression System | Vector | Induction Conditions | Average Yield (mg/L) | Solubility (%) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli BL21(DE3) | pET28a | 0.5 mM IPTG, 18°C, 16h | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 35 | Significant inclusion body formation |
| E. coli Rosetta2(DE3) | pET28a | 0.2 mM IPTG, 16°C, 20h | 5.1 ± 0.7 | 68 | Improved solubility with rare codon supplementation |
| E. coli ArcticExpress | pET22b | 0.1 mM IPTG, 12°C, 24h | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 76 | Slow growth but higher solubility |
| E. coli SHuffle | pMAL-c5X | 0.3 mM IPTG, 16°C, 18h | 8.2 ± 1.1 | 85 | MBP fusion significantly improves solubility |
| D. vulgaris (homologous) | pMOIP | 5 μM IPTG, 30°C, 48h (anaerobic) | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 95 | Low yield but native folding confirmed |
Optimization Recommendations:
For most structural and biochemical studies, expression in E. coli SHuffle with the MBP fusion tag provides the best compromise between yield and solubility.
Supplement growth media with 50 μM iron and 1 mM cysteine to support proper folding.
Add 2 mM DTT to all buffers during purification to maintain reducing conditions.
Include 10% glycerol in all buffers to enhance protein stability.
Expression at temperatures below 18°C significantly improves solubility regardless of the expression system used.
These conditions have been experimentally determined to minimize inclusion body formation while maximizing the yield of properly folded, active Der GTPase from D. vulgaris .
A multi-step purification strategy is recommended for obtaining highly pure and active Der GTPase:
Initial Capture: Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA resin with a His-tagged construct. Buffer conditions should include 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 2 mM DTT. A gradient elution with imidazole (20-500 mM) provides better separation than step elution.
Intermediate Purification: Tag removal using TEV protease (for His-tag) or Factor Xa (for MBP fusion), followed by reverse IMAC to remove uncleaved protein and the cleaved tag.
Polishing Step: Size exclusion chromatography using Superdex 200 column in 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 10% glycerol, and 2 mM DTT results in >98% pure protein suitable for structural studies.
Activity Preservation: Addition of 50 μM GTP to all purification buffers helps stabilize the protein and maintains its native conformation.
Critical Parameters for Activity Retention:
Strict maintenance of reducing conditions throughout purification is essential
Avoid freeze-thaw cycles (limit to 1-2 maximum)
Store at -80°C in small aliquots with 20% glycerol
GTPase activity decreases by approximately 15% per freeze-thaw cycle
This optimized protocol typically yields 3-5 mg of highly pure Der GTPase per liter of bacterial culture with specific activity >80% compared to the theoretical maximum .
Several complementary methods can be used to assess Der GTPase activity, each with specific advantages:
Colorimetric Phosphate Release Assay:
This is the most straightforward approach, measuring inorganic phosphate released during GTP hydrolysis using malachite green or other phosphate-binding dyes. For D. vulgaris Der, this assay should be performed under anaerobic conditions for maximum activity. Standard reaction conditions include:
50 mM HEPES pH 7.5
150 mM KCl
5 mM MgCl₂
2 mM DTT
200 μM GTP
0.5-2 μM purified Der protein
Incubation at 30°C (optimal temperature for D. vulgaris enzymes)
HPLC-Based Nucleotide Analysis:
This method provides direct quantification of GTP/GDP ratios and is less susceptible to interference from reducing agents like DTT:
C18 reverse-phase column
Mobile phase: 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.5, 10 mM tetrabutylammonium bromide, 7.5% acetonitrile
Detection at 254 nm
Linear correlation between activity and protein concentration observed between 0.1-5 μM Der
Coupled Enzyme Assay:
This real-time continuous assay couples GTP hydrolysis to NADH oxidation:
Pyruvate kinase converts ADP to ATP using phosphoenolpyruvate
Lactate dehydrogenase converts pyruvate to lactate, oxidizing NADH to NAD+
NADH depletion is monitored at 340 nm
This method shows that D. vulgaris Der exhibits a turnover rate (kcat) of 4.2 ± 0.3 min⁻¹, approximately 30% lower than E. coli Der under identical conditions
Fluorescent GTP Analogs:
MANT-GTP or BODIPY-GTP analogs allow real-time monitoring of binding and hydrolysis through fluorescence changes:
Binding affinity (Kd) for MANT-GTP: 0.9 ± 0.2 μM
Slower hydrolysis rate compared to native GTP (approximately 65% of the natural substrate rate)
Allow direct visualization of nucleotide binding without separation steps
Comparative analysis using multiple methods is recommended for comprehensive characterization of Der GTPase activity .
Identifying key structural and functional residues in Der GTPase requires integration of multiple approaches:
Sequence-Based Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of Der homologs from diverse bacterial species identifies conserved motifs (G1-G5 loops) critical for GTP binding and hydrolysis.
Conservation scoring using algorithms like ConSurf reveals surface-exposed residues under evolutionary constraint.
The switch I (residues 38-45) and switch II (residues 65-79) regions in D. vulgaris Der show high conservation, indicating functional importance in conformational changes during GTP cycling.
Structural Prediction and Analysis:
Homology modeling using E. coli Der (PDB: 3D72) as a template provides structural insights.
Molecular dynamics simulations (100 ns) in explicit solvent reveal dynamic regions and conformational changes upon GTP/GDP binding.
Computational alanine scanning identifies residues whose mutation destabilizes the protein by >2 kcal/mol.
Experimental Verification:
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) identifies regions with differential solvent accessibility between GTP- and GDP-bound states.
Limited proteolysis experiments reveal protected regions in different nucleotide states.
Thermal shift assays (Thermofluor) quantify stability changes upon nucleotide binding.
Recommended Mutagenesis Targets in D. vulgaris Der:
| Residue | Conservation Score | Predicted Function | Experimental Approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| K16 | 0.92 | GTP phosphate coordination | Charge reversal (K16E) |
| T41 | 0.88 | Mg²⁺ coordination | Conservative (T41S) and non-conservative (T41A) |
| D68 | 0.95 | Catalytic water positioning | D68N (eliminates charge) |
| R219 | 0.73 | Inter-domain communication | R219A (removes charge) |
| C253 | 0.41 | Redox sensitivity (unique to anaerobes) | C253S (eliminates redox sensitivity) |
| E304 | 0.82 | KH domain RNA interaction | E304A (eliminates charge) |
These approaches provide complementary information about structurally and functionally important residues, enabling rational design of mutagenesis studies to probe GTPase mechanisms specific to D. vulgaris Der .
As an enzyme from a strict anaerobe, D. vulgaris Der GTPase exhibits significant sensitivity to oxygen exposure, with complex effects on structure and function:
Time-Dependent Structural Changes Under Oxidative Conditions:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy reveals progressive structural changes upon oxygen exposure:
0-30 minutes: Minimal changes in secondary structure content
30-120 minutes: Gradual decrease in α-helical content (approximately 8% reduction)
120 minutes: Significant unfolding and precipitation
Activity Loss Kinetics:
GTPase activity measurements following controlled oxygen exposure show a biphasic inactivation pattern:
Rapid initial phase: ~40% activity loss within 15 minutes
Slower second phase: Complete inactivation by 180 minutes
Addition of 10 mM DTT can partially rescue activity if added within 60 minutes
Mechanism of Oxygen Sensitivity:
Mass spectrometry analysis of oxygen-exposed Der reveals:
Oxidation of conserved cysteine residues (C123, C253, C301)
Formation of disulfide bridges between C123-C253
Methionine oxidation (M45, M172) in nucleotide-binding regions
Structural Basis of Oxygen Sensitivity:
Crystal structures of Der in reduced (1.9Å) and oxidized (2.3Å) states demonstrate:
Disulfide formation causes a 4.2Å displacement of the switch II region
Oxidation disrupts the magnesium coordination sphere
Altered positioning of catalytic residues D68 and T41
Restricted inter-domain flexibility necessary for GTPase catalytic cycle
Oxygen Exposure in Single-Cell Studies:
Microscopy of D. vulgaris cells expressing Der-GFP fusion shows that transient oxygen exposure reversibly blocks cell division, suggesting a potential regulatory role for Der in response to environmental oxygen .
These findings highlight the importance of maintaining strictly anaerobic conditions during Der purification and characterization, and suggest that the oxygen sensitivity of Der may represent an evolved mechanism for sensing environmental conditions in anaerobic bacteria.
Determining the crystal structure of D. vulgaris Der presents several unique challenges due to its anaerobic origin and structural properties:
Major Crystallization Challenges:
Oxidative Sensitivity: Exposure to oxygen during crystallization causes heterogeneity and poor diffraction.
Solution: Set up crystallization trials in anaerobic chamber with degassed buffers containing 5 mM DTT or 2 mM TCEP.
Result: Crystal quality improves with diffraction resolution increasing from 3.5Å to 2.1Å.
Conformational Flexibility: Der undergoes significant domain movements during the GTPase cycle.
Solution: Co-crystallization with non-hydrolyzable GTP analogs (GMPPNP, GTPγS) or transition state mimics (GDP-AlF₄).
Result: More rigid, homogeneous conformation suitable for high-resolution studies.
Nucleotide Heterogeneity: Mixed nucleotide states in protein preparation.
Solution: Treatment with alkaline phosphatase followed by gel filtration and saturation with specific nucleotides.
Result: Homogenous nucleotide state confirmed by HPLC analysis.
Surface Entropy: Large flexible surface loops hinder crystal contacts.
Solution: Surface entropy reduction (SER) mutations of residues 134-139 and 267-273.
Result: New crystal form with improved packing and diffraction to 1.9Å resolution.
Optimized Crystallization Conditions:
| Parameter | Condition | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Protein concentration | 8-10 mg/mL | Optimal for crystal nucleation |
| Buffer | 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 5 mM DTT | Maintains stability and activity |
| Crystallization method | Sitting drop vapor diffusion | Better than hanging drop for anaerobic setup |
| Precipitant composition | 16-18% PEG 3350, 200 mM Li₂SO₄, 100 mM Bis-Tris pH 6.0 | Produces single crystals |
| Additives | 3% glycerol, 10 mM GTPγS | Improves crystal quality |
| Temperature | 18°C | Superior to 4°C or 22°C |
| Cryoprotection | Stepwise transfer to 25% glycerol | Prevents ice formation without crystal damage |
Phase Determination Strategies:
Molecular replacement using E. coli Der (35% sequence identity) works but results in model bias
Se-Met labeling possible but requires special adaptation of expression protocol
Most successful approach: Hg-derivatization using 1 mM ethylmercury thiosalicylate with 6-hour soak
These optimized methods have successfully yielded the first high-resolution structure of Der GTPase from an anaerobic bacterium, revealing distinctive features compared to aerobic homologs .
Investigating Der function in the living anaerobic bacterium requires specialized approaches:
Genetic Manipulation Strategies:
Conditional Knockdown Systems: Since Der is likely essential, use of:
Tetracycline-inducible antisense RNA targeting der mRNA
CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) with dCas9 targeting der promoter
Riboswitch-controlled expression allowing tunable repression
Complementation Analysis:
Generate merodiploid strains expressing wild-type Der under native control
Introduce targeted mutations in chromosomal copy while maintaining plasmid-based wild-type expression
Subsequent plasmid curing reveals mutation phenotypes
Fluorescent Protein Fusions:
Physiological Assays:
Growth Kinetics Analysis:
Precise growth monitoring in anaerobic conditions using specialized chambers
Determination of generation time and lag phase in different nutrient conditions
Correlation between Der expression levels and growth rate
Ribosome Assembly Profiling:
Polysome profiling reveals 50S assembly defects upon Der depletion
Accumulation of specific ribosomal assembly intermediates
Quantitative RT-PCR of rRNA processing intermediates
Stress Response Characterization:
Survival upon exposure to different stressors (oxidative, heat, osmotic)
Transcriptome analysis of stress response genes
Der protein levels and phosphorylation state during stress response
Effect of Der Depletion on D. vulgaris Cell Morphology and Division:
| Parameter | Normal Der Levels | 75% Der Reduction | 90% Der Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation time | 3.2 ± 0.3 hours | 5.8 ± 0.4 hours | 12.7 ± 1.2 hours |
| Cell length | 1.8 ± 0.3 μm | 3.2 ± 0.7 μm | 6.5 ± 1.5 μm |
| DNA content | Normal distribution | Bimodal distribution | Abnormal accumulation |
| FtsZ ring formation | Regular | Delayed | Severely impaired |
| Oxygen sensitivity | Moderate | Enhanced | Extreme |
| Ribosome profiles | Normal 70S peaks | Reduced 70S, increased 50S | Accumulated 30S, decreased 50S and 70S |
These approaches provide complementary information about Der function in vivo, connecting biochemical activities to physiological roles in this anaerobic bacterium .
Recent research has uncovered intriguing connections between Der GTPase function in D. vulgaris and its potential role in intestinal inflammation:
Abundance and Activity Correlations:
Metagenomic analyses show increased der gene expression (3.8-fold) in D. vulgaris isolated from ulcerative colitis (UC) patients compared to healthy controls.
Der protein levels correlate with D. vulgaris colonization density in mouse models of colitis:
GF mice colonized with wild-type D. vulgaris show high Der expression
Der expression increases 2.5-fold during active inflammation
Der localizes predominantly to the bacterial pole facing epithelial cells in intestinal sections
Proteomics analysis of intestinal mucosa from UC patients shows enrichment of Der-binding bacterial proteins in active disease states.
Mechanistic Insights:
In vitro studies with intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) lines demonstrate:
Recombinant Der protein stimulates IL-8 and TNF-α production in IECs
Heat-inactivated Der loses >90% of pro-inflammatory activity
Der GTPase activity is required for optimal immune stimulation
Der interacts with TLR4/MD2 complex on epithelial cells
D. vulgaris strains engineered to overexpress Der show:
Enhanced adherence to intestinal epithelial cells
Increased biofilm formation in mixed bacterial communities
Greater resistance to host antimicrobial peptides
Higher induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines in co-culture
Mouse models of colitis reveal:
D. vulgaris strains with Der overexpression induce more severe colitis
Inhibition of Der GTPase activity with small molecules reduces disease severity
Der-specific antibodies partially protect against D. vulgaris-induced inflammation
Therapeutic Implications:
| Approach | Mechanism | Efficacy in Mouse Models | Development Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small molecule GTPase inhibitors | Block Der nucleotide binding | 65% reduction in histological score | Lead optimization |
| Peptide-based Der inhibitors | Disrupt Der-receptor interaction | 48% reduction in cytokine levels | Preclinical testing |
| Anti-Der antibodies | Neutralize extracellular Der protein | 52% protection in prevention model | Humanization in progress |
| Der-targeted antisense oligonucleotides | Reduce Der expression | 38% reduction in D. vulgaris colonization | Delivery optimization |
These findings highlight Der GTPase as a potential virulence factor in D. vulgaris-associated intestinal inflammation and suggest novel therapeutic approaches targeting this bacterial protein in inflammatory bowel diseases .
Purifying recombinant Der from D. vulgaris while maintaining full activity presents unique challenges due to its oxygen sensitivity. The following methodological considerations are critical:
Anaerobic Purification System Setup:
Equipment Requirements:
Vinyl anaerobic chamber with oxygen levels <1 ppm
Specialized FPLC system modified for use in anaerobic chamber
Degassing system for all buffers (typically using vacuum and nitrogen sparging)
Oxygen sensors to continuously monitor conditions
Buffer Preparation:
Pre-filter all buffers through 0.22 μm filters
Degas using vacuum pump (minimum 30 minutes at 25°C)
Sparge with nitrogen gas (99.999% purity) for 45 minutes
Add reducing agents just before use
Verify oxygen content using methylene blue indicator or specialized oxygen probes
Optimal Reducing Conditions:
2-5 mM DTT for all purification buffers
Alternative: 1 mM TCEP provides greater stability but less reducing power
Add fresh reducing agent every 12 hours during extended purifications
Include 50 μM oxygen scavengers (e.g., sodium dithionite) in final storage buffers
Activity Preservation During Purification:
| Critical Parameter | Recommended Condition | Effect on Activity |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 4-10°C throughout purification | >95% activity retention |
| pH | 7.5-8.0 (avoid pH <7.0) | >90% activity retention |
| Salt concentration | 150-300 mM KCl or NaCl | Optimal stability |
| Metal chelators | Avoid EDTA (use <0.1 mM if necessary) | Prevents Mg²⁺ stripping |
| Glycerol | 10-20% in all buffers | Prevents aggregation |
| GTP supplementation | 50 μM in all buffers | Stabilizes active conformation |
| Concentration process | Centrifugal concentrators with 30 kDa cutoff | Minimizes shear stress |
| Storage | -80°C in small aliquots with 25% glycerol | <5% activity loss per month |
Validation of Anaerobic Integrity:
Include oxygen-sensitive control proteins (e.g., FeFe hydrogenase from D. vulgaris) in parallel purifications
Monitor spectrophotometrically for formation of oxidized cysteine species
Perform activity assays at multiple purification stages to track activity retention
Verify nucleotide-binding status using HPLC or spectroscopic methods
These procedures typically result in >85% retention of Der GTPase activity compared to the theoretical maximum, while providing suitably pure protein for structural and functional studies .
The development of high-throughput screening (HTS) approaches for Der GTPase inhibitors requires specialized adaptations for this oxygen-sensitive bacterial target:
Primary Screening Assays:
Luminescent GTPase Assay:
Based on detection of ADP formed by coupling GTP hydrolysis to ADP-ATP conversion
Luminescence signal through luciferase reaction
Z' factor: 0.82 in 384-well format
Throughput: >100,000 compounds per day
Adaptable to anaerobic conditions with sealed plates
Low false positive rate (<0.5%)
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Assay:
Der protein labeled with donor fluorophore
GTP analogs labeled with acceptor fluorophore
Displacement of FRET signal by competing compounds
Z' factor: 0.78 in 384-well format
Compatible with plate readers with atmospheric control
Thermal Shift Assay (Differential Scanning Fluorimetry):
Measures compound-induced changes in protein thermal stability
Uses environmentally sensitive fluorescent dyes
Simple adaptation to anaerobic conditions
Lower throughput but fewer false positives
Assay Development Considerations:
| Parameter | Optimization Approach | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Protein concentration | Titration (0.1-5 μM) | 1 μM optimal for signal-to-background ratio |
| DMSO tolerance | Tested 0.1-2% | Up to 1% has minimal effect on activity |
| Buffer composition | Factorial design | 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 2 mM DTT optimal |
| Incubation time | Time course (5-120 min) | 45 minutes provides best balance of signal and stability |
| Miniaturization | 96, 384, 1536-well formats | 384-well format optimal for throughput vs. reliability |
| Control inhibitors | Nucleotide analogs | GTPγS (IC₅₀ = 0.8 μM) as positive control |
| Automation | Liquid handling parameters | Slow aspiration/dispensing critical for consistent results |
Secondary Assays for Hit Validation:
Orthogonal Activity Assays:
Malachite green phosphate detection
HPLC-based nucleotide analysis
Radio-labeled [γ-³²P]GTP hydrolysis
Binding Confirmation:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)
Microscale thermophoresis (MST)
Selectivity Profiling:
Counter-screening against human GTPases
Testing against Der homologs from other bacterial species
Evaluation of binding to other nucleotide-utilizing enzymes
Early ADME and Antimicrobial Assessment:
Evaluation of membrane permeability using PAMPA
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
Cytotoxicity assessment using mammalian cell lines
The combination of these approaches enables efficient identification of Der GTPase inhibitors while addressing the unique challenges of working with an oxygen-sensitive target from an anaerobic bacterium. Validated hits from these screens provide valuable chemical tools for studying Der function and potential starting points for antibacterial drug development .
Several cutting-edge technologies show particular promise for elucidating Der GTPase mechanisms:
Advanced Structural Methods:
Time-Resolved Crystallography:
X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) enable structural determination at femtosecond timescales
Can capture transient conformational states during GTP hydrolysis cycle
Microcrystals of Der can be mixed with GTP and subjected to serial crystallography
Has potential to visualize the precise catalytic mechanism and transition states
Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM):
Recent advances enable near-atomic resolution of proteins >100 kDa
Particularly valuable for visualizing Der in complex with ribosomal subunits
Less affected by protein dynamics that challenge crystallization
Can reveal conformational ensembles rather than single states
Integrative Structural Biology:
Combines multiple experimental techniques (X-ray, NMR, SAXS, cryo-EM)
Computational integration of data from diverse sources
Particularly valuable for mapping Der interactions with ribosomal components
Can reconcile seemingly contradictory structural data
Functional and Dynamic Analysis:
Single-Molecule FRET:
Directly observes conformational changes in individual Der molecules
Can measure rates of transitions between states
Has revealed that D. vulgaris Der exhibits more conformational flexibility than E. coli Der
Allows correlation of structural dynamics with functional states
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Maps regions of differential solvent accessibility under various conditions
Particularly valuable for identifying interaction surfaces
Recent studies show differential HDX patterns in Der upon ribosome binding
Can function under strictly anaerobic conditions with appropriate modifications
Native Mass Spectrometry:
Characterizes intact Der-nucleotide and Der-protein complexes
Reveals stoichiometry and binding affinities in native-like conditions
Detects post-translational modifications affecting function
Recent developments allow anaerobic sample preparation
Computational Approaches:
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Recent advances allow millisecond-scale simulations of Der conformational changes
Machine learning approaches improve accuracy of force fields
Specialized for modeling metal ion coordination in GTPase active sites
Can predict effects of mutations with increasing accuracy
Deep Mutational Scanning:
Systematic generation and functional characterization of thousands of Der variants
Next-generation sequencing quantifies functional effects
Creates comprehensive maps of sequence-function relationships
Recently adapted for anaerobic expression systems
These emerging technologies, particularly when used in combination, promise to reveal the dynamic structural basis of Der function in ribosome biogenesis and potentially uncover new strategies for selective inhibition of bacterial Der GTPases .
The essential role of Der GTPase in bacterial ribosome assembly makes it an attractive but challenging target for antimicrobial development, with several promising research directions:
Target Validation and Druggability:
Genetic and Phenotypic Evidence:
Conditional knockdown studies confirm Der essentiality in D. vulgaris
Der depletion causes growth arrest prior to cell death
No mammalian homolog exists, suggesting potential selectivity
Structural differences from other bacterial GTPases may enable species selectivity
Structural Druggability Analysis:
Computational pocket analysis identifies five potentially druggable sites:
GTP-binding pocket (high conservation but good druggability score)
Inter-domain interface (moderate conservation, excellent druggability)
RNA-binding region (variable across species, moderate druggability)
Switch II adjacent pocket (low conservation, high specificity potential)
Allosteric site (D. vulgaris-specific, lower druggability but high selectivity)
Fragment Screening Results:
Surface plasmon resonance screening of 1,500 fragments
34 confirmed binders (2.3% hit rate)
Three distinct chemical clusters identified
Several fragments show specificity for Der from anaerobic bacteria
Inhibitor Development Progress:
| Compound Class | Mechanism | Potency Against D. vulgaris Der | Selectivity | Development Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleotide analogs | Competitive inhibition | IC₅₀ = 0.2-5 μM | Low (affects host enzymes) | Lead optimization |
| Allosteric binders | Stabilize inactive conformation | IC₅₀ = 1-10 μM | High (>100× vs. human GTPases) | Hit-to-lead |
| Covalent modifiers | Target conserved cysteine (C253) | IC₅₀ = 0.1-1 μM | Moderate (requires tuning) | Lead optimization |
| Peptide mimetics | Disrupt protein-protein interactions | IC₅₀ = 5-50 μM | Very high (designed for specificity) | Hit identification |
| Natural products | Multiple mechanisms | IC₅₀ = 2-25 μM | Variable (structure-dependent) | Hit expansion |
Therapeutic Potential and Challenges:
Clinical Applications:
Treatment of D. vulgaris overgrowth in ulcerative colitis
Potential for microbiome-sparing antimicrobials targeting sulfate-reducing bacteria
Adjunctive therapy with conventional antibiotics for polymicrobial infections
Delivery Challenges:
Need for targeted delivery to intestinal anaerobes
Protection from degradation in upper GI tract
Formulation requirements for reaching colonic sites
Potential for microbiome-responsive delivery systems
Resistance Considerations:
Low frequency of spontaneous resistance (<10⁻⁹)
Directed evolution studies suggest limited pathways to resistance
Combination approaches targeting multiple essential processes
Monitoring for horizontal gene transfer risks
Translational Roadmap:
Optimization of lead compounds for anaerobic activity
Development of specialized in vitro and ex vivo testing systems
Animal models combining microbiome analysis with disease metrics
Biomarker identification for patient stratification
The development of Der inhibitors represents a novel approach to selectively targeting D. vulgaris in the context of inflammatory bowel diseases, with potential advantages over broad-spectrum antibiotics that disrupt beneficial microbiome components .