KEGG: dvu:DVU0837
STRING: 882.DVU0837
Ribosome maturation factor RimM in Desulfovibrio vulgaris is a protein involved in the maturation of the 30S ribosomal subunit. It binds to ribosomal protein S19, located in the head domain of the 30S subunit. The RimM protein is widely conserved among bacteria, and RimM-related proteins have also been found in several eukaryotic species including malaria parasites (Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium yoelii), the malaria mosquito (Anopheles gambiae), and the chloroplast of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana . In D. vulgaris, the full-length RimM protein consists of 176 amino acids and has two distinct domains in its N- and C-terminal regions that contribute to its function in ribosome assembly .
RimM protein plays a specific role in ribosome assembly through several key mechanisms:
It associates exclusively with the free 30S subunit and not with the 30S subunit incorporated in the 70S ribosome
In E. coli, disruption of the rimM gene leads to accumulation of 17S rRNA (an unprocessed precursor of 16S rRNA), indicating its importance in proper rRNA processing
It specifically binds to ribosomal protein S19, which is categorized as a "late binder" in the assembly of the head of the 30S subunit
The binding of r-protein S19 with helix 33b of 16S rRNA causes conformational changes in the 3′ major domain of 16S rRNA, which RimM appears to facilitate
RimM is involved in the maturation of a specific region, composed of helices 31 and 33b of 16S rRNA, as well as r-proteins S13 and S19, in the head domain of the 30S subunit
These interactions are transient and specific, making RimM an essential factor for proper ribosome maturation in bacteria, which has led to suggestions that ribosome assembly factors could serve as novel antibacterial drug targets .
Expressing and purifying recombinant RimM from D. vulgaris involves several critical steps:
Expression System and Cloning:
Clone the full-length rimM gene (encoding all 176 amino acids) or specific domains using PCR amplification from D. vulgaris genomic DNA
Insert the gene into an appropriate expression vector with a suitable tag for purification
Transform the construct into E. coli expression host strains optimized for protein production
Induce protein expression using appropriate conditions (typically IPTG induction)
Purification Protocol:
Harvest cells by centrifugation and lyse using appropriate methods (sonication, French press, etc.)
If the protein forms inclusion bodies (as observed with some recombinant D. vulgaris proteins), solubilize using denaturants such as guanidinium chloride (3M)
For refolding, add iron (Fe(II)) anaerobically if the protein requires metal cofactors, then dilute the denaturant gradually
Purify using affinity chromatography, followed by additional purification steps like ion exchange and/or size exclusion chromatography
Analyze protein activity using appropriate functional assays
This approach has been successfully used for other recombinant proteins from D. vulgaris, such as rubrerythrin, and can be adapted for RimM purification .
Optimal storage conditions for recombinant D. vulgaris RimM protein depend on the formulation and intended use:
| Formulation | Temperature | Stabilizers | Shelf Life | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid form | -20°C/-80°C | 5-50% glycerol (50% recommended) | 6 months | Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles |
| Lyophilized form | -20°C/-80°C | N/A | 12 months | Reconstitute in deionized sterile water (0.1-1.0 mg/mL) |
| Working aliquots | 4°C | N/A | Up to 1 week | For immediate experimental use |
For reconstitution of lyophilized protein, it is recommended to briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to bring the contents to the bottom. Addition of glycerol to a final concentration of 50% is recommended for long-term storage of the reconstituted protein .
Several experimental approaches are employed to investigate RimM function:
Genetic Methods:
Gene disruption/knockout studies to assess phenotypic effects on growth and ribosome assembly
Complementation assays to confirm gene function and test mutant variants
Site-directed mutagenesis to identify critical amino acid residues
Biochemical Approaches:
Purification of native and recombinant proteins for in vitro studies
Pull-down assays to identify interaction partners (e.g., GST pull-down showing RimM binding to S19)
RNA processing analysis to examine effects on 16S rRNA maturation
Structural Methods:
X-ray crystallography and NMR for high-resolution structural analysis
Cryo-electron microscopy to visualize RimM-ribosome complexes
Ribosome Assembly Analysis:
Sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation to analyze ribosome profiles
Mass spectrometry to identify components of ribosome assembly intermediates
In vitro ribosome reconstitution assays to test the role of RimM in assembly kinetics
These approaches can be combined to provide a comprehensive understanding of RimM function in ribosome maturation.
Designing high-throughput experiments to study RimM across bacterial species requires standardized approaches that can be efficiently scaled and applied to diverse organisms:
Vector Design and Construction Strategy:
Develop a Gateway-based cloning system for modular construction of expression and knockout vectors
Use SLIC (sequence and ligation-independent cloning) to assemble custom constructs with standardized components
Design vectors with reusable and interchangeable DNA "parts" that can be applied across species
Incorporate appropriate selection markers for different bacterial hosts
Transformation and Selection Protocol:
Optimize electroporation conditions for each target species
For difficult-to-transform anaerobes like D. vulgaris, use specialized recovery media:
Extend incubation times for slow-growing species (5+ days for D. vulgaris)
Experimental Design Table for Multi-Species Analysis:
| Species | Vector Construction | Transformation Method | Selection Marker | Recovery Conditions | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. vulgaris | SLIC with pUC19-based vectors | Electroporation | G418 (kanamycin analog) | Anaerobic, MOYLS4, 30°C, 5 days | Southern blot, PCR |
| E. coli | λ red recombination | Chemical transformation | Kanamycin (50 μg/ml) | Aerobic, LB, 37°C, 1 day | Colony PCR, sequencing |
| Other species | TOPO/Gateway cloning | Species-specific methods | Appropriate antibiotics | Optimized for each species | Western blot, sequencing |
This standardized approach enables efficient manipulation of the rimM gene across diverse bacterial species, facilitating comparative functional studies .
Analyzing RimM interactions with ribosomal components requires a multi-faceted approach combining several techniques:
Affinity-Based Methods:
Sequential Peptide Affinity (SPA) tagging: Create chromosomal SPA-tagged RimM constructs for gentle purification of intact complexes
Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP): Isolate RimM complexes under native conditions
GST pull-down assays: Previously used successfully to demonstrate RimM binding to r-protein S19
Crosslinking and Mass Spectrometry:
Use chemical crosslinkers to stabilize transient interactions
Identify crosslinked peptides by mass spectrometry to map interaction interfaces
Analyze protein composition of isolated complexes using LC-MS/MS
Structural Biology Approaches:
Cryo-EM analysis of RimM-30S complexes at different assembly stages
NMR spectroscopy for detecting dynamic interactions in solution
In Vivo Localization:
Fluorescent protein fusion constructs to visualize RimM localization
Co-localization studies with ribosomal markers
Super-resolution microscopy for detailed spatial distribution
Functional Validation Experiments:
Mutagenesis of identified interaction sites followed by functional testing
Competition assays with peptides mimicking interaction interfaces
Complementation experiments with domain-swapped chimeric proteins
These approaches can be integrated to build a comprehensive map of RimM interactions with S19, 16S rRNA, and other potential binding partners .
Comparing RimM function across bacterial species reveals both conserved mechanisms and species-specific adaptations:
Evolutionary Conservation:
RimM is widely conserved among bacteria, indicating its fundamental importance in ribosome assembly
RimM-related proteins have also been found in eukaryotic species, including malaria parasites and plant chloroplasts, suggesting ancient evolutionary origins
Functional Similarities:
In both E. coli and D. vulgaris, RimM associates specifically with the free 30S subunit
The core function in facilitating 30S subunit head domain assembly appears conserved
Species-Specific Adaptations:
E. coli rimM disruption leads to accumulation of 17S rRNA and affects a specific region composed of helices 31 and 33b of 16S rRNA
D. vulgaris RimM may have adaptations related to its anaerobic lifestyle and unique ribosome composition
Sequence variations in the C-terminal domain may reflect species-specific rRNA interactions
Structural Comparison:
While the two-domain architecture is conserved, specific residues at interaction interfaces may vary
Domain sizes and interdomain flexibility can differ between species
Understanding these similarities and differences is crucial for developing species-specific antibiotic targeting strategies, as ribosome assembly factors have been proposed as novel antibacterial drug targets .
Designing experiments to study RimM's role in ribosome assembly requires careful consideration of several factors:
Key Experimental Design Elements:
Control Selection:
Include appropriate wild-type controls for comparison
Use inactive RimM mutants as negative controls
Consider complementation controls (ΔrimM + plasmid-expressed RimM)
Variable Definition and Measurement:
Independent variables: RimM concentration, mutations, domain deletions
Dependent variables: 30S assembly completion, rRNA processing state, growth rate
Control variables: temperature, ionic conditions, other assembly factors
Randomization and Replication:
Minimum three biological replicates for statistical validity
Multiple technical replicates to account for measurement variability
Randomize experimental order to minimize systematic errors
Sample Experimental Design Table:
| Experimental Approach | Design Structure | Controls | Sample Size | Data Analysis | Expected Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In vitro reconstitution | Factorial (RimM variants × time points) | No RimM, heat-inactivated RimM | 3 biological × 3 technical replicates | ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc | Identify assembly intermediates that accumulate without RimM |
| In vivo depletion | Time course with repeated measures | Wild-type strain, non-target depletion | 4 biological replicates | Mixed-effects model | Characterize physiological effects of RimM depletion |
| Structure-function analysis | Systematic mutagenesis | Wild-type RimM, unrelated protein mutants | 3 replicates per mutant | Multiple regression | Map functional regions of RimM |
This structured approach ensures experimental rigor while addressing the complex, dynamic nature of ribosome assembly .
Resolving contradictory data on RimM function requires systematic evaluation of methodological differences and careful integration of findings:
Sources of Experimental Variation:
Species differences: RimM may have species-specific functions or interactions
Experimental conditions: In vitro vs. in vivo approaches yield different insights
Methodological approaches: Different techniques have varying sensitivities and limitations
Protein constructs: Full-length vs. truncated proteins or different tagging strategies
Systematic Analysis Framework:
| Study Component | Documentation Requirements | Comparison Metrics | Integration Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental system | Species, strain, growth conditions | Degree of similarity to natural conditions | Weight findings by physiological relevance |
| RimM constructs | Sequence, domains, tags, expression level | Structural integrity, activity validation | Compare equivalent protein forms |
| Interaction detection | Method sensitivity, controls, replication | False positive/negative rates | Prioritize results confirmed by multiple methods |
| Functional assays | Endpoint measurements, time resolution | Direct vs. indirect measurements | Focus on direct functional readouts |
Resolution Strategies:
Direct experimental comparison: Test contradictory findings using identical conditions
Meta-analysis: Statistically combine results across studies while accounting for heterogeneity
Bayesian integration: Weight evidence based on methodological rigor and direct relevance
Third-party validation: Have independent labs replicate key contradictory findings
This structured approach helps distinguish genuine biological differences from methodological artifacts .
Studying RimM in challenging bacterial species like D. vulgaris requires specialized techniques adapted for anaerobic, slow-growing organisms:
Genetic Manipulation Strategies:
Custom Vector Design:
Transformation Protocol for Anaerobes:
Verification Methods:
Protein Analysis Under Anaerobic Conditions:
Anaerobic Protein Expression:
Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis:
These specialized approaches overcome the challenges associated with studying RimM in anaerobic bacteria like D. vulgaris .
Appropriate statistical approaches significantly enhance the rigor and interpretability of RimM functional studies:
Experimental Design Statistics:
Power Analysis and Sample Size Determination:
Randomization and Blocking:
Data Analysis Approaches:
For Comparative Studies:
ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests for comparing multiple conditions
Linear mixed-effects models to account for nested experimental structures
Non-parametric alternatives when assumptions are violated
For Time-Course Experiments:
Repeated measures ANOVA or mixed models for longitudinal data
Growth curve fitting using non-linear regression models
Time-to-event analysis for developmental milestones
For High-Dimensional Data:
Multiple testing correction (FDR, Bonferroni) for proteomics/transcriptomics
Dimension reduction techniques (PCA, t-SNE) for visualizing complex datasets
Cluster analysis to identify patterns in multi-parameter experiments
Reproducibility Enhancement:
Preregistration of Analysis Plans:
Define hypotheses and analysis strategies before data collection
Distinguish confirmatory from exploratory analyses
Minimize p-hacking and HARKing (Hypothesizing After Results are Known)
Effect Size Reporting:
Report standardized effect sizes with confidence intervals
Focus on biological significance rather than just statistical significance
Use meta-analytic thinking to integrate new results with existing knowledge
These statistical approaches increase the rigor and reproducibility of RimM functional studies .
Designing effective data tables for RimM expression and purification experiments requires careful organization of experimental variables and measurements:
Key Elements of Experimental Data Tables:
Clear Title: Explicitly state the purpose (e.g., "Effect of Induction Conditions on D. vulgaris RimM Expression Yield")
Independent Variables: Place in leftmost column (e.g., temperature, induction time, strain)
Dependent Variables: Organize in columns for each measurement (e.g., protein yield, purity, activity)
Multiple Trials: Include separate columns for each replicate
Derived Values: Add columns for calculated metrics (e.g., averages, standard deviations)19
Sample Data Table for RimM Expression Optimization:
| Temperature (°C) | IPTG Concentration (mM) | Trial 1 Yield (mg/L) | Trial 2 Yield (mg/L) | Trial 3 Yield (mg/L) | Average Yield (mg/L) | Purity by SDS-PAGE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 0.1 | 14.3 | 15.2 | 14.7 | 14.7 | 82 |
| 18 | 0.5 | 18.6 | 19.2 | 17.8 | 18.5 | 85 |
| 25 | 0.1 | 22.3 | 21.8 | 23.1 | 22.4 | 78 |
| 25 | 0.5 | 25.6 | 26.1 | 24.9 | 25.5 | 75 |
| 37 | 0.1 | 12.5 | 11.8 | 13.0 | 12.4 | 65 |
| 37 | 0.5 | 10.2 | 11.1 | 9.8 | 10.4 | 58 |
Sample Data Table for RimM Purification Steps:
| Purification Step | Volume (mL) | Total Protein (mg) | RimM Content (%) | RimM Yield (mg) | Cumulative Recovery (%) | Activity (units/mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude Extract | 120 | 450 | 15 | 67.5 | 100 | 35 |
| Affinity Chromatography | 25 | 85 | 65 | 55.3 | 82 | 120 |
| Ion Exchange | 15 | 42 | 90 | 37.8 | 56 | 245 |
| Size Exclusion | 10 | 32 | >95 | 30.4 | 45 | 280 |
Proper data table design enhances clarity, facilitates analysis, and ensures reproducibility in RimM research19 .