Recombinant Dictyostelium discoideum Protein sigN139 (DDB_G0288185)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Molecular Identification and Naming

  • Gene Identifier: DDB_G0288185 (UniProt: Q54JB1) .

  • Synonyms: SrfA-induced gene N-like protein 139 .

  • Species: Dictyostelium discoideum (strain AX2 or AX3) .

Key Features

PropertyDetailSource
Molecular Weight~10 kDa (calculated for 91 aa)
Isoelectric Point~4.19 (theoretical)
TagN-terminal His-tag (6xHis) for purification
Purity>90% (SDS-PAGE-validated)
Expression HostE. coli (for recombinant production)

Expression System

  • Host: E. coli .

  • Vector: Cloning vector with T7 promoter or compatible expression cassette .

  • Induction: IPTG-induced expression under standard E. coli growth conditions .

Purification Strategy

StepMethodOutcome
Cell LysisSonication or enzymatic disruptionSoluble protein released
Affinity ChromatographyNi-NTA or IMAC (His-tag binding)Enriched sigN139 protein
Gel FiltrationSize-exclusion chromatography (optional)Buffer exchange and concentration

Potential Functional Roles (Hypothetical)

  1. Proteostasis Regulation:

    • D. discoideum has a proteome rich in prion-like (Q/N-rich) proteins , and sigN139 may interact with chaperones or disaggregases (e.g., Hsp101) .

    • The His-tagged variant could serve as a substrate for ubiquitination or proteasomal degradation assays .

  2. Developmental Studies:

    • D. discoideum uses presenilin proteins for development , and sigN139 may modulate signaling pathways during multicellular stages.

  3. Bacteriolytic Activity:

    • Though not directly linked, D. discoideum produces bacteriolytic proteins (e.g., BadA-C) , and sigN139 might contribute to phagosome function.

Limitations and Future Directions

  • Functional Gaps: No studies directly link DDB_G0288185 to specific pathways.

  • Expression Host Bias: E. coli may not replicate D. discoideum-specific modifications.

  • Research Opportunities:

    • Structural Studies: X-ray crystallography or NMR to resolve 3D structure.

    • Interactome Mapping: Yeast two-hybrid or co-IP to identify binding partners.

Comparison with Related Proteins

ProteinFunctionExpression HostTag
BadABacteriolytic activity in phagosomes D. discoideumNone
Presenilin (PsenA/B)Developmental regulation, γ-secretase activity D. discoideum, E. coliNone
sigN139Uncharacterized; potential role in proteostasisE. coliHis

Q&A

What is Dictyostelium discoideum Protein sigN139 and why is it significant for research?

Protein sigN139 (DDB_G0288185, UniProt ID: Q54JB1) is a 91-amino acid protein from the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. It is also known as SrfA-induced gene N-like protein 139. Dictyostelium discoideum serves as a powerful model organism for investigating human health and disease mechanisms . This protein is significant because Dictyostelium has been reported to have a proteome extremely rich in prion-like proteins, making it valuable for studying protein aggregation and cellular processes relevant to human diseases . As a recombinant protein expressed with tags (such as His-tag), sigN139 enables researchers to conduct controlled experiments on protein function, interactions, and regulation in cellular systems.

How is recombinant sigN139 typically produced and what expression systems are most effective?

Recombinant sigN139 is commonly produced using E. coli expression systems, as evidenced by the commercially available preparation . The full-length protein (1-91aa) is typically expressed with an N-terminal His-tag to facilitate purification. The expression construct places the protein under the control of a strong promoter to ensure adequate expression levels.

For optimal expression, researchers should consider:

  • Codon optimization for the expression host

  • Temperature modulation during induction (typically 18-25°C) to enhance proper folding

  • Induction time optimization (4-16 hours)

  • Use of specialized E. coli strains designed for recombinant protein expression

The resulting protein is typically purified using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) leveraging the His-tag, followed by additional purification steps if higher purity is required. The purified protein is often supplied as a lyophilized powder that requires proper reconstitution before use .

What are the recommended storage and reconstitution protocols for recombinant sigN139?

For optimal stability and activity of recombinant sigN139, follow these evidence-based practices:

Storage Recommendations:

  • Store lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt

  • After reconstitution, store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week

  • For long-term storage, add glycerol (recommended final concentration 50%) and store aliquots at -20°C/-80°C

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they can compromise protein integrity

Reconstitution Protocol:

  • Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom

  • Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • For long-term storage, add glycerol to 5-50% final concentration

  • Prepare small working aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

  • Verify protein concentration after reconstitution using standard protein quantification methods

The storage buffer consists of Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose at pH 8.0, which helps maintain protein stability during storage and reconstitution .

How can sigN139 be effectively incorporated into Dictyostelium genetic screening systems?

Integrating sigN139 into genetic screening workflows requires careful experimental design. Building on established Dictyostelium methodologies:

  • Vector Selection: Choose appropriate expression vectors such as pTX-GFP extrachromosomal multi-copy plasmids, which have been successfully used for similar Dictyostelium proteins .

  • Fusion Design: Consider creating fusion constructs (e.g., with GFP or other tags) to facilitate visualization and functional studies. The placement of tags should be informed by structural predictions to avoid interfering with protein function.

  • Selection Strategy: Develop appropriate selection markers. For example, the Pyr56 selection system described for other Dictyostelium proteins can be adapted, where cells expressing functional protein constructs can be selected based on 5-FOA resistance .

  • Screening Optimization: For positive selection screens, the technique used with Pyr56-fusion proteins can serve as a model, where sequestration of protein activity due to aggregation provides resistance to 5-FOA .

A table outlining experimental design considerations for sigN139 genetic screens:

ParameterRecommendationRationale
Expression SystempTX-based vectorsProven efficacy in Dictyostelium
Promoteract15Strong constitutive expression
TagsN-terminal tags preferredBased on protein structure prediction
Selection5-FOA-based systemsEnables positive/negative selection
Screening MethodFluorescence microscopyAllows visualization of protein localization
ControlsWild-type and knockout strainsEssential for phenotype comparison

What experimental controls should be included when studying sigN139 function in vitro?

When designing experiments to study sigN139 function, incorporate these essential controls:

  • Positive Controls:

    • Well-characterized proteins from the same family or with similar expected functions

    • Wild-type Dictyostelium cells expressing endogenous sigN139

  • Negative Controls:

    • Expression vectors lacking the sigN139 insert

    • Heat-denatured sigN139 protein (to control for non-specific effects)

    • CRISPR-Cas9 generated sigN139 knockout strains

  • Experimental Validation Controls:

    • Concentration gradients to establish dose-response relationships

    • Time-course experiments to determine temporal dynamics

    • Multiple tag positions (N-terminal, C-terminal) to account for potential tag interference

  • Specificity Controls:

    • Competition assays with unlabeled protein

    • Mutated versions of sigN139 with altered key residues

    • Antibody validation using knockout cells

These controls help distinguish specific biological effects from artifacts and ensure experimental rigor consistent with best practices in protein research.

How can researchers effectively study sigN139 protein interactions and binding partners?

To investigate sigN139 protein interactions and identify binding partners, consider these methodological approaches:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Utilize the His-tag on recombinant sigN139 for pull-down assays

    • Verify interactions with western blotting using antibodies against suspected partners

    • Include stringent washing conditions to minimize non-specific binding

  • Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening:

    • Use sigN139 as bait to screen Dictyostelium cDNA libraries

    • Validate positive interactions with secondary assays

    • Consider membrane-based Y2H systems if sigN139 shows membrane association

  • Proximity Labeling:

    • Generate BioID or APEX2 fusions with sigN139

    • Express in Dictyostelium cells to label proximal proteins

    • Identify labeled proteins via mass spectrometry

  • Fluorescence Microscopy:

    • Create fluorescent protein fusions (like those described for other Dictyostelium proteins )

    • Perform colocalization studies with known cellular markers

    • Use FRET/FLIM to assess direct interactions in living cells

  • Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry:

    • Apply chemical cross-linkers to stabilize transient interactions

    • Analyze cross-linked complexes by mass spectrometry

    • Map interaction interfaces at amino acid resolution

These approaches should be used in combination to build a comprehensive interaction map, as each method has distinct strengths and limitations.

What methods are recommended for studying the potential role of sigN139 in protein aggregation or phase separation?

Given that Dictyostelium has a proteome rich in prion-like proteins , investigating sigN139's potential role in aggregation or phase separation requires specialized approaches:

  • In Vitro Phase Separation Assays:

    • Test purified recombinant sigN139 under various conditions (protein concentration, salt, pH, temperature)

    • Quantify phase separation using turbidity measurements and microscopy

    • Determine the reversibility of any observed phase transitions

  • Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP):

    • Express sigN139-GFP fusions in cells

    • Photobleach regions of interest and monitor fluorescence recovery

    • Compare mobility parameters to known phase-separating proteins

  • Adaptation of 5-FOA Selection System:

    • Create sigN139 fusions with Pyr56 similar to the polyglutamine system described in the literature

    • Select for cells with aggregation phenotypes using 5-FOA resistance

    • Analyze aggregate formation using fluorescence microscopy

  • Mutagenesis Analysis:

    • Identify and modify sequence elements potentially involved in aggregation

    • Test variants for altered aggregation properties

    • Correlate sequence features with aggregation behavior

  • Stress Response Studies:

    • Expose cells to various stressors (heat shock, oxidative stress, nutrient limitation)

    • Monitor sigN139 localization and aggregation state

    • Evaluate reversibility upon stress removal

The methodology described for polyglutamine protein aggregation in Dictyostelium provides a valuable framework that can be adapted for studying sigN139 aggregation properties .

What are common challenges in working with recombinant sigN139 and how can they be addressed?

Researchers working with recombinant sigN139 may encounter several challenges:

ChallengePossible CausesSolutions
Low protein solubilityHydrophobic regions, improper folding- Lower induction temperature (16-18°C)
- Add solubility enhancers (e.g., 0.1% Triton X-100)
- Use fusion partners (e.g., MBP, SUMO)
Protein degradationProtease activity, inherent instability- Add protease inhibitors
- Optimize buffer conditions
- Work at 4°C
- Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Poor antibody recognitionEpitope inaccessibility, low specificity- Try different antibodies
- Optimize blocking conditions
- Use tag-specific antibodies
Inconsistent activityBatch variation, improper handling- Establish functional assays for QC
- Validate each batch
- Standardize handling protocols
Expression toxicity in host cellsInterference with host cell functions- Use tightly regulated expression systems
- Optimize induction conditions
- Consider alternative expression hosts

Quality control measures should include SDS-PAGE to verify purity (>90% is typically expected for research applications) , western blotting to confirm identity, and functional assays appropriate for the experimental context.

How can researchers verify the functional integrity of recombinant sigN139 after purification and storage?

To ensure recombinant sigN139 remains functionally intact:

  • Purity Assessment:

    • SDS-PAGE analysis with Coomassie staining (expect >90% purity)

    • Mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity and detect potential degradation

  • Structural Integrity:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure

    • Dynamic light scattering (DLS) to evaluate size distribution and aggregation state

    • Thermal shift assays to determine stability under different buffer conditions

  • Activity Verification:

    • Develop functional assays based on predicted protein activity

    • Compare activity across different storage conditions and time points

    • Use positive controls (fresh preparations) for benchmark comparison

  • Microscopy-Based Assessment:

    • Fluorescently labeled protein localization in cellular assays

    • Compare subcellular distribution patterns to established references

    • Verify expected interaction patterns with known binding partners

  • Storage Optimization:

    • Test different buffer compositions and additive effects on stability

    • Evaluate freeze-drying vs. frozen storage for long-term maintenance

    • Implement quality checks before and after storage periods

A systematic approach to validation ensures experimental reproducibility and reliable results when working with this recombinant protein.

How can CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing be optimized for studying sigN139 function in Dictyostelium?

CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing offers powerful approaches for investigating sigN139 function in Dictyostelium:

  • Target Site Selection:

    • Design sgRNAs targeting the DDB_G0288185 gene using Dictyostelium-specific algorithms

    • Prioritize target sites with high on-target and low off-target scores

    • Consider targeting different regions (N-terminal, functional domains, C-terminal)

  • Delivery Optimization:

    • Use established Dictyostelium transformation methods (e.g., electroporation)

    • Co-deliver Cas9 and sgRNA as ribonucleoprotein complexes to reduce off-target effects

    • Consider transient vs. stable expression strategies based on experimental needs

  • Knockout Validation:

    • Design PCR strategies to confirm gene disruption

    • Perform western blotting to verify protein absence

    • Sequence the target region to characterize the exact modification

  • Knock-in Strategies:

    • Design appropriate homology arms (typically 500-1000bp) flanking the target site

    • Include selection markers (e.g., based on the Pyr56 system ) for positive selection

    • Consider fluorescent protein fusions for live-cell tracking

  • Phenotypic Analysis:

    • Compare growth rates, morphology, and development in knockout vs. wild-type cells

    • Assess stress responses and resistance phenotypes

    • Perform transcriptomic and proteomic profiling to identify affected pathways

The CRISPR-Cas9 system used successfully for generating pyr56-KO strains in Dictyostelium provides a methodological foundation that can be adapted for sigN139 functional studies.

What are the considerations for using sigN139 as a model to study protein-protein interactions in membranous environments?

The amino acid sequence of sigN139 suggests potential membrane association , making it valuable for studying membrane protein interactions:

  • Membrane Association Verification:

    • Perform subcellular fractionation to determine membrane localization

    • Use computational tools to identify potential transmembrane domains or lipid-binding motifs

    • Test protein-lipid interactions using lipid overlay assays or liposome binding experiments

  • Interaction Studies in Membrane Contexts:

    • Apply techniques like BRET/FRET optimized for membrane proteins

    • Use split-GFP complementation assays for in vivo interaction detection

    • Consider crosslinking approaches optimized for membrane environments

  • Reconstitution Systems:

    • Develop proteoliposome systems incorporating purified recombinant sigN139

    • Use nanodiscs or bicelles for controlled membrane mimetics

    • Optimize detergent selection for extraction while maintaining protein-protein interactions

  • Specialized Microscopy Approaches:

    • Apply super-resolution techniques (STORM, PALM) for detailed localization

    • Use single-particle tracking to analyze dynamic behavior in membranes

    • Implement correlative light-electron microscopy for structural context

  • Functional Context:

    • Investigate potential roles in membrane organization or signaling

    • Study effects of membrane composition on sigN139 function

    • Examine interactions with other Dictyostelium membrane proteins

These considerations help address the specific challenges of studying potentially membrane-associated proteins like sigN139 in their native context.

How can researchers integrate sigN139 studies into broader investigations of Dictyostelium as a model for human disease mechanisms?

Dictyostelium discoideum serves as a powerful model organism for investigating human health and disease . Researchers can position sigN139 studies within this broader context:

  • Comparative Genomics Approach:

    • Identify potential human homologs or proteins with similar domains

    • Map sigN139 to conserved cellular pathways relevant to human disease

    • Study how sigN139 perturbation affects pathways conserved between Dictyostelium and humans

  • Disease Model Integration:

    • Incorporate sigN139 into established Dictyostelium models of protein aggregation diseases

    • Study potential roles in processes like autophagy, mitochondrial function, or cytoskeletal organization relevant to neurodegenerative conditions

    • Explore connections to signaling pathways implicated in human diseases

  • High-Throughput Screening Applications:

    • Develop sigN139-based reporter systems for drug screening

    • Adapt the positive selection system described for polyglutamine proteins for sigN139 studies

    • Create assays to identify modulators of sigN139 function with therapeutic potential

  • Multi-Omics Integration:

    • Perform transcriptomic analysis of sigN139 knockout or overexpression strains

    • Conduct proteomic studies to identify changes in protein interaction networks

    • Apply metabolomic approaches to characterize biochemical consequences of sigN139 manipulation

  • Translational Research Framework:

    • Design experiments that bridge findings from Dictyostelium to more complex models

    • Validate key findings in mammalian cell systems

    • Develop collaborative approaches with clinical researchers to explore relevance to human patients

By positioning sigN139 research within the established framework of Dictyostelium as a model organism for human disease processes , researchers can maximize the translational impact of their findings.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.