Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Essential for protein import into peroxisomes.
KEGG: ddi:DDB_G0285523
STRING: 44689.DDB0238076
Dictyostelium discoideum putative peroxisome assembly protein 12 (pex12) is a 459 amino acid protein with multiple functional domains. The protein sequence (Uniprot NO.: Q54N40) includes a distinctive zinc-binding domain characterized by the C3HC4 RING finger motif, which is critical for its function in peroxisome biogenesis . The protein contains several signature sequences:
N-terminal region with two transmembrane domains
Central region with low complexity stretches and asparagine-rich segments
C-terminal RING finger domain (CxnCx2CxnCx2C) that mediates protein-protein interactions
The RING finger domain is particularly important as it facilitates ubiquitin ligase activity and interactions with other peroxins in the peroxisome assembly complex.
Pex12 functions as part of a broader peroxisomal import machinery that includes other peroxins such as Pex3, Pex10, Pex11, and Pex14. While these proteins work together in peroxisome biogenesis, they serve distinct roles :
| Peroxin | Primary Function | Conservation | Localization |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pex12 | E3 ubiquitin ligase component | Core peroxin across eukaryotes | Peroxisomal membrane |
| Pex3 | Membrane protein docking | Broadly conserved | Peroxisomal membrane |
| Pex10 | E3 ubiquitin ligase activity | Core peroxin | Peroxisomal membrane |
| Pex11 | Membrane elongation/division | Multiple isoforms | Peroxisomal membrane |
| Pex14 | Matrix protein import | Broadly conserved | Peroxisomal membrane |
Notably, computational analysis reveals that Pex12, along with Pex3, Pex10, and Pex19, is considered an unequivocal in silico marker for peroxisomes, suggesting its essential role in peroxisome formation and maintenance .
For optimal maintenance of protein activity, recombinant D. discoideum pex12 should be stored in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C for routine storage, or at -80°C for extended preservation . To minimize activity loss:
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can lead to protein denaturation
Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week
When thawing, use gentle mixing rather than vortexing to maintain protein integrity
Maintain pH stability (typically pH 7.4-8.0) to preserve the zinc-finger domain structure
For experiments requiring extended protein use, consider creating multiple small-volume aliquots rather than repeatedly accessing a single stock tube .
Based on research practices, several expression systems have been successfully implemented for D. discoideum pex12 production, each with distinct advantages:
| Expression System | Advantages | Challenges | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli (BL21) | Rapid growth, high yield | Potential improper folding of transmembrane regions | Moderate |
| Yeast (S. cerevisiae) | Post-translational modifications, proper membrane protein folding | Longer expression time | Good |
| Insect cells (Sf9) | Eukaryotic processing, glycosylation | Complex media requirements | High |
| D. discoideum itself | Native folding environment | Lower yield, specialized growth conditions | Variable |
For functional studies, the yeast expression system has shown particular utility as demonstrated by successful incorporation of related peroxins like MbPex14 into S. cerevisiae peroxisomes . This approach allows verification of proper folding and targeting. When expressing in heterologous systems, optimizing codon usage for the host organism significantly improves expression efficiency.
To study pex12 localization in D. discoideum, researchers should employ a multi-method approach combining:
Fluorescence microscopy with tagged proteins:
Express pex12 with a fluorescent tag (GFP or mCherry)
Co-express with established peroxisomal markers
Use confocal microscopy for high-resolution imaging
Subcellular fractionation and immunoblotting:
Separate cellular components through differential centrifugation
Identify pex12 in fractions using specific antibodies
Compare distribution with known peroxisomal markers
Immunoelectron microscopy:
Use gold-labeled antibodies against pex12
Visualize exact subcellular localization at ultrastructural level
Recent research demonstrates the value of combining these approaches, as illustrated in studies of peroxisomal proteins like Pex14, where both microscopy and biochemical analysis confirmed peroxisomal localization . When designing experiments, consider controls using mutant strains lacking other peroxins to assess dependency relationships in targeting.
Disruption of pex12 function in D. discoideum leads to several observable phenotypes related to peroxisome dysfunction:
Morphological changes:
Absence or abnormal appearance of peroxisomes
Mislocalization of peroxisomal matrix proteins
Altered cell size and shape
Metabolic defects:
Impaired fatty acid β-oxidation
Disrupted reactive oxygen species metabolism
Altered lipid composition
Developmental abnormalities:
Delayed or aberrant multicellular development
Compromised aggregation during starvation response
Altered cell motility and chemotaxis
These phenotypes can be quantified through growth rate measurements, developmental timing assays, and metabolic pathway analysis . Interestingly, comparative analysis with mitochondrial dysfunction models shows distinct phenotypic patterns, suggesting specific cellular signaling pathways are activated in response to peroxisomal versus mitochondrial defects .
D. discoideum pex12 displays both conserved features and unique characteristics compared to homologs in other species:
| Organism | Protein Size | Domain Conservation | Unique Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| D. discoideum | 459 aa | C-terminal RING domain | Asparagine-rich regions |
| H. sapiens | 359 aa | C-terminal RING domain | Extended C-terminus |
| S. cerevisiae | 399 aa | C-terminal RING domain | Extended N-terminus |
| M. balamuthi | 412 aa | C-terminal RING domain | Adapted to anaerobic conditions |
A particularly interesting comparison is with Mastigamoeba balamuthi, another amoeboid protist that has adapted its peroxisomes to function under anaerobic conditions . While both D. discoideum and M. balamuthi express pex12, the functional adaptations of these proteins reflect their evolutionary divergence and metabolic specializations.
The core RING finger domain remains highly conserved across species, suggesting its critical importance in protein function, while the variable regions may confer species-specific regulatory properties or interaction specificities .
D. discoideum offers valuable insights into human peroxisomal biogenesis disorders (PBDs) through its simplified but conserved peroxisomal machinery:
Zellweger spectrum disorders:
Mutations in human PEX12 cause Zellweger syndrome and related disorders
D. discoideum pex12 knockouts can model fundamental aspects of these conditions
Simplified genetic background allows clearer interpretation of pathogenic mechanisms
Therapeutic development opportunities:
High-throughput screening of compounds affecting pex12 function
Identification of genetic modifiers that suppress pex12 deficiency phenotypes
Testing of potential protein replacement therapies
Evolutionary conservation analysis:
Identification of functionally critical residues through comparative genomics
Development of predictive models for human PEX12 mutation pathogenicity
D. discoideum's advantages as a model system include its haploid genome, ease of genetic manipulation, and ability to be studied in both unicellular and multicellular states . Recent studies have demonstrated the utility of D. discoideum for modeling various neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting similar approaches could be applied to peroxisome biogenesis disorders .
Investigating peroxisome-mitochondria interactions through pex12 requires sophisticated experimental approaches:
Proximity labeling techniques:
Express pex12 fused to enzymes like APEX2 or BioID
Identify proteins in proximity to pex12 using mass spectrometry
Map the peroxisome-mitochondria interactome
Live-cell imaging approaches:
Dual labeling of peroxisomes (via pex12-FP) and mitochondria
Time-lapse microscopy to track organelle dynamics and interactions
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize contact sites
Functional assays:
Measure metabolite exchange between organelles in wild-type and pex12-mutant cells
Assess calcium signaling between peroxisomes and mitochondria
Evaluate redox state changes during organelle interaction
Recent studies in other organisms have revealed that peroxins like pex11 can be mislocalized to mitochondria in the absence of certain peroxisome assembly factors , suggesting complex crosstalk between these organelles. In D. discoideum, which has been established as a model for mitochondrial dysfunction , similar studies focusing on pex12 could reveal unique aspects of organelle communication in this evolutionarily distinct organism.
Recent research suggests pex12 may function in previously unrecognized peroxisome biogenesis pathways:
De novo peroxisome formation:
Evidence suggests pex12 may participate in peroxisome formation from the ER
Studies of pex12 localization during peroxisome proliferation can reveal temporal dynamics
Investigation of pex12 interactions with early peroxisome assembly factors like pex3 and pex19
Pexophagy regulation:
Potential role of pex12's ubiquitin ligase activity in marking peroxisomes for degradation
Analysis of peroxisome turnover rates in pex12 mutants with varying levels of dysfunction
Examination of pex12 post-translational modifications during cellular stress
Non-canonical functions:
Exploration of potential roles beyond peroxisome assembly
Investigation of transcriptional regulation in response to pex12 activity
Analysis of potential cytosolic functions of pex12 fragments
Emerging research in M. balamuthi revealed the existence of anaerobic peroxisomes , challenging the traditional view that peroxisomes primarily serve oxidative functions. This discovery opens new questions about the evolutionary adaptability of the peroxisome biogenesis machinery, including pex12, suggesting it may have broader functionality than previously recognized.
Purification of functional recombinant pex12 presents several challenges due to its membrane-associated nature and multiple domains. Researchers should consider these strategies:
Optimized solubilization approaches:
Test multiple detergents (DDM, CHAPS, digitonin) for optimal extraction
Consider amphipol substitution for long-term stability
Evaluate nanodiscs for maintaining native-like membrane environment
Fusion protein strategies:
N-terminal GST or MBP tags to enhance solubility
Self-cleaving intein systems for tag removal without proteases
Split-GFP complementation to verify proper folding
Expression optimization:
Temperature reduction during induction (16-20°C)
Co-expression with chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)
Controlled expression rate using titratable promoters
Successful purification protocols typically employ a combination of affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography, with careful attention to buffer composition to maintain the integrity of the zinc-finger domain .
When faced with conflicting data about pex12 localization and function, researchers should implement these resolution strategies:
Methodological reconciliation:
Compare experimental conditions (cell fixation, buffer composition, antibody specificity)
Evaluate tag interference by testing multiple tag positions and types
Apply complementary techniques (biochemical fractionation, microscopy, proximity labeling)
Genetic background considerations:
Assess influence of strain differences on localization patterns
Create clean genetic backgrounds to eliminate confounding mutations
Use CRISPR-Cas9 for precise genome editing rather than overexpression systems
Functional validation:
Perform rescue experiments with variant constructs
Conduct domain swapping to identify critical regions
Implement rapid protein degradation systems (AID, dTAG) for acute functional analysis
Research on peroxins in different organisms has sometimes yielded seemingly contradictory results. For example, studies in yeast showed that Pex11 localizes to mitochondria in pex3 and pex19 mutants, while in H. polymorpha pex3 cells, Pex11 localizes to the ER . These discrepancies highlight the importance of careful experimental design and validation across multiple approaches.
Several cutting-edge technologies show promise for deepening our understanding of pex12 function:
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Determine high-resolution structure of pex12 in membrane environment
Visualize pex12 interactions within the peroxisome import complex
Map conformational changes during protein function
Optogenetic approaches:
Control pex12 activity with light-inducible domains
Manipulate peroxisome formation in real-time
Study acute effects of pex12 activation/inactivation
Single-molecule studies:
Track individual pex12 molecules during peroxisome biogenesis
Measure binding kinetics with interaction partners
Determine stoichiometry of functional complexes
Multi-omics integration:
Combine proteomics, metabolomics, and lipidomics to create comprehensive models
Identify previously unknown substrates and regulatory pathways
Map peroxisome-associated interaction networks
The application of these technologies to D. discoideum pex12 research could reveal novel aspects of peroxisome biology that are conserved across evolution and provide insights into fundamental cellular processes.
Research on D. discoideum pex12 could enable several innovative synthetic biology applications:
Engineered organelles:
Design minimal synthetic peroxisomes using pex12 and core peroxins
Create specialized metabolic compartments for biotechnology
Develop controllable protein targeting systems
Biosensor development:
Use pex12-based systems to detect peroxisome proliferation
Engineer stress-responsive peroxisome assembly
Create reporters for peroxisomal import efficiency
Therapeutic strategies:
Design peptide inhibitors of pathogenic protein-protein interactions
Develop peroxisome-targeted drug delivery systems
Create cell lines with enhanced detoxification capabilities
Recent bacteriolytic activity studies in D. discoideum provide a template for how cellular compartmentalization can enhance specific biochemical activities . Applying similar principles to engineered peroxisomes could create new tools for bioremediation, biocatalysis, and medical applications.
Robust experimental design for studying pex12 requires comprehensive controls:
Expression level controls:
Compare endogenous vs. overexpressed protein
Use inducible promoters to titrate expression
Quantify protein levels across experimental conditions
Localization controls:
Include known peroxisomal markers (matrix and membrane)
Use markers for other organelles to rule out mislocalization
Empty vector controls for tagged constructs
Functional validation controls:
Wild-type protein complementation
Domain-specific mutants
Interspecies complementation tests
Technical controls:
Multiple fixation methods for microscopy
Different subcellular fractionation techniques
Antibody specificity verification
Research on bacteriolytic activities in D. discoideum demonstrated the importance of pH controls, as certain activities were only detected at specific pH values mimicking phagosomal conditions . Similar considerations may apply to peroxisomal proteins, highlighting the importance of physiologically relevant experimental conditions.
To effectively study pex12 interactions within the peroxisomal importomer complex:
In vivo interaction studies:
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC)
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
Proximity-dependent biotin labeling (BioID, APEX)
Biochemical approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation with crosslinking
Blue native PAGE for intact complexes
Size exclusion chromatography combined with multi-angle light scattering
Structural biology methods:
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry
Cross-linking mass spectrometry
Single-particle cryo-EM of purified complexes
Functional reconstitution:
Liposome reconstitution assays
Cell-free expression systems
Permeabilized cell systems