Recombinant Dictyostelium discoideum Putative uncharacterized protein DDB_G0275587 (DDB_G0275587)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
DDB_G0275587Putative uncharacterized protein DDB_G0275587
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-53
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Dictyostelium discoideum (Slime mold)
Target Names
DDB_G0275587
Target Protein Sequence
MLFKSIISLS NSSKSLNNKI NNDNENNNLE FSSNKTTINP YSVFSYSRPL WNC
Uniprot No.

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

  • What is Dictyostelium discoideum and why is it valuable as a model organism for studying uncharacterized proteins?

Dictyostelium discoideum is a social amoeba that has emerged as a valuable model organism for investigating numerous aspects of eukaryotic cell biology. It offers significant advantages for studying uncharacterized proteins due to its unique biological properties and experimental tractability.

The value of D. discoideum stems from its utility in studying cell motility, adhesion, macropinocytosis, phagocytosis, host-pathogen interactions, and multicellular development . The organism also demonstrates remarkable conservation of DNA repair factors that are targets in cancer and other therapies, including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases that are targeted to treat breast and ovarian cancers .

Methodologically, D. discoideum offers several advantages:

  • Genetic tractability with established techniques for gene disruption or mutation by gene replacement

  • Well-developed genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 system

  • Multiple established methods for studying mutation rates and specific repair pathways

  • Resistance to various DNA damaging agents, making it ideal for studying genome stability

Importantly for uncharacterized protein research, genome analysis reveals that D. discoideum contains orthologs of several DNA repair pathway components otherwise limited to vertebrates, including the Fanconi Anemia DNA inter-strand crosslink and DNA strand break repair pathways .

  • How are putative uncharacterized proteins in Dictyostelium discoideum identified and characterized initially?

Putative uncharacterized proteins in D. discoideum are initially identified through genome sequencing analysis and subsequent computational annotation. The characterization process follows a systematic workflow:

Initial identification methods:

  • Genome sequencing and computational annotation

  • Identification of open reading frames (ORFs) without known function

  • Assignment of gene identifiers (e.g., DDB_G0275587) based on genomic location

  • Designation as "putative uncharacterized protein" when function cannot be predicted based on sequence homology

Preliminary characterization approach:

  • Bioinformatic analysis for domain identification and structural predictions

  • Sequence alignment with proteins of known function across species

  • Expression pattern analysis across developmental stages

  • Recombinant protein production for biochemical and structural studies

  • What expression systems are recommended for producing recombinant Dictyostelium discoideum proteins?

Several expression systems have been successfully employed for producing recombinant D. discoideum proteins, each with distinct advantages depending on research goals:

Table 1: Expression Systems for Recombinant D. discoideum Proteins

Expression SystemAdvantagesConsiderationsBest For
Yeast Expression SystemEukaryotic post-translational modifications; High yieldDifferent glycosylation patternsStructural studies requiring PTMs
Dictyostelium-based ExpressionNative post-translational modifications; Natural foldingLower yield than commercial systemsFunctional studies requiring authentic modifications
E. coli Expression SystemHigh yield; Cost-effective; Simplified purificationLack of post-translational modificationsStructural studies of domains without PTMs

For D. discoideum proteins, an approach using the organism's own expression machinery has shown particular promise. Research indicates that expression vectors based on the discoidin I-encoding gene promoter, linked to a D. discoideum leader peptide, can be effective . The expression can be induced by starving cells in a simple phosphate buffer, and the producing cells can be grown either on bacteria or on semi-synthetic media without affecting protein accumulation levels .

For researchers seeking higher yields, commercially available recombinant proteins are often produced in yeast expression systems, as indicated in multiple search results .

  • What recombinant antibody tools are available for Dictyostelium discoideum research?

The development of recombinant antibody (rAb) tools for D. discoideum has advanced significantly in recent years, addressing the historical challenge of limited reagent availability for this research community.

A comprehensive recombinant antibody toolbox has been developed specifically for D. discoideum research, using hybridoma sequencing and phage display techniques . This toolbox provides:

  • A panel of recombinant antibodies against D. discoideum antigens

  • Reliable reagents for labeling and characterization of proteins and subcellular compartments

  • Accessibility to the entire Dictyostelium research community

The methodology employed in developing these tools involved:

  • Hybridoma sequencing to determine antibody variable region sequences

  • Phage display for antibody selection and optimization

  • Conversion of traditional antibodies to recombinant format

This approach allows for consistent reproduction of antibodies without requiring ongoing hybridoma culture maintenance, significantly improving reagent reliability and accessibility .

For uncharacterized proteins specifically, researchers can utilize these established techniques to develop custom antibodies against their target of interest, providing essential tools for localization studies, functional characterization, and interaction analysis.

  • What basic experimental design considerations are important when studying uncharacterized proteins like DDB_G0275587?

When designing experiments to study uncharacterized proteins such as DDB_G0275587, several key experimental design principles must be considered:

Fundamental experimental design elements:

  • Clear definition of research objectives and hypotheses

  • Identification of independent and dependent variables

  • Determination of appropriate experimental conditions and treatments

  • Selection of suitable experimental design type (completely randomized, randomized block, factorial)

  • Determination of adequate sample size

  • Establishment of protocols for data collection and analysis

For uncharacterized protein studies specifically, consider the following methodological approach:

  • Pre-experimental Assessment:

    • Define clear research questions regarding the protein's potential function

    • Establish operational definitions of variables

    • Conduct preliminary bioinformatic analysis to guide hypothesis formation

  • Control Selection:

    • Include positive controls (well-characterized proteins in the same family)

    • Include negative controls (mock treatments or non-expressing cells)

    • Consider using gene knockout/knockdown approaches for functional validation

  • Variable Management:

    • Control experimental conditions meticulously (temperature, pH, cell density)

    • Standardize protein expression and purification protocols

    • Account for post-translational modifications that may affect function

The experimental approach should be systematic, moving from basic characterization (expression patterns, localization) to more complex functional studies (interaction partners, phenotypic effects of disruption).

Advanced Research Questions

  • How can I design comprehensive experiments to characterize the function of uncharacterized proteins like DDB_G0275587?

Characterizing uncharacterized proteins requires a multi-faceted experimental approach that integrates various methodologies. For proteins like DDB_G0275587, consider the following comprehensive strategy:

Stage 1: Preliminary Characterization

  • Expression profiling: Determine expression levels across developmental stages and under various stress conditions

  • Subcellular localization: Use GFP-tagging or immunofluorescence with recombinant antibodies to determine cellular distribution

  • Co-localization studies: Identify potential functional compartments through co-localization with known markers

Stage 2: Functional Interrogation

  • Gene disruption: Create knockout strains using CRISPR/Cas9 and characterize phenotypic consequences

  • Protein-protein interaction studies:

    • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

    • Yeast two-hybrid screening

    • Proximity labeling approaches (BioID or APEX)

  • Post-translational modification analysis: Identify phosphorylation, ADP-ribosylation, or other modifications

Stage 3: Pathway Integration

  • Stress response analysis: Examine changes in cellular response to DNA damage, oxidative stress, or other challenges

  • Genetic interaction mapping: Create double mutants with genes in suspected pathways

  • Transcriptomic/proteomic profiling: Compare wild-type and mutant strains

For uncharacterized proteins potentially involved in DNA repair (based on D. discoideum's conservation of DNA repair factors ), consider specifically designing experiments to assess:

  • Sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents

  • Recruitment to sites of DNA damage

  • Interaction with known DNA repair factors

  • Changes in mutation rates in knockout strains

The experimental design should include appropriate statistical approaches for each experiment, with consideration of biological replicates and appropriate controls to ensure reproducibility and validity of results .

  • What genome editing techniques are most effective for studying uncharacterized proteins in Dictyostelium discoideum?

Genome editing techniques have revolutionized the study of uncharacterized proteins in D. discoideum, with several approaches demonstrating particular effectiveness:

CRISPR/Cas9 System:
The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been successfully adapted for D. discoideum, enabling precise genome modifications . Recent methodological refinements have improved efficiency and specificity:

  • Optimized sgRNA design parameters for D. discoideum's AT-rich genome

  • Development of D. discoideum-specific Cas9 expression vectors

  • Established protocols for homology-directed repair (HDR) to introduce specific mutations or tags

Homologous Recombination-Based Approaches:
D. discoideum shows a preference for homologous recombination (HR) over non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) for DNA double-strand break repair , making HR-based gene targeting particularly effective:

  • Gene replacement vectors with selection markers

  • Knock-in strategies for protein tagging at endogenous loci

  • Conditional gene expression systems

Gene Inactivation Strategies:
For functional studies of uncharacterized proteins, several inactivation approaches have proven valuable:

  • Complete gene knockout via homologous recombination

  • REMI (Restriction Enzyme Mediated Integration) mutagenesis

  • RNA interference (RNAi)-based approaches for gene silencing

When specifically studying putative uncharacterized proteins like DDB_G0275587, consider designing genome editing experiments that:

  • Generate complete knockouts to evaluate essentiality and obvious phenotypes

  • Create tagged versions at endogenous loci to study localization and dynamics

  • Introduce specific mutations in predicted functional domains

  • Establish inducible expression systems for temporal control

Research has demonstrated that D. discoideum cells deficient in NHEJ proteins such as Ku70/80 show only minor impacts during growth on tolerance to agents that induce DNA double-strand breaks, as HR can be employed for repair . This suggests that HR-based genome editing approaches may be particularly effective in this organism.

  • How can I integrate DNA repair pathway analysis in Dictyostelium discoideum to infer potential functions of uncharacterized proteins?

D. discoideum has emerged as an excellent model for studying DNA repair pathways, with implications for understanding the potential functions of uncharacterized proteins. A systematic approach to integrate DNA repair pathway analysis includes:

Pathway-Focused Phenotypic Screening:
Expose wild-type and knockout strains to specific DNA-damaging agents to identify potential pathway involvement:

Table 2: DNA Damage Agents and Associated Repair Pathways

DNA-Damaging AgentPrimary Repair PathwaySecondary PathwaysPhenotypic Readout
CisplatinFanconi Anemia pathwayHomologous recombinationGrowth inhibition, Cell cycle arrest
Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)Base excision repairIncreased mutation rate
UV radiationNucleotide excision repairTranslesion synthesisSurvival rates
Ionizing radiationHomologous recombination, NHEJChromosome abnormalities

Molecular Pathway Analysis:
For uncharacterized proteins like DDB_G0275587, several approaches can determine potential involvement in DNA repair:

  • ADP-ribosylation studies: D. discoideum contains ADP-ribosyl transferases (ARTs) involved in DNA repair . Analyze:

    • Protein recruitment to damage sites

    • Post-translational modification changes following damage

    • Interaction with known ARTs

  • Strand break repair analysis: Methods established in D. discoideum can assess involvement in specific repair pathways:

    • NHEJ efficiency assays

    • HR reporter assays

    • Single-strand break repair kinetics

  • DNA damage response signaling:

    • Phosphorylation cascade analysis

    • Chromatin recruitment dynamics

    • Transcriptional response to damage

Research has shown that D. discoideum displays remarkable conservation of DNA repair factors that are targets in cancer therapies . For instance, the role of ADP-ribosyl transferases (Adprt1a, Adprt2, and Adprt1b) in regulating DNA repair pathway choice has been established (Figure 2 from reference ).

When studying uncharacterized proteins, examine their potential interaction with these established pathways by:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation with known repair factors

  • Co-localization at sites of induced DNA damage

  • Epistasis analysis using double mutants

  • Complementation studies in defined pathway mutants

This integrated approach can provide significant insights into the potential function of uncharacterized proteins within the context of DNA repair and genome stability.

  • What analytical approaches help resolve contradictory results in the characterization of uncharacterized proteins?

When facing contradictory results in the characterization of uncharacterized proteins like DDB_G0275587, researchers should employ systematic analytical approaches to resolve discrepancies:

Statistical Validation and Experimental Design Review:

  • Implement rigorous statistical analysis to determine significance of contradictory findings

  • Review experimental design for potential confounding variables

  • Apply meta-analysis techniques to integrate multiple experimental outcomes

  • Consider statistical experimental design (DOE) approaches to systematically explore parameter space

Multi-method Confirmation Strategy:
Employ orthogonal techniques to verify contradictory findings:

  • For localization discrepancies:

    • Compare antibody-based methods with fluorescent protein tagging

    • Use fractionation approaches alongside microscopy

    • Apply super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization

  • For functional assignment conflicts:

    • Combine genetic (knockout/knockdown) with biochemical approaches

    • Validate protein-protein interactions with multiple methods (Y2H, co-IP, proximity labeling)

    • Use both in vitro and in vivo functional assays

  • For expression pattern inconsistencies:

    • Compare RNA-seq with proteomics data

    • Validate with RT-qPCR and Western blotting

    • Examine expression in different genetic backgrounds

Systematic Variation Analysis:
Systematically examine potential sources of variation that could explain contradictory results:

Table 3: Sources of Variation and Resolution Strategies

Source of VariationAnalysis ApproachResolution Strategy
Cell growth conditionsCompare growth media, temperature, cell densityStandardize conditions across experiments
Genetic backgroundSequence verification, strain authenticationUse isogenic strains or complementation
Protein isoformsRNA-seq analysis, alternative splicingIsoform-specific reagents and analyses
Post-translational modificationsPhosphoproteomics, mass spectrometryCondition-specific analyses
Technical artifactsPositive and negative controlsMethod validation with known standards

For cases where contradictions persist despite these approaches, consider developing a conditional function model that incorporates seemingly contradictory results into a unified hypothesis, specifying the conditions under which each observation holds true.

Developing recombinant antibodies specific to putative uncharacterized proteins like DDB_G0275587 is particularly valuable given the limited commercial options for Dictyostelium research. A comprehensive development and validation strategy includes:

Generation of Recombinant Antibodies:
Based on successful approaches for D. discoideum , employ these methodologies:

  • Phage Display Selection:

    • Generate diverse antibody fragment libraries

    • Perform selections against recombinant DDB_G0275587

    • Isolate specific binders through multiple rounds of selection

    • Convert selected fragments to complete antibody formats

  • Hybridoma Development and Sequencing:

    • Immunize animals with recombinant DDB_G0275587

    • Generate hybridomas from responding B cells

    • Screen for specific binding

    • Sequence variable regions of promising clones

    • Reconstruct as recombinant antibodies

Antibody Validation Strategy:
Comprehensive validation is critical for antibodies against uncharacterized proteins:

Table 4: Validation Approaches for Recombinant Antibodies

Validation MethodTechnical ApproachSuccess Criteria
Specificity testingWestern blot against knockout cellsSingle band present in WT, absent in KO
Epitope mappingPeptide arrays or deletion constructsDefined binding region identified
Cross-reactivityTesting against related proteinsMinimal binding to homologous proteins
Application versatilityTesting in multiple techniques (IF, IP, WB)Consistent performance across applications
ReproducibilityBatch-to-batch comparisonConsistent binding characteristics

Production and Distribution:
For sustainable antibody resources:

  • Establish standardized production protocols

  • Document sequence information for reproducibility

  • Consider collaboration with antibody repositories

  • Share reagents with the Dictyostelium research community

Recent advances in recombinant antibody technology for D. discoideum have demonstrated the feasibility of this approach . By applying hybridoma sequencing and phage display techniques, researchers have successfully generated panels of recombinant antibodies against D. discoideum antigens. These have proven valuable for labeling and characterization of proteins and subcellular compartments .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.