Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. If you require a specific format, please specify this in your order notes. We will fulfill your request to the best of our ability.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
KEGG: cfa:608810
UniGene: Cfa.21607
What expression systems are optimal for producing recombinant dog NICN1?
Based on established recombinant protein production methods for canine proteins, several expression systems can be considered for recombinant dog NICN1:
The choice of expression system should be based on the intended application. For structural studies where high yield is prioritized, E. coli may be suitable. For functional studies requiring proper folding and post-translational modifications, insect or mammalian expression systems would be preferable .
What are the key considerations in designing a purification strategy for recombinant dog NICN1?
When designing a purification strategy for recombinant dog NICN1, researchers should consider:
Affinity tags: Addition of his-tag, GST, or other affinity tags facilitates purification. His-tag is commonly used for canine recombinant proteins .
Purification conditions: Since NICN1 is a nuclear protein, considerations for protein solubility and stability are important. Buffer optimization should include:
Quality control: The purity should be verified by SDS-PAGE (>85-95% purity is typically achievable), and identity confirmed by Western blot or mass spectrometry .
Functional verification: Nuclear localization of the recombinant protein can be verified using GFP-fusion constructs in cell culture systems .
Storage: For optimal stability, store in buffer containing 5-50% glycerol at -20°C/-80°C, avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles .
How can Design of Experiments (DoE) approach be applied to optimize recombinant dog NICN1 production?
Design of Experiments (DoE) provides a systematic approach to optimization that is more efficient than one-factor-at-a-time methods, particularly valuable for recombinant protein production . For dog NICN1 production, implement DoE as follows:
Define critical factors: Identify key variables affecting NICN1 expression and purification, such as:
Temperature (typically testing 16°C, 25°C, 30°C, 37°C)
Induction time points and duration
Inducer concentration (e.g., IPTG 0.1-1.0 mM for E. coli)
Media composition
pH range
Select appropriate DoE approach: For initial screening, use factorial designs; for optimization, response surface methodology is appropriate .
Experimental matrix: Create a designed set of experiments where multiple factors are varied simultaneously according to the DoE plan.
Response measurement: Define clear metrics for success (protein yield, purity, activity).
Statistical analysis: Use statistical software to analyze results and identify optimal conditions and significant interactions between factors .
DoE approach minimizes the number of experiments needed while providing robust data on factor interactions, reducing cost and time investment compared to traditional optimization approaches .
What methods are effective for studying the nuclear localization and function of dog NICN1?
To study nuclear localization and function of canine NICN1:
Fluorescent protein fusion constructs: Generate GFP-tagged or other fluorescent protein-tagged NICN1 constructs to visualize subcellular localization in live cells .
Cell fractionation: Separate nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions biochemically to confirm NICN1 localization by Western blotting.
Immunofluorescence microscopy: Use specific antibodies against NICN1 combined with nuclear stains (DAPI) to visualize endogenous protein localization.
Nuclear localization signal (NLS) mapping: Generate deletion or point mutation constructs to identify the NLS sequences within dog NICN1. Prediction of these signals can be performed using tools like InterPro, similar to the approach used for other nuclear proteins .
Interactome analysis: Identify nuclear binding partners using co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry, or yeast two-hybrid screening.
Chromatin association: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) can determine if NICN1 associates with specific DNA regions, similar to methods used for assessing H3K4me3 status in canine studies .
How can researchers investigate the potential role of dog NICN1 in gene regulation?
Given that NICN1 is a nuclear protein with potential roles in gene regulation, several approaches can be employed:
RNA-seq analysis: Compare gene expression profiles in cells with normal, overexpressed, or knocked-down NICN1 levels to identify regulated genes.
ChIP-seq: If NICN1 binds DNA or associates with chromatin, ChIP-seq can map genomic binding sites, similar to H3K4me3 ChIP-seq performed in canine spermatocytes .
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing: Generate NICN1 knockout or knockin cell lines to study resultant transcriptional changes.
Reporter gene assays: If specific target genes are identified, reporter constructs can test NICN1's effect on their promoter activities.
RNA immunoprecipitation: Determine if NICN1 associates with specific RNAs, particularly given the known interactions of human NICN1 mRNA with nuclear retention factors through its Alu elements .
Protein domain analysis: Generate truncation variants to map functional domains responsible for specific aspects of gene regulation.
What is known about the potential role of NICN1 in tumor suppression, and how can this be studied in canine models?
NICN1 has been identified as a tumor suppressor gene that promotes cell differentiation in cell lines derived from nasopharyngeal carcinomas . To study this function in canine models:
Expression profiling: Compare NICN1 expression levels in normal canine tissues versus tumor samples using qRT-PCR, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry.
Cell proliferation assays: Measure how NICN1 overexpression or knockdown affects proliferation rates in canine cancer cell lines.
Differentiation markers: Assess changes in differentiation markers when NICN1 levels are altered in canine cells.
Xenograft models: Test the effects of NICN1 modulation on tumor growth using canine cancer cells in appropriate animal models.
Pathway analysis: Investigate how NICN1 interacts with known tumor suppressor or oncogenic pathways in dogs.
Comparative analysis: Compare findings in canine models with human studies to identify conserved mechanisms of tumor suppression.
How does the nuclear retention of NICN1 mRNA through Alu element editing affect recombinant expression strategies?
Studies on human NICN1 have shown that its mRNA contains Alu elements in the 3'-UTR that undergo extensive A-to-I editing, which contributes to nuclear retention of the full-length transcript . This has important implications for recombinant expression:
Expression construct design: When designing expression vectors for dog NICN1, consider excluding the 3'-UTR containing the Alu elements to prevent nuclear retention of the transcript and maximize cytoplasmic expression.
Alternative transcript selection: Different NICN1 transcripts show varying degrees of nuclear/cytoplasmic localization. The shorter transcript lacking the edited Alu elements is almost exclusively cytoplasmic and may be preferential for expression systems .
Codon optimization: Consider using codon-optimized synthetic NICN1 coding sequences without the natural UTRs for higher expression in heterologous systems.
Expression monitoring: Evaluate both transcript levels and protein yields, as high mRNA levels may not correlate with high protein production if nuclear retention occurs.
Species differences: Investigate whether canine NICN1 transcripts undergo similar editing and retention as human transcripts, as this may vary between species.
What approaches can be used to investigate species-specific differences between human and canine NICN1?
To investigate species-specific differences between human and canine NICN1:
Comparative sequence analysis: Perform detailed sequence alignment of human, canine, and other mammalian NICN1 orthologs to identify conserved and variable regions.
Domain swap experiments: Create chimeric proteins containing domains from human and dog NICN1 to identify regions responsible for species-specific functions.
Cross-species complementation: Test whether dog NICN1 can rescue phenotypes in human cells with NICN1 knockdown and vice versa.
Interaction partner identification: Compare the interactomes of human and dog NICN1 using co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry.
3D structure comparison: If structures become available, compare the three-dimensional structures of human and dog NICN1 to identify structural differences.
Tissue expression patterns: Compare the tissue-specific expression patterns between species using qRT-PCR on matched tissue panels .
Response to stimuli: Investigate whether human and dog NICN1 respond differently to various cellular stresses or signaling pathways.
How can researchers address contradictory data in NICN1 functional studies?
When confronting contradictory data in NICN1 research:
Standardize experimental conditions: Ensure all comparative experiments use consistent cell types, expression levels, and assay conditions.
Validate reagents: Confirm specificity of antibodies and activity of recombinant proteins across different lots or sources.
Consider isoform diversity: Determine if contradictions arise from studying different splice variants or post-translationally modified forms of NICN1.
Replicate with multiple techniques: Verify findings using complementary methodologies to rule out technique-specific artifacts.
Check for cellular context dependencies: NICN1 function may vary based on cell type, developmental stage, or physiological state.
Meta-analysis approach: Systematically review all available data using statistical methods to identify patterns and sources of variability.
Replication by independent laboratories: Collaborate with other research groups to independently validate key findings using standardized protocols.
What are the key considerations for designing experiments to compare canine and human NICN1?
When designing comparative experiments:
Sequence verification: Ensure full sequencing of both canine and human NICN1 constructs to verify integrity.
Equivalent expression systems: Use identical expression vectors, tags, and host cells for both species' proteins.
Expression level normalization: Quantify expression levels and adjust conditions to achieve comparable protein levels.
Multiple cell lines: Test in both human and canine cell lines to account for species-specific cellular environments.
Appropriate controls: Include species-matched positive and negative controls in all assays.
Randomization and blinding: Implement proper experimental design principles including randomization and blinded analysis to prevent bias .
Statistical power calculation: Ensure sufficient replication based on anticipated effect sizes and variability .
Physiological relevance: Consider the natural expression levels and contexts of NICN1 in each species when interpreting results.
How should researchers approach the validation of recombinant dog NICN1 for functional studies?
Comprehensive validation should include:
Identity confirmation: Verify protein identity by:
Mass spectrometry analysis
Western blotting with specific antibodies
N-terminal sequencing
Purity assessment: Determine purity through:
Structural integrity: Assess proper folding by:
Circular dichroism spectroscopy
Limited proteolysis
Thermal shift assays
Functional validation: Confirm activity through:
Nuclear localization in transfected cells
Known protein-protein interactions
Gene regulation effects if established
Batch consistency: Establish lot-to-lot reproducibility by standardized characterization protocols.
Stability testing: Determine storage conditions that maintain activity.
What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing NICN1 expression and functional data?
Statistical analysis should be tailored to the experimental design:
Expression comparisons:
For comparing expression across multiple tissues: ANOVA followed by appropriate post-hoc tests
For comparing two conditions: t-tests (paired or unpaired as appropriate)
For non-normally distributed data: non-parametric alternatives (Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis)
Functional studies:
Dose-response relationships: non-linear regression models
Time-course experiments: repeated measures ANOVA or mixed models
Complex experimental designs: multifactorial ANOVA or generalized linear models
Reproducibility considerations:
Advanced approaches:
All statistical analyses should be clearly described with justification for tests chosen, significance thresholds, and corrections for multiple testing when applicable.