Recombinant Drosophila melanogaster Stellate protein CG33247 (Ste:CG33247) is a protein that is part of a family of Stellate proteins in Drosophila melanogaster . Stellate proteins are associated with sex chromosome meiotic drive, a phenomenon where certain chromosomes are preferentially passed on during sexual reproduction . Specifically, Ste:CG33247 is one of thirteen annotated Ste genes found on FlyBase .
The Ste genes, including Ste:CG33247, are located on the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster . Research indicates that Ste is an X chromosome-linked driver with a self-restraining mechanism that weakens its drive and prevents extinction .
The βTub-Ste piRNA-resistant transgenic strain was generated via phiC31 site-directed integration into the Drosophila melanogaster genome . The piRNA-resistant Ste cDNA was designed by introducing silent mutations throughout the entire CDS . The consensus sequence from the 13 annotated Ste genes on FlyBase (Ste:CG33236, Ste:CG33237, Ste:CG33238, Ste:CG33239, Ste:CG33240, Ste:CG33241, Ste:CG33242, Ste:CG33243, Ste:CG33244, Ste:CG33245, Ste:CG33246, Ste:CG33247, and SteXh:CG42398) was adopted to design the CDS .
Asymmetric Segregation: Ste exhibits asymmetric segregation during meiosis II . Immunofluorescence staining showed the presence of Ste (magenta) combined with Phalloidin staining (F-actin, blue) in a telophase II cell of XSte200/Y; Ubi-GFP-Pav males (GFP-Pav, green) .
Sex Ratio Distortion: RNAi-mediated depletion of Ste rescued the sex ratio distortion, confirming that Ste is responsible for the skewed sex ratio .
Mathematical modeling suggests that extinction is not the inevitable outcome of any X chromosome-linked drivers; only those exceeding a certain strength threshold lead to extinction . The asymmetric segregation of Ste during meiosis II weakens the drive strength below this critical threshold, allowing Ste to avoid the fate of extinction of a strong driver and resolving the paradox of sex chromosome drivers .
Su(Ste) is selected during evolution to counteract the distorted sex ratio caused by Ste . Additionally, the asymmetric segregation of Ste during meiosis II cannot prevent the meiotic failure caused by the high-level expression of Ste, thus requiring the action of Su(Ste) .
Note: While we will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Note: All protein shipments default to blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
The specific tag type is determined during production. Please specify your desired tag type for preferential development.
KEGG: dme:Dmel_CG33247
STRING: 7227.FBpp0289373
The Stellate (Ste) protein in Drosophila melanogaster is encoded by the Stellate gene located on the X chromosome. It is structurally homologous to the β-subunit of casein kinase II. In wild-type flies, Stellate gene expression is typically silenced through RNA interference mechanisms. When derepressed, the Stellate protein can cause significant meiotic defects, including abnormal chromosome condensation and segregation, and may lead to male sterility . Functionally, Stellate operates as part of the cry-Ste genetic interaction system, a complex between heterochromatic and euchromatic regions that is regulated by the piRNA pathway .
The Stellate genes in D. melanogaster are organized in two distinct clusters on the X chromosome:
The euchromatic Stellate (Ste eu) cluster located in the 12E1,2 region of the cytogenetic polytene map, containing approximately 12 tandem repeat copies .
The heterochromatic Stellate (Ste) cluster positioned in the h27 region of the mitotic prometaphase heterochromatin map, comprising about 20 copies .
Each heterochromatic Ste unit measures approximately 1250 base pairs, with open reading frames (ORFs) of 750 nucleotides in both clusters .
Researchers typically employ several approaches to study Stellate protein function:
Genetic manipulation: Creating flies with deleted or mutated Suppressor of Stellate Su(Ste) elements to observe Stellate derepression effects.
Fluorescence microscopy: Using FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) to visualize the chromosomal distribution of Stellate sequences, as demonstrated in studies of the cry-Ste system .
Southern blotting: For analyzing the repetitive nature and distribution of Stellate sequences in male and female genomes .
RNA interference assays: To study the mechanisms of Stellate silencing through the piRNA pathway.
Recombinant protein expression: Producing the protein in heterologous systems for biochemical and structural studies.
For recombinant expression of Stellate protein CG33247, researchers should consider:
Expression system selection: Based on experimental requirements, various systems can be employed:
E. coli: For high-yield, cost-effective production
Yeast: For improved protein folding and post-translational modifications
Baculovirus/insect cells: For more native-like protein modifications
Mammalian cells: For studying complex interactions with other Drosophila proteins
Optimization parameters:
Induction temperature (typically 16-25°C for improved solubility)
Expression time (4-24 hours depending on system)
Codon optimization for the expression host
Addition of solubility tags (His, GST, MBP)
Purification strategy:
Initial capture using affinity chromatography
Secondary purification via ion exchange or size exclusion
Buffer optimization to maintain protein stability
For detection and quantification of native or recombinant Stellate protein in Drosophila tissues:
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence:
Use anti-Stellate antibodies to detect protein localization in testis tissue sections
Counterstain with DAPI to visualize nuclei and chromosomes
Western blotting:
Sample preparation from testes tissue (typical protocol):
a. Dissect 20-30 pairs of testes in cold PBS
b. Homogenize in lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors
c. Centrifuge to clear debris
d. Quantify protein concentration
Detect using antibodies against Stellate protein
Use β-tubulin or GAPDH as loading controls
Quantitative mass spectrometry:
For precise quantification and identification of post-translational modifications
Particularly useful for comparing wild-type vs. Su(Ste)-deficient flies
Flow cytometry:
For quantification in cellular preparations from testes
The Stellate protein functions as an X chromosome-linked meiotic driver with a unique self-restraining mechanism that prevents excessive drive strength and population extinction . Research has revealed several key aspects of this system:
Drive mechanism:
Self-restraint mechanism:
Regulatory control:
Mathematical modeling data:
Several models demonstrate how Stellate's drive strength affects population dynamics:
| Drive Strength | X:Y Ratio | Population Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| <0.3 | <2:1 | Stable population |
| 0.3-0.6 | 2:1-5:1 | Declining fertility |
| >0.6 | >5:1 | Population extinction |
Note: Drive strength represents the proportion of Y-bearing sperm eliminated
When addressing contradictory findings regarding Stellate protein interactions:
Proximity labeling techniques:
BioID or APEX2 fusions with Stellate protein to identify true interacting partners in vivo
Helps distinguish between direct interactions and proteins that merely co-localize
In vitro reconstitution experiments:
Using purified components to test direct physical interactions
Examining the effect of Stellate on casein kinase II activity, given its homology to CK2β
Cross-linking mass spectrometry:
For identifying interaction surfaces and binding domains
Particularly useful for resolving conflicting reports about protein complexes
Live-cell imaging with FRET/BRET sensors:
For tracking dynamic interactions during meiosis
Can help resolve temporal aspects of contradictory findings
Domain mapping and mutational analysis:
Systematic mutation of key Stellate residues to identify functional domains
Correlation of biochemical interactions with in vivo phenotypes
The cry-Ste system appears to be unique to D. melanogaster while being absent in closely related species like D. simulans . Comparative evolutionary analysis provides valuable insights:
Phylogenetic profiling:
Methodology for evolutionary analysis:
Extract genomic DNA from multiple Drosophila species
Perform PCR amplification using conserved primers
Sequence and align homologous regions
Analyze selection pressures using dN/dS ratios
Perform chromatin immunoprecipitation to compare binding partners
Copy number variation analysis:
Expression pattern comparison:
Stellate protein aggregation can be problematic for structural and functional studies. Here are methodological approaches to resolve this issue:
Understanding the aggregation mechanism:
Prevention strategies:
Buffer optimization:
Screen buffers with varying pH (7.0-8.5)
Test different salt concentrations (150-500 mM NaCl)
Include stabilizing agents (5-10% glycerol, 1-5 mM DTT)
Expression conditions:
Lower induction temperature (16-18°C)
Reduce expression time
Co-express with chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)
Fusion partners:
MBP tag can dramatically improve solubility
SUMO fusion systems allow tag removal without residual amino acids
Purification adjustments:
Include mild detergents (0.05% Tween-20 or 0.1% CHAPS)
Consider on-column refolding protocols
Implement size exclusion chromatography as a final step to remove aggregation-prone species
Analysis of aggregation state:
Dynamic light scattering to monitor aggregation
Analytical ultracentrifugation to characterize oligomeric states
Thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing conditions
Studying meiotic drive presents unique challenges. Here are methodological solutions:
Genetic manipulation strategies:
Generate transgenic flies with inducible Stellate expression
Create fluorescently tagged Stellate variants for live imaging
Use CRISPR/Cas9 to modify endogenous Stellate genes
Cytological techniques:
Advanced squash preparations of testes for improved visualization:
a. Dissect testes in testis buffer (183 mM KCl, 47 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8)
b. Transfer to siliconized slide with 5 μl fixative (2% PFA in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100)
c. Place coverslip and apply gentle pressure
d. Flash-freeze in liquid nitrogen and remove coverslip
e. Process for immunofluorescence
Flow cytometric analysis:
For quantifying X:Y sperm ratios in experimental crosses
Protocol adjustments for Drosophila sperm:
a. Dissect seminal vesicles into PBS
b. Gently disrupt to release mature sperm
c. Fix in 2% paraformaldehyde
d. Stain with X and Y chromosome-specific FISH probes
e. Analyze by flow cytometry
Experimental design considerations:
Use genetic backgrounds lacking Su(Ste) to maximize Stellate expression
Implement temperature-sensitive systems to control timing of expression
Design crosses to track inheritance patterns through multiple generations
The Stellate system represents a fascinating model for studying evolutionary conflicts and meiotic drive mechanisms:
Comparative analysis across selfish genetic elements:
Compare Stellate with other drive systems (SD, t-haplotype)
Analyze common principles of drive mechanisms
Develop unified models of drive system evolution
Methodological approach for evolutionary studies:
Population genomics to map Stellate/Su(Ste) variation
Experimental evolution in laboratory populations
Mathematical modeling of drive system dynamics
Applications to synthetic drive systems:
Using principles from Stellate's self-limiting mechanism to design safer gene drives
Potential for applied genetic control strategies
Broader implications:
Understanding mechanisms of reproductive isolation
Insights into speciation processes
Models for intragenomic conflict resolution
Cutting-edge techniques that could advance Stellate research include:
Single-cell approaches:
Single-cell RNA-seq of developing spermatocytes to track gene expression changes
Single-cell proteomics to identify Stellate-responsive pathways
Spatial transcriptomics to map expression patterns within the testis
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize Stellate localization during meiosis
Live-cell imaging with photoactivatable fluorescent proteins
Correlative light and electron microscopy to examine crystalline aggregates
Structural biology approaches:
Cryo-EM analysis of Stellate aggregates and complexes
X-ray crystallography of purified Stellate protein
NMR studies of Stellate interactions with binding partners
Functional genomics:
Systematic CRISPR screens to identify genetic interactors
Proteomic analysis of Stellate-associated complexes during meiosis
Metabolomic profiling to identify downstream effects of Stellate expression
The interaction between Stellate and the piRNA pathway is central to understanding its regulation. Key methodological approaches include:
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and CLIP-seq:
Protocol optimization:
a. Cross-link testis tissue with UV or formaldehyde
b. Immunoprecipitate with antibodies against piRNA pathway components (Piwi, Aub, AGO3)
c. Extract and sequence associated RNAs
d. Identify Stellate-derived sequences
Small RNA sequencing:
Size-selection for piRNAs (23-30 nt)
Directional libraries to preserve strand information
Analysis pipeline to identify Stellate-targeting piRNAs
Genetic interaction studies:
Cross flies with mutations in piRNA pathway genes with Stellate reporter strains
Quantify effects on Stellate expression and crystalline aggregate formation
Create double and triple mutants to map genetic pathways
Biochemical reconstitution:
In vitro assembly of minimal piRNA silencing complexes
Testing Stellate targeting efficiency with synthetic piRNAs
Measuring kinetic parameters of silencing reactions
| piRNA Pathway Component | Effect on Stellate Expression When Mutated | Experimental Readout |
|---|---|---|
| Piwi | Strong derepression | High levels of crystalline aggregates |
| Aubergine (Aub) | Moderate derepression | Intermediate crystalline aggregate formation |
| AGO3 | Moderate derepression | Intermediate crystalline aggregate formation |
| Spindle-E (SpnE) | Strong derepression | High levels of crystalline aggregates |
| Squash (Squ) | Weak derepression | Few crystalline aggregates |
The unique asymmetric segregation of Stellate protein during both meiosis I and II is crucial to its function as a self-limiting meiotic driver . Methods to track this include:
Live imaging approaches:
Generate transgenic flies expressing fluorescently tagged Stellate (e.g., Stellate-GFP)
Optimize ex vivo culture conditions for Drosophila testes
Use time-lapse confocal microscopy to track protein distribution during meiotic divisions
Implement photobleaching or photoactivation to trace protein movement
Quantitative immunofluorescence:
Fix testes at specific meiotic stages
Use antibodies against Stellate protein and meiotic markers
Measure fluorescence intensity ratios between daughter cells
Implementation of standardized measurement protocols:
a. Define regions of interest around each daughter cell
b. Calculate background-subtracted fluorescence intensity
c. Normalize to cell volume or DNA content
d. Compare ratios across multiple cells and experiments
Correlating protein distribution with functional outcomes:
Track individual cells through both meiotic divisions
Correlate Stellate distribution with subsequent cell fate (survival vs. death)
Use genetic markers to distinguish X and Y-bearing cells
Establishing causality:
Artificial targeting of Stellate to specific chromosomes or cellular compartments
Testing the effects of forced symmetrical distribution