Recombinant Enterobacter sp. Probable Intracellular Septation Protein A (Ent638_2285) is a bacterially expressed protein derived from the endophytic bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638, which forms symbiotic relationships with poplar plants . This protein, encoded by the gene Ent638_2285 (UniProt ID: A4WB74), is implicated in bacterial cell division and septation processes. Produced recombinantly in E. coli, it serves as a critical tool for studying bacterial physiology and host-microbe interactions .
The protein is synthesized in E. coli via recombinant DNA technology, followed by affinity chromatography using the His tag . Lyophilized formulations ensure stability, with reconstitution recommended in sterile water supplemented with glycerol (5–50%) for long-term storage .
Genomic Location: The Ent638_2285 gene resides on the 4.5 Mb chromosome of Enterobacter sp. 638, which also harbors a 157 kb plasmid (pENTE01) .
Conservation: Limited to Enterobacter spp., though structural analogs exist in other Gram-negative bacteria .
Antibiotic Target Discovery: Septation proteins are potential targets for disrupting bacterial cell division .
Plant-Microbe Interaction Studies: Investigating its role in endophytic colonization and symbiosis .
Structural Biology: Crystallization studies to elucidate septation mechanisms.
Functional Characterization: No experimental data directly link Ent638_2285 to septation; knockout studies are needed.
Pathway Elucidation: Unclear interaction partners or regulatory networks .
Biotechnological Potential: Engineered strains could enhance phytoremediation or agricultural productivity .
KEGG: ent:Ent638_2285
STRING: 399742.Ent638_2285
Ent638_2285, also known as YciB or Inner membrane-spanning protein YciB, is a probable intracellular septation protein found in Enterobacter species. It is a 179-amino acid membrane protein (UniProt ID: A4WB74) that appears to be involved in bacterial cell division processes and potentially in metabolite transport . The protein is thought to contribute to maintaining proper cell shape and division symmetry, as mutations in similar proteins have been shown to affect these processes in related bacterial species .
The full amino acid sequence of Ent638_2285 (1-179aa) is:
MKQFLDFLPLVVFFAFYKLYDIYAATTALIVATAIVLIYTWIRYRKVEKMALITFVLVAVFGGLTVFFHNDEFIKWKVTVIYGLFAGALLFSQWVMNKPLIQRMLGKEITLPQEVWSRLNIAWAVFFILCGLANIYIAFWMPQNIWVNFKVFGLTALTLIFTLLSGVYIYKHMPQDDKH
This sequence reveals characteristics of a transmembrane protein with hydrophobic regions consistent with its proposed localization in the inner membrane.
While direct experimental evidence for Ent638_2285 is limited in the available literature, research on similar inner membrane proteins suggests it may play a role in maintaining bacterial cell shape. Studies on related proteins indicate that mutations in inner membrane proteins can lead to shape abnormalities and affect cell division processes . In various bacteria, proper shape maintenance is crucial for accurate chromosome segregation and cell division, with abnormalities potentially leading to increased rates of anucleate cells or other division defects .
Recombinant Ent638_2285 has been successfully expressed in E. coli expression systems with an N-terminal His tag . For optimal expression of this membrane protein, consider the following methodology:
Use specialized E. coli strains designed for membrane protein expression (e.g., C41(DE3), C43(DE3))
Express at lower temperatures (16-25°C) to reduce inclusion body formation
Consider IPTG concentrations between 0.1-0.5 mM for induction
Extend expression time to 16-24 hours at lower temperatures
This approach helps balance protein yield with proper folding of the membrane protein.
A multi-step purification approach is recommended:
Cell lysis using appropriate detergents (e.g., n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside or CHAPS) to solubilize membrane proteins
Initial purification using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography with imidazole gradient elution
Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates and contaminants
Optional ion exchange chromatography for highest purity
This strategy has been shown to yield protein with purity greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE .
Based on the product information, the following storage protocol is recommended:
Store lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to 5-50% (50% recommended) final concentration
Aliquot and store at -20°C/-80°C for long-term storage
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
This protocol helps maintain protein stability and prevents degradation during storage.
To investigate Ent638_2285's function in cell division, researchers should consider a multi-faceted approach:
Gene knockout/knockdown studies:
Generate Ent638_2285 deletion mutants
Quantify changes in cell morphology, division frequency, and septum formation
Measure anucleate cell formation rates (normally <0.03% in wild-type vs. potentially higher in mutants)
Protein localization:
Create fluorescent protein fusions (e.g., GFP-Ent638_2285)
Use super-resolution microscopy to track localization during the cell cycle
Co-localization studies with known septation proteins
Complementation assays:
Express wild-type Ent638_2285 in knockout strains to confirm phenotype rescue
Test point mutations to identify essential functional residues
These approaches would provide insights into whether Ent638_2285 influences cell division similar to other intracellular septation proteins.
Research suggests Ent638_2285/YciB may be involved in metabolite transport . To investigate this function:
Transport assays:
Compare uptake rates of various radiolabeled metabolites in wild-type vs. Ent638_2285 mutants
Measure changes in membrane potential using fluorescent dyes
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Perform pull-down assays to identify interaction partners
Use bacterial two-hybrid systems to screen for interactions with known transporters
Metabolomic profiling:
Compare intracellular and extracellular metabolite profiles between wild-type and mutant strains
Look for specific metabolite classes that show altered concentrations
This systematic approach would help characterize any transport function of Ent638_2285.
Research indicates YciB (Ent638_2285) may be linked to resistance against contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) toxins . Investigators can explore this connection through:
Resistance development assays:
Challenge bacteria with CDI toxins and select for resistant mutants
Sequence yciB/Ent638_2285 in resistant strains to identify protective mutations
Protein-toxin interaction studies:
Assess direct binding between purified Ent638_2285 and CDI toxins
Perform competition assays with wild-type and mutant strains expressing different levels of Ent638_2285
Mechanistic investigations:
Determine if Ent638_2285 acts as a receptor for toxin entry
Investigate whether it functions in a complex with other membrane proteins to confer resistance
Understanding this function could provide insights into bacterial competition mechanisms and potential antimicrobial targets.
To explore connections between Ent638_2285 and bacterial shape:
Morphometric analysis:
Cell wall analysis:
Examine peptidoglycan synthesis patterns in mutants vs. wild-type
Investigate localization relative to cell wall synthesis machinery
Cytoskeletal interactions:
Established research shows that similar membrane proteins, when mutated, can cause cells to grow as irregularly sized spheres instead of rods, with reduced chromosome segregation accuracy .
Membrane protein aggregation is a common challenge. Implement these strategies:
Optimize detergent selection:
| Detergent Class | Examples | Recommended Concentration |
|---|---|---|
| Mild non-ionic | DDM, DM | 1-2× CMC |
| Zwitterionic | CHAPS, FC-12 | 0.5-1% w/v |
| Steroid-based | Digitonin | 0.1-0.5% w/v |
Solubilization optimization:
Test different detergent-to-protein ratios
Include stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids)
Evaluate solubilization at different temperatures (4°C vs. room temperature)
Purification modifications:
Add detergent to all buffers above CMC
Include lipids or amphipols for protein stabilization
Consider on-column refolding techniques
These approaches can significantly reduce aggregation while maintaining protein structure and function.
Researchers encountering contradictory results should consider:
Strain-specific differences:
Compare protein sequences across strains to identify variations
Assess genetic background effects by complementation in multiple strains
Experimental condition variations:
Standardize growth conditions (media, temperature, growth phase)
Document all buffer compositions and experimental parameters precisely
Functional redundancy:
Investigate potential backup systems that may mask phenotypes
Create double or triple mutants of functionally related genes
Technical considerations:
Validate antibody specificity for detection experiments
Confirm knockout/knockdown efficiency using multiple methods
Use appropriate statistical analyses for subtle phenotypes
This systematic approach helps distinguish true biological variations from technical artifacts.