Recombinant Enterobacter sp. UPF0208 membrane protein Ent638_2839 (Ent638_2839)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Supplied as a lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement. We will accommodate your request whenever possible.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping is available upon request; please contact us in advance for pricing and arrangements.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its inclusion.
Synonyms
Ent638_2839; UPF0208 membrane protein Ent638_2839
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-151
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Enterobacter sp. (strain 638)
Target Names
Ent638_2839
Target Protein Sequence
MSTPENPSVSFFSLFRRGQLYAKTWPLEKRLAPVFVDNRVIRITRYAIRFMPPIAVFTLC WQIALGGQLGPAVATALFALSLPMQGLWWLGKRSVTPLPPTILNWFYEVRGKLQEAGQAL APVEGKPDYQALADTLKRAFKQLDKTFLDDL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
UPF0208 family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is UPF0208 membrane protein Ent638_2839 and why is it significant for research?

UPF0208 membrane protein Ent638_2839 is a membrane protein from Enterobacter sp. (strain 638) with 151 amino acid residues. The designation "UPF" (Uncharacterized Protein Family) indicates that while the protein has been identified through genomic analysis, its precise biological function remains to be fully elucidated. This protein is significant for research as it represents an opportunity to explore novel membrane protein functions in bacterial systems, particularly those related to Enterobacter species which have clinical and environmental relevance .

The methodological approach to studying proteins of unknown function typically involves comparative genomics, structural analysis, and functional assays to determine potential roles in cellular processes. Given that approximately 30% of eukaryotic genes encode membrane proteins involved in crucial biological functions like transport, signaling, and cell adhesion, characterizing novel membrane proteins remains an important research frontier .

What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining stability of recombinant Ent638_2839?

The recombinant UPF0208 membrane protein Ent638_2839 requires specific storage conditions to maintain structural integrity and functional activity. For short-term storage (up to one week), working aliquots can be maintained at 4°C. For medium-term storage, the protein should be kept at -20°C in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol which has been optimized for this specific protein .

For long-term preservation, storage at -80°C is recommended. It's critical to note that repeated freezing and thawing cycles significantly compromise protein integrity and should be avoided. This is particularly important for membrane proteins, which are inherently less stable outside their native lipid environment. A methodological approach is to prepare small working aliquots during initial receipt of the protein to minimize freeze-thaw cycles .

How should researchers prepare recombinant Ent638_2839 for experimental use?

When preparing recombinant Ent638_2839 for experiments, researchers should follow a methodical protocol to ensure maximum protein viability:

  • Thaw the protein slowly on ice to minimize structural disruption

  • Avoid vigorous vortexing which can cause protein denaturation

  • If dilution is required, use the same buffer composition as the storage buffer (Tris-based with 50% glycerol) whenever possible

  • For incorporation into experimental systems, consider the hydrophobic nature of membrane proteins and use appropriate detergents or lipid environments

For membrane protein studies, it's essential to recognize that special handling is required due to their hydrophobic nature. Unlike soluble proteins, membrane proteins like Ent638_2839 require an amphipathic environment to maintain their native conformation and prevent aggregation .

What membrane enrichment techniques are most effective for studying Ent638_2839 in its native context?

For studying Ent638_2839 in its native cellular context, several membrane enrichment techniques have demonstrated efficacy. Based on comparative studies of membrane protein enrichment methods, a combination of ultracentrifugation followed by urea washing has shown superior results for integral membrane proteins like Ent638_2839 .

The recommended methodological approach involves:

  • Cell homogenization in buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA with protease inhibitors)

  • Differential centrifugation steps (1,000g, then 10,000g)

  • Ultracentrifugation at approximately 438,000g for 30 minutes

  • Membrane washing with 8M urea (pH 7-7.5) for 20 minutes at 4°C

  • Recovery of membrane fraction by ultracentrifugation after dilution

This protocol has been shown to significantly enhance the identification of integral membrane proteins by removing contaminating peripheral and cytosolic proteins. Research indicates this method can increase identification of multi-spanning transmembrane proteins by up to sixfold compared to unwashed membrane preparations .

What analytical techniques are most suitable for characterizing the structure and function of Ent638_2839?

Given the challenges associated with membrane protein analysis, a multi-technique approach is recommended for characterizing Ent638_2839:

TechniqueApplicationAdvantagesLimitations
LC-MS/MSProtein identification, post-translational modificationsHigh sensitivity, comprehensive coverageSample preparation critical for membrane proteins
Circular DichroismSecondary structure analysisRelatively simple sample requirementsLimited structural resolution
Proteoliposome ReconstitutionFunctional studiesNative-like lipid environmentTechnical complexity
Cryo-EMHigh-resolution structural analysisWorks well for membrane proteinsRequires specialized equipment
Protein-Protein Interaction AssaysFunctional networksIdentifies binding partnersMay miss transient interactions

For bottom-up proteomics approaches using LC-MS/MS, the membrane enrichment protocol described in question 2.1 significantly improves detection and characterization of integral membrane proteins like Ent638_2839. The urea washing step is particularly critical for removing peripheral proteins that may otherwise dominate the analytical signal .

How can researchers overcome solubility challenges when working with recombinant Ent638_2839?

Membrane proteins like Ent638_2839 present inherent solubility challenges due to their hydrophobic nature. A methodological approach to address these challenges includes:

  • Use of appropriate detergents for solubilization - mild non-ionic detergents like DDM (n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside) or LMNG (lauryl maltose neopentyl glycol) often provide good results

  • Addition of lipids during purification to stabilize native structure

  • Optimization of buffer conditions (pH, salt concentration, glycerol percentage)

  • Employment of amphipathic polymer systems like nanodiscs or SMALPs (styrene maleic acid lipid particles)

When solubilizing Ent638_2839 from membrane preparations, researchers should avoid harsh detergents that might denature the protein. The effectiveness of solubilization can be monitored by techniques such as size-exclusion chromatography to ensure monodispersity of the protein preparation .

What strategies should be employed for expressing and purifying Ent638_2839 for structural studies?

For high-yield expression and purification of Ent638_2839 suitable for structural studies, researchers should consider implementing this methodological workflow:

  • Expression system selection:

    • E. coli is confirmed as a viable host for Ent638_2839 expression

    • The protein can be produced with a His-tag for affinity purification

    • Expression region spanning amino acids 1-151 covers the full-length protein

  • Optimal purification strategy:

    • Affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA for His-tagged protein

    • Size exclusion chromatography to ensure monodispersity

    • Detergent exchange during purification if required for downstream applications

  • Quality control assessments:

    • SDS-PAGE to verify purity

    • Mass spectrometry to confirm identity

    • Circular dichroism to assess proper folding

For structural studies specifically, maintaining protein stability throughout the purification process is critical. The addition of stabilizing agents in the buffer may be necessary, and screening multiple detergents is often required to identify optimal conditions for structural preservation .

How can researchers investigate potential protein-protein interactions involving Ent638_2839?

Investigating protein-protein interactions for membrane proteins requires specialized approaches. For Ent638_2839, the following methodological strategy is recommended:

  • In vivo approaches:

    • Bacterial two-hybrid systems adapted for membrane proteins

    • Proximity-based labeling techniques (BioID, APEX) to identify neighboring proteins

    • Co-immunoprecipitation with crosslinking to capture transient interactions

  • In vitro approaches:

    • Pull-down assays using purified His-tagged Ent638_2839

    • Surface plasmon resonance with immobilized protein

    • Microscale thermophoresis for detecting interactions in solution

  • Bioinformatic prediction:

    • Sequence-based interaction prediction

    • Structural modeling to identify potential interaction interfaces

The membrane enrichment protocol described earlier (urea washing after isolation of membranes) has been shown to preserve protein-protein interactions while removing contaminants, making it particularly valuable for interaction studies. This approach can reveal membrane protein complexes and clusters that might be disrupted by more aggressive solubilization methods .

What computational approaches are valuable for predicting the function of UPF0208 family proteins like Ent638_2839?

For uncharacterized proteins like Ent638_2839, computational approaches offer valuable insights into potential functions. A comprehensive methodology includes:

  • Sequence-based analysis:

    • Identification of conserved domains and motifs

    • Multiple sequence alignment with characterized proteins

    • Phylogenetic analysis to identify functionally characterized homologs

  • Structure-based prediction:

    • Homology modeling using related structures as templates

    • Ab initio modeling for regions without templates

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to predict conformational dynamics

  • Integrative approaches:

    • Gene neighborhood analysis

    • Co-expression network construction

    • Metabolic pathway mapping

The UPF0208 family designation indicates current knowledge gaps, making computational prediction particularly valuable. The complete amino acid sequence of Ent638_2839 (MSTPENPSVSFFSLFRRGQLYAKTWPLEKRLAPVFVDNRVIRITRYAIRFMPPIAVFTLCWQIALGGQLGPAVATALFALSLPMQGLWWLGKRSVTPLPPTILNWFYEVRGKLQEAGQALAPVEGKPDYQALADTLKRAFKQLDKTFLDDL) provides the foundation for these computational analyses .

How can researchers differentiate between UPF0208 (Ent638_2839) and other similar membrane proteins such as UPF0266 (Ent638_2389)?

Differentiating between similar membrane proteins like UPF0208 (Ent638_2839) and UPF0266 (Ent638_2389) requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Sequence-based differentiation:

    • UPF0208 (Ent638_2839) has 151 amino acids with UniProt accession A4WCS4

    • UPF0266 (Ent638_2389) has 152 amino acids with UniProt accession A4WBH8

    • The amino acid sequences are distinct despite similar lengths

  • Analytical differentiation techniques:

    • Specific antibodies raised against unique epitopes

    • Peptide mass fingerprinting targeting unique tryptic peptides

    • SRM/MRM (Selected/Multiple Reaction Monitoring) mass spectrometry

  • Functional differentiation:

    • Development of specific activity assays based on predicted functions

    • Gene knockout studies with complementation testing

When analyzing membrane proteomes containing both proteins, LC-MS/MS analysis after proper membrane enrichment can differentiate between these proteins based on their unique peptide signatures. The membrane preparation methods discussed earlier are crucial for ensuring sufficient coverage of these hydrophobic proteins .

What are the technical challenges in studying transmembrane topology of Ent638_2839 and how can they be addressed?

Determining transmembrane topology of integral membrane proteins like Ent638_2839 presents several technical challenges that can be addressed through specialized methodologies:

For membrane proteins with uncharacterized topology like Ent638_2839, a combination of computational prediction and experimental validation typically yields the most reliable results. The hydrophobic regions in the amino acid sequence (e.g., IAVFTLCWQIALGGQLGPAVATALFALSLPM) suggest potential transmembrane domains that should be specifically targeted in these analyses .

How can researchers assess the functional activity of Ent638_2839 given its uncharacterized nature?

Assessing functional activity for uncharacterized membrane proteins like Ent638_2839 requires an exploratory approach combining various techniques:

  • Phenotypic analysis:

    • Gene knockout/knockdown studies to identify phenotypic changes

    • Overexpression studies to identify gain-of-function effects

    • Complementation assays in related bacterial species

  • Biochemical characterization:

    • ATP/GTP binding and hydrolysis assays to test for enzymatic activity

    • Transport assays for various substrates in reconstituted systems

    • Binding assays with potential ligands identified through computational predictions

  • Cellular localization studies:

    • Subcellular fractionation to confirm membrane localization

    • Co-localization with proteins of known function

    • Dynamics studies under different growth conditions

When designing functional assays for UPF0208 family proteins, researchers should consider that membrane proteins commonly function in transport, signaling, or structural roles. The experimental design should incorporate controls with characterized membrane proteins to validate the assay system. Membrane preparation using the urea washing method can provide a cleaner background for functional studies by removing contaminating activities from peripheral proteins .

What emerging technologies hold promise for advancing our understanding of Ent638_2839 and similar UPF proteins?

Several cutting-edge technologies are poised to accelerate research on uncharacterized membrane proteins like Ent638_2839:

  • Advanced structural methods:

    • Cryo-electron tomography for in situ structural determination

    • Micro-electron diffraction (MicroED) for membrane protein crystals

    • Integrative structural biology combining multiple data sources

  • High-throughput functional screening:

    • CRISPR-based functional genomics screens

    • Activity-based protein profiling for function discovery

    • Deep mutational scanning to identify critical residues

  • Single-molecule techniques:

    • Single-molecule FRET to study conformational dynamics

    • Nanopore analysis for potential transport functions

    • Single-particle tracking in reconstituted systems

These emerging technologies can overcome traditional limitations in membrane protein research and may be particularly valuable for proteins like Ent638_2839 that lack functional annotation. When applied in combination with the optimized membrane preparation methods discussed earlier, these approaches can provide unprecedented insights into the structure, function, and interactions of uncharacterized membrane proteins .

How can multi-omics approaches be applied to elucidate the biological role of Ent638_2839?

Multi-omics integration offers powerful strategies for functional characterization of uncharacterized proteins like Ent638_2839:

  • Integrated methodological approach:

    • Transcriptomics: Identify co-expressed genes under various conditions

    • Proteomics: Map protein-protein interactions and post-translational modifications

    • Metabolomics: Detect metabolic changes upon gene deletion/overexpression

    • Phenomics: Characterize growth and stress response phenotypes

  • Data integration framework:

    • Correlation analysis across multiple omics layers

    • Network-based analysis to position Ent638_2839 in cellular pathways

    • Machine learning approaches to predict function from integrated data

  • Validation strategy:

    • Targeted experiments to test hypotheses generated from multi-omics data

    • Genetic manipulation to confirm predicted functions

    • Biochemical assays designed based on multi-omics predictions

The membrane enrichment protocol featuring urea washing is particularly valuable for proteomics within this multi-omics framework, as it significantly enhances identification of membrane proteins and their interacting partners. This methodological approach can reveal functional associations that might otherwise remain hidden in complex cellular systems .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.