Recombinant Enterococcus faecalis Glutathione biosynthesis bifunctional protein gshAB (gshAB), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Glutathione Biosynthesis Bifunctional Protein gshAB

Glutathione biosynthesis bifunctional protein gshAB is an enzyme crucial for the synthesis of glutathione, a tripeptide thiol that plays a central role in maintaining cellular redox balance across various organisms. While specific information on "Recombinant Enterococcus faecalis Glutathione biosynthesis bifunctional protein gshAB (gshAB), partial" is limited, understanding its function and significance can be inferred from studies on similar proteins in other bacteria.

Function and Structure of gshAB

The gshAB protein synthesizes glutathione from L-glutamate and L-cysteine via gamma-L-glutamyl-L-cysteine. This process involves two sequential reactions typically catalyzed by separate enzymes, but in some bacteria, these reactions are unified in a bifunctional enzyme like gshAB . The bifunctionality allows for efficient glutathione production, which is essential for protecting cells against oxidative stress.

Role in Oxidative Stress Resistance

Glutathione is a major antioxidant that helps cells resist oxidative stress. In pathogenic bacteria, such as Streptococcus agalactiae, the ability to synthesize glutathione is linked to virulence and survival within the host . While Enterococcus faecalis is not as commonly associated with neonatal infections as Streptococcus agalactiae, its ability to resist oxidative stress could contribute to its persistence in various environments.

Research Findings and Implications

OrganismRole of gshABImplications
Streptococcus agalactiaeEssential for resistance to oxidative stress and virulence .Targeting gshAB could provide novel therapeutic strategies against infections.
Enterococcus faecalisPresumed role in oxidative stress resistance, though specific studies are lacking.Understanding its role could inform strategies to combat antibiotic resistance.

Potential Applications and Future Research

The study of glutathione biosynthesis bifunctional proteins like gshAB in various bacteria can lead to insights into bacterial survival mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. For Enterococcus faecalis, further research is needed to elucidate the specific role of gshAB in its pathogenesis and resistance to oxidative stress.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
gshAB; gshF; EF_3089Glutathione biosynthesis bifunctional protein GshAB; Gamma-GCS-GS; GCS-GS) [Includes: Glutamate--cysteine ligase; EC 6.3.2.2; Gamma-ECS; GCS; Gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase); Glutathione synthetase; EC 6.3.2.3; GSH synthetase; GS; GSH-S; GSHase; Glutathione synthase)]
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Enterococcus faecalis (strain ATCC 700802 / V583)
Target Names
gshAB
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein synthesizes glutathione from L-glutamate and L-cysteine via the intermediate gamma-L-glutamyl-L-cysteine.

Database Links

KEGG: efa:EF3089

STRING: 226185.EF3089

Protein Families
Glutamate--cysteine ligase type 1 family, Type 2 subfamily

Q&A

What is the bifunctional glutathione biosynthesis protein in Enterococcus faecalis and how does it differ from traditional glutathione synthesis pathways?

The bifunctional glutathione biosynthesis protein in Enterococcus faecalis represents a unique enzymatic platform that combines two catalytic functions typically performed by separate enzymes. Unlike the traditional glutathione biosynthesis pathway that relies on sequential activity of two separate ligases (GshA and GshB), the bifunctional protein (GshF) unifies both necessary reactions in a single enzyme platform . This protein contains a canonical bacterial GshA module that catalyzes the condensation of L-glutamate and L-cysteine to form γ-glutamylcysteine, linked to a novel ATP-grasp-like module responsible for the subsequent formation of glutathione from γ-glutamylcysteine and glycine . The structural arrangement of these modules within a single protein represents an evolutionary adaptation that has been identified and characterized in several pathogenic and free-living bacteria .

What are the structural components of the bifunctional GshF protein and how do they contribute to its function?

The bifunctional GshF protein consists of two primary structural modules that work in concert to synthesize glutathione. Crystal structure analyses of prototypic GshF enzymes from related species reveal:

  • A canonical bacterial GshA module at the N-terminal region that catalyzes the first reaction (condensation of L-glutamate and L-cysteine)

  • A novel ATP-grasp-like module at the C-terminal region responsible for the second reaction (addition of glycine to γ-glutamylcysteine)

  • An unprecedented subdomain in the ATP-grasp module positioned at the interface of the GshF dimer

This unique subdomain at the dimer interface appears strategically positioned to mediate intersubunit communication and allosteric regulation of enzymatic activity . The entire bifunctional platform operates as a dynamic dimeric assembly, with the spatial arrangement of the modules enabling efficient substrate channeling between the two catalytic sites . This structural organization likely contributes to enhanced catalytic efficiency compared to separate enzymes performing the same reactions.

How can researchers confirm the expression of functional GshF/GshAB protein in Enterococcus faecalis?

Confirming functional expression of GshF/GshAB protein in Enterococcus faecalis requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Genetic analysis: PCR amplification of the gshF gene using specific primers, followed by sequence verification to confirm the presence of intact reading frames for both catalytic domains.

  • Protein expression analysis: Western blot analysis using antibodies specific to conserved epitopes of GshF, or tag-based detection if working with recombinant versions.

  • Functional assays: Measurement of glutathione synthesis activity by:

    • Quantifying glutathione levels using HPLC or enzymatic assays

    • Measuring ATP consumption during the synthesis reaction

    • Monitoring the formation of reaction intermediates (γ-glutamylcysteine)

  • Complementation studies: Determining if the E. faecalis gshF gene can restore glutathione synthesis in bacterial mutants lacking traditional glutathione synthesis pathways.

For reliable results, researchers should include appropriate positive and negative controls and validate findings through at least two independent methodological approaches.

How does the dimeric structure of GshF affect its enzymatic activity and what methods can be used to investigate the allosteric regulation mechanisms?

The dimeric structure of GshF significantly impacts its enzymatic activity, with crystal structures revealing an unprecedented subdomain in the ATP-grasp module positioned at the dimer interface that appears to mediate intersubunit communication and allosteric regulation . To investigate these allosteric mechanisms, researchers can employ several methodological approaches:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis: Introducing mutations at key residues within the subdomain at the dimer interface to disrupt intersubunit communication, followed by kinetic analyses to measure changes in catalytic efficiency.

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS): This technique can identify regions of the protein that undergo conformational changes upon substrate binding, helping to map allosteric networks within the protein.

  • Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS): Can be used to analyze conformational changes in solution under different substrate concentrations or regulatory conditions.

  • Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET): By strategically labeling different domains with fluorophores, researchers can monitor conformational changes and domain movements during catalysis.

  • Molecular dynamics simulations: Computational approaches can model the dynamic behavior of the dimer interface and predict how substrate binding at one site affects the other catalytic site.

When investigating allosteric regulation in GshF, it's crucial to consider both intramolecular communication between the two catalytic modules within a single polypeptide chain and intermolecular communication between the two subunits of the dimer. The experimental design should include controls that differentiate these two types of regulation.

What are the key experimental considerations for optimizing recombinant expression of Enterococcus faecalis GshF/GshAB in heterologous systems?

Optimizing recombinant expression of Enterococcus faecalis GshF/GshAB in heterologous systems requires addressing several critical experimental considerations:

ParameterConsiderationsOptimization Strategies
Expression System- Codon usage differences
- Potential toxicity
- Post-translational modifications
- Use codon-optimized gene sequences
- Test multiple expression systems (E. coli, yeast, etc.)
- Consider gram-positive expression hosts
Expression Conditions- Growth temperature
- Induction timing and concentration
- Media composition
- Lower temperature (16-25°C) often improves folding
- Test different induction parameters
- Supplement with manganese (known to be important for E. faecalis metabolism)
Protein Solubility- Formation of inclusion bodies
- Improper folding
- Use solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO)
- Co-express with molecular chaperones
- Test detergents for membrane-associated fractions
Purification Strategy- Maintaining enzymatic activity
- Preserving dimeric structure
- Avoid harsh elution conditions
- Include stabilizing agents in buffers
- Consider native purification methods
Activity Verification- Substrate availability
- Coupled enzyme assays
- Ensure availability of all substrates (glutamate, cysteine, glycine, ATP)
- Verify both enzymatic activities separately

When working with the bifunctional protein, it's critical to verify that both enzymatic activities are preserved in the recombinant protein. This can be assessed by monitoring the formation of both γ-glutamylcysteine (first reaction) and glutathione (second reaction). Additionally, analytical gel filtration should be employed to confirm that the recombinant protein maintains its native dimeric state, as this is essential for full functionality .

How can researchers investigate the potential role of GshF/GshAB in Enterococcus faecalis virulence and stress response?

Investigating the role of GshF/GshAB in Enterococcus faecalis virulence and stress response requires a multidisciplinary approach combining molecular genetics, physiological assays, and infection models:

  • Gene knockout and complementation studies:

    • Create a clean deletion of the gshF gene

    • Complement with wild-type and catalytically inactive versions

    • Assess changes in glutathione levels and redox homeostasis

  • Stress challenge assays:

    • Oxidative stress (H₂O₂, superoxide generators)

    • Antibiotic tolerance

    • Acid/alkaline stress

    • Metal stress (particularly relevant as E. faecalis has been shown to scavenge manganese in stress conditions)

  • Virulence factor expression analysis:

    • Transcriptomics (RNA-Seq) comparing wild-type and gshF mutants

    • Proteomics to identify differentially expressed virulence factors

    • Specific assays for known virulence determinants (e.g., cytolysin, gelatinase)

  • Biofilm formation assessment:

    • Quantitative biofilm assays with crystal violet staining

    • Confocal microscopy to analyze biofilm architecture

    • Expression analysis of biofilm-related genes (particularly relevant as E. faecalis has shown significant up-regulation of biofilm formation genes under stress)

  • In vivo infection models:

    • Urinary tract infection models (as UTIs are the most common infection caused by enterococci)

    • Invertebrate models (C. elegans, G. mellonella)

    • Mammalian models with appropriate controls and ethical considerations

When designing these experiments, it's important to consider that glutathione plays crucial roles in redox homeostasis and stress response. Therefore, researchers should distinguish between direct effects of GshF/GshAB on virulence versus indirect effects mediated through altered stress resistance. Additionally, the analysis should consider that E. faecalis strains from different origins (clinical, probiotic, etc.) may have similar capacities to grow under stress conditions but may differ in their virulence potential based on the presence of specific fitness and virulence factors rather than expression levels .

What methodologies are most effective for studying the kinetic parameters of the bifunctional GshF/GshAB and how do they compare to the traditional two-enzyme pathway?

Studying the kinetic parameters of bifunctional GshF/GshAB requires specialized approaches to address its unique dual-catalytic nature:

A comparative analysis table for presenting kinetic data might look like this:

When conducting these analyses, researchers should be aware that the bifunctional enzyme likely exhibits complex kinetic behavior due to potential substrate channeling and allosteric effects between the two active sites. Additionally, the dimeric nature of the enzyme may result in cooperative kinetics that should be carefully analyzed using appropriate models beyond simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics.

How can structural insights from Enterococcus faecalis GshF/GshAB inform the development of novel antimicrobial strategies?

Structural insights from Enterococcus faecalis GshF/GshAB offer several promising avenues for antimicrobial development:

  • Structure-based inhibitor design: The crystal structures of bifunctional GshF enzymes reveal unique architectural features that can be exploited for selective inhibition . Specifically targeting:

    • The interface between GshA and ATP-grasp modules

    • The unprecedented subdomain in the ATP-grasp module at the dimer interface

    • Substrate binding pockets unique to the bifunctional arrangement

  • Allosteric inhibitors: The identification of an unprecedented subdomain that mediates intersubunit communication and allosteric regulation presents opportunities to develop compounds that disrupt this regulation, potentially inhibiting enzyme function without directly competing with substrates.

  • Dimer disruption strategy: Since GshF operates as a dynamic dimeric assembly , compounds that interfere with dimer formation could inhibit function while avoiding the challenges of active site-directed inhibition.

  • Targeted degradation approaches: Knowledge of the protein structure enables the development of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) or similar technologies that could selectively mark GshF for degradation in bacterial cells.

When pursuing these strategies, researchers should consider that:

  • Glutathione plays a crucial role in defending against oxidative stress, which is a common antibacterial mechanism

  • Inhibition of glutathione biosynthesis may sensitize bacteria to existing antibiotics

  • The structural differences between bacterial GshF and mammalian glutathione synthesis enzymes enable selective targeting

A comprehensive approach would combine structural biology techniques with medicinal chemistry and microbiology to develop and validate potential inhibitors against a panel of pathogenic bacteria containing bifunctional glutathione synthases.

What gene manipulation strategies can be applied to study the physiological roles of GshF/GshAB in Enterococcus faecalis?

Multiple gene manipulation approaches can be employed to investigate the physiological roles of GshF/GshAB in Enterococcus faecalis:

  • Precision gene deletion approaches:

    • CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for markerless deletions

    • Homologous recombination using temperature-sensitive plasmids

    • Creation of conditional knockouts using inducible promoters

    • Domain-specific deletions to separate the two enzymatic functions

  • Expression modulation strategies:

    • Antisense RNA expression to reduce GshF levels

    • Inducible promoter replacements to control expression timing

    • Riboswitch-based regulation systems

    • Degron tagging for controlled protein degradation

  • Point mutation analysis:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of catalytic residues in each active site

    • Mutation of residues at the domain interface

    • Mutation of dimeric interface residues

    • Introduction of reporter residues (e.g., for fluorescence studies)

  • Fusion protein approaches:

    • Epitope tagging for immunoprecipitation studies

    • Fluorescent protein fusions for localization studies

    • Split-protein complementation assays to study protein interactions

    • FRET-based sensors to monitor substrate binding or conformational changes

When designing these genetic manipulations, researchers should consider:

  • The essentiality of glutathione in different growth conditions

  • Potential polar effects on downstream genes

  • The need for complementation studies to confirm phenotype specificity

  • The importance of controlling expression levels in complementation experiments

The transcriptomic profiling methods demonstrated in Enterococcus faecalis studies can be particularly valuable for assessing the broader impacts of GshF/GshAB manipulation on cellular physiology and stress responses.

How can comparative genomic and transcriptomic approaches enhance our understanding of GshF/GshAB evolution and function across bacterial species?

Comparative genomic and transcriptomic approaches offer powerful frameworks for understanding GshF/GshAB evolution and function:

  • Phylogenetic analysis of GshF distribution:

    • Mapping GshF presence across bacterial taxonomy

    • Identifying evolutionary events (gene fusion, horizontal transfer)

    • Correlating GshF presence with ecological niches and pathogenicity

    • Analyzing selection pressures on different protein domains

  • Structural gene comparison:

    • Alignment of GshF sequences from diverse bacteria

    • Identification of conserved versus variable regions

    • Correlation of sequence variations with enzymatic efficiency

    • Structural modeling across species to identify functional adaptations

  • Transcriptomic profiling under stress conditions:

    • RNA-Seq analysis comparing wild-type and gshF-deficient strains

    • Identification of compensatory mechanisms in different species

    • Studying differential regulation in pathogenic versus non-pathogenic strains

    • Analysis of expression patterns in host-mimicking conditions (similar to E. faecalis growth in human urine)

  • Integrated multi-omics approaches:

    • Combining transcriptomics with proteomics and metabolomics

    • Correlating glutathione levels with global stress responses

    • Comparative analysis across multiple bacterial species

    • Network analysis to identify regulatory connections

The Grad-seq technique demonstrated for analyzing Enterococcus faecalis RNA-protein complexes could be particularly valuable for understanding potential regulatory interactions involving GshF or its mRNA. This approach provides global RNA and protein sedimentation profiles leading to the identification of RNA-protein complexes .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.