KEGG: efa:EF0914
STRING: 226185.EF0914
Translation Initiation Factor IF-3 in E. faecalis, encoded by the infC gene, consists of two distinct domains connected by a flexible linker. Similar to other bacterial IF-3 proteins, it comprises an N-terminal domain (NTD) and a C-terminal domain (CTD), each with specific functional roles. The CTD carries out most of the known functions of IF-3 and can independently sustain bacterial growth, while the NTD plays important roles in interacting with initiator tRNA and coordinating the movement of both domains during the translation initiation pathway .
While the general two-domain structure of IF-3 is conserved across bacterial species, notable differences exist in E. faecalis compared to model organisms like E. coli. Unlike E. coli IF-3, which is known to utilize an AUU (ATT) start codon for translational regulation, E. faecalis infC is annotated to start with the canonical ATG codon. This difference may impact regulatory mechanisms controlling IF-3 expression levels and subsequent effects on translation initiation efficiency .
Translation Initiation Factor IF-3 in E. faecalis serves multiple critical functions:
Acts as a fidelity factor during assembly of the ternary initiation complex
Ensures correct recognition of start codons in mRNA
Facilitates proper pairing of the initiator tRNA anticodon with the start codon in the ribosomal P-site
Prevents premature docking of the 50S ribosomal subunit to the 30S pre-initiation complex
Stabilizes free 30S subunits
Enables 30S subunits to bind to mRNA
Verifies accuracy against the first aminoacyl-tRNA
Promotes rapid codon-anticodon pairing for initiator tRNA binding
For effective recombinant expression of E. faecalis IF-3, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:
Vector Selection: Choose expression vectors compatible with E. faecalis, such as those based on the pWV01 replicon.
Optimized Codons: Ensure the coding sequence utilizes codons optimized for E. faecalis expression.
Promoter Selection: Utilize constitutive promoters like P23 for stable expression or inducible promoters for controlled expression.
Transformation Strategy: For clinical E. faecalis strains with limited transformation efficiency, consider conjugation using donor strains such as E. faecalis CK111, which contains chromosomally integrated pWV01 repA gene under the control of the lactococcal P23 promoter.
Selection Markers: Incorporate appropriate antibiotic resistance markers for selection of transformants.
Expression Verification: Confirm successful expression through Western blotting and functional assays .
Purification of recombinant E. faecalis IF-3 requires careful consideration of its biochemical properties and typically follows these steps:
Expression Optimization: Express the recombinant protein with an affinity tag (His-tag or GST-tag) to facilitate purification.
Cell Lysis: Use optimized lysis buffers (typically containing 20-50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100-300 mM NaCl, 5-10% glycerol) with protease inhibitors.
Affinity Chromatography: Purify using Ni-NTA columns for His-tagged proteins or glutathione resins for GST-tagged proteins.
Tag Removal: If necessary, remove affinity tags using site-specific proteases.
Ion Exchange Chromatography: Further purify using anion or cation exchange chromatography based on the protein's isoelectric point.
Size Exclusion Chromatography: Perform final purification step to remove aggregates and ensure homogeneity.
Verification: Confirm purity by SDS-PAGE and functionality through activity assays with 30S ribosomal subunits .
Several complementary approaches can be employed to study E. faecalis IF-3-ribosome interactions:
Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulations: Investigate atomic-level interactions between IF-3 domains and ribosomal components or initiator tRNA.
Site-Directed Mutagenesis: Introduce mutations at key residues (e.g., R25A/Q33A/R66A in the NTD) to disrupt specific interactions.
Cryo-Electron Microscopy: Visualize IF-3 binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit at different stages of initiation.
Fluorescence-Based Assays: Use fluorescently labeled IF-3 to monitor binding kinetics and conformational changes.
Toe-Printing Assays: Assess the impact of IF-3 on mRNA positioning on the ribosome.
Filter-Binding Assays: Quantitatively measure IF-3 affinity for ribosomes under various conditions.
Ribosome Dissociation Assays: Evaluate the role of IF-3 in preventing premature 50S subunit association .
The coordination between the N-terminal (NTD) and C-terminal (CTD) domains of E. faecalis IF-3 involves a sophisticated interplay crucial for translation initiation fidelity:
E. faecalis IF-3 serves as a critical checkpoint for translation initiation fidelity through multiple mechanisms:
Start Codon Discrimination: IF-3 monitors the codon-anticodon interaction between mRNA and initiator tRNA, preferentially stabilizing complexes with canonical start codons (primarily AUG in E. faecalis, which accounts for 81.5% of start codons).
Non-canonical Start Codon Regulation: For non-canonical start codons (GUG: 10%, UUG: 8.5% in E. faecalis), IF-3 modulates initiation efficiency, likely through conformational changes that affect stability of the initiation complex.
Initiator tRNA Verification: IF-3 specifically verifies features of the initiator tRNA, including the characteristic three consecutive GC base pairs in its anticodon stem that facilitate preferential binding to the ribosomal P-site.
Dissociation Promotion: When non-cognate tRNAs or incorrect start codons are present, IF-3 increases dissociation of the initiation complex, preventing inappropriate translation initiation.
50S Subunit Association Control: IF-3 prevents premature docking of the 50S ribosomal subunit until a correct initiation complex has formed .
The genetic context of the infC gene in E. faecalis presents several interesting features that influence its expression and function:
Start Codon Selection: Unlike E. coli infC, which uses a rare AUU start codon for autoregulation, E. faecalis infC is annotated to use the canonical AUG start codon, potentially impacting its translational regulation mechanisms.
Genomic Environment: The genomic context of infC in E. faecalis may include nearby genes involved in translation or ribosome biogenesis, creating potential for coordinated regulation.
Recombination Potential: E. faecalis exhibits high levels of recombination, which may facilitate the acquisition of genetic elements affecting infC expression. This recombination capability contributes to the genetic plasticity of E. faecalis and may influence the evolution of translation initiation mechanisms.
Regulatory Elements: The promoter region and other regulatory elements affecting infC expression in E. faecalis may differ from those in model organisms, potentially leading to species-specific regulation patterns.
Horizontal Gene Transfer Impacts: The capability of E. faecalis to participate in horizontal gene transfer, particularly through conjugative plasmids, may influence infC expression if regulatory elements are acquired through such mechanisms .
Designing strategic mutations in E. faecalis IF-3 provides powerful tools for investigating translation initiation mechanisms:
Domain-Specific Mutations:
C-terminal Domain (CTD): Mutations affecting ribosome binding can isolate the role of CTD in start codon recognition
N-terminal Domain (NTD): Targeted mutations (e.g., R25A/Q33A/R66A) can disrupt interactions with initiator tRNA without affecting NTD structure
Linker Region: Alterations in the flexible linker can assess its role in coordinating domain movements
Functional Residue Targeting:
Residues involved in RNA binding
Residues affecting domain interactions
Residues mediating conformational changes
Experimental Approach:
Site-directed mutagenesis to create precise amino acid substitutions
Domain swapping between E. faecalis and other bacterial IF-3 proteins
Truncation mutations to assess domain-specific functions
Phenotypic Analysis Methods:
Research on E. faecalis IF-3 has significant implications for understanding antibiotic resistance mechanisms:
Translation-Targeting Antibiotics: Many antibiotics (tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, macrolides) target the bacterial translation apparatus. Understanding how IF-3 functions in E. faecalis can reveal potential species-specific vulnerabilities or resistance mechanisms.
Stress Response Connection: Translation initiation regulation via IF-3 may influence how E. faecalis responds to antibiotic stress, potentially affecting expression of resistance genes.
Biofilm Formation Impact: IF-3-mediated translation regulation may influence expression of factors involved in biofilm formation, which can contribute to antibiotic tolerance.
Antibiotic Development Opportunities: Structural and functional differences between E. faecalis IF-3 and human translation factors could present targets for developing selective antibiotics.
Resistance Gene Expression: Understanding how IF-3 affects start codon selection efficiency could inform models of resistance gene expression under antibiotic pressure, especially for genes using non-canonical start codons .
Comparative analysis of IF-3 across clinically relevant bacterial species reveals important differences and similarities:
| Feature | E. faecalis IF-3 | E. coli IF-3 | Other Bacterial IF-3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Start Codon | Predominantly AUG | AUU (rare start codon) | Varies by species |
| Autoregulation | Less understood | Via AUU start codon | Species-dependent |
| Domain Structure | Two domains with flexible linker | Two domains with flexible linker | Generally conserved two-domain structure |
| CTD Function | Primary role in ribosome binding | Primary role in ribosome binding | Predominantly conserved function |
| NTD Function | Critical for tRNA interactions | Important for full function | Variable importance |
| Species Distribution | Single copy in genome | Single copy in genome | Multiple copies in some bacteria, chloroplasts, and mitochondria |
Key differences include:
Regulatory mechanisms: E. faecalis likely employs different translational regulation strategies compared to E. coli
Start codon preferences: E. faecalis primarily uses AUG (81.5%), with less frequent use of alternative start codons
Species-specific interactions: Potential differences in ribosome-binding interfaces and initiator tRNA recognition
Evolutionary adaptations: Variations that may reflect adaptations to different ecological niches and stress responses
Researchers working with recombinant E. faecalis IF-3 commonly encounter several challenges that can be addressed through specific methodological approaches:
Protein Solubility Issues:
Challenge: IF-3 may form inclusion bodies when overexpressed
Solution: Optimize expression conditions (lower temperature, reduced induction), use solubility-enhancing fusion tags (SUMO, MBP), or develop refolding protocols from inclusion bodies
Functional Activity Maintenance:
Challenge: Recombinant IF-3 may lose activity during purification
Solution: Include stabilizing agents (glycerol, reducing agents), minimize freeze-thaw cycles, and verify activity with functional assays
Expression Host Selection:
Challenge: Choosing appropriate expression systems for E. faecalis proteins
Solution: E. coli BL21(DE3) derivatives work well for initial trials; for complex cases, consider gram-positive expression hosts like B. subtilis or L. lactis
Codon Usage Differences:
Challenge: Codon bias may affect expression efficiency
Solution: Optimize codons for the expression host or use strains with rare tRNA supplements
Genetic Manipulation:
When conducting functional assays with E. faecalis IF-3, researchers should consider these troubleshooting approaches for common artifacts:
Non-specific Binding in Ribosome Binding Assays:
Artifact: High background signal suggesting non-specific binding
Troubleshooting: Adjust salt concentration (typically 100-300 mM), include competitors like BSA or tRNA, and perform careful controls with mutated IF-3 variants
Domain Misfolding Detection:
Artifact: Unexpected functional outcomes due to improper domain folding
Troubleshooting: Verify structural integrity through circular dichroism, thermal shift assays, or limited proteolysis before functional testing
Aggregation During Assays:
Artifact: Progressive loss of activity during experiments
Troubleshooting: Include stabilizing agents, perform size exclusion chromatography immediately before assays, and monitor protein stability with dynamic light scattering
Ribosomal Preparation Variability:
Artifact: Inconsistent results between different ribosome preparations
Troubleshooting: Standardize ribosome isolation protocols, verify ribosome quality through activity assays, and include internal controls
Buffer Composition Effects:
Several promising research directions could significantly advance our understanding of E. faecalis IF-3:
Structural Dynamics Investigation:
High-resolution structural studies of E. faecalis IF-3 in complex with the 30S ribosomal subunit
Time-resolved cryo-EM to capture different states during translation initiation
Computational modeling of domain movements during the initiation process
Regulatory Network Mapping:
Comprehensive analysis of factors affecting infC expression in E. faecalis
Investigation of potential autoregulatory mechanisms specific to E. faecalis
Systems biology approaches to place IF-3 within the broader translational control network
Start Codon Selection Mechanisms:
Detailed comparison of E. faecalis IF-3 discrimination between canonical (AUG) and non-canonical (GUG, UUG) start codons
Investigation of potential leaderless mRNA translation mechanisms in E. faecalis
Analysis of potential specialized translation initiation during stress conditions
Novel Therapeutics Development:
Screening for small molecules that specifically target E. faecalis IF-3
Structure-based design of peptides that disrupt IF-3 function
Investigation of combination approaches targeting translation initiation
Evolutionary Adaptation Analysis:
Structural studies of E. faecalis IF-3 hold significant potential for antimicrobial development through several promising approaches:
Structure-Based Drug Design:
High-resolution structures of E. faecalis IF-3, particularly in complex with the 30S ribosomal subunit, could reveal unique binding pockets
Computational screening against these pockets could identify lead compounds that specifically disrupt IF-3 function
Rational design of peptidomimetics targeting the interface between IF-3 domains or between IF-3 and ribosomal components
Species-Specific Targeting:
Detailed structural comparisons between E. faecalis IF-3 and human translation factors could identify bacterial-specific features
Development of compounds that selectively bind to bacterial-specific regions, minimizing off-target effects
Exploitation of differences in domain organization and linker regions unique to bacterial IF-3
Resistance Mechanism Circumvention:
Structural understanding of how mutations in IF-3 might confer resistance to translation-targeting antibiotics
Design of compounds targeting multiple sites simultaneously to reduce resistance development
Development of adjuvants that enhance the effectiveness of existing antibiotics by modulating IF-3 function
Novel Binding Site Identification: