Recombinant Equine Herpesvirus 1 Glycoprotein N (gN), also designated as the UL49.5 product or gene 10-encoded protein, is a critical envelope glycoprotein essential for viral replication and egress. This recombinant version is produced in Escherichia coli with an N-terminal histidine (His) tag for purification and structural studies .
Key Specifications (Based on Commercial Recombinant Product):
Property | Details |
---|---|
Catalog Number | RFL29483EF |
Source | E. coli |
Tag | N-terminal His tag |
Protein Length | Full-length mature protein (28–100 amino acids) |
Purity | >90% (SDS-PAGE confirmed) |
AA Sequence | DPGVKQRIDVAREEERRDFWHAACSGHGFPITTPSTAAILFYVSLLAVGVAVACQAYRAVLRIVTLEMLQHLH |
Storage Buffer | Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% trehalose, pH 8.0 |
Applications | SDS-PAGE, glycoprotein interaction studies |
gM/gN Complex Formation:
The gN-gM complex is stabilized by disulfide bonds, as evidenced by altered electrophoretic mobilities under nonreducing conditions .
Coexpression of gN and gM is necessary for the maturation of gM to its endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H (endo H)-resistant form .
Deletion of gN (ΔUL49.5) results in:
Viral Egress and Entry:
gN-Dependent gM Processing:
Functional Redundancy:
Glycoprotein | Primary Function | Dependency | Impact of Deletion |
---|---|---|---|
gN (UL49.5) | gM processing and virion assembly | Required for gM maturation | Severe replication defect |
gK | Cell-to-cell spread and egress | Partially redundant | Reduced plaque size, syncytia |
gD | Host cell entry (via MHC-I binding) | Essential for entry | Impaired infection in equine cells |
gM | Envelope stability and virion release | Requires gN for processing | No virion formation |
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting:
Reverse Genetics:
Vaccine Targets:
KEGG: vg:1487565
Glycoprotein N (gN) is one of twelve glycoproteins encoded by Equine herpesvirus 1, an alphaherpesvirus that causes respiratory distress, abortion, and neurological disease in horses. The glycoproteins of EHV-1 are potential candidates for vaccine antigens . gN appears to play a critical role in the viral envelope structure and functions primarily through its interaction with Glycoprotein M (gM). Current research demonstrates that gN is necessary and sufficient for functional processing of gM, suggesting its importance in viral maturation . Unlike some other EHV-1 glycoproteins, gN alone demonstrates low immunogenicity in horses, but when co-expressed with gM, it contributes to significant antigenicity.
EHV-1 is closely related to Equine herpesvirus 4 (EHV-4), with both being endemic in horses worldwide. While both viruses replicate in the upper respiratory tract, EHV-1 additionally causes abortion and equine herpesvirus myeloencephalopathy (EHM) . The glycoproteins between these two viruses show varying degrees of amino acid identity, which contributes to their different pathogenicities. While detailed specific differences between gN in EHV-1 versus other herpesviruses are not extensively documented in the search results, it's noteworthy that some glycoproteins like gD show approximately 77% amino acid identity between EHV-1 and EHV-4 . This suggests that viral glycoproteins, including potentially gN, have type-specific regions that may be associated with the differing clinical manifestations between related herpesviruses.
The molecular characteristics of EHV-1 gN are not extensively described in the search results, but when co-expressed with gM, these proteins form a complex with a molecular mass of over 250 kDa as observed by immunoblot analysis . It remains unclear whether this large molecular mass protein contains only gM or both gM and gN . This suggests that gN may undergo significant post-translational modifications or complex formation that alters its apparent molecular weight when expressed in the presence of gM.
Research has shown that co-expression of gM and gN significantly enhances their antigenicity compared to when each is expressed individually. Immunoblot analysis revealed that when gM and gN are co-expressed in 293T cells, they form a high molecular weight complex (over 250 kDa) that strongly reacts with horse sera against EHV-1 . This enhanced antigenicity was not observed when either glycoprotein was expressed alone.
Methodologically, this enhancement can be demonstrated through:
Transfection of 293T cells with expression plasmids encoding gM alone, gN alone, or both gM and gN together
Immunoblot analysis using sera from EHV-1-infected horses to detect antigen-antibody reactions
Comparison of band intensity and molecular weight patterns between individual expression and co-expression conditions
The enhanced antigenicity observed with co-expression suggests that the gM/gN complex presents epitopes that are either not present or not properly folded when each protein is expressed individually . This highlights the importance of protein-protein interactions in achieving proper conformation and immunogenicity of viral glycoproteins.
This observation suggests that the immunogenicity of gN is highly dependent on its interaction with gM, which likely facilitates proper protein folding and presentation of antigenic determinants. For vaccine development strategies targeting EHV-1, this finding emphasizes the importance of considering protein complexes rather than individual proteins for optimal immunogenicity.
For next-generation EHV-1 vaccines, several approaches could be considered:
Development of subunit vaccines containing the co-expressed gM/gN complex
Design of DNA vaccines encoding both gM and gN to ensure co-expression in host cells
Creation of virus-like particles (VLPs) incorporating the gM/gN complex in its native conformation
When developing such vaccines, it's important to consider that immunity against closely related viruses like EHV-4 does not provide strong protection against EHV-1-associated diseases . Research on glycoprotein D suggests that type-specific immune responses may be important for protection against EHV-1 . By analogy, identifying type-specific epitopes within the gM/gN complex could improve vaccine efficacy.
Expression in 293T cells via transfection with appropriate expression plasmids
Cell lysis under conditions that preserve protein conformation
Affinity chromatography using tags incorporated into the recombinant protein
Size exclusion chromatography to separate the high molecular weight gM/gN complex
Verification of purified proteins by immunoblot analysis using specific antibodies or horse sera
Given that co-expression of gM and gN enhances their antigenicity, purification strategies should consider isolating the complex rather than individual proteins for applications requiring functional activity .
Based on the research, several analytical techniques have proven valuable for characterizing the gM/gN complex:
Immunoblot analysis: This technique has been successfully used to detect the high molecular weight complex (>250 kDa) formed when gM and gN are co-expressed .
Co-immunoprecipitation: While not explicitly mentioned for gM/gN, this approach was referenced for other glycoprotein complexes (gE/gI) and could be applied to study the interaction between gM and gN .
Molecular weight determination: Comparing the molecular weights of individually expressed versus co-expressed glycoproteins provides insights into complex formation and potential post-translational modifications .
Luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assays: While described for studying gD fragments, this technique could potentially be adapted for analyzing gM/gN interactions and antibody responses .
These techniques collectively provide information about protein-protein interactions, complex formation, and immunological recognition of the gM/gN complex.
While the search results don't provide direct evidence on how the gM/gN interaction affects viral assembly and egress, they do suggest that this interaction is important for protein maturation and antigenicity . Research has shown that "gN is necessary and sufficient for functional processing of gM," indicating an essential role in ensuring proper gM functionality .
By analogy with other herpesviruses, the gM/gN complex likely plays important roles in:
Secondary envelopment of virus particles
Trafficking of viral glycoproteins to sites of viral assembly
Incorporation of other viral glycoproteins into the virion envelope
Membrane fusion events during viral entry and egress
Further research using recombinant viruses with mutations in gM and gN would help elucidate the precise role of this complex in the viral life cycle.
Future structural biology approaches that could address this question include:
Mutational analysis to identify critical residues required for gM-gN interaction
X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy of the purified complex
Computational modeling based on homologous proteins in related herpesviruses
FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) analysis of fluorescently labeled proteins to study their interaction dynamics
Understanding these structural determinants could provide insights for designing inhibitors that disrupt the gM-gN interaction as potential antiviral therapeutics.
EHV-1 encodes twelve glycoproteins, several of which form functional complexes. The search results provide information on three such complexes:
gM/gN complex: Co-expression results in a high molecular weight complex (>250 kDa) with enhanced antigenicity compared to individual expression .
gE/gI complex: Co-expression of gE and gI results in two additional bands (80-90 kDa and 250 kDa) not seen with individual expression, and gI appears necessary for efficient expression of gE .
gH/gL complex: Unlike the other two complexes, co-expression of gH and gL did not enhance their reactivity with horse sera in the studies reviewed .
These findings suggest that different glycoprotein complexes in EHV-1 behave distinctly, with some requiring partner proteins for proper folding, processing, or antigenicity. The gM/gN and gE/gI complexes show similarities in their enhancement of antigenicity through co-expression, while the gH/gL complex appears to differ in this respect.
While the search results don't provide direct comparative information about gN across different herpesviruses, they do mention that some glycoproteins of herpesviruses require co-expression with different glycoproteins for efficient expression and protein folding . This suggests a conserved principle in herpesvirus biology where glycoprotein complexes, rather than individual proteins, form the functional units.
Several important knowledge gaps regarding EHV-1 gN remain to be addressed:
The precise composition of the high molecular weight complex formed when gM and gN are co-expressed (whether it contains only gM or both gM and gN)
The specific structural domains involved in the gM-gN interaction
The role of post-translational modifications in gN function and antigenicity
The contribution of gN to viral tropism and pathogenesis
Type-specific epitopes within gN that might be important for protective immunity
Addressing these gaps would advance our understanding of EHV-1 biology and potentially inform the development of more effective vaccines and antiviral strategies.
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology offers powerful approaches for studying EHV-1 gN through:
Generation of recombinant EHV-1 with precise mutations in the gN gene to study structure-function relationships
Creation of cell lines lacking receptors or cofactors potentially involved in gM/gN complex function
Tagging endogenous gN with fluorescent proteins to track its localization and interactions during viral infection
Knockout of gN to definitively establish its role in viral replication and pathogenesis
Introduction of type-specific sequences from EHV-4 gN into EHV-1 gN to study their impact on viral properties
These approaches would complement traditional recombinant protein studies and provide insights into gN function in the context of viral infection.