Recombinant Escherichia coli Inner Membrane Protein ybaN is a protein expressed in Escherichia coli, a bacterium commonly used for recombinant protein production. This protein is of interest due to its role in the inner membrane of E. coli, which is crucial for various cellular processes. The ybaN protein is often studied in the context of understanding bacterial membrane function and biogenesis.
The recombinant ybaN protein is typically expressed as a full-length protein, consisting of 125 amino acids, and is often fused with a His-tag for easy purification. The His-tag is attached to the N-terminal end of the protein, facilitating its isolation using affinity chromatography techniques.
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Species | Escherichia coli (expression host) |
| Source | Escherichia coli |
| Tag | N-terminal His-tag |
| Protein Length | Full Length (1-125 amino acids) |
| Form | Lyophilized powder |
| Purity | Greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE |
| Storage | Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt |
| Reconstitution | Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL |
The biogenesis of inner membrane proteins involves several steps, including targeting to the membrane and insertion into it. This process is complex and involves various molecular machinery components. Research in this area is ongoing, with a focus on understanding how proteins like ybaN are integrated into the membrane and how they contribute to membrane function .
KEGG: ecj:JW0457
STRING: 316385.ECDH10B_0424
Recombinant ybaN is typically expressed in E. coli expression systems using vectors that incorporate affinity tags to facilitate purification. Current research protocols frequently employ N-terminal His-tagging for efficient isolation through immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). Expression conditions generally include:
Selection of an appropriate E. coli strain that tolerates membrane protein overexpression
Induction at reduced temperatures (16-25°C) to minimize inclusion body formation
Extended expression periods (16-24 hours) to maximize protein yield
Use of specialized media formulations to support membrane protein production
Purification typically involves cell disruption followed by membrane fraction isolation, detergent solubilization, and affinity chromatography. The protein is often stored in buffer containing stabilizing agents such as glycerol to maintain structural integrity .
When conducting experiments with recombinant ybaN, several controls are essential:
Expression controls: Non-induced cultures and vector-only transformants to establish baseline expression
Purification controls: Column flow-through and wash fractions to monitor purification efficiency
Protein quality controls: SDS-PAGE analysis, Western blotting, and size-exclusion chromatography to assess purity and integrity
Functional controls: Comparison with well-characterized membrane proteins of similar size/structure
Negative controls: Experiments with denatured protein to distinguish between specific and non-specific effects
These controls help ensure experimental validity and facilitate troubleshooting when unexpected results occur. Researchers should document control experiments thoroughly to support the reliability of their findings .
The proper folding and membrane integration of ybaN are critically dependent on expression conditions. Research indicates that membrane protein folding pathways involve complex interactions with cellular machinery including the Sec translocon and YidC insertase systems.
Key factors affecting ybaN folding include:
| Factor | Effect on ybaN | Optimization Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Lower temperatures (16-20°C) typically improve folding | Systematic temperature screening |
| Induction level | Excessive induction may overwhelm folding machinery | Titration of inducer concentration |
| Host strain | Strains with enhanced membrane protein capabilities perform better | Comparison of C41(DE3), C43(DE3), and other specialized strains |
| Growth phase | Induction during mid-log phase balances yield and folding | Monitor growth curves to determine optimal induction timing |
| Media composition | Rich media may support better folding | Test minimal vs. complex media formulations |
Researchers investigating ybaN folding should consider implementing a factorial experimental design to assess the interplay between these variables. Fluorescence-based folding reporters or accessibility assays can provide quantitative measures of folding efficiency .
Membrane protein topology determination frequently produces conflicting results due to methodological limitations. For ybaN, resolving topology contradictions requires multiple complementary approaches:
Computational prediction: Begin with in silico topology prediction using algorithms like TMHMM, Phobius, and TOPCONS, comparing outputs to identify consensus regions.
Cysteine scanning mutagenesis: Systematically replace residues with cysteine and assess accessibility to membrane-impermeable reagents.
Reporter fusion analysis: Create sequential fusions with reporters like GFP or alkaline phosphatase to determine cytoplasmic or periplasmic localization.
Protease protection assays: Expose membrane preparations to proteases and identify protected fragments via mass spectrometry.
Cryo-electron microscopy: For definitive structural determination, though challenging with smaller membrane proteins.
Investigating ybaN interactions with other membrane components requires specialized approaches that maintain the native-like membrane environment. Effective methodological strategies include:
Crosslinking studies: Chemical crosslinkers with varying spacer lengths can capture transient interactions.
Co-immunoprecipitation with mild detergents: Preserves protein-protein interactions while solubilizing membrane components.
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC): Enables visualization of interactions in living cells.
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET): Measures proximity between fluorescently labeled proteins.
Bacterial two-hybrid systems: Modified for membrane protein analysis.
Lipidomic analysis: Identifies specific lipid interactions that may affect ybaN function.
Research design should incorporate proper controls, including non-interacting membrane proteins and competition assays to confirm specificity. Interpretation of results must consider potential artifacts introduced by overexpression or tag interference .
The choice of expression system significantly impacts both yield and functionality of recombinant ybaN. A comparative analysis of expression systems reveals:
| Expression System | Advantages | Disadvantages | Suitability for ybaN |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli BL21(DE3) | High yield, simple cultivation | May form inclusion bodies | Moderate |
| E. coli C41/C43(DE3) | Specialized for membrane proteins | Lower yield than BL21 | High |
| E. coli Lemo21(DE3) | Tunable expression level | Requires optimization | High |
| Cell-free systems | Avoids toxicity issues | Expensive, lower yield | For structural studies |
| Yeast (P. pastoris) | Post-translational modifications | Complex cultivation | For functional studies |
For most ybaN studies, C41/C43(DE3) strains provide an optimal balance between expression level and proper membrane integration. When designing expression experiments, researchers should consider:
Using tight promoter control to prevent leaky expression
Incorporating fusion partners that enhance membrane targeting
Optimizing codon usage for efficient translation
Implementing co-expression of chaperones to aid folding
The experimental design should include systematic optimization of induction parameters and harvesting time to maximize functional protein yield .
Reconstitution of purified ybaN into artificial membrane systems is essential for functional characterization. A methodical approach includes:
Selection of appropriate lipid composition:
Test mixtures mimicking E. coli inner membrane (phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, cardiolipin)
Vary cholesterol content to assess effects on protein stability
Consider native lipid extract reconstitution as a benchmark
Reconstitution method optimization:
Detergent removal via dialysis (gentle but time-consuming)
Bio-Beads absorption (faster but potentially disruptive)
Dilution method (simple but yields heterogeneous vesicles)
Verification of successful reconstitution:
Density gradient centrifugation to confirm protein incorporation
Freeze-fracture electron microscopy to visualize distribution
Fluorescence quenching assays to assess orientation
Functional assessment protocols:
Design assays specific to hypothesized ybaN function
Include positive controls with well-characterized membrane proteins
Implement negative controls with denatured ybaN or empty liposomes
The reconstitution buffer composition, particularly pH and ionic strength, should be systematically optimized to maintain protein stability throughout the procedure .
Effective purification of membrane proteins like ybaN requires specialized approaches to maintain protein stability while achieving high purity. A comprehensive purification strategy involves:
Membrane preparation:
Gentle cell lysis (French press or sonication with cooling)
Differential centrifugation to isolate membrane fractions
Washing steps to remove peripheral proteins
Solubilization optimization:
Screen multiple detergents (DDM, LMNG, CHAPS, etc.)
Test varying detergent concentrations (typically 1-2% for extraction, 2-3× CMC for chromatography)
Include stabilizing additives (glycerol, specific lipids)
Chromatography sequence:
IMAC as primary capture step for His-tagged ybaN
Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates
Optional ion exchange step for higher purity
Quality assessment:
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Mass spectrometry for identity confirmation
Dynamic light scattering for homogeneity analysis
The recombinant ybaN protein must be handled according to established protocols for storage buffer preparation, including 6% trehalose at pH 8.0, which helps maintain stability during freeze-thaw cycles. Aliquoting is essential to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can destabilize the protein-detergent complex .
When encountering low expression or poor solubility of ybaN, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:
| Issue | Potential Causes | Troubleshooting Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression level | Promoter leakiness, protein toxicity | Use tighter promoter control, reduce temperature, co-express chaperones |
| Formation of inclusion bodies | Rapid expression, improper folding | Lower inducer concentration, induce at OD600 = 0.4-0.6, add glycylbetaine |
| Poor membrane integration | Overwhelming Sec translocon | Reduce expression rate, co-express membrane insertion machinery |
| Low solubilization efficiency | Inappropriate detergent | Screen detergent panel, optimize detergent:protein ratio |
| Protein instability | Buffer conditions, detergent effects | Add stabilizing additives, incorporate lipids during purification |
For particularly challenging cases, consider:
Expression as smaller domains rather than full-length protein
Fusion to stabilizing partners (MBP, SUMO)
Addition of specific lipids during solubilization
Implementation of high-throughput condition screening
Document all optimization attempts systematically, as the conditions that improve ybaN handling may provide insights into its structural properties and interactions .
Assessing proper folding and homogeneity of membrane proteins like ybaN requires specialized analytical techniques:
Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy:
Far-UV CD (190-250 nm) to estimate secondary structure content
Near-UV CD (250-350 nm) to evaluate tertiary structure
Thermal denaturation to determine stability
Fluorescence-Based Approaches:
Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence to monitor folding state
ANS binding to detect exposed hydrophobic surfaces
Fluorescent dye-binding to assess aggregation propensity
Size and Homogeneity Analysis:
Size-exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS)
Analytical ultracentrifugation to determine oligomeric state
Dynamic light scattering for polydispersity assessment
Stability and Function Correlation:
Thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing conditions
Activity assays (if known) to correlate structure with function
Limited proteolysis to identify stable domains
Designing experiments to elucidate ybaN function requires a multi-faceted approach given the limited prior knowledge about this membrane protein:
Bioinformatic analysis:
Sequence homology with functionally characterized proteins
Identification of conserved motifs or functional domains
Structural prediction to identify potential binding sites
Genetic approaches:
Gene knockout studies to observe phenotypic changes
Complementation assays to confirm function
Synthetic lethality screening to identify interaction partners
Biochemical characterization:
Binding assays with potential substrates or interactors
Activity assays based on predicted function
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues
Localization studies:
Fluorescent protein fusions to track cellular distribution
Immunolocalization in fixed cells
Fractionation studies to confirm membrane association
Systems biology approaches:
Transcriptomics to identify co-regulated genes
Metabolomics to detect changes in knockout strains
Protein-protein interaction network analysis
Experimental design should incorporate appropriate controls and replication to ensure statistical validity. Given the challenges in membrane protein research, researchers should consider starting with simpler hypotheses and gradually building more complex models of ybaN function as evidence accumulates .
Proper reconstitution of lyophilized ybaN is critical for maintaining functional integrity. The recommended protocol includes:
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to ensure all material is at the bottom
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 50% for long-term storage stability
Avoid vigorous shaking or vortexing, which can cause aggregation
Allow complete dissolution at 4°C with gentle rotation
Aliquot immediately after reconstitution to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week
Store long-term aliquots at -20°C or -80°C
Researchers should verify protein concentration after reconstitution using appropriate methods like Bradford assay or UV spectroscopy with correction for the detergent contribution. The reconstituted protein should be assessed for activity or structural integrity before proceeding with experiments .
Validating the specificity of molecular interactions with ybaN requires rigorous controls and orthogonal methods:
Competition assays:
Demonstrate displacement with unlabeled ligands
Show concentration-dependent effects
Mutational analysis:
Generate point mutations in predicted interaction sites
Demonstrate correlation between structural changes and binding affinity
Cross-validation methods:
Confirm interactions identified in vitro with in vivo approaches
Use multiple detection technologies (FRET, SPR, ITC, etc.)
Specificity controls:
Test structurally similar but functionally distinct proteins
Examine interaction with scrambled peptides or denatured proteins
Biological relevance confirmation:
Demonstrate phenotypic effects correlating with interaction strength
Show co-localization in cellular contexts