The Recombinant Escherichia coli O157:H7 UPF0060 membrane protein ynfA (ynfA) is a recombinant protein derived from the bacterium Escherichia coli O157:H7. This strain is known for its pathogenicity, particularly in causing foodborne illnesses due to its ability to produce Shiga toxins. The UPF0060 membrane protein is part of a family of proteins with unknown functions, often studied for their potential roles in bacterial physiology and pathogenicity.
Species: Escherichia coli O157:H7 (strain EC4115 / EHEC)
Uniprot ID: B5Z364
Tag Info: The tag type is determined during the production process.
Storage Buffer: Tris-based buffer, 50% glycerol, optimized for this protein.
Storage: Store at -20°C for extended storage; conserve at -20°C or -80°C. Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended.
AA Sequence: MIKTTLLFFATALCEIIGCFLPWLWLKRNASIWLLLPAGISLALFVWLLTLHPAASGRVY AAYGGVYVCTALMWLRVVDGVKLTLYDWTGPLIALCGmLIIVVGWGRT
Protein Length: 108 amino acids
E. coli O157:H7 is a significant foodborne pathogen due to its ability to produce Shiga toxins. Key virulence factors include the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), which encodes proteins necessary for bacterial adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells . Other factors like curli fimbriae contribute to biofilm formation and attachment .
KEGG: ecf:ECH74115_2291
YnfA is a membrane protein belonging to the UPF0060 family found in Escherichia coli, including the pathogenic O157:H7 strain. The protein consists of 108 amino acid residues and is encoded by the ynfA gene . YnfA functions as an integral membrane protein, although its exact role and mechanisms remain under investigation. The protein has been modeled using AlphaFold, with a global pLDDT (predicted Local Distance Difference Test) score of 86.65, indicating a confident structural prediction although no experimental structure determination has been reported . E. coli O157:H7 represents a major enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) serotype capable of causing bloody diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis (HC), and potentially fatal hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) .
Recombinant expression of YnfA presents specific challenges compared to soluble E. coli proteins due to its membrane-bound nature. As a membrane protein, YnfA requires specialized expression systems and careful optimization to maintain proper folding and functionality. Based on established recombinant protein methodologies, expression typically involves:
Vector selection: pET-24a(+) or similar expression vectors with strong promoters like T7 are commonly used for membrane protein expression
Host strain selection: E. coli BL21(DE3) is frequently employed due to its reduced protease activity and compatibility with T7 expression systems
Induction conditions: IPTG induction (typically 1mM) with careful optimization of temperature, typically ranging from 18-37°C
Extended expression time: For membrane proteins like YnfA, longer expression periods (up to 24 hours) may be necessary to achieve sufficient yields
Unlike soluble proteins, membrane proteins often require detergent solubilization during purification and may form inclusion bodies that necessitate refolding procedures to recover native structure.
Effective purification of recombinant YnfA typically employs affinity chromatography with careful consideration of membrane protein solubilization. Based on similar membrane protein purification protocols, the following strategy is recommended:
For denatured YnfA in inclusion bodies, purification under denaturing conditions using 8M urea or 6M guanidine hydrochloride may be necessary, followed by controlled refolding through dialysis against decreasing concentrations of denaturant .
Verification of recombinant YnfA identity and integrity requires multiple analytical approaches:
SDS-PAGE analysis: Confirms the molecular weight of approximately 12 kDa for YnfA. For tagged constructs, the observed molecular weight will be higher depending on the size of the affinity tag .
Western blotting: Using anti-His antibodies for His-tagged constructs provides specific confirmation of protein identity. A recommended protocol involves:
Mass spectrometry: Peptide mass fingerprinting following tryptic digestion provides definitive identification.
Secondary structure analysis: Circular dichroism spectroscopy confirms proper folding of the membrane protein, particularly important after refolding procedures.
Functional assays: Although specific functional assays for YnfA are not well established due to its uncharacterized function, membrane integration can be assessed through membrane fractionation studies.
The UPF0060 membrane protein YnfA from pathogenic E. coli O157:H7 shares significant structural similarities with its counterpart in non-pathogenic E. coli K-12, with some potentially important differences that may relate to pathogenicity. The computational model from AlphaFold provides valuable insights into the protein's structure .
| Feature | E. coli K-12 YnfA | E. coli O157:H7 YnfA | Potential Functional Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence length | 108 amino acids | 108 amino acids | Conserved size suggests similar core function |
| Transmembrane helices | 3 predicted TM domains | 3 predicted TM domains | Similar membrane topology |
| Model confidence (pLDDT) | 86.65 (confident) | Not specifically reported for O157:H7 variant | - |
| Key structural regions | Highly conserved loop regions | Potential differences in surface-exposed loops | Loop variations may affect host interactions |
The highest structural variability between pathogenic and non-pathogenic variants likely occurs in the loop regions connecting the transmembrane helices, which are typically exposed to the extracellular environment or periplasmic space. These regions may contribute to strain-specific interactions or functions related to pathogenicity, although experimental validation is required to confirm these predictions .
Optimizing expression and stability of recombinant YnfA requires systematic evaluation of multiple parameters. Based on established methodologies for recombinant protein optimization, the following approach is recommended:
Experimental Design Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM):
Implement central composite design (CCD) to optimize multiple variables simultaneously, including:
Codon Optimization:
Analyze codon usage patterns in the gene sequence and optimize for E. coli expression systems, particularly for rare codons that might limit translation efficiency .
Fusion Tag Selection:
Compare expression levels and solubility with different fusion partners:
| Fusion Tag | Advantages | Disadvantages | Recommended for YnfA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6×His | Small size, minimal interference | Limited solubility enhancement | Initial purification trials |
| MBP | Enhanced solubility, chaperone-like effect | Large size (42 kDa) | When inclusion bodies are problematic |
| SUMO | Improved folding, removable | Requires specific protease | For maximizing active protein recovery |
| GST | Enhanced solubility | Large size, dimerization | Less suitable for membrane proteins |
Stability Enhancement:
For improved stability of purified YnfA, implement formulation optimization similar to approaches described in :
Screen multiple buffer systems (pH 6.0-8.0)
Evaluate stabilizing additives (glycerol, sucrose, arginine)
Test various detergent types and concentrations for optimal micelle formation
Consider nanodiscs or amphipols for long-term stability
Statistical analysis of optimization experiments using ANOVA can identify significant factors and interactions affecting expression yield and stability .
While the specific function of YnfA in E. coli O157:H7 pathogenicity remains incompletely characterized, several potential roles can be inferred based on membrane protein location and structural features:
Membrane Integrity and Stress Response:
As a membrane protein, YnfA may contribute to maintaining membrane integrity under stress conditions encountered during infection, including acid stress in the stomach or bile salt exposure in the intestine.
Transport Function:
Based on structural predictions, YnfA might function as a small molecule transporter, potentially involved in nutrient acquisition or toxin export, contributing to virulence and survival in the host.
Signaling and Adhesion:
Surface-exposed regions of YnfA could participate in host-pathogen interactions, potentially affecting adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells, a critical step in E. coli O157:H7 pathogenesis .
Immune Evasion:
Membrane proteins can modulate host immune responses; YnfA might play a role in evading host defenses, contributing to the persistence of infection.
E. coli O157:H7 causes severe clinical manifestations, including bloody diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), particularly in children and the elderly . The potential role of YnfA in these pathogenic processes warrants further investigation through targeted genetic approaches, including:
Gene knockout studies
Complementation experiments
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues
Host interaction assays
Developing sensitive and specific immunodetection methods for YnfA requires careful consideration of antigen preparation, antibody development, and assay optimization. The following methodological approach is recommended:
Antigen Preparation:
For generating anti-YnfA antibodies, recombinant protein expression should follow these steps:
Antibody Production Strategy:
| Approach | Advantages | Limitations | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyclonal antibodies | Recognize multiple epitopes, robust detection | Batch-to-batch variation | Initial screening, western blots |
| Monoclonal antibodies | Consistent specificity, renewable resource | Higher development cost, single epitope | Quantitative assays, conformational epitopes |
| Recombinant antibodies | Defined specificity, no animals required | Technical expertise required | Highly specific applications |
Assay Development:
ELISA: Optimize coating conditions, antibody concentrations, and detection systems
Lateral flow assays: For rapid detection in field settings
Immunofluorescence: For localization studies in bacterial cells
Flow cytometry: For quantification of surface expression
Cross-reactivity Assessment:
Test antibodies against:
YnfA homologs from non-pathogenic E. coli strains
Related enterobacterial proteins
Host tissue proteins (for clinical applications)
Validation with Clinical or Environmental Samples:
The development of specific immunodetection methods could contribute to more rapid identification of E. coli O157:H7 in clinical settings, potentially improving patient outcomes by enabling earlier intervention .
The membrane protein YnfA represents a potential vaccine target against E. coli O157:H7, although several factors must be considered when evaluating its suitability:
Antigenicity and Immunogenicity:
Surface exposure: The extracellular or periplasmic loops of YnfA may present epitopes accessible to the immune system
Conservation: Analysis of sequence conservation across clinical isolates would determine suitability as a broadly protective antigen
Immunogenicity: Ability to elicit strong B-cell and T-cell responses requires experimental validation
Chimeric Vaccine Design Approach:
Similar to the strategy described in , YnfA epitopes could be incorporated into chimeric vaccine constructs:
Combine YnfA immunogenic regions with proven carrier proteins or adjuvants
Include multiple antigenic determinants from E. coli O157:H7 for broader protection
Design flexible linkers between epitopes to maintain native conformation
A chimeric approach combining outer membrane protein A (OmpA) and heat-labile enterotoxin B subunit (LTB) has shown promise for E. coli O157:H7 vaccine development . A similar strategy incorporating YnfA epitopes could be explored.
Expression and Purification Considerations:
Safety and Efficacy Assessment:
In vitro neutralization assays
Animal immunization studies evaluating:
Antibody titers
Protection against challenge
Mucosal immunity (critical for enteric pathogens)
Advantages of YnfA as a Target:
Membrane proteins often elicit strong immune responses
Potential role in pathogenesis could make it a functional target
Less likely to cross-react with commensal microbiota if sufficiently divergent
The development of vaccines against E. coli O157:H7 is particularly important given the increased risk of hemolytic uremic syndrome and hemorrhagic colitis following antibiotic therapy, making prevention through vaccination a preferred approach .
Implementing central composite design for optimizing recombinant YnfA expression requires careful selection of parameters and their ranges. The following methodology is recommended based on established recombinant protein optimization approaches:
Selection of Critical Parameters:
Four key variables typically influence membrane protein expression:
| Parameter | Low Level (-1) | Center Point (0) | High Level (+1) | Justification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPTG concentration | 0.1 mM | 0.5 mM | 1.0 mM | Controls induction strength |
| Post-induction temperature | 16°C | 25°C | 37°C | Affects folding kinetics |
| Expression time | 4 hours | 14 hours | 24 hours | Impacts yield and toxicity |
| Media composition | Minimal | LB | Enriched | Provides necessary components |
Experimental Design Matrix:
For four factors, a central composite design would require 31 experiments:
16 factorial points (2⁴)
8 axial points
7 center points for error estimation
Response Variables Measurement:
Primary: Yield of purified active YnfA (mg/L culture)
Secondary: Percent soluble vs. inclusion body formation
Tertiary: Functional activity measurement if available
Statistical Analysis:
Validation of Optimized Conditions:
This systematic approach significantly reduces the number of experiments required compared to one-factor-at-a-time methods while identifying interactions between variables that affect expression outcomes.
Determining the membrane topology of YnfA requires multiple complementary experimental approaches to generate a comprehensive model of protein orientation within the membrane:
Computational Prediction Methods:
Begin with in silico analysis using multiple topology prediction algorithms:
TMHMM and TMpred for transmembrane helix prediction
SignalP for signal peptide identification
TOPCONS for consensus topology modeling
The AlphaFold structural model provides a starting point but requires experimental validation .
Fusion Reporter Techniques:
PhoA fusion strategy: Construct a library of YnfA-alkaline phosphatase fusion proteins with truncations at different positions; PhoA is only active when located in the periplasm
GFP fusion complementary approach: GFP fluorescence occurs only when the protein is cytoplasmic
β-lactamase reporter: Provides ampicillin resistance when located in the periplasm
Cysteine Scanning Mutagenesis and Accessibility:
Introduce single cysteine residues at various positions in a cysteine-free YnfA variant
Assess accessibility using membrane-permeable and impermeable thiol-reactive reagents
Modification patterns reveal topology of different regions
Protease Protection Assays:
Isolate membrane vesicles containing YnfA
Treat with proteases (e.g., trypsin, proteinase K)
Analyze protected fragments by mass spectrometry or western blotting
Protected regions indicate membrane-embedded or lumenal domains
Integration of Results:
Compile data from all approaches to generate a consensus topology model:
| Region | Residue Position | Predicted Location | Supporting Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| N-terminus | 1-10 | Cytoplasmic | PhoA fusion, cysteine accessibility |
| TM1 | 11-30 | Membrane-spanning | Hydrophobicity, protease protection |
| Loop 1 | 31-45 | Periplasmic | PhoA activity, accessibility |
| TM2 | 46-65 | Membrane-spanning | Hydrophobicity, AlphaFold model |
| Loop 2 | 66-78 | Cytoplasmic | GFP fluorescence, protease sensitivity |
| TM3 | 79-98 | Membrane-spanning | Hydrophobicity, AlphaFold model |
| C-terminus | 99-108 | Periplasmic | PhoA fusion, cysteine accessibility |
Understanding membrane topology is essential for identifying regions that might interact with host components or function in pathogenesis, providing direction for functional studies and potential therapeutic targeting.
Investigating YnfA protein interactions requires specialized approaches suitable for membrane proteins. The following analytical techniques are recommended:
Co-immunoprecipitation with Membrane-Compatible Detergents:
Solubilize membranes using mild detergents (DDM, CHAPS, or digitonin)
Use anti-YnfA antibodies linked to solid support
Identify binding partners by mass spectrometry
Critical control: parallel experiment using pre-immune serum
Bacterial Two-Hybrid Systems Adapted for Membrane Proteins:
BACTH (Bacterial Adenylate Cyclase Two-Hybrid) system
Split-ubiquitin yeast two-hybrid adapted for membrane proteins
Controls must include tests for auto-activation and protein expression verification
Cross-linking Approaches:
In vivo cross-linking using cell-permeable agents (formaldehyde, DSP)
Site-specific photo-crosslinking using unnatural amino acids
Mass spectrometric analysis of cross-linked complexes with specialized software
Proximity-Dependent Biotin Identification (BioID):
Fuse YnfA to a promiscuous biotin ligase (BirA*)
Express in E. coli O157:H7
Identify biotinylated proximity proteins using streptavidin pulldown and mass spectrometry
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) for Direct Interaction Studies:
Immobilize purified YnfA in supported lipid bilayers or nanodiscs
Flow potential binding partners over the surface
Measure association/dissociation kinetics
Calculate binding affinities (KD values)
| Method | Advantages | Limitations | Best Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-immunoprecipitation | Identifies native complexes | Transient interactions may be missed | Initial screening for stable complexes |
| Bacterial two-hybrid | In vivo detection | Potential false positives/negatives | Testing specific protein pairs |
| Cross-linking | Captures transient interactions | Complex data analysis | Identifying interaction interfaces |
| BioID | Detects weak/transient interactions | Spatial resolution limited to ~10 nm | Mapping local interactome |
| SPR | Provides binding kinetics | Requires purified proteins | Confirming direct interactions |
Identifying YnfA interaction partners may reveal its functional role in E. coli O157:H7 physiology and pathogenesis, potentially highlighting new therapeutic targets or virulence mechanisms.
A comprehensive mutagenesis strategy for identifying functional residues in YnfA should combine computational prediction with systematic experimental validation:
Computational Identification of Target Residues:
Begin by analyzing the YnfA sequence and predicted structure to identify:
Alanine Scanning Mutagenesis:
Systematically replace selected residues with alanine
Express mutant variants in an E. coli ynfA knockout strain
Assess impact on protein expression, localization, stability, and function
Group residues based on phenotypic effects
Targeted Deep Mutagenesis:
For critical regions identified in alanine scanning:
| Target Region | Approach | Rationale | Analysis Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conserved motifs | Saturation mutagenesis | Comprehensive functional assessment | Functional screening, growth phenotypes |
| Transmembrane domains | Scanning with helix-breaking residues (Pro, Gly) | Test structural importance | Protein stability, membrane integration |
| Surface-exposed loops | Charge reversal mutations | Identify electrostatic interactions | Binding assays, functional tests |
| Potential binding sites | Conservative replacements | Maintain structure, alter specificity | Ligand binding, protein interaction studies |
Functional Assessment of Mutants:
Growth complementation assays in ynfA knockout strains
Protein stability analysis using western blotting
Membrane localization using fractionation and immunodetection
Specific functional assays once YnfA function is better characterized
Structure-Function Correlation:
Map mutations onto the structural model
Identify spatial clusters of functionally important residues
Generate a refined functional model incorporating experimental data
In vivo Validation:
Test critical mutations in E. coli O157:H7 infection models
Assess impact on virulence, colonization, or persistence
Correlate molecular function with pathogenesis
This systematic approach will provide insights into YnfA function while establishing structure-function relationships that may guide the development of targeted interventions against E. coli O157:H7.
Developing YnfA-based detection methods for E. coli O157:H7 in clinical samples requires addressing several critical factors:
Specificity Considerations:
Evaluate sequence conservation and uniqueness of YnfA in E. coli O157:H7 compared to:
Commensal E. coli strains
Other Enterobacteriaceae
Human microbiome components
Design detection reagents (antibodies, primers, probes) targeting unique regions
Sensitivity Requirements:
Clinical relevance: Infectious dose of E. coli O157:H7 is low (~50-100 organisms)
Detection limit should be 10-100 CFU/mL in complex matrices
Sample preparation methods must efficiently extract or expose YnfA
Sample Matrix Considerations:
| Sample Type | Challenges | Recommended Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Stool | High protein content, PCR inhibitors | Immunomagnetic separation, sample dilution |
| Blood | Low bacterial load, host DNA interference | Selective enrichment, membrane filtration |
| Food | Complex matrices, competing microbiota | Selective enrichment, immunocapture |
| Environmental | Inhibitory compounds, low concentration | Filtration, concentration, enrichment culture |
Detection Platform Selection:
Nucleic acid-based detection:
PCR targeting ynfA gene with specific primers
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for resource-limited settings
Protein-based detection:
ELISA using anti-YnfA antibodies
Lateral flow immunoassay for point-of-care testing
Mass spectrometry for reference laboratory confirmation
Validation Requirements:
Analytical validation:
Limit of detection
Specificity testing against panel of related organisms
Reproducibility across different operators and instruments
Clinical validation:
Sensitivity and specificity compared to gold standard methods
Positive and negative predictive values in relevant populations
Integration with Current Diagnostic Approaches:
Current diagnostic methods for E. coli O157:H7 include culture on selective media, immunoassays, and PCR . YnfA-based detection would need to demonstrate advantages in terms of speed, specificity, or ease of use to justify clinical implementation.
Membrane proteins like YnfA can potentially contribute to antimicrobial resistance through several mechanisms, although specific evidence for YnfA's role requires further investigation:
Potential Efflux Pump Function:
Based on structural prediction, YnfA might function as a component of efflux systems that:
Export antibiotics from the bacterial cell
Reduce intracellular antibiotic concentration below effective levels
Contribute to multidrug resistance phenotypes
Membrane Permeability Alterations:
YnfA may influence membrane properties that affect antibiotic entry:
Modify lipid organization or membrane fluidity
Alter surface charge distribution
Create a physical barrier to antibiotic penetration
Stress Response and Adaptation:
Potential role in bacterial stress response pathways
Contribution to adaptive resistance under antibiotic pressure
Possible involvement in formation of persister cells
Clinical Implications:
Antibiotic therapy for E. coli O157:H7 infections remains controversial due to:
Research Approaches to Investigate YnfA's Role:
Gene knockout studies comparing antibiotic susceptibility profiles
Overexpression studies to assess impact on minimum inhibitory concentrations
Transport assays using fluorescent antibiotic analogs
Transcriptional analysis of ynfA expression under antibiotic stress
Understanding YnfA's potential contribution to antimicrobial resistance could inform treatment strategies for E. coli O157:H7 infections and guide the development of adjunctive therapies that might enhance antibiotic efficacy.
YnfA represents a potential target for novel antimicrobial development, with several favorable characteristics and important considerations:
Target Validation Criteria:
Essential function or significant contribution to virulence (requires experimental confirmation)
Surface accessibility for drug binding
Structural distinctiveness from human proteins
Potential role in antimicrobial resistance mechanisms
Drug Development Approaches:
| Approach | Mechanism | Advantages | Development Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small molecule inhibitors | Direct inhibition of protein function | Traditional drug-like properties | Requires knowledge of protein function |
| Peptidomimetics | Interference with protein-protein interactions | High specificity | Delivery challenges, potential instability |
| Monoclonal antibodies | Binding to surface-exposed epitopes | Highly specific, long half-life | Large size limits membrane penetration |
| Antisense oligonucleotides | Inhibition of ynfA gene expression | Highly specific to sequence | Delivery into bacterial cells challenging |
Target-Based Screening Strategies:
Advantages of YnfA as an Antimicrobial Target:
Membrane proteins are accessible from the extracellular space
Novel target not addressed by current antibiotics
Potential for narrow-spectrum activity if sufficiently different from commensal bacteria
May avoid triggering Shiga toxin release if mechanism doesn't cause bacterial lysis
Potential Challenges:
Incomplete understanding of YnfA function
Possible redundancy with other bacterial proteins
Membrane protein targets often have complex pharmacokinetics
Development of resistance through target mutation
Novel antimicrobial approaches are particularly important for E. coli O157:H7 given the complications associated with conventional antibiotic therapy in these infections .
Systems biology approaches offer powerful frameworks for elucidating YnfA function within the broader context of E. coli O157:H7 biology:
Multi-Omics Integration:
Transcriptomics: Compare ynfA expression across growth conditions, stress responses, and infection models
Proteomics: Identify changes in the membrane proteome associated with YnfA expression
Metabolomics: Detect metabolic shifts in ynfA mutants that may indicate functional pathways
Interactomics: Map YnfA's protein-protein interaction network
Network Analysis Approaches:
Co-expression network analysis to identify genes with similar expression patterns
Protein-protein interaction networks to place YnfA in functional pathways
Metabolic modeling to predict impact of YnfA on cellular metabolism
Flux balance analysis to identify altered metabolic fluxes in ynfA mutants
Computational Modeling:
Molecular dynamics simulations of YnfA in membrane environments
Systems-level models incorporating YnfA into known E. coli O157:H7 pathways
Machine learning approaches to predict YnfA function from multi-omics data
High-Throughput Phenotypic Screening:
Phenotype microarrays comparing wild-type and ynfA mutants
Chemical genomics to identify compounds with differential effects on ynfA mutants
Synthetic genetic array analysis to identify genetic interactions
Integration with Host-Pathogen Interaction Data:
Dual RNA-seq during infection to capture host and pathogen responses
Proteomics of host-pathogen interface to identify potential YnfA interactions
Systems modeling of infection dynamics incorporating YnfA function
These approaches will place YnfA within the broader context of E. coli O157:H7 biology, potentially revealing unexpected functions and connections that might not be apparent from reductionist approaches alone.
Recent technological advances are transforming our ability to characterize membrane protein structures with unprecedented detail:
Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM) Advances:
Single-particle cryo-EM now achieves near-atomic resolution for membrane proteins
Benefits for YnfA: No crystal requirement, analysis in near-native lipid environments
Methodological considerations: Sample preparation in detergent micelles, nanodiscs, or amphipols
Integrative Structural Biology Approaches:
Native Mass Spectrometry:
Analysis of intact membrane protein complexes
Determination of subunit stoichiometry and small molecule binding
Application to YnfA: Could reveal oligomeric state and associated lipids or cofactors
Advanced Crystallography Methods:
Serial femtosecond crystallography using X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs)
In meso crystallization techniques optimized for membrane proteins
Microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) for nanocrystals
Computational Advances:
Enhanced sampling molecular dynamics to model conformational changes
Machine learning approaches to predict functional sites
Coevolutionary analysis to identify structurally and functionally coupled residues
| Technology | Resolution Range | Sample Requirements | Advantages for YnfA Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryo-EM | 2.5-4 Å | ~0.1 mg protein, detergent or nanodisc | Visualization in membrane-like environment |
| Solid-state NMR | Site-specific | 5-10 mg isotopically labeled protein | Dynamic information, native-like conditions |
| Native MS | Subunit composition | 0.1-1 mg highly purified protein | Oligomeric state, ligand binding |
| XFELs | 1.5-3 Å | Microcrystals, ~0.5 mg protein | Room temperature structures, radiation damage mitigation |
| AlphaFold + experiments | Varies by method | Depends on experimental constraints | Leverages computational prediction with experimental validation |
These technologies can overcome traditional challenges in membrane protein structural biology, potentially accelerating our understanding of YnfA structure and function beyond what is currently available from computational predictions alone .
Comprehensive characterization of YnfA may provide insights into broader virulence mechanisms in pathogenic E. coli through several avenues:
Comparative Analysis Across Pathotypes:
Examine YnfA variation across E. coli pathotypes (EHEC, EPEC, ETEC, UPEC)
Identify pathotype-specific sequence variations or expression patterns
Correlate YnfA characteristics with virulence traits
Integration with Known Virulence Networks:
Map YnfA's position relative to established virulence mechanisms:
Shiga toxin production and release
Type III secretion system
Adhesion and colonization factors
Acid resistance systems
Horizontal Gene Transfer and Evolution:
Analyze ynfA gene context for evidence of horizontal acquisition
Identify selective pressures driving YnfA evolution in pathogenic lineages
Determine if ynfA is part of pathogenicity islands or mobile genetic elements
Host-Pathogen Interface:
Investigate YnfA's potential interactions with host factors
Assess impact on key virulence phenotypes:
Epithelial adhesion and colonization
Immune evasion strategies
Survival in different host microenvironments
Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications:
Understanding YnfA's role could reveal common virulence mechanisms shared across pathogenic E. coli strains, potentially uncovering new targets for broad-spectrum interventions against multiple pathotypes causing significant human disease.