Recombinant Exiguobacterium sibiricum UPF0754 membrane protein Exig_0680 (Exig_0680)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Supplied as a lyophilized powder.

Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.

The specific tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its incorporation.
Synonyms
Exig_0680; UPF0754 membrane protein Exig_0680
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-378
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Exiguobacterium sibiricum (strain DSM 17290 / JCM 13490 / 255-15)
Target Names
Exig_0680
Target Protein Sequence
MQVEVDLVIKMIGMIVIGALIGAVTNHLAIRMLFRPLEAKYIGKYRIPFTPGLIPKRRDE LAANLGRTVVKHLLTPEGISKRLQQPIVYQAITRMIQQEVQKWTRSTKTIREIAERFVAN PEGKLQQQIEQRIDQELESMAVAIKTARLTEVLGEGGTTKIKTAIPGMVEVLLHQTEQYF DSPAGKMKLEETVAQFIQSKLGGGMFGMLLANVNIVEMIQPELKRVIQGKSTHQFISEMV EQEVHTLLERTVGSLLEPEAERQIIERMKSEIVTRIPLAALLDTPLHEFLEPLEVRISQE MVPMLSKQMVNRLIEQVEQIMATLDLETIVREEVDLLDTAYLEEIVLSISRREFRAITWL GGLLGGLIGMIQAILLIV
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
UPF0754 family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is Exiguobacterium sibiricum UPF0754 membrane protein (Exig_0680)?

Exig_0680 is a membrane protein from the extremophilic bacterium Exiguobacterium sibiricum (strain DSM 17290 / JCM 13490 / 255-15). It belongs to the UPF0754 protein family, which consists of proteins with unknown functions that have conserved membrane-spanning domains. The protein has a UniProt accession number of B1YK80 and a full-length amino acid sequence starting with MQVEVDLVIKMIGMIVIGLI and ending with GGLLGGLIGMIQAILLIV . This protein is expressed as a recombinant form for research purposes and likely plays a role in membrane structure or transport functions, though its precise biological function remains under investigation.

What are the structural characteristics of Exig_0680?

Exig_0680 is a full-length membrane protein consisting of 378 amino acids. The protein contains multiple hydrophobic regions that likely form transmembrane domains, characteristic of integral membrane proteins. Analysis of its sequence suggests it has both hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions arranged in a pattern consistent with membrane-spanning segments . The protein's specific three-dimensional structure has not been fully determined by X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM, making it a potential candidate for structural studies using techniques optimized for membrane proteins, similar to approaches used for other membrane proteins like acid-sensing ion channels and glutamate-gated chloride channels .

How is Exig_0680 typically stored and handled in laboratory settings?

For optimal preservation of Exig_0680's structure and function, the recombinant protein should be stored in a Tris-based buffer containing 50% glycerol that has been specifically optimized for this protein. Short-term storage can be at -20°C, while extended storage should be at either -20°C or -80°C to minimize degradation . It's essential to note that repeated freeze-thaw cycles can compromise protein integrity and should be avoided. To mitigate this risk, researchers should prepare small working aliquots that can be stored at 4°C for up to one week. This approach preserves the larger stock while providing convenient access for ongoing experiments.

What expression systems are most effective for producing functional Exig_0680?

While the search results don't specifically address expression systems for Exig_0680, membrane proteins similar to Exig_0680 often require specialized expression systems. For eukaryotic membrane proteins, the BacMam system (baculovirus transduction of mammalian cells) has proven effective, particularly when using optimized vectors like plasmid Eric Gouaux (pEG) BacMam . For prokaryotic membrane proteins like Exig_0680, E. coli-based expression systems with specific modifications for membrane protein expression might be suitable.

A methodological approach would involve:

  • Sequence analysis and optimization (codon optimization for the expression host)

  • Testing multiple expression vectors with different fusion tags

  • Small-scale expression trials in various conditions (temperature, induction time)

  • Screening for proper folding using techniques like fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography (FSEC)

  • Scaling up production once optimal conditions are established

This systematic approach helps ensure the recombinant protein maintains its native conformation, which is critical for functional studies .

What are the specific challenges in purifying Exig_0680 compared to other membrane proteins?

Purification of Exig_0680, like other membrane proteins, presents several unique challenges. The protein's hydrophobic nature requires careful consideration of detergent selection to maintain stability while extracting it from the membrane. Additionally, as noted in the research on similar membrane proteins, obtaining homogeneous, monodisperse preparations is critical for downstream applications .

For Exig_0680 specifically, researchers should consider:

  • Detergent screening to identify optimal solubilization conditions

  • Implementation of two-step purification protocols (e.g., affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion)

  • Quality control using multiple techniques (SDS-PAGE, Western blot, mass spectrometry)

  • Stability assessment in various buffer conditions

The potential for proteolysis during expression and purification necessitates careful optimization of the purification workflow. Using fusion tags at both N and C termini can help distinguish full-length protein from truncated forms, particularly by increasing imidazole concentration during elution to selectively purify complete proteins .

How can structural studies of Exig_0680 be optimized to increase chances of successful crystallization?

Structural studies of membrane proteins like Exig_0680 require careful optimization at multiple levels. Based on approaches used for other membrane proteins, the following methodological strategy is recommended:

  • Construct Design:

    • Create multiple truncation variants to identify stable constructs

    • Introduce stabilizing mutations at flexible regions

    • Consider fusion partners that facilitate crystallization

  • Expression Optimization:

    • Use fluorescence-tagged constructs to rapidly screen expression and stability

    • Employ FSEC to assess protein monodispersity as an early indicator of crystallization potential

  • Purification Refinement:

    • Test multiple detergents and detergent mixtures

    • Consider lipid supplementation to maintain native-like environment

    • Implement stringent purification to achieve >95% purity

  • Crystallization Screening:

    • Utilize sparse matrix screens specifically designed for membrane proteins

    • Test in meso crystallization methods (lipidic cubic phase)

    • Optimize crystallization hits systematically (pH, temperature, additives)

This multi-faceted approach increases the probability of obtaining diffraction-quality crystals, which remains a significant challenge for membrane proteins .

What protein-protein interaction studies can reveal the functional partners of Exig_0680?

Understanding the interaction network of Exig_0680 is crucial for elucidating its biological function. Several complementary methodological approaches can be employed:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) Studies:

    • Similar to techniques used in case study 4 , antibodies against Exig_0680 can be used to pull down protein complexes

    • Mass spectrometry analysis of co-precipitated proteins reveals interaction partners

    • Reverse Co-IP with antibodies against suspected partners confirms interactions

  • Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry:

    • Chemical crosslinking captures transient interactions

    • MS/MS analysis identifies crosslinked peptides and their proteins of origin

    • Data analysis reveals spatial constraints within protein complexes

  • Yeast Two-Hybrid Modified for Membrane Proteins:

    • Split-ubiquitin yeast two-hybrid system specifically designed for membrane proteins

    • Library screening identifies novel interaction partners

    • Confirmation with direct one-to-one tests validates hits

  • FRET/BRET Studies in Model Membranes:

    • Fluorescent or bioluminescent tags on Exig_0680 and potential partners

    • Energy transfer indicates close proximity in membrane environment

    • Live-cell imaging reveals dynamics of interactions

Table 1: Comparison of Protein-Protein Interaction Methods for Membrane Proteins

MethodAdvantagesLimitationsSample Preparation Complexity
Co-IPPreserves native interactionsRequires specific antibodiesModerate
Crosslinking MSCaptures transient interactionsComplex data analysisHigh
Split-ubiquitin Y2HHigh-throughput screeningHigher false positive rateLow
FRET/BRETDynamic information in live systemsRequires protein taggingModerate

These approaches provide complementary data that, when combined, offer a comprehensive view of Exig_0680's interaction network .

What are the optimal conditions for functional assays of Exig_0680?

Designing functional assays for a membrane protein with unknown function presents a significant challenge. Based on approaches used for similar proteins, a systematic methodology includes:

  • Buffer Optimization:

    • Test multiple buffer systems (HEPES, Tris, Phosphate) at pH range 6.0-8.0

    • Evaluate various salt concentrations (50-300 mM NaCl)

    • Assess stability with different detergents or nanodiscs/liposomes

  • Activity Screening Approaches:

    • ATPase/GTPase activity assays if sequence suggests nucleotide binding

    • Transport assays using liposomes reconstituted with Exig_0680

    • Binding assays with potential ligands identified through bioinformatics

  • Environmental Parameter Testing:

    • Temperature range testing (20-60°C), given Exiguobacterium's extremophilic nature

    • Salt tolerance evaluation (0-500 mM)

    • pH stability profile (pH 4-10)

While specific activity of Exig_0680 is unknown, these methodological approaches provide a framework for discovering its function . Extremophilic organisms often have unique adaptations, so considering the native environment of Exiguobacterium sibiricum is crucial when designing functional assays.

How can site-directed mutagenesis be used to probe the structure-function relationship of Exig_0680?

Site-directed mutagenesis represents a powerful approach to understanding the relationship between protein structure and function. For Exig_0680, a systematic mutagenesis strategy would include:

  • Target Selection Based on Sequence Analysis:

    • Conserved residues identified through multiple sequence alignment

    • Hydrophobic residues in predicted transmembrane regions

    • Charged residues in loop regions that might participate in interactions

  • Mutation Strategy:

    • Conservative mutations (maintaining similar properties)

    • Non-conservative mutations (dramatically changing properties)

    • Alanine-scanning of specific domains

  • Functional Impact Assessment:

    • Expression level and membrane localization evaluation

    • Stability analysis using thermal shift assays

    • Activity assays (based on identified function)

    • Interaction partner binding assessment

  • Structural Consequences Evaluation:

    • Circular dichroism to assess secondary structure changes

    • Limited proteolysis to identify conformational changes

    • Structural studies on promising mutants

Table 2: Proposed Mutagenesis Targets Based on Exig_0680 Sequence

RegionResidue(s)Rationale for MutationSuggested Mutation(s)
N-terminalM1, Q2Start of protein, potential processingM1L, Q2N
TM region 1L13-L20Hydrophobic core of TM domainL17A, I19F
Loop regionE38-K48Charged residues, potential interaction surfaceE38Q, K48R
Conserved motifP142-Q149Highly conserved among homologsP142A, Q149E
C-terminalL377-V378Terminal residues, potential interactionL377A, V378G

This methodical approach to mutagenesis can reveal critical functional residues and provide insights into the mechanism of action of Exig_0680 .

What strategies can overcome expression challenges when working with Exig_0680?

Expression of membrane proteins like Exig_0680 often encounters specific challenges. When expression yields are low or the protein is misfolded, consider the following methodological solutions:

  • For Poor Expression Levels:

    • Codon optimization for the expression host

    • Use of stronger or more tightly regulated promoters

    • Optimization of induction conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, duration)

    • Testing different fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, etc.) to enhance solubility

    • Screening multiple expression hosts

  • For Protein Aggregation:

    • Reduction of expression temperature (16-20°C)

    • Co-expression with molecular chaperones

    • Addition of specific folding enhancers to growth media

    • Use of specialized E. coli strains designed for membrane proteins

  • For Proteolysis Issues:

    • Addition of protease inhibitors during extraction

    • Use of host strains deficient in specific proteases

    • Design of constructs with stabilized termini

Table 3: Troubleshooting Expression Problems with Membrane Proteins

ProblemPotential CauseSolution StrategyExpected Outcome
Low yieldPoor translationCodon optimization2-5× increase in expression
Toxicity to hostTightly regulated expressionReduced toxicity, higher final yield
Inefficient foldingLower temperature, chaperonesIncreased proportion of folded protein
AggregationHydrophobic regions exposedDetergent screeningImproved solubilization
Improper disulfide formationOxidizing environmentCorrect folding
TruncationInternal translation initiationModify internal Shine-Dalgarno-like sequencesFull-length product
ProteolysisProtease inhibitors, C-term tagsIntact protein

These approaches address the specific challenges noted for full-length protein expression, particularly for hydrophobic proteins with complex folding requirements .

How can researchers overcome solubility and stability issues when working with purified Exig_0680?

Maintaining membrane protein stability after purification represents a significant challenge. For Exig_0680, consider these methodological approaches:

  • Detergent Optimization:

    • Systematic screening of detergent types (maltoside, glucoside, fos-choline series)

    • Testing mixed detergent systems

    • Evaluation of detergent concentration effects on stability

  • Buffer Optimization:

    • Testing various buffer systems (HEPES, Tris, Phosphate)

    • Screening pH range (typically 6.0-8.0)

    • Evaluation of salt type and concentration

    • Addition of stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids, cholesterol)

  • Alternative Membrane Mimetics:

    • Reconstitution into nanodiscs with various MSP proteins and lipid compositions

    • Use of SMALPs (styrene maleic acid lipid particles) for native lipid co-purification

    • Amphipol substitution for long-term stability

  • Storage Optimization:

    • As recommended in the product information, store in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C or -80°C for extended storage

    • Prepare working aliquots to avoid freeze-thaw cycles

    • Evaluate stabilizers for room temperature handling

Using fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography (FSEC) as described in research on other membrane proteins can be valuable for rapidly assessing protein monodispersity under different conditions, which correlates well with long-term stability .

What are the common pitfalls in designing experiments to determine the function of uncharacterized membrane proteins like Exig_0680?

When investigating an uncharacterized membrane protein like Exig_0680, researchers should be aware of several experimental design pitfalls:

  • Hypothesis Limitation Pitfalls:

    • Over-reliance on bioinformatic predictions without experimental validation

    • Narrow focus on a single predicted function

    • Failure to consider organism-specific adaptations (extremophile context)

    Methodological Solution: Implement parallel, diverse functional screening approaches rather than committing to a single functional hypothesis.

  • Technical Challenges:

    • Using inappropriate detergents that disrupt protein function

    • Failure to include essential cofactors or lipids

    • Inadequate controls for non-specific effects

    Methodological Solution: Establish baseline activity in multiple membrane mimetic environments, including nanodiscs with native-like lipid compositions.

  • Data Interpretation Issues:

    • Misattribution of contaminating protein activities

    • Over-interpretation of weak functional signals

    • Disregarding negative results that might indicate specialized conditions

    Methodological Solution: Implement rigorous purification QC, use multiple detection methods, and systematically vary experimental conditions.

  • Contextual Understanding Gaps:

    • Ignoring physiological conditions of the native organism

    • Failing to consider protein partners required for function

    • Overlooking post-translational modifications

    Methodological Solution: Develop assays that incorporate the extremophilic context of Exiguobacterium sibiricum, including temperature optima, pH resilience, and potential interaction partners .

How might advanced structural techniques beyond X-ray crystallography be applied to study Exig_0680?

The structural characterization of membrane proteins has expanded beyond traditional X-ray crystallography. For Exig_0680, several cutting-edge methodological approaches offer promising avenues:

  • Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM):

    • Single-particle analysis for high-resolution structure determination

    • Advantages: Requires less protein, no crystallization needed

    • Methodological approach: Prepare protein in detergent micelles, amphipols, or nanodiscs; optimize grid preparation conditions; collect high-quality data on latest-generation microscopes

  • Integrative Structural Biology:

    • Combining multiple structural techniques (SAXS, NMR, crosslinking-MS)

    • Advantages: Overcomes limitations of individual methods, provides dynamic information

    • Methodological approach: Develop computational frameworks to integrate diverse structural data types

  • AlphaFold2 and Machine Learning Approaches:

    • AI-based structure prediction specifically tuned for membrane proteins

    • Advantages: Rapid structure generation, no experimental protein required

    • Methodological approach: Use multiple sequence alignments of UPF0754 family proteins to generate predictions, validate computationally predicted structures with limited experimental data

  • Solid-State NMR:

    • Study of membrane proteins in native-like lipid environments

    • Advantages: Provides dynamic information, works with non-crystalline samples

    • Methodological approach: Isotopic labeling strategies, specialized pulse sequences for membrane proteins

Table 4: Comparison of Structural Biology Techniques for Membrane Proteins

TechniqueResolution RangeSample RequirementsEnvironmental ContextTime Requirement
X-ray Crystallography1.5-3.5 ÅCrystalsDetergent/LCPWeeks-Years
Cryo-EM2.5-4.5 Å~0.1 mg purified proteinDetergent/NanodiscWeeks-Months
Solid-State NMR3-5 ÅIsotope labeledNative lipidsMonths
AlphaFold2VariableSequence onlyComputationalHours-Days
Integrative methods5-15 ÅMethod dependentVariousWeeks-Months

These approaches represent the leading edge of membrane protein structural biology and could provide breakthrough insights into Exig_0680's structure and function .

What computational approaches can predict functional sites and potential interacting partners for Exig_0680?

Computational biology offers powerful tools for generating functional hypotheses for uncharacterized proteins like Exig_0680. A comprehensive methodological approach includes:

  • Evolutionary Analysis:

    • Conservation mapping across UPF0754 family members

    • Coevolution analysis to identify functionally coupled residues

    • Methodological implementation: Multiple sequence alignment followed by statistical coupling analysis or direct coupling analysis

  • Structural Bioinformatics:

    • Pocket and cavity detection on predicted or experimental structures

    • Electrostatic surface analysis to identify potential binding sites

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to identify conformational states

    • Methodological implementation: Combine AlphaFold2 predictions with specialized cavity detection algorithms and long-timescale simulations

  • Network-Based Predictions:

    • Genome neighborhood analysis to identify functionally related genes

    • Protein-protein interaction network analysis using data from related organisms

    • Methodological implementation: Comparative genomics tools combined with interactome databases

  • Machine Learning Applications:

    • Function prediction using deep learning models trained on known membrane protein functions

    • Ligand binding site prediction using graph neural networks

    • Methodological implementation: Apply specialized membrane protein function prediction tools with appropriate feature encoding

Table 5: Computational Methods for Functional Prediction of Membrane Proteins

MethodPrediction TypeInput RequirementsValidation Approach
Conservation mappingFunctional residuesMSA of homologsSite-directed mutagenesis
Coevolution analysisResidue contacts, functional couplingDeep MSAStructure validation, double mutant cycles
Cavity detectionBinding sites3D structure (predicted or experimental)Ligand screening assays
Molecular dynamicsDynamic behavior, conformational states3D structure, force fieldExperimental dynamics (EPR, FRET)
Genome contextPathway involvementGenome data from multiple organismsCo-expression studies

These computational approaches generate testable hypotheses that can guide experimental design for functional characterization of Exig_0680 .

How might CRISPR-based methods be applied to study the function of Exig_0680 homologs in model organisms?

While direct CRISPR studies in Exiguobacterium sibiricum might be challenging due to limited genetic tools, studying homologs in model organisms offers valuable insights. A methodological framework includes:

  • Homolog Identification and Selection:

    • Bioinformatic identification of UPF0754 family proteins in model organisms

    • Selection criteria: Sequence similarity, conserved domains, genomic context

    • Methodological approach: Reciprocal BLAST, domain architecture analysis, synteny mapping

  • CRISPR Knockout Strategies:

    • Generation of clean knockouts in model organisms (E. coli, B. subtilis)

    • Phenotypic characterization under various stress conditions

    • Methodological approach: CRISPR-Cas9 with non-homologous end joining or homology-directed repair

  • CRISPR Interference/Activation:

    • Reversible gene repression (CRISPRi) or activation (CRISPRa)

    • Allows study of essential genes and dose-dependent phenotypes

    • Methodological approach: dCas9 fusion systems with inducible control

  • Tagged Variant Generation:

    • Endogenous tagging for localization and interaction studies

    • CRISPR-mediated insertion of fluorescent proteins or affinity tags

    • Methodological approach: Homology-directed repair with tag-containing donor templates

Table 6: CRISPR-based Strategies for Functional Genomics of Membrane Proteins

StrategyGenetic ModificationPhenotypic InformationTechnical Complexity
KnockoutGene deletionLoss of functionMedium
CRISPRiReversible repressionPartial loss of function, essentialityMedium
CRISPRaOverexpressionGain of functionHigh
Base editingPoint mutationsStructure-function relationshipsHigh
Endogenous taggingFusion proteinsLocalization, interactionsMedium

These CRISPR-based approaches enable systematic functional characterization of homologous proteins, which can inform hypotheses about Exig_0680's function in its native context .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.