Fold change: ATP synthase genes (atpB, atpF, atpA) are upregulated 2–4× in Alnus glutinosa nodules compared to free-living cells .
Metabolic activity: Enhanced ATP synthase activity supports nitrogenase function (3% of total nodule proteome) .
Proton gradient maintenance: Essential for energizing nitrogenase-mediated N₂ fixation .
Coordination with nif and suf clusters: Facilitates Fe-S cluster assembly for nitrogenase maturation .
| Strain | UniProt ID | Sequence Identity |
|---|---|---|
| F. alni ACN14a | Q0RDA8 | 100% |
| F. sp. EAN1pec | A8L3V9 | 94% |
6/8 ATP synthase cluster genes (FRAAL5930–5937) upregulated in symbiosis .
Downregulation of ammonium assimilation genes (glnA, amtB) in nodules suggests metabolic prioritization of N₂ fixation .
Used to characterize ATP synthase assembly and proton translocation mechanisms .
Proteogenomic tools: Enables tracking of F. alni metabolic shifts during symbiosis .
Instability: Requires glycerol stabilization for long-term storage .
Low yield: Native membrane protein complexity limits high-throughput production .
Structural studies: Cryo-EM analysis to resolve proton channel architecture.
Metabolic modeling: Integrate ATP synthase activity with nitrogen fixation kinetics.
KEGG: fal:FRAAL5937
STRING: 326424.FRAAL5937
Methodological Answer:
Transcriptomics: Compare atpB expression in free-living vs. symbiotic Frankia using RNA-seq (source ).
Mutant studies: Use CRISPRi knockdown in Frankia to assess nodulation efficiency (source ).
Proteomics: Quantify ATP synthase subunits via SILAC or iTRAQ in symbiosis (source ).
Symbiotic Expression Data (Source ):
| Condition | atpB Expression (FPKM) | Nitrogenase Activity (nmol CH/mg protein/hr) |
|---|---|---|
| Free-living (-N) | 120 ± 15 | 0 |
| Nodule (21 dpi) | 250 ± 30 | 450 ± 50 |
Methodological Answer:
Standardize assays: Use identical buffer systems (e.g., 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 5 mM MgCl) (source ).
Control for homologs: Screen for paralogs (e.g., atpB1 vs. atpB2) via BlastP (e-value <1e-10) (source ).
Data reconciliation: Apply meta-analysis tools like RevMan to compare V and K values (source ).
Reported Kinetic Discrepancies (Source ):
| Study | V (μmol/min/mg) | K (mM ATP) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alloisio et al. 2010 | 8.2 ± 0.5 | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 7.0 |
| Ni et al. 2019 | 12.1 ± 1.1 | 0.68 ± 0.08 | 7.5 |
Methodological Answer:
Crosslinking-MS: Use DSSO or BS crosslinkers to stabilize protein complexes, followed by Orbitrap Fusion Lumos analysis (source ).
Genetic interaction screens: Employ Tn-seq to identify co-essential genes with atpB (source ).
Molecular dynamics: Simulate atpB-subunit c interactions using GROMACS (source ).
Identified Interactors (Source ):
| Protein | Function | Interaction Score (SAINT) |
|---|---|---|
| Subunit c (atpE) | F rotor ring formation | 0.98 |
| Cytochrome bd oxidase | Oxidative phosphorylation | 0.87 |
Methodological Answer:
Phenotypic microarrays: Use Biolog plates to assess metabolic shifts under osmotic stress (source ).
Proteomic profiling: Compare ΔatpB vs. wild-type via TMT labeling and LC-MS/MS (source ).
Fluorescence microscopy: Track cytoplasmic pH with BCECF-AM dye (source ).
Stress Response Data (Source ):
| Stress Condition | Wild-Type Growth (OD) | ΔatpB Growth (OD) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| 0.5 M NaCl | 0.8 ± 0.05 | 0.3 ± 0.02* |
| 20% PEG 8000 | 0.6 ± 0.04 | 0.1 ± 0.01* |