Conserved Motifs: Contains hydrophobic regions indicative of membrane association .
Post-Translational Modifications: Predicted myristylation sites, common in viral proteins for host-cell membrane binding .
Functional Uncharacterization: Despite its classification, no direct enzymatic or immune-modulatory roles have been experimentally validated .
FV3-004R is encoded by ORF 004R in the FV3 genome (GenBank: NC_005946.1), which spans 957 nucleotides . FV3 is notable for its recombinant evolution, with studies revealing widespread genetic exchange between FV3 and Common midwife toad virus (CMTV) . While FV3-004R itself has not been linked to recombination events, its genomic neighbors (e.g., ORFs 003R and 005L) show interspecies recombination patterns .
Despite its availability, FV3-004R remains understudied:
KEGG: vg:2947776
FV3-004R is a small uncharacterized protein (60 amino acids) encoded by the frog virus 3 genome. The full amino acid sequence is MNAKYDTDQGVGRMLFLGTIGLAVVVGGLMAYGYYYDGKTPSSGTSFHTASPSFSSRYRY . Based on sequence analysis, the protein contains hydrophobic regions suggesting potential membrane association, though its specific structure-function relationship remains under investigation.
For structural studies, researchers typically express the recombinant protein with an N-terminal His-tag in E. coli expression systems . The protein is generally purified to >90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE before being used in structural analyses such as circular dichroism or crystallography attempts.
FV3 genes are expressed in a coordinated fashion leading to the sequential appearance of immediate early (IE), delayed early (DE), and late (L) viral transcripts . Transcriptome analyses using oligonucleotide microarrays containing 70-mer probes corresponding to each of the 98 FV3 ORFs have been crucial in determining the temporal expression patterns .
Based on comprehensive temporal classification studies of FV3 genes, researchers have identified:
33 immediate early (IE) genes
22 delayed early (DE) genes
36 late (L) genes
While the specific classification of FV3-004R was not explicitly mentioned in the search results, the temporal expression pattern can be determined through similar microarray analyses or RT-PCR validation approaches used for other FV3 genes .
For optimal stability and activity, recombinant FV3-004R protein should be stored according to the following protocol:
Upon receipt, briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute the lyophilized protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being the standard recommendation)
Aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
For short-term use, working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week
It's important to note that repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended as it may lead to protein degradation and loss of activity . For experimental reproducibility, researchers should document the storage conditions and number of freeze-thaw cycles when reporting results using this protein.
The expression and purification of recombinant FV3-004R protein typically follows this methodological approach:
Construct Design: The full-length gene (encoding amino acids 1-60) is cloned into a bacterial expression vector with an N-terminal His-tag .
Expression System: Transform the construct into an appropriate E. coli strain. BL21(DE3) or similar strains are commonly used for recombinant viral protein expression .
Induction Conditions:
Culture bacteria in LB medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics
Grow at 37°C until OD600 reaches 0.6-0.8
Induce with IPTG (typically 0.5-1.0 mM)
Continue growth at lower temperature (16-25°C) for 4-16 hours
Cell Harvest and Lysis:
Harvest cells by centrifugation (5,000 × g, 15 min, 4°C)
Resuspend in lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors
Lyse cells using sonication or high-pressure homogenization
Purification:
Affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA resin to capture His-tagged protein
Wash with increasing imidazole concentrations
Elute with high imidazole buffer
Optional further purification by size exclusion chromatography
Quality Control:
Buffer Exchange and Storage:
Investigating the function of uncharacterized viral proteins like FV3-004R requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:
Bioinformatic Analysis:
Sequence homology searches against characterized proteins
Prediction of structural motifs and domains
Comparative analysis with related ranavirus proteins
Localization Studies:
Express fluorescently-tagged FV3-004R in infected cells
Track subcellular localization using confocal microscopy
Perform co-localization studies with cellular compartment markers
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Yeast two-hybrid screens with host cell proteins
Co-immunoprecipitation experiments
Proximity labeling approaches (BioID or APEX)
Functional Assays:
Gene knockout or knockdown studies using CRISPR-Cas9
Overexpression studies and phenotypic analysis
Effects on viral replication kinetics
Structural Biology:
X-ray crystallography or NMR studies
Cryo-EM analysis in context of viral particles
Host Response Analysis:
Transcriptome analysis of host cells in presence/absence of FV3-004R
Analysis of immune response modulation
A systematic approach combining these methodologies would help elucidate the function of this currently uncharacterized protein.
Several complementary analytical techniques can be employed to study FV3-004R interactions with host proteins:
Affinity Purification-Mass Spectrometry (AP-MS):
Express tagged FV3-004R in host cells
Purify protein complexes using affinity tags
Identify interacting partners by LC-MS/MS
Quantify enrichment against appropriate controls
Proximity-Dependent Biotin Identification (BioID):
Fuse FV3-004R to a biotin ligase (BirA*)
Express in cells and allow biotinylation of proximal proteins
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify by MS
Advantage: captures transient interactions
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):
Immobilize purified FV3-004R on sensor chip
Flow potential interacting proteins over surface
Measure binding kinetics and affinity constants
Advantage: provides quantitative interaction data
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST):
Label FV3-004R or potential binding partners
Monitor thermophoretic movement upon binding
Determine binding constants in solution
Advantage: requires small sample amounts
Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry (XL-MS):
Cross-link protein complexes in cells
Digest and analyze by MS
Identify cross-linked peptides to map interaction sites
Advantage: provides structural information about the complex
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):
Tag FV3-004R and potential partner with fluorophore pairs
Monitor energy transfer as indicator of proximity
Advantage: can be performed in living cells
Each technique has strengths and limitations; therefore, a combination of approaches is recommended for comprehensive interaction characterization.
Recombination between FV3 and other ranaviruses, particularly common midwife toad virus (CMTV), has been widely documented and can significantly impact viral genes including potentially FV3-004R . Analysis of recombination events in ranavirus genomes reveals several key patterns:
Recombination Breakpoints: Most recombination breakpoints are located within open reading frames (ORFs), generating new ORFs and proteins that are mosaics between FV3 and CMTV . This creates chimeric proteins with potentially altered functions.
Protein Composition Ratios: The FV3/CMTV ratio within recombinant ORFs varies from 0 (entirely CMTV-like) to 0.98 (mostly FV3-like), depending on where the recombination events occur .
Impact on Protein Function: When recombination occurs within an ORF, it can generate a novel protein with domains from both parental viruses, potentially altering function, host interactions, or virulence properties.
While the search results don't specifically mention FV3-004R in the context of recombination, the widespread nature of recombination events throughout the FV3 genome suggests this gene could be affected. Researchers investigating FV3-004R should consider analyzing sequence variations across isolates to identify potential recombination events affecting this specific region.
To analyze potential recombination events affecting FV3-004R, researchers should employ a systematic approach combining:
Genome Sequencing:
Full genome sequencing of multiple FV3 isolates from different geographic regions
Use of next-generation sequencing with sufficient depth (>30×)
Assembly and annotation focusing on the FV3-004R region
Recombination Detection Algorithms:
RDP4 suite (incorporating methods like GENECONV, BootScan, MaxChi)
GARD (Genetic Algorithm for Recombination Detection)
HyPhy package for detecting selection pressures in recombinant regions
Comparative Genomic Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment of FV3-004R across isolates
Comparison with homologs in related ranaviruses
Phylogenetic analysis to detect incongruences indicative of recombination
Breakpoint Analysis:
Functional Validation:
Expression of putative recombinant FV3-004R variants
Comparative functional assays
Structural analysis of protein changes
The analysis should include appropriate statistical validation and multiple hypothesis testing correction to minimize false positives in recombination detection.
Understanding the temporal expression pattern of FV3-004R requires comparing its expression with the established patterns of other FV3 genes. FV3 gene expression follows a coordinated cascade with three temporal classes:
Immediate Early (IE) Genes:
Delayed Early (DE) Genes:
Late (L) Genes:
To determine the specific temporal class of FV3-004R, researchers should:
Perform time-course RT-PCR or qRT-PCR analysis (2, 4, and 9 hours post-infection)
Analyze expression in presence of cycloheximide (CHX)
Test expression using temperature-sensitive mutants at non-permissive temperatures
This methodological approach allows precise classification of FV3-004R into one of the three temporal classes, providing insights into its potential role during viral replication.
Though FV3-004R remains uncharacterized, investigating its potential role in viral pathogenesis requires systematic experimental approaches:
Gene Knockout Studies:
Generate FV3 variants with FV3-004R deletions or mutations using reverse genetics
Compare replication kinetics in cell culture
Assess virulence in amphibian models
Measure viral loads in different tissues
Host Response Analysis:
Expose host cells to purified recombinant FV3-004R
Perform RNA-seq to identify transcriptional changes
Analyze immune signaling pathway activation/suppression
Compare with responses to whole virus infection
Cellular Localization and Trafficking:
Create fluorescently-tagged FV3-004R constructs
Track protein localization during infection
Identify potential co-localization with cellular organelles
Examine timing of expression relative to pathogenic events
Interaction with Virulence Factors:
Recombinant Virus Studies:
Create chimeric viruses with FV3-004R variants from different isolates
Test for altered host range or tissue tropism
Examine differences in replication efficiency
Assess impact on host mortality rates
Comparative Analysis Across Isolates:
Compare FV3-004R sequences from isolates with different virulence profiles
Identify potential correlations between sequence variations and pathogenicity
Test hypotheses using recombinant proteins or viruses
The experimental design should include appropriate controls and multiple host cell types or species to account for potential host-specific effects.
Despite being uncharacterized, several experimental approaches can determine if FV3-004R plays a role in immune evasion:
Protein Localization During Infection:
Express tagged FV3-004R in infected cells
Determine if it localizes to immune signaling compartments
Track potential co-localization with immune receptors or adaptors
Host Protein Interaction Screening:
Perform yeast two-hybrid or AP-MS screens against immune signaling proteins
Validate interactions using co-immunoprecipitation
Determine functional consequences of identified interactions
Immune Signaling Pathway Analysis:
Express FV3-004R in reporter cell lines for key immune pathways (NF-κB, IRF3, etc.)
Stimulate cells with immune agonists and measure pathway inhibition
Compare with known viral immune antagonists
Comparative Analysis with Immune Evasion Genes:
Immunological Assays:
Measure cytokine responses in presence/absence of FV3-004R
Analyze effects on antigen presentation pathways
Test impact on interferon production or signaling
Temporal Expression Analysis:
Correlate FV3-004R expression timing with immune response dynamics
Determine if it's expressed early like other immune evasion genes
Analyze if expression changes in response to immune activation
A comprehensive approach using these methodologies would help elucidate any potential role of FV3-004R in immune evasion strategies employed by FV3.
Using CRISPR-Cas9 to edit the FV3 genome and validate FV3-004R function requires a careful experimental design:
Guide RNA Design and Validation:
Design multiple guide RNAs targeting the FV3-004R locus
Test guide RNA efficiency in reporter systems
Ensure specificity by checking for off-target sites in the FV3 genome
Viral Genomic Modification Strategies:
Knockout Approach: Create complete gene deletions or frameshift mutations
Tagging Approach: Insert epitope tags or fluorescent proteins for localization studies
Point Mutations: Introduce specific amino acid changes to test functional hypotheses
Promoter Modification: Alter expression timing to test temporal importance
Delivery System Optimization:
Transfect CRISPR-Cas9 components into permissive cells
Infect with wild-type FV3
Harvest and screen for edited viruses
Mutant Virus Screening and Isolation:
PCR and sequencing to identify desired mutations
Plaque purification to isolate clonal mutant viruses
Verify genome integrity beyond the target site
Phenotypic Characterization:
Growth Curves: Compare replication kinetics with wild-type virus
Cell Tropism: Test infection efficiency in different cell types
Virulence Assays: Assess pathogenicity in suitable amphibian models
Transcriptome Analysis: Examine global changes in viral/host gene expression
Complementation Studies:
Express FV3-004R in trans to rescue mutant phenotypes
Create domain-specific mutants for structure-function analysis
Test cross-complementation with homologs from related ranaviruses
Data Analysis and Interpretation:
Analysis Type | Wild-type FV3 | FV3-004R Knockout | FV3-004R Point Mutant |
---|---|---|---|
Viral Titer (log10 PFU/ml) | [baseline] | [observed change] | [observed change] |
Plaque Size (mm) | [baseline] | [observed change] | [observed change] |
Time to CPE (hours) | [baseline] | [observed change] | [observed change] |
Host Gene Expression | [baseline pattern] | [differential pattern] | [differential pattern] |
Viral Gene Expression | [baseline pattern] | [differential pattern] | [differential pattern] |
This comprehensive approach would provide robust evidence for the function of FV3-004R in the viral life cycle.
When analyzing experimental data related to FV3-004R function, researchers should consider these statistical approaches:
For Growth Curve Analysis:
Area under the curve (AUC) calculations
Repeated measures ANOVA for time course differences
Non-linear regression for growth rate parameters
Sample data structure:
Time (h) | WT FV3 (log10 PFU/ml) | FV3-004R Mutant (log10 PFU/ml) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | n.s. |
12 | 4.7 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.4 | <0.05 |
24 | 6.8 ± 0.4 | 5.2 ± 0.5 | <0.01 |
48 | 7.5 ± 0.3 | 6.1 ± 0.4 | <0.01 |
72 | 7.3 ± 0.4 | 6.0 ± 0.5 | <0.01 |
For Protein Interaction Studies:
Significance Analysis of INTeractome (SAINT) for AP-MS data
Permutation tests for co-immunoprecipitation enrichment
Calculation of enrichment factors with confidence intervals
For Transcriptomics/Proteomics:
Differential expression analysis (DESeq2, limma)
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)
Pathway analysis with multiple testing correction
Volcano plot visualization of significant changes
For Functional Assays:
Student's t-test or ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests
Non-parametric alternatives when normality cannot be assumed
Effect size calculations (Cohen's d or similar)
For Recombination Analysis:
Statistical tests implemented in recombination detection software
Phylogenetic incongruence tests
Breakpoint distribution analysis
Multiple test correction (FDR or Bonferroni)
For Replication Studies:
Meta-analysis approaches for combining multiple experiments
Power analysis for determining adequate sample sizes
Bayesian approaches for updating confidence with new data
Each analytical approach should include appropriate controls, biological replicates (minimum n=3), and clear reporting of statistical methods, significance thresholds, and effect sizes.
Integrating data from diverse experimental approaches to model FV3-004R function requires a systematic multi-omics strategy:
Data Integration Framework:
Establish a centralized database for all FV3-004R experimental data
Standardize data formats for cross-experiment comparability
Implement data quality control and normalization procedures
Multi-omics Data Fusion:
Integrate genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and interactomics data
Use computational approaches like Similarity Network Fusion (SNF)
Apply machine learning for pattern discovery across datasets
Example integration table:
Data Type | Observation | Confidence | Supporting Evidence |
---|---|---|---|
Localization | Membrane-associated | High | Fluorescence microscopy, fractionation studies |
Interactome | Binds host protein X | Medium | AP-MS, Y2H, co-IP validation |
Expression | IE gene class | High | RT-PCR, microarray, CHX treatment |
Structure | Contains transmembrane domain | Medium | Prediction algorithms, CD spectroscopy |
Function | Inhibits pathway Y | Medium | Reporter assays, knockout phenotype |
Network Analysis Approaches:
Construct protein-protein interaction networks
Identify functional modules and pathways
Map FV3-004R within the viral-host interaction landscape
Predict functional roles based on network position
Temporal Dimension Integration:
Align data across infection time points
Create dynamic models of FV3-004R activity
Correlate expression timing with functional events
Comparative Analysis Framework:
Integrate data from FV3-004R homologs in related viruses
Compare recombinant variants with different functions
Build evolutionary context for functional predictions
Validation Strategy:
Design experiments to test model predictions
Implement iterative cycles of prediction and validation
Quantify model confidence and identify knowledge gaps
Visual and Computational Representation:
Develop interactive visualizations of integrated data
Create computational models of FV3-004R function
Update models as new data becomes available
This integrated approach transforms isolated experimental findings into a comprehensive functional model, revealing emergent properties not apparent from individual datasets.
Interpreting recombination data for FV3 genes presents several key challenges that researchers must address through careful methodological approaches:
Distinguishing Recombination from Convergent Evolution:
Challenge: Similar sequences may arise through convergent evolution rather than recombination
Solution: Use multiple recombination detection methods and require consensus across algorithms
Analysis Approach: Compare evolutionary rates across different gene regions and examine spatial patterns of sequence similarity
Breakpoint Precision:
Challenge: Determining exact recombination breakpoints can be difficult
Solution: Implement bootscanning methods with small window sizes and perform sensitivity analyses
Analysis Approach: Create breakpoint distribution plots with confidence intervals
Functional Interpretation of Recombinants:
Sampling Bias:
Challenge: Limited sampling may miss key recombinant lineages
Solution: Include diverse geographical and temporal sampling
Analysis Approach: Perform rarefaction analysis to estimate sampling completeness
Recombination vs. Sequencing Artifacts:
Challenge: Sequencing errors or assembly issues may mimic recombination signals
Solution: Use high-quality sequencing with sufficient depth and validate unusual patterns
Analysis Approach: Apply quality filters and compare results across technical replicates
Temporal Dynamics of Recombination:
Distinguishing Direct vs. Indirect Recombination:
Challenge: Determining if recombination occurred directly between two strains or through intermediates
Solution: Sample potential intermediate hosts and perform coalescent analyses
Analysis Approach: Network-based representations of recombination patterns rather than simple trees
A robust analysis workflow addressing these challenges would include:
High-quality genome sequencing of diverse isolates
Application of multiple recombination detection algorithms
Statistical validation with appropriate null models
Mapping of recombination breakpoints to protein structures
Functional testing of recombinant variants
Integration with epidemiological and ecological data
This comprehensive approach would provide a more accurate picture of recombination affecting FV3-004R and its potential functional consequences.