Recombinant Geobacillus kaustophilus UPF0754 membrane protein GK0639 (GK0639)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, but this can be adjusted as per your needs.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. To request a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
GK0639; UPF0754 membrane protein GK0639
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-377
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Geobacillus kaustophilus (strain HTA426)
Target Names
GK0639
Target Protein Sequence
METFVYLLFMVAVGALIGGVTNFIAIVMLFRPYEPMYVFGKRLPFTPGLIPKRRRELAEQ LGKTVVEHLVTPEGLRRKLMDPSFTAEMAEWGREWLRKWLARKETPAELLERLGIRSPAE RLEAMAAEQAERAYERWSETWRLRPIRDVLPAELKQTMEARVESLAGYLADRTLDYFRSE EGKQQISSMIERFFQERGMVGNMLQMLLGNVNFVDKVQAELGKFLRHAGTREVLSRLLWT EWNKWLDYPLATVEEMIGRRRIDEAVRSAARRLVQSGSWLHRPLDELIAPYEQPLFDRLI PQAAATVSCLLSDKIEAIVAQLGLADIVRDQVESFSLRRLEAIILSIARRELKMITYLGA LLGGLIGAVQGVIGLWL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: gka:GK0639

STRING: 235909.GK0639

Protein Families
UPF0754 family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What are the optimal expression systems for Recombinant Geobacillus kaustophilus UPF0754 membrane protein GK0639?

The recombinant full-length Geobacillus kaustophilus UPF0754 membrane protein GK0639 (1-377aa) is most commonly expressed in E. coli expression systems with an N-terminal His tag . This approach offers several advantages for membrane protein expression:

For optimal expression, consider the following methodological parameters:

  • Expression vector selection: Vectors with strong inducible promoters like T7 are preferred for controlled expression of membrane proteins.

  • Host strain optimization: E. coli strains specifically designed for membrane protein expression (such as C41(DE3) or C43(DE3)) often yield better results than standard laboratory strains.

  • Induction conditions: Lower temperatures (16-25°C) and reduced inducer concentrations typically improve proper folding of membrane proteins.

  • Media composition: Enhanced media formulations with osmolytes or specific additives can improve yield and stability.

When designing your expression experiments, implement appropriate controls and document qualitative observations throughout the process, as these can provide valuable insights into optimizing conditions .

What are the recommended storage and reconstitution protocols for GK0639 protein?

For optimal stability and activity of recombinant GK0639 protein, adhere to these storage and reconstitution guidelines:

  • Storage conditions: Store lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Working aliquots can be maintained at 4°C for up to one week. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they can compromise protein integrity .

  • Buffer composition: The optimal storage buffer consists of Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose at pH 8.0 .

  • Reconstitution procedure:

    • Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to bring contents to the bottom

    • Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

    • Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (default recommendation is 50%)

    • Aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C

  • Quality control: Verify protein integrity using SDS-PAGE analysis after reconstitution to ensure purity remains greater than 90%.

Maintaining proper documentation of storage conditions and reconstitution procedures is essential for experimental reproducibility and troubleshooting potential issues with protein activity.

What experimental design considerations are critical when studying membrane protein function of GK0639?

When designing experiments to investigate GK0639 membrane protein function, researchers should implement a systematic approach addressing these critical factors:

Table 1. Experimental Design Matrix for GK0639 Functional Studies

ParameterControl ConditionTest ConditionsMeasurement MethodExpected Outcome
Temperature37°C45°C, 55°C, 65°CActivity assay, CD spectroscopyIncreased stability at higher temperatures
pH7.06.0, 8.0, 9.0Activity assay, fluorescenceOptimal activity at pH 8.0
Lipid compositionStandard liposomesVaried acyl chain length, head groupsReconstitution efficiency, activityPreference for specific lipid environments
Salt concentration150 mM NaCl0-500 mM NaCl, KCl, MgCl₂Binding assays, thermal stabilityIon-dependent conformational changes

This comprehensive approach aligns with established principles of experimental design in biological research, ensuring that investigations of GK0639 function yield reliable and interpretable results .

How can researchers effectively characterize the structure-function relationship of GK0639?

Elucidating the structure-function relationship of GK0639 requires an integrated experimental approach that combines structural analysis with functional assays:

  • Structural characterization approaches:

    • X-ray crystallography: Challenging for membrane proteins but provides high-resolution structural data

    • Cryo-electron microscopy: Increasingly powerful for membrane protein structure determination

    • NMR spectroscopy: Useful for dynamics studies of specific domains or regions

    • Computational modeling: Based on the known amino acid sequence to predict structure and functional domains

  • Functional domain mapping:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues

    • Truncation constructs to isolate functional domains

    • Chimeric proteins with related membrane proteins

    • Cross-linking studies to identify interaction interfaces

  • Integration of structural and functional data:

    • Correlation of conformational changes with functional states

    • Identification of potential ligand-binding sites

    • Mapping of potential interaction partners

When interpreting structure-function data, researchers should employ both qualitative observations and quantitative analyses, with careful consideration of experimental limitations when extrapolating to in vivo function .

What approaches can be used to investigate potential interactions between GK0639 and other cellular components?

Investigating the interaction network of GK0639 within cellular systems requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • In vitro interaction studies:

    • Pull-down assays using His-tagged GK0639 as bait

    • Surface plasmon resonance for real-time binding kinetics

    • Isothermal titration calorimetry for thermodynamic parameters

    • Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) for proximity analysis

  • In vivo interaction mapping:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation from native or heterologous expression systems

    • Bacterial two-hybrid systems adapted for membrane proteins

    • In vivo crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry (XL-MS)

    • Proximity labeling approaches (BioID, APEX)

  • Functional validation of interactions:

    • Co-expression studies to assess functional modulation

    • Competitive binding assays with predicted interaction partners

    • Genetic interaction studies in appropriate host systems

    • Mutational analysis of predicted interaction interfaces

  • Data analysis and interpretation:

    • Network analysis of identified interactions

    • Comparison with known interaction partners of homologous proteins

    • Integration with structural data to validate interaction models

The experimental design should include appropriate controls for non-specific binding, particularly important for membrane proteins that may have hydrophobic interaction propensities. Quantitative analysis of binding parameters should be conducted with appropriate statistical rigor and reported with measures of variation .

How can researchers design experiments to investigate the role of GK0639 in bacterial physiology?

Investigating the physiological role of GK0639 requires a multi-faceted experimental approach that integrates genetic, biochemical, and physiological studies:

  • Genetic manipulation strategies:

    • Gene deletion or knockdown to assess loss-of-function phenotypes

    • Controlled overexpression to evaluate gain-of-function effects

    • Complementation studies to confirm phenotype specificity

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of key residues for structure-function analysis

  • Phenotypic characterization:

    • Growth curve analysis under various environmental conditions

    • Membrane integrity assessments

    • Stress response profiling (temperature, pH, osmotic)

    • Metabolic profiling using techniques like metabolomics

  • Localization studies:

    • Fluorescent protein fusions to determine subcellular localization

    • Immunolocalization with specific antibodies

    • Membrane fractionation and Western blot analysis

    • Protease accessibility assays to determine membrane topology

  • Comparative analysis:

    • Examination of GK0639 function in related thermophilic bacteria

    • Heterologous expression in model organisms for complementation studies

    • Evolutionary analysis of protein conservation and variation

Table 2. Experimental Approaches for GK0639 Physiological Function Analysis

ApproachMethodologyData CollectionAnalysis MethodExpected Outcomes
Gene knockoutCRISPR-Cas, homologous recombinationGrowth rates, stress survivalComparative statistics, survival curvesIdentification of growth or stress phenotypes
Protein localizationFluorescent tagging, microscopyFluorescence images, time-lapseImage analysis, colocalizationMembrane distribution patterns, potential functional sites
Transcriptional responseRNA-seq, qPCRExpression levels under varying conditionsDifferential expression analysisCo-regulated genes suggesting functional pathways
Protein-protein interactionsCo-IP, bacterial two-hybridInteraction partners, binding affinitiesNetwork analysis, binding kineticsIdentification of functional complexes

When designing these experiments, researchers must carefully control variables that might affect membrane protein function, including temperature, pH, and ionic conditions. The experimental design should include appropriate controls and be structured to allow for both qualitative observations and quantitative data analysis .

What are the best approaches to optimize reconstitution of GK0639 into model membrane systems?

Reconstitution of membrane proteins like GK0639 into model membrane systems is critical for functional studies. The following methodological approaches should be considered:

  • Selection of appropriate membrane mimetics:

    • Detergent micelles: Initial solubilization typically uses mild detergents like DDM or LMNG

    • Liposomes: Various lipid compositions should be tested to identify optimal environment

    • Nanodiscs: Provide a native-like bilayer environment with controlled size

    • Polymer-based systems: Amphipols or SMALPs can maintain native lipid interactions

  • Reconstitution protocol optimization:

    • Detergent removal methods: Dialysis, Bio-Beads, or cyclodextrin adsorption

    • Protein:lipid ratios: Typically starting at 1:100 and optimizing based on function

    • Buffer composition: Particularly important for thermostable proteins like GK0639

    • Temperature control during reconstitution: Critical for thermophilic proteins

  • Quality control assessments:

    • Size-exclusion chromatography to verify monodispersity

    • Negative-stain or cryo-electron microscopy to visualize proteoliposomes

    • Fluorescence-based assays to assess protein orientation

    • Circular dichroism to confirm secondary structure retention

  • Functional validation:

    • Activity assays comparing different reconstitution conditions

    • Stability assessments at various temperatures

    • Ligand binding studies in the reconstituted system

When reporting reconstitution results, provide detailed protocols including exact composition of lipid mixtures, protein:lipid ratios, buffer components, and temperature conditions to ensure reproducibility .

How can researchers design appropriate controls when studying thermostable proteins like GK0639?

Designing appropriate controls for experimental studies with thermostable proteins like GK0639 requires specific considerations:

  • Temperature-related controls:

    • Non-thermostable homolog: Include a mesophilic homolog protein as negative control

    • Denaturation controls: Heat treatments exceeding the expected stability threshold

    • Temperature gradient experiments: Rather than single-point comparisons

    • Internal calibration: Use of known thermostable markers for comparison

  • Experimental subject controls:

    • Wild-type versus mutant comparisons

    • Protein variants with disrupted functional domains

    • Concentration-matched controls for activity assays

    • Age-matched protein preparations to control for degradation effects

  • Measurement controls:

    • Buffer-only controls to establish baselines

    • Instrument calibration specific to high-temperature conditions

    • Time-course measurements to distinguish stability from activity

    • Multiple measurement techniques to validate observations

  • Statistical approaches:

    • Appropriate sample sizes (n≥3) for robust statistical analysis

    • Analysis of variance to determine significant differences

    • Non-parametric tests when data distribution is non-normal

    • Calculation of standard deviation to quantify variability

Table 3. Control Design Matrix for GK0639 Thermostability Experiments

Control TypePurposeImplementationData Analysis Approach
Negative controlsEstablish baselineBuffer-only samples, denatured proteinBackground subtraction, baseline comparison
Positive controlsValidate assayKnown thermostable proteinRelative stability comparison
Internal controlsAccount for variabilityMultiple batches of same preparationAnalysis of variance, standard deviation
Process controlsValidate methodologyStandard curves, calibration samplesMethod validation, error analysis

A well-designed experimental control strategy will address variables specific to thermostable membrane proteins while adhering to fundamental experimental design principles, enhancing the validity and reproducibility of results .

What statistical methods are most appropriate for analyzing GK0639 functional data?

Selecting appropriate statistical methods for analyzing GK0639 functional data requires consideration of experimental design, data distribution, and research questions:

  • Descriptive statistics:

    • For quantitative data: Calculate mean, median, standard deviation, and confidence intervals

    • For qualitative observations: Frequency tables or histograms

    • Data presentation: Report both central tendency and measures of variation

  • Inferential statistics for hypothesis testing:

    • Parametric tests (when normality assumptions are met):

      • t-tests for comparing two conditions

      • ANOVA for multiple conditions followed by post-hoc tests

      • Regression analysis for relationship between variables

    • Non-parametric alternatives (when data is not normally distributed):

      • Mann-Whitney U test (instead of t-test)

      • Kruskal-Wallis test (instead of ANOVA)

      • Spearman correlation (instead of Pearson)

  • Specialized analyses for membrane protein studies:

    • Binding kinetics: Non-linear regression for Kd determination

    • Thermal stability: Boltzmann sigmoidal fitting for Tm calculation

    • Structural changes: Statistical analysis of spectroscopic data

    • Activity assays: Michaelis-Menten kinetics analysis

  • Statistical power and experimental design considerations:

    • Sample size determination through power analysis

    • Randomization of experimental units

    • Blocking design to control for known sources of variation

    • Repeated measures approaches when appropriate

When reporting statistical results, include the specific test used, p-values, confidence intervals, and effect sizes. For complex datasets, consider multivariate statistical approaches or machine learning methods to identify patterns that may not be apparent with univariate statistics .

How can researchers troubleshoot common issues in GK0639 expression and purification?

Troubleshooting expression and purification of membrane proteins like GK0639 requires systematic problem identification and resolution:

  • Low expression yield troubleshooting:

    • Optimize codon usage for expression host

    • Test different promoter strengths and induction conditions

    • Evaluate alternate fusion tags or expression vectors

    • Screen multiple E. coli strains designed for membrane proteins

    • Adjust growth temperature, typically lowering to 16-25°C

    • Supplement media with specific cofactors or membrane components

  • Solubilization challenges:

    • Screen multiple detergents (non-ionic, zwitterionic, mild)

    • Optimize detergent concentration and buffer composition

    • Test mixed micelle approaches with multiple detergents

    • Evaluate solubilization time and temperature

    • Consider native lipid addition during solubilization

  • Purification optimization:

    • Refine affinity chromatography conditions (imidazole gradient)

    • Implement additional purification steps (ion exchange, size exclusion)

    • Optimize buffer composition to enhance stability

    • Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids, ligands)

    • Monitor protein quality throughout purification

  • Protein quality assessment:

    • SDS-PAGE for purity evaluation at each step

    • Western blot for target protein verification

    • Dynamic light scattering for aggregation analysis

    • Functional assays to confirm activity is maintained

Table 4. Troubleshooting Guide for GK0639 Expression and Purification

IssuePotential CausesDiagnostic ApproachResolution Strategies
Low expressionToxicity, protein degradation, poor transcription/translationSDS-PAGE time course, RT-PCR, Western blotAdjust induction OD, lower temperature, change host strain
Poor solubilizationInappropriate detergent, insufficient concentration, aggregationSolubility screening, DLS analysisTest detergent panel, optimize buffer conditions
Precipitation during purificationDetergent stripping, aggregation, instabilityVisual inspection, absorbance at 320nmAdd stabilizers, maintain CMC, adjust buffer components
Loss of activityDenaturation, cofactor loss, improper foldingActivity assays at each stepAdd cofactors, optimize purification speed, maintain native lipids

Researchers should maintain detailed records of all experimental conditions and observations to facilitate systematic troubleshooting and optimization. Qualitative observations during the purification process can provide valuable insights for protocol refinement .

What are promising research applications for GK0639 based on its properties and structural features?

Based on the properties of GK0639 as a thermostable membrane protein from Geobacillus kaustophilus, several promising research directions emerge:

  • Structural biology advances:

    • Utilizing GK0639 as a model system for membrane protein crystallization techniques

    • Investigating thermostability mechanisms through comparative structural analysis

    • Developing improved computational prediction models for membrane protein structures

  • Biotechnological applications:

    • Engineering enhanced biosensors using thermostable membrane protein scaffolds

    • Developing robust biocatalysts for high-temperature industrial processes

    • Creating thermostable membrane protein expression systems

  • Fundamental membrane biology:

    • Investigating membrane adaptation mechanisms in thermophilic organisms

    • Studying protein-lipid interactions under extreme conditions

    • Exploring evolutionary conservation of membrane protein functions

  • Antibacterial research connections:

    • Investigating potential relationships between membrane proteins and antibacterial resistance

    • Exploring parallels with antibacterial production in Geobacillus kaustophilus Tm6T2 (a)

    • Developing targeted approaches to membrane proteins as antimicrobial targets

These research directions should be pursued using rigorous experimental design principles, accounting for variability, establishing appropriate controls, and employing suitable statistical analyses .

How can comparative analysis with other membrane proteins enhance our understanding of GK0639?

Comparative analysis provides a powerful approach to understand the structure, function, and evolution of GK0639:

  • Homology-based functional prediction:

    • Sequence alignment with characterized membrane proteins

    • Identification of conserved functional motifs

    • Phylogenetic analysis to trace evolutionary relationships

    • Structural comparison with solved membrane protein structures

  • Cross-species functional conservation:

    • Expression of GK0639 homologs from different thermophilic species

    • Functional complementation studies in model organisms

    • Comparative analysis of thermal stability mechanisms

    • Identification of species-specific adaptations

  • Experimental approaches for comparative studies:

    • Chimeric protein construction to map functional domains

    • Parallel characterization of homologs under identical conditions

    • Systematic mutagenesis of divergent residues

    • Computational simulation of evolutionary trajectories

  • Integration with systems biology:

    • Comparative genomic context analysis

    • Metabolic pathway reconstruction across species

    • Protein-protein interaction network comparison

    • Transcriptional regulation pattern analysis

When conducting comparative analyses, researchers should carefully document methodological approaches and analytical parameters to ensure reproducibility and facilitate meta-analysis across different studies .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.