Recombinant Geobacter sulfurreducens Isoleucine--tRNA ligase (ileS), partial, is a recombinant protein derived from the bacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens. This enzyme plays a crucial role in the process of attaching the amino acid isoleucine to its corresponding transfer RNA (tRNA) molecule, which is essential for protein synthesis. The term "partial" indicates that this recombinant protein may not represent the full-length native enzyme but rather a fragment or a construct designed for specific research or application purposes.
Isoleucine--tRNA ligase, also known as isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, is responsible for catalyzing the attachment of isoleucine to its cognate tRNA, forming isoleucyl-tRNA. This process is critical for ensuring the accurate translation of genetic information during protein synthesis. The enzyme recognizes specific tRNA molecules and attaches the appropriate amino acid, thereby preventing the incorporation of incorrect amino acids into proteins.
KEGG: gsu:GSU3136
STRING: 243231.GSU3136
Geobacter sulfurreducens is a gram-negative metal- and sulfur-reducing proteobacterium that was first isolated in Norman, Oklahoma from materials found around a contaminated ditch . It is characterized as a rod-shaped, aerotolerant anaerobe with non-fermentative metabolism, featuring flagellum and type four pili . The organism was discovered by Derek R. Lovley in 1987 and has since become a model organism for studying electroactive bacteria due to its ability to transfer electrons to metallic minerals in natural environments, essentially "breathing" metals .
The Isoleucine--tRNA ligase (ileS) from G. sulfurreducens is of particular interest because aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are essential enzymes responsible for accurately charging tRNAs with their cognate amino acids, a crucial step in protein synthesis. Within the context of G. sulfurreducens' unique metabolism, which is heavily dependent on cytochromes and characterized by high lipid and iron content compared to other bacteria, understanding the function and regulation of ileS provides insights into how this organism maintains translational fidelity under its distinctive physiological conditions .
Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS) is responsible for decoding isoleucine codons in all three domains of life . As a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, IleRS catalyzes a two-step reaction: first, it activates isoleucine with ATP to form isoleucyl-AMP, and second, it transfers the activated isoleucine to the 3'-end of the appropriate tRNA molecule to form isoleucyl-tRNA^Ile .
The enzyme is built around a conserved N-terminal Rossmann fold catalytic domain that encloses the synthetic site where amino acid activation occurs . Additionally, IleRS contains a connective peptide 1 (CP1) inserted between the two halves of the catalytic domain, which folds into an independent domain hosting the post-transfer editing site . This structural arrangement is shared with closely related class I valyl- and leucyl-tRNA synthetases .
A critical aspect of IleRS function is its ability to distinguish between the cognate amino acid isoleucine and structurally similar non-cognate amino acids such as valine. The discrimination factor between isoleucine and valine can be as low as 200, necessitating editing mechanisms to prevent misincorporation of incorrect amino acids during protein synthesis .
The expression and purification of recombinant G. sulfurreducens IleRS typically follows standard protocols for recombinant protein production, adapted to the specific characteristics of this enzyme. Based on methodologies described for related aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the following approach is recommended:
Cloning Strategy:
PCR amplification of the ileS gene from G. sulfurreducens genomic DNA
Insertion into an expression vector (commonly pET series) with an appropriate affinity tag (His6 or GST)
Transformation into an E. coli expression strain (BL21(DE3) or derivatives)
Expression Conditions:
Culture in LB or rich media (e.g., TB) at 30°C until OD600 reaches 0.6-0.8
Induction with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG
Post-induction growth at 18-25°C for 12-16 hours to minimize inclusion body formation
Purification Protocol:
Cell lysis by sonication or French press in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and 10% glycerol
Affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA or glutathione resin
Ion exchange chromatography (typically Q-Sepharose)
Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing
Activity Assessment:
ATP-PPi exchange assay to measure amino acid activation
Aminoacylation assay using radioactive amino acids or other detection methods
Editing assay to assess hydrolysis of misacylated tRNA species
The purified enzyme should be stored in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, and 50% glycerol at -80°C for long-term stability.
Based on studies of IleRS from related organisms and the unique characteristics of G. sulfurreducens, the following biochemical properties can be anticipated for G. sulfurreducens IleRS:
| Property | Characteristic | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | ~110-120 kDa | Typical for bacterial IleRS |
| Optimal pH | 7.5-8.0 | For aminoacylation activity |
| Optimal Temperature | 30-37°C | Reflecting G. sulfurreducens growth conditions |
| Metal Ion Requirement | Mg²⁺ (2-5 mM) | Essential for ATP binding and catalysis |
| ATP Km | 0.1-0.5 mM | For isoleucine activation |
| Isoleucine Km | 10-50 μM | For aminoacylation reaction |
| tRNA^Ile Km | 0.5-2 μM | For aminoacylation reaction |
| Editing Activity | Present | Post-transfer editing against misactivated valine |
| Substrate Specificity | High for Ile vs. Val (>200-fold) | Discrimination factor |
The enzyme is expected to have a relatively high thermal stability compared to IleRS from mesophilic organisms, consistent with G. sulfurreducens' adaptation to various environmental conditions. Additionally, given the high iron content of G. sulfurreducens cells, the enzyme might display specific adaptations related to function in an iron-rich cellular environment .
G. sulfurreducens IleRS likely employs both pre-transfer and post-transfer editing mechanisms similar to other bacterial IleRS enzymes, but with potential adaptations reflecting its unique metabolism. In bacterial IleRS enzymes like that from E. coli, tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing contributes up to 30% of total editing activity . This mechanism involves hydrolysis of non-cognate aminoacyl-AMP intermediates before transfer to tRNA.
The post-transfer editing activity, which hydrolyzes misacylated tRNAs and is located in the CP1 domain, is more universally conserved. This domain in G. sulfurreducens IleRS would be expected to efficiently hydrolyze Val-tRNA^Ile with rates potentially similar to those observed in other bacterial enzymes (around 40 s^-1) . Given G. sulfurreducens' unique ecological niche and metabolic adaptations, its IleRS might have evolved specific features in its editing domain to accommodate its particular cellular environment.
The discrimination factors for non-cognate amino acids in G. sulfurreducens IleRS are likely similar to other bacterial IleRS enzymes: approximately 200-fold against valine and potentially 6000-7000-fold against α-aminobutyrate (Abu) . These discrimination factors would necessitate editing mechanisms to prevent misincorporation during protein synthesis, particularly under stress conditions where non-proteinogenic amino acids might accumulate.
G. sulfurreducens possesses a unique isoleucine biosynthesis pathway that distinguishes it from model organisms like E. coli. While E. coli synthesizes the isoleucine precursor 2-oxobutanoate primarily from threonine via threonine ammonia-lyase, G. sulfurreducens utilizes both this pathway and an alternative citramalate pathway, with the latter serving as the main biosynthetic route .
This metabolic adaptation has several implications for ileS function:
Substrate Availability: The citramalate pathway, which synthesizes 2-oxobutanoate from acetyl-coenzyme A and pyruvate, likely provides a more abundant supply of isoleucine under G. sulfurreducens' typical growth conditions. The ileS enzyme must function efficiently with potentially different steady-state concentrations of isoleucine compared to organisms using only the threonine pathway.
Metabolic Integration: The genes encoding citramalate synthase (GSU1798) and threonine ammonia-lyase (GSU0486) have been identified in G. sulfurreducens, with knockout studies demonstrating that mutants lacking both enzymes are isoleucine auxotrophs, while single mutants can grow without isoleucine supplementation . This metabolic flexibility may influence the regulation of ileS expression and activity.
Evolutionary Adaptation: The citramalate synthase of G. sulfurreducens represents the first characterized member of a phylogenetically distinct clade of citramalate synthases with representatives across diverse microorganisms . This suggests that the alternative isoleucine biosynthesis pathway and potentially the ileS enzyme have co-evolved specific features adapted to G. sulfurreducens' metabolic needs.
Response to Environmental Conditions: The dual pathway for isoleucine biosynthesis may allow G. sulfurreducens to maintain adequate isoleucine production under varying environmental conditions, potentially affecting the substrate availability for ileS and thus influencing its catalytic efficiency and fidelity.
G. sulfurreducens exhibits a unique cellular composition characterized by high lipid and iron content compared to other bacteria . This distinctive composition likely influences ileS function and regulation in several ways:
The cumulative effect of these factors suggests that G. sulfurreducens ileS may possess unique structural and functional adaptations not observed in ileS enzymes from model organisms with different cellular compositions and metabolic strategies.
Given G. sulfurreducens' unique ability to reduce metals and its adaptation to metal-rich environments, several specialized experimental approaches can be employed to investigate the relationship between metal reduction and ileS activity:
Bioelectrochemical Systems:
Grow G. sulfurreducens in three-electrode systems with controlled electrode potentials
Compare ileS expression, protein levels, and activity across different redox conditions
Correlate ileS function with current production as a measure of electron transfer activity
Metal Reduction Assays:
Culture cells with various electron acceptors (Fe(III), Mn(IV), electrodes)
Extract ileS and measure activity to determine if electron acceptor type affects enzyme function
Compare amino acid misincorporation rates under different respiratory conditions
Redox-Dependent Proteomics:
Apply redox proteomics techniques to identify potential redox-sensitive residues in ileS
Perform ICAT (isotope-coded affinity tag) labeling to quantify cysteine oxidation states
Use pulsed SILAC to measure ileS turnover under different redox conditions
In vivo Translation Fidelity Assays:
Construct reporter strains containing engineered isoleucine codons at critical positions
Measure mistranslation rates under varying metal reduction conditions
Correlate with direct measurements of tRNA charging accuracy
Integrated Multi-omics Approach:
Combine transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to create a systems-level view
Track isoleucine pathway intermediates, ileS expression, and protein error rates simultaneously
Develop computational models to predict ileS regulation in response to metal reduction
| Experimental Approach | Measured Parameter | Technique | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bioelectrochemical | Current density | Chronoamperometry | Correlation between electron transfer rate and ileS expression |
| ileS expression | RT-qPCR | Potential upregulation under high current conditions | |
| Metal Reduction | Fe(III) reduction rate | Ferrozine assay | Relationship between reduction rate and aminoacylation fidelity |
| Aminoacylation kinetics | [32P]-PPi exchange | Altered kinetic parameters during active metal reduction | |
| Redox Proteomics | Oxidation states of ileS | Mass spectrometry | Identification of redox-sensitive residues |
| Protein-protein interactions | Co-immunoprecipitation | Potential redox-dependent interaction partners | |
| Translation Fidelity | Mistranslation rate | Fluorescent reporters | Quantitative assessment of translation errors |
| tRNA charging levels | Northern blotting | Changes in charged vs. uncharged tRNA^Ile ratio | |
| Multi-omics | Integrated cellular response | Data integration algorithms | Systems-level model of ileS regulation |
The accurate measurement of editing activity in G. sulfurreducens IleRS requires several complementary approaches to distinguish between pre-transfer and post-transfer editing mechanisms and to quantify their relative contributions. The following methodologies are recommended:
ATP/PPi Exchange Assay for Amino Acid Activation:
Reaction mixture: 100 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM KCl, 2 mM ATP, 2 mM [32P]PPi (1-5 cpm/pmol), and varying concentrations of amino acids
Include purified IleRS at 10-50 nM concentration
Incubate at 37°C for time points from 30 seconds to 10 minutes
Quantify [32P]ATP formation by thin-layer chromatography or charcoal adsorption
Calculate activation rates for isoleucine vs. non-cognate amino acids like valine
tRNA Aminoacylation Assay:
Reaction mixture: 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl₂, 50 mM KCl, 4 mM ATP, 2 mM DTT, 0.1 μg/μl BSA, 0.004 units/μl inorganic pyrophosphatase, and 200 μM ATP
Include 10-15 μM tRNA^Ile and either 2 mM isoleucine or 20 mM valine
Use 15-50 nM IleRS depending on the amino acid used
Quantify aminoacylated tRNA by acid precipitation and filter binding or by using [14C/3H]-labeled amino acids
Post-transfer Editing Assay:
Prepare misacylated Val-tRNA^Ile using a mutant IleRS with compromised editing
Reaction mixture: 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl₂, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM DTT
Add wild-type IleRS at 10-50 nM concentration
Monitor deacylation by acid precipitation and filter binding
Calculate deacylation rate constants (kdeacyl)
Pre-transfer Editing Analysis:
Perform aminoacylation with and without tRNA to detect tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing
Measure AMP formation using [α-32P]ATP and thin-layer chromatography
Compare AMP production rates with different amino acids and in the presence/absence of tRNA
Use kinetic modeling to separate contributions of different editing pathways
Pulse-Chase Approach for Pathway Discrimination:
Pulse with radioactive amino acid and ATP to form enzyme-bound intermediates
Chase with non-radioactive amino acid and analyze products
The pattern of labeled products can distinguish between pre- and post-transfer editing
For mutations or modifications to the enzyme, site-directed mutagenesis of key residues in the editing domain (typically conserved threonine or histidine residues) can be used to create editing-deficient variants for comparative studies .
Genetic manipulation of G. sulfurreducens presents unique challenges due to its specialized metabolism and growth requirements. The following techniques have proven effective for in vivo studies of genes like ileS:
Targeted Gene Knockout using Homologous Recombination:
Design primers to amplify regions flanking the ileS gene
Clone these regions into a suicide vector containing an antibiotic resistance marker
Transform into G. sulfurreducens using electroporation (typically 1.5-2.0 kV, 400 Ω, 25 μF)
Select for double recombinants on appropriate media containing antibiotics
Since ileS is essential, this approach requires complementation with a plasmid-borne copy of the gene
For complementation, use an inducible promoter system like the lac or tet promoters adapted for G. sulfurreducens
Site-Directed Mutagenesis for Structure-Function Studies:
Create point mutations in ileS using overlap extension PCR
Introduce the mutated gene on a complementation plasmid
Exchange the chromosomal wild-type gene with a knockout cassette in the presence of the complementation plasmid
Use riboswitch or other regulatory elements to control expression levels
Chromosomal Tagging for Localization and Protein Interaction Studies:
Design constructs to add epitope or fluorescent protein tags to the C-terminus of ileS
Use homologous recombination to integrate these constructs into the native locus
Verify functionality of the tagged protein by complementation tests
Perform immunofluorescence microscopy or pull-down assays to study localization and interactions
Conditional Expression Systems:
Implement a tetracycline-responsive system adapted for G. sulfurreducens
Create strains where the chromosomal ileS is under control of an inducible promoter
Titrate expression levels by varying inducer concentration
Monitor growth, protein synthesis rates, and error frequencies under different expression conditions
CRISPR-Cas9 System for G. sulfurreducens:
Adapt CRISPR-Cas9 for use in G. sulfurreducens using vectors containing origin of replication functional in this organism
Design sgRNAs targeting ileS or related genes
Use for precise genome editing, including introduction of point mutations
Employ CRISPRi for partial repression studies when complete knockout is lethal
| Genetic Technique | Application for ileS Studies | Considerations for G. sulfurreducens |
|---|---|---|
| Homologous Recombination | Gene replacement, knockout | Lower efficiency than in E. coli; requires optimization of electroporation |
| Site-Directed Mutagenesis | Structure-function analysis | Must verify functionality due to essential nature of ileS |
| Chromosomal Tagging | Localization, interaction studies | C-terminal tags preferable to minimize functional disruption |
| Conditional Expression | Dosage response studies | Careful calibration of induction system required |
| CRISPR-Cas9 | Precise editing, CRISPRi | Adaptation of existing systems; optimization of delivery required |
These techniques should be combined with phenotypic assays measuring growth rates, metal reduction capability, and protein synthesis fidelity to fully characterize the impact of ileS modifications on G. sulfurreducens physiology.
Investigating the connection between ileS function and electron transport in G. sulfurreducens requires specialized techniques that bridge protein synthesis and electrochemical activity. The following methodological approaches are recommended:
Bioelectrochemical Cultivation with Controlled Gene Expression:
Construct strains with ileS under control of inducible promoters
Grow cells in three-electrode bioelectrochemical systems (working electrode set at specific potentials)
Monitor current production while manipulating ileS expression levels
Correlate current density with ileS activity using quantitative assays
In situ Assessment of Translation Fidelity:
Develop reporter systems containing sequences sensitive to isoleucine misincorporation
Measure reporter activity during growth with different electron acceptors
Compare translation error rates during Fe(III) reduction versus electrode respiration
Correlate with direct measurements of misaminoacylated tRNA levels using acid gel electrophoresis
Metabolic Flux Analysis with Isotope Labeling:
Culture G. sulfurreducens with 13C-labeled acetate under different electron-accepting conditions
Track isotope incorporation into isoleucine and related amino acids
Correlate flux through isoleucine biosynthesis pathways with electron transport rates
Develop computational models linking central metabolism to aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis
Redox-State Dependent Proteomics:
Harvest cells at defined redox states (controlled electrode potential or Fe(II)/Fe(III) ratios)
Perform quantitative proteomics to measure ileS levels and post-translational modifications
Apply crosslinking mass spectrometry to identify potential interaction partners
Correlate findings with electrophysiological measurements
Combined Transcriptomic-Proteomic-Electrochemical Analysis:
Subject G. sulfurreducens to controlled electrochemical cultivation with varied potentials
Extract RNA and protein at defined time points during adaptation to new redox conditions
Perform RNA-Seq and quantitative proteomics to track ileS expression and protein levels
Correlate with electrochemical parameters like current density and impedance spectra
| Experimental Approach | Measurements | Equipment | Analysis Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bioelectrochemical | Current production | Potentiostat, bioelectrochemical cells | Chronoamperometry, cyclic voltammetry |
| ileS activity | Radioactive amino acids, TLC | Aminoacylation assays | |
| Translation Fidelity | Error frequency | Dual luciferase reporters | Luminescence ratio analysis |
| tRNA charging | Northern blots, acid gels | Charged/uncharged tRNA ratios | |
| Metabolic Flux | 13C incorporation | GC-MS or LC-MS/MS | Isotope tracing, flux balance analysis |
| Pathway activity | Enzyme assays | Metabolic control analysis | |
| Redox Proteomics | Protein modifications | LC-MS/MS, ICAT labeling | PTM identification, quantification |
| Protein interactions | BN-PAGE, crosslinking | Interaction network analysis | |
| Multi-omics | Integrated response | RNA-Seq, proteomics, electrochemistry | Multivariate statistical analysis |
A particularly powerful approach would be to combine these methods with genetic manipulations, such as introducing specific mutations in the editing domain of ileS and measuring the impact on electron transfer capabilities and growth under various electron-accepting conditions.
Computational approaches offer powerful tools for predicting how mutations in ileS might affect the broader metabolism of G. sulfurreducens. The following methodologies can be applied:
| Computational Method | Application | Software/Tools | Expected Insights |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homology Modeling | IleRS structure prediction | MODELLER, SWISS-MODEL | Structure of G. sulfurreducens-specific features |
| Molecular Dynamics | Conformational changes | GROMACS, NAMD, AMBER | Dynamic behavior of wild-type vs. mutant enzymes |
| Binding Free Energy | Substrate discrimination | FEP+, AMBER-TI | Quantitative prediction of specificity changes |
| Metabolic Modeling | System-level effects | COBRA Toolbox, COBRApy | Growth rate and flux distribution predictions |
| Kinetic Modeling | Translation dynamics | COPASI, PySCeS | Error rates and protein synthesis efficiency |
| Codon Analysis | Translational landscape | CodonW, DAMBE | Effects on synthesis of key proteins |
| Multi-scale Integration | Holistic prediction | Custom frameworks | Linking molecular events to cellular phenotypes |
Example workflow for predicting effects of editing domain mutations:
Generate homology model of G. sulfurreducens IleRS based on crystal structures
Introduce mutations in silico and perform molecular dynamics simulations
Calculate binding affinities for Ile vs. Val in wild-type and mutant enzymes
Determine kinetic parameters from computational predictions
Feed these parameters into a kinetic model of aminoacylation and editing
Predict mischarging rates and impact on translation fidelity
Integrate with genome-scale metabolic model to predict growth phenotypes
Validate predictions with experimental measurements
This multi-scale approach allows for predictions ranging from atomic-level interactions to organism-level phenotypes, providing a comprehensive view of how ileS mutations might affect G. sulfurreducens metabolism.
Understanding the function of ileS in G. sulfurreducens offers several potential benefits for bioelectrochemical applications, given the organism's unique capability to transfer electrons to external acceptors including electrodes. The following perspectives highlight key research directions:
Enhanced Biofilm Formation and Current Production:
Optimizing ileS function could improve protein synthesis fidelity under electroactive conditions
Engineered ileS variants with adjusted specificity could enhance stress tolerance during electrode respiration
Manipulation of isoleucine incorporation in key cytochromes might improve electron transfer efficiency
Controlled Protein Expression for Bioelectronic Interfaces:
Understanding how ileS function responds to different redox environments could inform electrode design
Engineered ileS variants might allow for redox-responsive protein synthesis control
The connection between ileS activity and electron transfer could be exploited for bioelectronic sensing applications
Metabolic Engineering for Improved Performance:
Coordinating isoleucine biosynthesis pathway and ileS function could optimize resource allocation during electrode respiration
Tailoring the balance between citramalate and threonine pathways might enhance electrochemical activity
Engineering ileS to function optimally under specific electrode potentials could improve biocatalytic current production
Bioelectrochemical Sensing Applications:
Understanding how ileS responds to environmental changes could enable development of whole-cell biosensors
The connection between translation fidelity and electron transfer could be exploited for detecting metabolic stressors
Engineered ileS variants could serve as components of bioelectronic detection systems
These applications depend on fundamental research establishing clear relationships between ileS function, protein synthesis fidelity, and electron transfer mechanisms in G. sulfurreducens.
The evolutionary aspects of G. sulfurreducens' isoleucine metabolism and ileS function offer insights into bacterial adaptation to specialized ecological niches. Several key evolutionary implications can be drawn:
Dual Pathway Evolution:
G. sulfurreducens possesses both the threonine and citramalate pathways for isoleucine biosynthesis, with the latter being the dominant route
This metabolic flexibility likely represents an adaptation to environments where threonine might be limiting or where acetyl-CoA (a precursor for the citramalate pathway) is abundant
The presence of a phylogenetically distinct citramalate synthase suggests independent evolution or horizontal gene transfer events
Adaptation to Redox-Active Environments:
G. sulfurreducens thrives in metal-rich, redox-active environments where iron cycling occurs
The ileS enzyme may have evolved features allowing it to function optimally under fluctuating redox conditions
Selection pressure for accurate protein synthesis during metal respiration could have driven specific adaptations in the editing domain
Coevolution with Electron Transfer Systems:
The extensive cytochrome network of G. sulfurreducens represents a significant investment in iron-containing proteins
Accurate translation of these proteins is crucial for electron transfer efficiency
The ileS enzyme may have coevolved with these systems to ensure proper synthesis of electron transport components
Metabolic Integration with Lipid Biosynthesis:
The high lipid content of G. sulfurreducens cells suggests a unique metabolic configuration
The connection between isoleucine metabolism (which shares precursors with lipid biosynthesis) and ileS function may reflect adaptation to this lipid-rich cellular environment
The balance between amino acid and lipid biosynthesis pathways may have shaped ileS evolution
Broader Implications for Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Evolution:
The presence or absence of tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing in different IleRS enzymes suggests evolutionary plasticity in editing mechanisms
G. sulfurreducens ileS may represent an interesting case study in how aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases adapt to specialized metabolic contexts
Comparative analysis across Geobacter species could reveal evolutionary trajectories of ileS in electroactive bacteria
These evolutionary considerations provide a framework for understanding G. sulfurreducens ileS not just as an isolated enzyme but as part of an integrated system that has evolved to support the organism's unique lifestyle and metabolic capabilities.