Recombinant Geophagus steindachneri Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (mt-co2)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Role in Mitochondrial Respiration

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (COX2) is a core component of Complex IV, the terminal enzyme in the electron transport chain. Its primary functions include:

  • Electron Transfer: Mediates electron flow via the CuA center (cysteine residues at positions 196 and 200; histidine at 204 in human orthologs) .

  • Oxygen Reduction: Collaborates with subunits I (COX1) and III (COX3) to reduce oxygen to water, generating a proton gradient for ATP synthesis .

In Geophagus steindachneri, mt-co2 likely retains these conserved functions, though species-specific variations in sequence or folding may influence catalytic efficiency or stability.

Production and Research Applications

The recombinant protein is commercially available in 50 µg quantities (Table 1) and is used in:

ApplicationMethodologyRelevance
ELISA AssaysServes as an antigen to detect COX2-specific antibodiesQuantitative analysis of COX2 expression
Protein Interaction StudiesInvestigates binding partners (e.g., cytochrome c, subunit assembly)Structural/functional insights into COX
Enzymatic Activity AssaysMeasures oxygen consumption or electron transfer rates in vitroFunctional characterization of recombinant COX2

Table 2: Functional Domains

DomainDescriptionReference
N-TerminalTwo transmembrane alpha-helices
PeriplasmicCuA center (cysteine-rich loop, histidine)

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Please note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have specific format requirements, kindly indicate them during order placement, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchasing method or location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery timelines.
Note: All protein shipments are standardly accompanied by blue ice packs. If dry ice shipping is preferred, please contact us in advance for arrangements. Additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend briefly centrifuging the vial prior to opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Please reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%. Customers may use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
The shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and the protein's inherent stability.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during the production process. If you have a specific tag type in mind, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
mt-co2; coii; coxii; mtco2; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2; Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide II; Fragment
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-64
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Geophagus steindachneri (Red hump earth eater)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
MAHPSQLGFQDAASPMMEELLHFHDHALMVVFLISTFVLYIILTMLTTKLTDKLILESHE IEII
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (mt-co2) is a key component of cytochrome c oxidase, the terminal enzyme in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. This enzyme is responsible for driving oxidative phosphorylation. The respiratory chain comprises three multisubunit complexes: succinate dehydrogenase (complex II, CII), ubiquinol-cytochrome c oxidoreductase (cytochrome b-c1 complex, complex III, CIII), and cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV, CIV). These complexes work together to transfer electrons derived from NADH and succinate to molecular oxygen, generating an electrochemical gradient across the inner membrane that powers transmembrane transport and ATP synthase. Cytochrome c oxidase is the component of the respiratory chain that catalyzes the reduction of oxygen to water. Electrons originating from reduced cytochrome c in the intermembrane space (IMS) are transferred through the dinuclear copper A center (CU(A)) of subunit 2 and heme A of subunit 1 to the active site in subunit 1, a binuclear center (BNC) formed by heme A3 and copper B (CU(B)). The BNC reduces molecular oxygen to 2 water molecules using 4 electrons from cytochrome c in the IMS and 4 protons from the mitochondrial matrix.
Protein Families
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 and what is its role in Geophagus steindachneri?

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (mt-co2) is a mitochondrial protein that forms part of the terminal enzyme of the respiratory electron transport chain. In Geophagus steindachneri (Red hump earth eater), this protein plays a critical role in cellular respiration by catalyzing the reduction of oxygen to water, coupled with proton pumping across the inner mitochondrial membrane . The protein is encoded by the mitochondrial genome and has been designated as EC 1.9.3.1, indicating its enzymatic classification . As a component of Complex IV of the electron transport chain, mt-co2 contributes to energy production through oxidative phosphorylation, which is essential for various physiological processes in this fish species.

How does mt-co2 from Geophagus steindachneri compare to homologous proteins in other species?

When comparing the mt-co2 protein from Geophagus steindachneri with homologous proteins from other species, several patterns emerge:

SpeciesProtein LengthSequence SimilarityKey Distinguishing Features
Geophagus steindachneri64 aa (expression region)ReferenceContains the sequence MAHPSQLGFQD at N-terminus
Polypterus ornatipinnis230 aa (full length)Moderate similarityHas MAHPTQLGLQD at N-terminus, longer C-terminal region
Arvicanthis somalicus227 aa (full length)Lower similarityBegins with MAYPFQLGLQD, several substitutions in conserved regions
Microtus pennsylvanicus227 aa (partial sequence shown)Lower similarityBegins with MAYPFQLGLQD, mammalian-specific variations

The sequence comparison reveals that while the N-terminal regions share some conserved motifs (particularly the MAH or MAY prefix followed by similar residues), there are species-specific variations that likely reflect evolutionary adaptations to different environments and metabolic requirements . The fish species (G. steindachneri and P. ornatipinnis) show closer similarity to each other than to the mammalian species (A. somalicus and M. pennsylvanicus), consistent with evolutionary relationships.

How can recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 be used in biodiversity and phylogenetic studies?

Recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 can serve as a valuable reference standard in biodiversity and phylogenetic studies. While cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) is more commonly used as a DNA barcode, mt-co2 provides complementary information that can enhance phylogenetic resolution . Researchers can use the recombinant protein in the following ways:

  • Reference standard for antibody validation: Antibodies raised against the recombinant protein can be used to detect mt-co2 in tissue samples across different Geophagus populations, helping to identify protein-level variations that might correlate with genetic divergence.

  • Calibration control for molecular techniques: In studies employing PCR or sequencing techniques targeting the mt-co2 gene, the recombinant protein can serve as a positive control for downstream protein analyses.

  • Comparative evolutionary studies: By comparing the functional properties of recombinant mt-co2 proteins from different Geophagus species, researchers can investigate how protein function has evolved within this genus .

The approach used by researchers studying Geophagus sensu stricto species, where they sequenced mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and used multiple species delimitation methods, demonstrates how cytochrome c oxidase genes can reveal cryptic diversity and assist in taxonomy .

What are the optimal conditions for expression and purification of recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2?

Based on protocols used for similar recombinant proteins, the following conditions are recommended for expression and purification of recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2:

Expression System:

  • E. coli is the preferred expression system, as demonstrated with similar proteins from other species .

  • The protein should be expressed with an N-terminal His-tag to facilitate purification.

Expression Conditions:

  • Induction with IPTG at a final concentration of 0.5-1.0 mM when bacterial culture reaches OD600 of 0.6-0.8.

  • Post-induction culture at 16-18°C for 16-20 hours to enhance proper folding.

Purification Protocol:

  • Cell lysis using sonication in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, and 10 mM imidazole.

  • Affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA resin.

  • Elution with increasing imidazole concentration (50-250 mM).

  • Buffer exchange to remove imidazole using dialysis or gel filtration.

Final Formulation:

  • Storage in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C for long-term stability .

  • Aliquoting to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can compromise protein activity.

These conditions are adapted from successful protocols used for recombinant cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 proteins from other species and should be optimized for specific research requirements.

How can researchers design experiments to investigate the functional properties of Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2?

Researchers can employ several experimental approaches to investigate the functional properties of Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2:

Enzyme Activity Assays:

  • Cytochrome c oxidation assay: Measure the rate of cytochrome c oxidation spectrophotometrically at 550 nm in the presence of recombinant mt-co2.

  • Oxygen consumption assay: Use an oxygen electrode to measure oxygen consumption rates in reconstituted systems containing the recombinant protein.

Structural Studies:

  • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy: Assess secondary structure elements and conformational stability under different conditions.

  • Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC): Determine thermal stability parameters.

Interaction Studies:

  • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): Quantify binding kinetics with other components of the respiratory chain.

  • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC): Measure thermodynamic parameters of substrate binding.

Comparative Analysis:

  • Compare enzymatic properties (Km, Vmax, inhibitor sensitivity) between recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 and homologous proteins from related species to identify species-specific functional adaptations .

Experimental Design Considerations:

  • Include appropriate controls (e.g., heat-inactivated protein, known inhibitors)

  • Optimize buffer conditions (pH, ionic strength, temperature)

  • Consider the natural environment of G. steindachneri when designing physiologically relevant experiments

These methodologies provide a comprehensive approach to characterizing the functional properties of the recombinant protein and understanding its role in the respiratory chain of G. steindachneri.

What PCR and sequencing protocols are recommended for studying the mt-co2 gene in Geophagus steindachneri?

Based on methodologies used in related research, the following PCR and sequencing protocols are recommended for studying the mt-co2 gene in Geophagus steindachneri:

DNA Extraction:

  • The phenol-chloroform method has proven effective for extracting high-quality genomic DNA from fish tissues .

  • DNA should be checked for integrity on a 0.8% agarose gel and quantified spectrophotometrically.

  • Dilute DNA to a final concentration of 50 ng/μl for optimal PCR results.

PCR Amplification:

  • Prepare a 15 μl PCR reaction containing:

    • 7.6 μl of ddH₂O

    • 1.2 μl dNTP (10 mM)

    • 1.5 μl buffer 10X (100 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM KCl)

    • 1.2 μl MgCl₂ (25 mM)

    • 1.2 μl of forward and reverse primers (2 pM each)

    • 0.5 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (1 U/μl)

    • 1 μl of template DNA (50 ng/μl)

  • Recommended primer pairs:

    • For mt-co2 specific amplification: design primers based on conserved regions flanking the mt-co2 gene

    • Alternative approach: use universal primers similar to COI-Fish-f.2 and COI-Fish-r.1 adapted for mt-co2

  • PCR cycling conditions:

    • Initial denaturation at 93°C for 1 min

    • 35 cycles of: denaturation at 93°C for 10 s, annealing at 50-52°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min

    • Final extension at 72°C for 7 min

Sequencing Protocol:

  • Purify PCR products using ExoSap or similar enzyme-based purification method.

  • Perform fluorescent dye-terminator (ddNTP) sequencing using BigDye chemistry.

  • Sequence on an automatic sequencer (e.g., ABI 3500).

  • Analyze chromatograms using software such as Geneious v7.0.6 or newer.

  • Verify sequences by translating into putative amino acids to check for the absence of internal stop codons .

This methodology, adapted from successful protocols used in related cytochrome c oxidase gene studies, provides a reliable approach for obtaining high-quality sequence data from the mt-co2 gene in Geophagus steindachneri.

How can researchers effectively use mt-co2 as a molecular marker for species identification in Geophagus?

Researchers can effectively use mt-co2 as a molecular marker for species identification in Geophagus through the following approaches:

Single-Locus Species Discovery (SLSD) Methods:

  • mPTP (Multi-rate Poisson Tree Process): This method has been shown to delimit approximately 15 lineages in similar studies with Geophagus using COI . Researchers can apply this to mt-co2 sequence data to identify potential species boundaries.

  • GMYC (General Mixed Yule Coalescent): This method typically identifies more lineages (around 30 in similar studies) and can be used complementarily with other methods to ensure robust species delimitation .

  • bGMYC (Bayesian implementation of GMYC): This provides a probabilistic framework for species delimitation, identifying around 18 lineages in similar studies .

  • LocMin approach: This method tends to be more conservative, identifying around 14 lineages in similar studies .

Implementation Protocol:

  • Collect tissue samples from specimens representing different geographical locations and morphological variations.

  • Extract DNA and amplify the mt-co2 gene using the protocols described earlier.

  • Sequence the amplicons and assemble contigs.

  • Align sequences using MAFFT or similar alignment software.

  • Collapse sequences into unique haplotypes using tools like hapCollapse.

  • Generate a Bayesian Inference phylogeny using BEAST 2.6.2 with appropriate settings:

    • Determine the best nucleotide substitution model using bModelTest

    • Use a strict molecular clock

    • Apply a Yule model tree prior

    • Run multiple independent MCMC analyses (e.g., three runs of 20 million generations)

    • Sample trees every 2,000 generations

  • Apply multiple species delimitation methods to identify consensus lineages.

  • Integrate the molecular results with morphological data for comprehensive species identification.

Advantages of mt-co2 as a Marker:

  • Mitochondrial marker with maternal inheritance pattern

  • Generally lacks recombination

  • Evolves at a rate suitable for species-level discrimination

  • Can reveal cryptic diversity not apparent through morphological examination alone

By combining multiple analytical approaches and integrating molecular data with morphological characters, researchers can effectively use mt-co2 as a reliable marker for Geophagus species identification and discovery.

What are the most effective ELISA protocols for detecting recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2?

The following ELISA protocol is recommended for effectively detecting recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2:

Materials Required:

  • High-binding 96-well ELISA plates

  • Recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 protein (50 μg)

  • Primary antibodies: anti-His tag monoclonal antibody and/or anti-mt-co2 polyclonal antibody

  • HRP-conjugated secondary antibody

  • TMB substrate solution

  • Stop solution (2N H₂SO₄)

  • Washing buffer (PBS with 0.05% Tween-20)

  • Blocking buffer (PBS with 3% BSA)

Direct ELISA Protocol:

  • Coating: Dilute recombinant mt-co2 in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) to 1-10 μg/ml. Add 100 μl per well and incubate overnight at 4°C.

  • Washing: Wash plates 3 times with washing buffer.

  • Blocking: Add 300 μl of blocking buffer per well and incubate for 1-2 hours at room temperature.

  • Primary antibody: Dilute anti-mt-co2 antibody in blocking buffer at optimal concentration (typically 1:1000-1:5000). Add 100 μl per well and incubate for 2 hours at room temperature.

  • Washing: Wash plates 5 times with washing buffer.

  • Secondary antibody: Dilute HRP-conjugated secondary antibody in blocking buffer (typically 1:5000-1:10000). Add 100 μl per well and incubate for 1 hour at room temperature.

  • Washing: Wash plates 5 times with washing buffer.

  • Detection: Add 100 μl of TMB substrate solution per well and incubate for 15-30 minutes in the dark.

  • Stopping reaction: Add 50 μl of stop solution per well.

  • Measurement: Read absorbance at 450 nm with reference at 620 nm.

Sandwich ELISA Protocol (for samples containing mt-co2):

  • Capture antibody: Coat plates with anti-mt-co2 antibody (1-10 μg/ml) in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer overnight at 4°C.

  • Follow steps 2-3 as in Direct ELISA.

  • Sample addition: Add samples potentially containing mt-co2 and a standard curve of recombinant mt-co2 diluted in blocking buffer. Incubate for 2 hours at room temperature.

  • Detection antibody: Use biotinylated anti-mt-co2 antibody (targeting a different epitope) or anti-His tag antibody if the recombinant protein contains a His-tag .

  • Follow steps 5-10 as in Direct ELISA, using streptavidin-HRP if biotinylated antibodies were used.

Optimization Recommendations:

  • Perform checkerboard titrations to determine optimal concentrations of coating antigen and antibodies.

  • Include positive controls (purified recombinant protein) and negative controls (buffer only).

  • Store the recombinant protein in the recommended buffer (Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol) at -20°C to maintain stability .

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which may reduce protein immunoreactivity.

This protocol provides a reliable method for detecting recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 in various research applications.

How can researchers investigate the functional evolution of mt-co2 across different Geophagus species?

Researchers can investigate the functional evolution of mt-co2 across different Geophagus species through a multi-faceted approach that combines molecular, structural, and biochemical analyses:

Comparative Sequence Analysis:

  • Selection pressure analysis: Calculate the ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) across the mt-co2 gene in multiple Geophagus species to identify sites under positive, neutral, or purifying selection.

  • Ancestral sequence reconstruction: Use maximum likelihood methods to infer ancestral mt-co2 sequences at key nodes in the Geophagus phylogeny.

  • Coevolution analysis: Identify co-evolving residues between mt-co2 and other subunits of the cytochrome c oxidase complex to understand functional constraints .

Recombinant Protein Expression and Characterization:

  • Express recombinant mt-co2 proteins from multiple Geophagus species using consistent methodology.

  • Perform comparative biochemical assays to measure:

    • Enzyme kinetics (Km, Vmax, kcat)

    • Substrate specificity

    • pH and temperature optima

    • Inhibitor sensitivity

Structural Analysis:

  • Use homology modeling based on crystallized cytochrome c oxidase structures to predict structural differences between species.

  • Identify structurally important residues that vary between species and may influence function.

Experimental Validation:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis: Introduce species-specific amino acid substitutions into the recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 to test their functional effects.

  • Protein engineering: Create chimeric proteins combining domains from different species to identify regions responsible for functional differences.

Ecological and Physiological Context:

  • Correlate functional differences with ecological parameters of each species' habitat.

  • Consider adaptations to different oxygen levels, temperature regimes, or other environmental factors that might drive functional evolution of respiratory proteins .

This comprehensive approach allows researchers to connect sequence evolution with functional changes and ecological adaptations, providing insights into how natural selection has shaped the evolution of mt-co2 in the Geophagus genus.

What are common challenges in expressing recombinant fish mitochondrial proteins and how can they be overcome?

Expressing recombinant fish mitochondrial proteins, including Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2, presents several challenges. Here are the common issues and recommended solutions:

ChallengeCauseSolution
Poor expression levelsCodon bias differences between fish and expression host (typically E. coli)Use codon-optimized gene synthesis; employ expression hosts with rare codon tRNAs; use lower induction temperatures (16-18°C)
Protein insolubilityHydrophobic transmembrane domains causing aggregationExpress as fusion with solubility-enhancing tags (e.g., SUMO, MBP); use detergents in lysis buffer; optimize lysis conditions
Incorrect foldingAbsence of mitochondrial chaperones in bacterial expression systemsExpress in eukaryotic systems for complex proteins; use molecular chaperone co-expression strategies; employ lower induction temperatures
Protein instabilityDegradation by proteases; inherent instabilityAdd protease inhibitors during purification; optimize buffer conditions; maintain cold chain during purification
Low yield of functional proteinCombined effects of above issuesUse cell-free expression systems; express only soluble domains; use insect or mammalian cell expression systems

Optimized Expression Strategy for Recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2:

  • Vector design: Use pET vectors with T7 promoter and incorporate an N-terminal His-tag for purification .

  • Expression host: BL21(DE3) E. coli strain supplemented with plasmids encoding rare tRNAs or Rosetta strain.

  • Culture conditions:

    • Grow cultures at 37°C until OD600 reaches 0.6-0.8

    • Reduce temperature to 16-18°C before induction

    • Induce with lower IPTG concentration (0.1-0.5 mM)

    • Continue expression for 16-20 hours

  • Lysis and extraction:

    • Use mild detergents (0.5-1% Triton X-100 or n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside)

    • Include reducing agents (1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol)

    • Ensure complete protease inhibitor cocktail is present

  • Purification strategy:

    • Two-step purification: IMAC followed by size exclusion chromatography

    • Maintain detergent above critical micelle concentration throughout purification

  • Storage: Store in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol as recommended for similar proteins .

By implementing these strategies, researchers can overcome the common challenges associated with expressing recombinant fish mitochondrial proteins and obtain functionally active Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 for further studies.

How can researchers distinguish between authentic mtDNA-derived sequences and nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (NUMTs) when studying mt-co2?

Distinguishing between authentic mtDNA-derived sequences and nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (NUMTs) is crucial for accurate analysis of mt-co2. Researchers should employ the following comprehensive strategy:

Laboratory Techniques to Minimize NUMT Amplification:

  • Mitochondrial enrichment: Isolate mitochondria from tissue samples before DNA extraction to increase the ratio of mtDNA to nuclear DNA.

  • Long-range PCR: Design primers to amplify longer fragments (>1kb) encompassing the mt-co2 gene, as NUMTs are typically shorter fragments.

  • mtDNA-specific primers: Design primers in regions where NUMTs are less common or have higher divergence from authentic mtDNA.

Analytical Methods to Detect NUMTs:

  • Multiple sequence alignment analysis:

    • Examine chromatograms for double peaks, indicating potential co-amplification of mtDNA and NUMTs.

    • Look for unexpected indels that might shift reading frames.

  • Translation analysis:

    • Check for premature stop codons, frameshift mutations, or unusual amino acid substitutions.

    • NUMTs often accumulate mutations that would be detrimental in functional genes .

  • Phylogenetic analysis:

    • Construct phylogenetic trees including known authentic sequences.

    • NUMTs often form distinct clades or show unusually long branches.

    • Apply multiple species delimitation methods (mPTP, GMYC, bGMYC) as used in Geophagus studies to identify outlier sequences .

  • Sequence characteristics:

    • Compare base composition (GC content) between putative mt-co2 sequences.

    • Authentic mtDNA typically shows consistent patterns while NUMTs may deviate.

Validation Strategy:

  • Multiple PCR approaches: Use different primer combinations and compare results.

  • Cloning and sequencing: When heterogeneous amplicons are suspected, clone PCR products and sequence multiple clones.

  • Cross-validation with protein data: Use antibodies specific to mt-co2 to verify the presence and size of the protein in mitochondrial fractions.

Decision Matrix for Sequence Authentication:

ObservationAuthentic mtDNANUMTAction Required
Open reading frameIntactOften disruptedTranslate sequences and check for premature stop codons
Substitution patternFunctional constraints evidentRandom mutationsCalculate dN/dS ratios
Phylogenetic positionConsistent with taxonomyOften incongruentCompare with established phylogenies
Sequence heterogeneityLimited within individualsMay show high variationCheck for unusual polymorphism patterns
Protein expressionDetectable proteinNo corresponding proteinValidate with protein detection methods

By applying this multi-faceted approach, researchers can reliably distinguish authentic mt-co2 sequences from NUMTs, ensuring the accuracy of subsequent evolutionary and functional analyses in Geophagus steindachneri and related species.

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing mt-co2 sequence variation in population studies of Geophagus species?

When analyzing mt-co2 sequence variation in population studies of Geophagus species, researchers should employ multiple statistical approaches to comprehensively assess genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary dynamics:

Population Genetic Statistics:

Phylogeographic Analysis:

  • Nested clade phylogeographic analysis (NCPA): Relates genetic variation to geographic distribution.

    • Implementation: Construct haplotype networks and apply significance testing for geographical associations.

    • Interpretation: Identifies patterns of restricted gene flow, range expansion, or historical fragmentation.

  • Isolation by distance (IBD): Tests correlation between genetic and geographic distances.

    • Implementation: Mantel tests comparing matrices of genetic and geographic distances.

    • Interpretation: Significant correlation suggests distance-limited dispersal.

Demographic History Analysis:

  • Neutrality tests: Detect deviations from neutral evolution that might indicate population size changes.

    • Implementation: Calculate Tajima's D, Fu's Fs, and Ramos-Onsins & Rozas' R2 statistics.

    • Interpretation: Significant negative values often indicate population expansion.

  • Mismatch distribution analysis: Examines the distribution of pairwise differences between sequences.

    • Implementation: Compare observed distributions to expected distributions under demographic models.

    • Interpretation: Unimodal distributions typically indicate recent population expansion.

  • Bayesian skyline plots: Reconstruct historical effective population size changes.

    • Implementation: Apply Bayesian coalescent analysis in programs like BEAST.

    • Interpretation: Identifies periods of population growth, decline, or stability over time.

Species Delimitation Analysis:

Apply multiple species delimitation methods as demonstrated in Geophagus studies:

  • mPTP (Multi-rate Poisson Tree Process)

  • GMYC (General Mixed Yule Coalescent)

  • bGMYC (Bayesian implementation of GMYC)

  • LocMin approach

This multi-method approach helps identify consensus lineages and potential cryptic species .

Recommended Software Pipeline:

  • Sequence alignment: MAFFT v7.307 or newer

  • Basic population statistics: DnaSP v6 or Arlequin

  • Haplotype networks: PopART or Network

  • Phylogenetic analysis: BEAST 2.6.2 with appropriate models

  • Species delimitation: mPTP, GMYC, bGMYC implementations

  • Geographic analysis: SAMOVA, Barrier, or GENELAND

By employing this comprehensive statistical framework, researchers can thoroughly analyze mt-co2 sequence variation in Geophagus species, revealing patterns of genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary history that inform conservation strategies and taxonomic decisions.

How can researchers integrate mt-co2 data with morphological and ecological information in Geophagus taxonomy studies?

Integrating mt-co2 molecular data with morphological and ecological information provides a comprehensive approach to Geophagus taxonomy studies. The following methodology enables effective integration:

Integrative Taxonomy Framework:

  • Congruence approach: Assess whether mt-co2 genetic lineages correspond to morphologically distinct groups.

    • Implementation: Compare genetic clusters from species delimitation methods with morphological classifications.

    • Interpretation: Strong congruence provides robust evidence for species boundaries.

  • Cumulative evidence approach: Combine all data types into a single analysis.

    • Implementation: Use total evidence phylogenetic methods or Bayesian multispecies coalescent models.

    • Interpretation: Identifies species even when individual data types show incomplete lineage sorting.

Methodological Steps:

  • Independent analysis of each data type:

    • Analyze mt-co2 sequences using multiple species delimitation methods (mPTP, GMYC, bGMYC, LocMin) .

    • Conduct morphometric analysis using traditional or geometric morphometrics.

    • Characterize ecological niches using environmental variables from collection localities.

  • Correlation analysis between data types:

    • Test for correlation between genetic distance matrices and morphological distance matrices.

    • Assess whether genetic clusters correspond to eco-morphological groups.

  • Integrative species delimitation:

    • Apply Bayesian approaches that can incorporate multiple data types (e.g., iBPP, STACEY).

    • Weight evidence based on the reliability of each data source.

Data Integration Table for Geophagus Taxonomy:

Integration LevelMethodsExpected OutcomesExamples from Geophagus Studies
Character mappingMap morphological traits onto mt-co2 phylogenyIdentify synapomorphies for cladesRevealed six morphologically distinct but undescribed species
Niche analysisEnvironmental niche modeling based on collection localities of mt-co2 lineagesIdentify ecological factors driving speciationFive lineages restricted to single collection sites or watersheds
Biogeographic analysisAncestral area reconstruction using mt-co2 phylogenyUnderstand historical dispersal and vicariance eventsIdentified species threatened by human activities (deforestation, agriculture, hydroelectric plants)
Multivariate analysisCanonical correlation analysis between genetic and morphological dataQuantify correlation strength between data typesCombined DNA and morphological data enhanced biodiversity assessment

Case Study Application:

In Geophagus taxonomy studies, researchers successfully used this integrative approach by:

  • Sequencing mt-co2 (and related COI) from 337 individuals across 77 locations.

  • Applying multiple species delimitation methods (revealing 14-30 lineages).

  • Comparing these lineages with morphological assessments.

  • Identifying six morphologically distinct but previously undescribed species.

  • Determining that five of these lineages were restricted to limited geographic areas and faced conservation threats .

What quality control measures should be implemented when analyzing mt-co2 sequence data from Geophagus species?

Implementing rigorous quality control measures is essential when analyzing mt-co2 sequence data from Geophagus species to ensure reliable results. The following comprehensive quality control framework addresses all stages of data generation and analysis:

Pre-sequencing Quality Control:

  • Sample authentication:

    • Confirm species identification using morphological keys.

    • Document specimens with photographs and voucher preservation.

    • Record precise geographic coordinates of collection sites.

  • DNA quality assessment:

    • Verify DNA integrity on 0.8% agarose gels.

    • Ensure adequate DNA concentration (typically 50 ng/μl) and purity (A260/280 ratio between 1.8-2.0) .

Sequencing Quality Control:

  • PCR optimization:

    • Include positive controls (known Geophagus mt-co2) and negative controls (no template).

    • Optimize PCR conditions for specificity (adjust annealing temperature, MgCl₂ concentration).

  • Chromatogram evaluation:

    • Inspect base call quality scores (aim for Phred scores >30).

    • Manually review all chromatograms for signal clarity and background noise.

    • Perform bidirectional sequencing and resolve any discrepancies.

  • Sequence validation:

    • Translate sequences to amino acids to check for premature stop codons or frameshift mutations .

    • Compare with reference mt-co2 sequences to confirm gene identity.

Bioinformatic Quality Control:

  • Sequence alignment quality:

    • Use high-quality alignment software (e.g., MAFFT v7.307) .

    • Manually inspect alignments, especially in regions with gaps.

    • Trim low-quality sequence ends.

  • Contamination screening:

    • BLAST all sequences against GenBank to detect potential contamination.

    • Check for unexpectedly high similarity to distantly related species.

  • NUMT detection:

    • Screen for nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes using criteria described in FAQ 4.3.

    • Remove sequences with characteristics typical of NUMTs.

  • Data consistency checks:

    • Compare new mt-co2 sequences with available COI or other mitochondrial markers from the same individuals.

    • Verify that individuals from the same population cluster together in preliminary analyses.

Analytical Quality Control:

  • Model validation:

    • Test multiple nucleotide substitution models and select the best-fit model using bModelTest or similar approaches .

    • Assess model adequacy through posterior predictive checks.

  • Phylogenetic reliability assessment:

    • Calculate support values (bootstrap, posterior probabilities) for all nodes.

    • Run multiple independent MCMC analyses to ensure convergence .

    • Assess convergence using metrics like effective sample size (ESS) values (aim for ESS >200).

  • Species delimitation validation:

    • Apply multiple delimitation methods (mPTP, GMYC, bGMYC, LocMin) .

    • Look for consensus across methods to identify robust lineages.

    • Validate molecular lineages with morphological data when available.

Documentation and Reporting:

  • Detailed methods reporting:

    • Document all parameters used in analyses.

    • Report all quality control steps and outcomes.

  • Data deposition:

    • Submit all sequences to GenBank with complete metadata.

    • Provide voucher specimen information.

What are the main limitations of using recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 in research and how can they be addressed?

The use of recombinant Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 in research presents several important limitations that researchers should consider, along with strategies to address them:

Functional Limitations:

  • Altered post-translational modifications: Recombinant proteins expressed in E. coli lack eukaryotic post-translational modifications that may be present in native mt-co2.

    • Solution: Use eukaryotic expression systems (insect cells, yeast) for studies where post-translational modifications are critical.

  • Structural differences from native protein: The addition of tags (e.g., His-tag) and potential differences in folding can affect structure and function.

    • Solution: Include tag removal options (protease cleavage sites) and compare results with tag-free variants when possible.

  • Isolation from native complex: In vivo, mt-co2 functions as part of the larger cytochrome c oxidase complex, not as an isolated subunit.

    • Solution: For functional studies, consider co-expressing multiple subunits or reconstituting the complex with other purified components.

Technical Limitations:

  • Expression challenges: The hydrophobic regions of mt-co2 can cause aggregation and low solubility.

    • Solution: Optimize expression conditions as outlined in FAQ 4.2; consider expressing soluble domains separately for certain applications.

  • Stability issues: The recombinant protein may have reduced stability compared to the native form.

    • Solution: Store in recommended buffer conditions (Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol) ; avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.

  • Batch-to-batch variation: Variation between production lots can affect experimental reproducibility.

    • Solution: Implement standardized quality control testing for each batch; characterize critical parameters (purity, activity) before use.

Biological and Ecological Relevance Limitations:

  • Environmental context: Recombinant proteins are studied under laboratory conditions that may not reflect the natural environment of G. steindachneri.

    • Solution: Design experiments that account for relevant ecological parameters (temperature, pH, ion concentrations) typical of G. steindachneri habitat.

  • Species-specific interactions: The recombinant protein may not faithfully reproduce species-specific interactions with other proteins.

    • Solution: Validate key findings using native protein extracts or tissue samples when possible.

  • Evolutionary implications: Single gene/protein studies may miss broader evolutionary patterns.

    • Solution: Integrate mt-co2 data with other genetic markers and morphological data as demonstrated in comprehensive Geophagus studies .

Data Interpretation Limitations:

  • Extrapolation to whole organisms: Findings from recombinant protein studies require careful extrapolation to organismal biology.

    • Solution: Complement in vitro studies with whole-organism approaches when feasible.

  • Taxonomic representation: Studying mt-co2 from a single species may not represent the diversity within Geophagus.

    • Solution: Compare with homologous proteins from related species to understand evolutionary patterns .

What are promising future research directions for studies involving Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2?

Several promising research directions involving Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2 offer significant potential for advancing our understanding of evolution, ecology, and biodiversity:

Evolutionary Genomics and Adaptation:

  • Adaptive evolution analysis: Investigate signatures of selection on mt-co2 across Geophagus species occupying different environmental niches to identify adaptive mutations related to respiratory function.

    • Approach: Apply codon-based models to detect positive selection; correlate selected sites with structural and functional domains.

    • Expected outcome: Identification of key amino acid positions that may drive adaptation to different oxygen levels or thermal regimes.

  • Comparative mitogenomics: Analyze the co-evolution of mt-co2 with other mitochondrial and nuclear genes involved in the respiratory chain.

    • Approach: Compare evolutionary rates and patterns across the mitochondrial genome; test for cytonuclear co-evolution.

    • Expected outcome: Understanding of evolutionary constraints and co-adaptation between mitochondrial and nuclear genes.

Biodiversity and Taxonomy:

  • Integrative taxonomy: Expand on current approaches by combining mt-co2 data with multiple nuclear markers, morphometrics, and ecological data.

    • Approach: Apply multivariate statistical methods to integrate diverse data types; use machine learning approaches for species delimitation.

    • Expected outcome: Refined taxonomy of Geophagus with robust species delimitations, potentially revealing additional cryptic species .

  • Range-wide phylogeography: Map mt-co2 genetic variation across the entire range of Geophagus steindachneri and related species.

    • Approach: Comprehensive sampling across watersheds; application of landscape genetics approaches.

    • Expected outcome: Identification of historical processes shaping current genetic diversity; recognition of evolutionarily significant units for conservation.

Functional and Structural Biology:

  • Structure-function studies: Investigate the relationship between specific amino acid variations in mt-co2 and functional properties.

    • Approach: Generate recombinant variants with site-directed mutagenesis; measure enzymatic activities under different conditions.

    • Expected outcome: Mechanistic understanding of how sequence variations affect protein function.

  • Protein-protein interaction mapping: Characterize interactions between mt-co2 and other components of the respiratory chain.

    • Approach: Co-immunoprecipitation studies; surface plasmon resonance; in silico molecular docking.

    • Expected outcome: Identification of critical interaction interfaces and species-specific interaction patterns.

Conservation and Environmental Genomics:

  • Environmental biomonitoring: Develop mt-co2-based assays for monitoring Geophagus populations and environmental health.

    • Approach: Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding targeting mt-co2; development of species-specific primers.

    • Expected outcome: Non-invasive monitoring tools for biodiversity assessment; early detection of invasive or endangered species.

  • Climate change response prediction: Assess how mt-co2 variants might influence species' responses to changing environmental conditions.

    • Approach: Correlate mt-co2 genetic variation with thermal tolerance; experimental testing of performance under simulated climate change scenarios.

    • Expected outcome: Prediction of species vulnerability to climate change; identification of populations with adaptive potential.

Methodological Innovations:

  • Advanced recombinant expression systems: Develop improved methods for expressing functional fish mitochondrial proteins.

    • Approach: Cell-free expression systems; specialized chaperone co-expression; membrane mimetics.

    • Expected outcome: Higher yields of functional recombinant protein; improved structural and functional studies.

  • Nanobody development: Generate single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) specific to Geophagus steindachneri mt-co2.

    • Approach: Immunization of camelids; phage display selection; affinity maturation.

    • Expected outcome: Highly specific molecular tools for detection, purification, and functional modulation of mt-co2.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.