KEGG: gvi:gvip461
STRING: 251221.gvip461
Lysine-tRNA ligase (lysS), also known as lysyl-tRNA synthetase, belongs to the class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Its primary function is catalyzing the specific aminoacylation of tRNA^Lys molecules by attaching lysine to its cognate tRNA. In Gloeobacter violaceus, an early-diverging cyanobacterium lacking thylakoids, this enzyme plays a crucial role in protein synthesis by ensuring the correct incorporation of lysine into growing polypeptide chains .
Gloeobacter violaceus holds special evolutionary significance as one of the earliest-diverging cyanobacterial lineages and is unique in lacking thylakoid membranes . Studying its lysS enzyme provides insights into:
The evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in photosynthetic organisms
Adaptations in protein synthesis machinery in early-diverging photosynthetic prokaryotes
Potential structural and functional differences compared to lysS from organisms with thylakoid membranes
Molecular mechanisms that may have been conserved throughout evolution
Based on structural studies of lysyl-tRNA synthetases, these enzymes typically exhibit:
A catalytic domain containing the class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase signature motifs
Binding sites for ATP, lysine, and tRNA
Conformational changes upon substrate binding, including:
Ordering of specific loop regions
Reorganization of the active site
Rotational movements of helical domains
For example, in E. coli lysS, lysine binding triggers a network of hydrogen bonds that leads to the ordering of two loops (residues 215-217 and 444-455), conformational changes in residues 393-409, and a 10° rotation of a 4-helix bundle domain located between motif 2 and 3 .
For optimal expression of recombinant G. violaceus lysS, consider these methodological approaches:
Expression host selection: E. coli BL21(DE3) or Rosetta strains are often effective for expressing cyanobacterial proteins due to their codon optimization capabilities
Vector design:
Include a 6×His-tag or other affinity tag for purification
Use T7 or similar strong promoters with inducible expression
Consider fusion partners like SUMO or MBP if solubility is problematic
Expression conditions:
Lower temperatures (16-18°C) often improve folding of cyanobacterial proteins
Extended induction times (16-24 hours) at lower IPTG concentrations (0.1-0.3 mM)
Supplementation with appropriate cofactors may enhance folding
To preserve enzymatic activity during purification:
Buffer composition:
Maintain pH between 7.5-8.0 (typical optimum for lysyl-tRNA synthetases)
Include 5-10% glycerol to stabilize the protein
Add reducing agents (5 mM β-mercaptoethanol or 1-2 mM DTT) to prevent oxidation
Consider including Mg²⁺ (1-5 mM) as a cofactor
Purification workflow:
Initial capture using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)
Secondary purification via ion exchange chromatography
Final polishing step using size exclusion chromatography to ensure homogeneity
Keep all steps at 4°C to prevent degradation
Activity preservation:
Avoid freeze-thaw cycles by aliquoting purified protein
Store with 10-20% glycerol at -80°C for long-term storage
Include protease inhibitors during cell lysis and initial purification steps
To effectively measure aminoacylation activity of recombinant G. violaceus lysS:
Aminoacylation assay setup:
Reaction mixture containing:
Purified recombinant lysS (1-5 μM)
tRNA^Lys substrate (5-20 μM)
ATP (2-5 mM)
Lysine (1-10 mM)
Mg²⁺ (5-10 mM)
Buffer (typically HEPES or Tris-HCl, pH 7.5-8.0)
Measurement methods:
Radioactive assay: Use ³H or ¹⁴C-labeled lysine to measure incorporation into tRNA
Colorimetric pyrophosphate detection: Coupling with pyrophosphatase and malachite green assay
Thin-layer chromatography: For separation and quantification of aminoacylated vs. non-aminoacylated tRNA
Controls to include:
No-enzyme control
Heat-inactivated enzyme control
Reactions with non-cognate amino acids to test specificity
E. coli lysS as a positive control and reference standard
When facing data that contradicts your hypotheses about G. violaceus lysS function:
Methodological validation:
Re-examine experimental conditions and assay components
Verify enzyme purity and integrity via SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry
Confirm substrate quality and integrity
Test multiple batches of the recombinant protein
Exploratory experiments:
Examine broader reaction conditions (pH, temperature, ionic strength)
Test alternative cofactors or metal ions
Investigate potential inhibitors or activators specific to G. violaceus lysS
Consider allosteric regulators that might be present in the natural environment
Re-evaluate your hypothesis:
For comprehensive structural analysis:
X-ray crystallography approach:
Co-crystallization with substrates (lysine, ATP, tRNA) to capture different conformational states
Resolution of 2.5 Å or better is desirable to observe detailed binding interactions
Consider crystallizing with inhibitors to trap specific conformations
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Particularly valuable for visualizing lysS-tRNA complex formation
Can capture conformational ensembles not easily crystallized
Provides insights into dynamic regions of the protein
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):
To elucidate conformational changes:
Biophysical methods:
Circular dichroism (CD): Monitors secondary structure changes upon substrate binding
Fluorescence spectroscopy: Using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence or fluorescent labels to track domain movements
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC): Provides thermodynamic parameters of binding events
Computational approaches:
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Target residues predicted to be involved in conformational changes
Create variants to test the importance of specific hydrogen bonding networks
Pair with activity assays to correlate structural changes with function
A comparative analysis reveals:
| Species | Unique Features | Sequence Identity to G. violaceus lysS | Notable Adaptations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gloeobacter violaceus | Early-diverging, lacks thylakoids | 100% (reference) | Potential adaptations for functioning without thylakoid compartmentalization |
| Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 | Thylakoid-containing | ~60-70%* | Additional domains for thylakoid localization |
| Synechococcus sp. | Thylakoid-containing | ~55-65%* | Marine adaptations in some species |
| Anabaena/Nostoc | Heterocyst-forming | ~50-60%* | Potential adaptations for nitrogen fixation |
*Estimated range based on typical conservation patterns of essential enzymes in cyanobacteria
Functional implications of these differences may include:
Altered substrate specificity or kinetic parameters
Different regulatory mechanisms
Specialized adaptations to cellular architecture (especially regarding the absence of thylakoids in G. violaceus)
Potential moonlighting functions in different cellular contexts
The study of G. violaceus lysS provides insights into:
Early evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases:
Co-evolution with cellular architecture:
Adaptations in protein synthesis machinery in an organism lacking thylakoid membranes
Potential insights into compartmentalization of translation in photosynthetic organisms
Evolution of specificity determinants in the absence of subcellular compartments
Evolutionary markers:
Conserved motifs that have remained unchanged since the divergence of Gloeobacterales
Signatures of selection that might indicate specialized adaptations
Potential lateral gene transfer events in the evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases
Advanced applications include:
Phylogenetic markers:
Ancestral sequence reconstruction:
Recreate putative ancestral lysS enzymes to test hypotheses about early photosynthetic organisms
Compare properties of reconstructed enzymes with extant G. violaceus lysS
Test functional predictions in heterologous expression systems
Synthetic biology applications:
Engineer chimeric lysS enzymes combining domains from different evolutionary lineages
Explore the minimal functional requirements for lysyl-tRNA synthetase activity
Develop orthogonal translation systems based on unique features of G. violaceus lysS
To investigate potential regulatory mechanisms:
Transcriptional regulation:
RT-qPCR analysis under different growth conditions
Promoter analysis and reporter gene assays
ChIP-seq to identify potential transcription factors
Post-translational modifications:
Mass spectrometry to identify modifications (phosphorylation, acetylation, etc.)
Site-directed mutagenesis of potential modification sites
Activity assays comparing native vs. recombinant protein
Protein-protein interactions:
Pull-down assays to identify interaction partners
Yeast two-hybrid or bacterial two-hybrid screens
Biolayer interferometry or surface plasmon resonance to quantify interactions
Co-immunoprecipitation from G. violaceus lysates with antibodies against recombinant lysS
When facing expression or solubility issues:
Expression optimization:
Try multiple expression strains (BL21, Rosetta, Arctic Express)
Test different temperatures (16°C, 25°C, 37°C)
Vary induction conditions (IPTG concentration, induction time)
Consider autoinduction media for gentler expression
Solubility enhancement:
Test various fusion partners (SUMO, MBP, GST, TrxA)
Include solubility enhancers in lysis buffer (non-detergent sulfobetaines, arginine)
Co-express with molecular chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)
Try refolding from inclusion bodies if necessary
Construct design:
Create truncations to remove problematic domains
Introduce surface mutations to enhance solubility
Optimize codon usage for E. coli expression
Consider synthetic gene design with optimized GC content
For more consistent activity assays:
Enzyme quality control:
Verify enzyme purity by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry
Check for proper folding using circular dichroism
Assess aggregation state by dynamic light scattering
Confirm metal content by ICP-MS if metalloenzyme properties are suspected
Substrate and reagent quality:
Use freshly prepared ATP solutions
Verify tRNA^Lys integrity by native PAGE
Test different sources of tRNA (in vitro transcribed vs. purified)
Ensure proper storage of all reagents
Assay standardization:
Develop a detailed SOP with precise timing and mixing steps
Use internal standards for colorimetric or fluorometric assays
Include reference controls in each experiment
Consider automated liquid handling to reduce variability