Recombinant Gracilaria tenuistipitata var. liui 30S ribosomal protein S18, chloroplastic (rps18)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us for preferential development.
Synonyms
rps18; Grc000133; 30S ribosomal protein S18; chloroplastic
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-70
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Gracilaria tenuistipitata var. liui (Red alga)
Target Names
rps18
Target Protein Sequence
MIFYKQRNAH LKPNETINYK DIDLLRKFIT DQSKIVSRRS NGLTVKQQKQ LAKSIKKARI LALLPFVNKD
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Protein Families
Bacterial ribosomal protein bS18 family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast.

Q&A

What is the evolutionary significance of the chloroplastic rps18 gene in Gracilaria tenuistipitata var. liui?

The rps18 gene in G. tenuistipitata var. liui represents part of an exceptionally well-preserved ancient gene repertoire. The chloroplast genome of G. tenuistipitata var. liui contains a surprisingly complete set of plastid genes, making it valuable for evolutionary studies. This red alga, along with other Rhodophyta, maintains the most comprehensive collection of plastid genes known in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Phylogenetic analyses using concatenated protein datasets from plastid genomes strongly support red algal plastid monophyly and reveal specific evolutionary relationships between different red algal groups such as Florideophycidae (which includes Gracilaria) and the Bangiales . The preservation of rps18 within this genome offers important insights into the evolutionary trajectory of plastid ribosomal proteins and their conservation across algal lineages.

What is the functional role of 30S ribosomal protein S18 in chloroplastic translation?

The 30S ribosomal protein S18 plays a crucial role in chloroplastic translation by contributing to the structural integrity and functionality of the 30S ribosomal subunit. This protein facilitates proper binding of messenger RNA to the ribosome and helps maintain the accuracy of the translation process. Like other ribosomal proteins, S18 interacts with various components of the translational machinery. Drawing parallels from bacterial systems, S18 likely interacts with mobile tails of other ribosomal proteins and may participate in stabilizing the mRNA-ribosome complex near the exit channel . In chloroplasts specifically, these interactions are essential for the translation of plastid-encoded genes that contribute to photosynthetic functions. The precise positioning of S18 within the ribosomal architecture enables it to participate in multiple aspects of translation initiation, elongation, and potentially termination.

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant production of G. tenuistipitata var. liui chloroplastic rps18?

For recombinant expression of chloroplastic rps18 from G. tenuistipitata var. liui, several expression systems can be employed, each with distinct advantages. Bacterial expression in E. coli remains the most accessible approach, particularly using BL21(DE3) strains with pET vector systems. For optimal expression, codon optimization based on the E. coli codon usage bias is essential, as red algal chloroplast genes often contain rare codons. Expression conditions typically require induction with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG at lower temperatures (16-18°C) to enhance proper folding.

Alternative expression systems include yeast (Pichia pastoris), which may provide better post-translational processing, or cell-free expression systems that bypass inclusion body formation issues. For researchers requiring native-like conditions, using algal-based expression systems may be considered, though transformation efficiency remains challenging. Recent genome editing advances in macroalgae, while not specifically developed for G. tenuistipitata, demonstrate potential approaches for expression in native or related hosts .

Expression SystemAdvantagesChallengesTypical Yield
E. coli BL21(DE3)Rapid growth, high yields, simple protocolsPossible inclusion body formation, lacks post-translational modifications10-30 mg/L culture
P. pastorisBetter folding, some post-translational modificationsLonger production time, more complex protocols5-15 mg/L culture
Cell-free systemRapid expression, no cell viability issuesHigher cost, lower scalability0.5-2 mg/mL reaction
Algal systemsNative-like modifications, natural foldingLow transformation efficiency, slow growth, complex protocols0.1-1 mg/L culture

What purification strategy optimizes yield and activity of recombinant chloroplastic rps18?

The optimal purification strategy for recombinant chloroplastic rps18 involves a multi-step approach designed to maximize both yield and biological activity. Initially, affinity chromatography using a His-tag system provides the foundation for purification, followed by additional refinement steps:

  • Affinity Chromatography: Express the protein with an N-terminal or C-terminal His₆-tag and purify using Ni-NTA resin with a gradient elution (50-300 mM imidazole). This captures the target protein while removing the majority of contaminants.

  • Ion Exchange Chromatography: Based on the predicted isoelectric point of rps18, select either cation exchange (SP Sepharose) or anion exchange (Q Sepharose) chromatography to separate proteins with similar binding affinities to Ni-NTA.

  • Size Exclusion Chromatography: As a final polishing step, use a Superdex 75 or equivalent column to separate monomeric protein from aggregates and remove any remaining contaminants.

For researchers studying functional interactions, consider:

  • RNA binding assays using electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) or surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to verify that the purified protein maintains its RNA binding capability.

  • Circular dichroism spectroscopy to confirm proper secondary structure formation.

Activity preservation often requires the addition of stabilizing agents such as glycerol (10-15%) and reducing agents like DTT (1-2 mM) to the storage buffer. For structural studies, further optimization of buffer conditions (pH 7.0-8.0, 150-300 mM NaCl) is recommended to enhance stability while maintaining native conformation.

How can researchers overcome solubility issues when expressing recombinant chloroplastic rps18?

Solubility challenges are common when expressing recombinant chloroplastic proteins, including rps18 from G. tenuistipitata var. liui. To overcome these issues, researchers can implement several evidence-based strategies:

Expression optimization:

  • Lower the induction temperature to 16-18°C and reduce IPTG concentration (0.1-0.2 mM)

  • Utilize slower expression protocols with longer induction times (16-24 hours)

  • Co-express with molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE) to assist protein folding

Fusion tag selection:

  • Employ solubility-enhancing tags such as MBP (maltose-binding protein), SUMO, or Thioredoxin

  • Position the tag at the N-terminus which typically provides better solubility enhancement

  • Include a precision protease cleavage site for tag removal post-purification

Buffer optimization:

  • Screen multiple buffer conditions using a factorial design approach

  • Test various pH ranges (6.5-8.5), salt concentrations (100-500 mM NaCl), and additives

  • Include stabilizing agents such as glycerol (5-15%), arginine (50-200 mM), or specific detergents (0.05-0.1% Triton X-100)

If inclusion bodies are unavoidable, a refolding protocol can be developed:

  • Solubilize inclusion bodies with 6-8 M urea or 4-6 M guanidine hydrochloride

  • Perform refolding by gradual dialysis with decreasing denaturant concentration

  • Add redox couples (oxidized/reduced glutathione) to promote proper disulfide bond formation

  • Monitor refolding efficiency using circular dichroism and activity assays

These methodological approaches should be systematically tested and optimized for the specific characteristics of G. tenuistipitata var. liui rps18.

How can researchers utilize recombinant rps18 to study chloroplast ribosome assembly?

Researchers can employ recombinant G. tenuistipitata var. liui rps18 to examine chloroplast ribosome assembly through multiple experimental approaches:

In vitro reconstitution assays:

  • Combine purified recombinant rps18 with other isolated 30S subunit proteins and 16S rRNA

  • Monitor assembly intermediates using sucrose gradient centrifugation and electron microscopy

  • Quantify binding kinetics and assembly order through time-course experiments with fluorescently labeled components

Interaction mapping:

  • Perform systematic analysis of rps18 interactions with other ribosomal proteins and rRNA segments

  • Utilize pull-down assays, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), or isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)

  • Create a detailed interaction network to identify critical assembly nodes

Assembly perturbation studies:

  • Introduce specific mutations in conserved residues of rps18 based on structural predictions

  • Assess how these mutations affect assembly kinetics and final ribosome structure

  • Compare with bacterial assembly pathways to identify algal-specific features

A typical experimental dataset might reveal binding affinities as shown in the following table:

Interaction PartnerAssociation Constant (Ka)Dissociation Constant (Kd)Assembly Stage
16S rRNA (5' domain)2.3 × 10⁶ M⁻¹0.43 μMEarly
16S rRNA (central domain)5.1 × 10⁵ M⁻¹1.96 μMEarly-Mid
Ribosomal protein S67.8 × 10⁵ M⁻¹1.28 μMMiddle
Ribosomal protein S111.2 × 10⁵ M⁻¹8.33 μMLate
30S assembly intermediate3.4 × 10⁶ M⁻¹0.29 μMFinal

By comparing these data with known bacterial ribosome assembly pathways, researchers can identify unique features of chloroplast ribosome biogenesis in red algae and gain insights into the evolutionary adaptations of plastid translation machinery.

What methodologies can be used to study rps18 interactions with the mRNA channel?

To investigate interactions between G. tenuistipitata var. liui chloroplastic rps18 and the mRNA channel, researchers can employ several complementary methodologies:

Cross-linking and Structural Studies:

  • Utilize UV-induced cross-linking with synthetic mRNA fragments containing photo-reactive nucleotides

  • Perform protein-RNA footprinting experiments using nuclease protection assays

  • Apply hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to map interaction interfaces

  • Develop cryo-EM reconstructions of ribosome-mRNA complexes with and without rps18

These approaches can reveal specific interaction patterns, similar to those observed for other ribosomal proteins that interact with mobile tails of proteins and participate in stabilizing the mRNA-ribosome complex .

Functional Assays:

  • Conduct filter-binding assays with radiolabeled mRNA to quantify binding affinities

  • Perform electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with various mRNA substrates

  • Develop fluorescence-based assays (FRET) to monitor real-time binding dynamics

  • Use microscale thermophoresis (MST) to determine binding constants under near-physiological conditions

A systematic approach would involve testing mRNA fragments with different sequence features to determine binding preferences:

mRNA FeatureBinding Affinity (Kd)Interaction StabilityKey Interacting Residues
A/U-rich 5' UTR0.8 μMHighLys12, Arg43, Arg57
G/C-rich coding region4.3 μMModerateArg57, Lys62
Shine-Dalgarno-like sequence0.3 μMVery HighLys12, Arg14, Lys62
Unstructured region1.2 μMHighArg43, Arg57, Lys62
Structured hairpin7.6 μMLowArg14, Lys12

These methodologies would provide insights into how rps18 contributes to mRNA recognition and positioning within the chloroplast ribosome, potentially revealing unique features compared to cyanobacterial or other plastid ribosomes.

How can researchers utilize rps18 to study the evolutionary relationships among red algal chloroplasts?

Researchers can employ several approaches using rps18 to investigate evolutionary relationships among red algal chloroplasts:

Phylogenetic Analysis:

  • Extract and align rps18 sequences from multiple red algal species, including Gracilaria tenuistipitata var. liui

  • Perform maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and distance-based phylogenetic analyses

  • Compare rps18-based phylogenies with those constructed using other chloroplast genes

  • Implement concatenated protein datasets that include rps18 alongside other conserved chloroplast proteins for more robust phylogenetic inference

Selective Pressure Analysis:

  • Calculate nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution ratios (dN/dS) across the rps18 gene

  • Identify sites under positive, negative, or neutral selection

  • Compare selection patterns across different red algal lineages

  • Map selection patterns onto structural models to identify functionally important regions

Structural Conservation Analysis:

  • Model the three-dimensional structure of rps18 proteins across red algal lineages

  • Quantify structural conservation using root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) metrics

  • Identify conserved surface patches that likely represent functional interfaces

  • Correlate structural conservation with sequence evolution rates

A comparative analysis of rps18 conservation across red algal lineages might reveal patterns like:

Red Algal GroupSequence Identity to G. tenuistipitata rps18Key Conserved MotifsStructurally Variable RegionsEvolutionary Rate (substitutions/site/year)
Florideophycidae91-97%RNA binding domain, S6 interaction siteN-terminal region1.2 × 10⁻⁹
Bangiales85-89%RNA binding domain, S6 interaction siteN-terminal region, C-terminal tail1.8 × 10⁻⁹
Cyanidiophyceae72-78%RNA binding domainN-terminal region, C-terminal tail, surface loops2.5 × 10⁻⁹
Other Rhodophyta80-88%RNA binding domain, S6 interaction siteSurface loops1.9 × 10⁻⁹

How can CRISPR-Cas technologies be applied to study rps18 function in Gracilaria tenuistipitata var. liui?

Applying CRISPR-Cas technologies to study rps18 function in G. tenuistipitata var. liui represents a significant challenge but offers tremendous potential for functional genomics. While genome editing in macroalgae is still developing, recent advances provide a framework for approaching this complex organism:

Design Considerations:

  • Target site selection must account for the high GC content often present in red algal genomes

  • PAM site availability may be limited in the compact chloroplast genome

  • Designing multiple gRNAs targeting different regions of rps18 can increase success probability

  • Implement a co-targeting strategy similar to that used in Ectocarpus, where an auxotrophic marker like ADENINE PHOSPHORIBOSYL TRANSFERASE is simultaneously targeted to enable selection of edited cells

Delivery Methods:

  • Optimize protoplast preparation protocols specifically for G. tenuistipitata var. liui

  • Test both ribonucleoprotein (RNP) delivery and plasmid-based expression

  • Evaluate biolistic bombardment for organelle transformation, which may be more effective for targeting chloroplast genes

  • Consider microinjection for targeted delivery to specific cell types

Selection and Screening:

  • Implementation of a 2-fluoroadenine (2-FA) resistance-based selection system, which has proven effective in other macroalgae

  • Develop PCR-based screening protocols with primers flanking the expected edit site

  • Implement high-throughput sequencing to detect low-frequency editing events

  • Establish phenotypic screens based on predicted rps18 functions

Challenges specific to chloroplast genome editing include:

  • Multiple chloroplast genome copies per cell requiring homoplasmy achievement

  • Limited selection markers for chloroplast transformants

  • Poor understanding of DNA repair mechanisms in red algal chloroplasts

  • Potential lethality of rps18 knockouts due to its essential role in translation

To address these challenges, researchers might implement partial knockdown approaches or generate point mutations rather than complete knockouts. Additionally, developing inducible systems could allow temporal control of rps18 expression to study its function while minimizing lethal effects.

What are the methodological approaches for studying post-translational modifications of chloroplastic rps18?

Investigating post-translational modifications (PTMs) of chloroplastic rps18 from G. tenuistipitata var. liui requires an integrated analytical workflow:

Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches:

  • Bottom-up proteomics: Digest purified rps18 with trypsin and analyze resulting peptides using LC-MS/MS

  • Top-down proteomics: Analyze intact rps18 protein to maintain PTM relationships

  • Middle-down approach: Generate larger peptide fragments to preserve co-occurring modifications

  • Targeted multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) to quantify specific modifications

Enrichment Strategies:

  • Phosphorylation: Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) or titanium dioxide enrichment

  • Acetylation: Anti-acetyllysine antibody immunoprecipitation

  • Methylation: Anti-methylarginine or methylysine antibody pulldown

  • Redox modifications: Differential alkylation to trap oxidation states

Functional Characterization:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of modified residues to generate phospho-mimetic (Ser→Asp) or phospho-deficient (Ser→Ala) variants

  • In vitro reconstitution assays comparing wild-type and PTM-mimetic proteins

  • Ribosome binding and translation activity assays with modified and unmodified rps18

A typical PTM analysis might reveal patterns like this:

Modification TypeModified ResidueStoichiometryFunctional ImpactSuspected Enzyme
PhosphorylationSer2715-22%Reduced 16S rRNA bindingPlastid casein kinase
PhosphorylationThr4545-60%Enhanced S6 interactionPlastid casein kinase
AcetylationLys6230-35%Reduced mRNA affinityUnknown acetyltransferase
MethylationArg1480-85%Enhanced ribosome assemblyPutative chloroplast methyltransferase
OxidationCys95Variable (stress-dependent)Translation regulationNon-enzymatic

Given the ancient evolutionary origin of chloroplastic ribosomes in red algae, PTM patterns of rps18 may reveal unique regulatory mechanisms that differ from those observed in green plant lineages or cyanobacteria, providing insights into the evolution of translation regulation.

How can researchers investigate the role of rps18 in stress response mechanisms in Gracilaria?

Investigating rps18's role in stress response mechanisms requires multi-level analytical approaches that connect molecular changes to physiological outcomes:

Transcriptome and Proteome Analysis:

  • Compare rps18 transcript and protein levels across multiple stress conditions (temperature, salinity, light, oxidative stress)

  • Implement RNA-Seq with specific attention to chloroplast transcripts

  • Utilize ribosome profiling (Ribo-Seq) to examine translational efficiency during stress

  • Perform quantitative proteomics to track rps18 abundance and modification states

Stress-Response Phenotyping:

  • Develop protocols to analyze photosynthetic efficiency under stress using pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM) fluorometry

  • Measure growth rates and morphological changes in response to stressors

  • Quantify stress metabolite production (compatible solutes, antioxidants)

  • Analyze ultrastructural changes in chloroplasts using transmission electron microscopy

Functional Validation Approaches:

  • Generate recombinant rps18 variants mimicking stress-induced modifications

  • Perform in vitro translation assays under various stress conditions (temperature, pH, salt)

  • Implement in vivo approaches using transient expression of modified rps18

  • Utilize genome editing technologies, despite their challenges in macroalgae , to create variants for functional testing

A comprehensive study might produce data illustrating stress-specific responses:

This approach would reveal whether rps18 serves as a regulatory node in stress response pathways, potentially through selective translation of stress-responsive transcripts or through broader adjustments to chloroplast translation efficiency under adverse conditions.

How can researchers resolve contradictory results in rps18 functional studies?

When confronting contradictory results in rps18 functional studies, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:

Methodological Reconciliation:

  • Thoroughly document all experimental conditions, including buffer compositions, protein concentrations, and assay parameters

  • Perform side-by-side comparisons using standardized protocols

  • Implement multiple orthogonal techniques to verify each functional aspect

  • Consider the influence of fusion tags, which may differentially affect rps18 activity

Statistical Analysis and Reproducibility:

  • Implement appropriate statistical tests with consideration of multiple hypothesis testing

  • Ensure sufficient biological replicates (minimum n=3) and technical replicates

  • Perform power analysis to determine if sample sizes are adequate

  • Consider Bayesian approaches to integrate prior knowledge with new data

Source of Contradictions Decision Tree:

  • Organism-specific differences

    • Compare sequence alignment across species

    • Identify key structural differences

    • Evaluate evolutionary distance

  • Technical artifacts

    • Verify reagent quality and consistency

    • Assess equipment calibration and performance

    • Review data processing pipelines

  • Biological complexity

    • Consider post-translational modifications

    • Evaluate potential binding partners

    • Assess cellular context differences

A structured approach for resolving contradictions might involve a comparative analysis table:

Contradictory FindingStudy A ConditionsStudy B ConditionsPotential ReconciliationValidation Strategy
rps18-mRNA binding affinitypH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 25°C, His-tagged proteinpH 6.8, 100 mM KCl, 4°C, untagged proteinBuffer and tag effects on binding interfaceTest multiple conditions with both tagged and untagged protein
Phosphorylation effect on activityIn vitro kinase assay, recombinant proteinIn vivo analysis, native conditionsContext-dependent regulationPerform both in vitro and in vivo verification with phospho-mimetic mutants
Assembly roleBacterial expression systemNative red algal extractsSpecies-specific assembly factorsComplementation assays with heterologous expression
Stress responseAcute heat shockGradual temperature increaseTemporal adaptation mechanismsTime-course analysis under both conditions

By systematically addressing methodological differences and biological contexts, researchers can transform apparent contradictions into deeper insights about condition-specific behaviors of rps18.

What bioinformatic approaches are most effective for analyzing rps18 sequence-structure-function relationships?

Effective bioinformatic analysis of rps18 sequence-structure-function relationships requires a multi-layered computational approach:

Sequence Analysis:

  • Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of rps18 sequences across diverse organisms, with particular focus on red algal lineages

  • Identify conserved residues and sequence motifs using information theory approaches (Shannon entropy, Jensen-Shannon divergence)

  • Detect coevolving residue networks using statistical coupling analysis or mutual information methods

  • Implement comparative genomic approaches to identify conserved genomic contexts

Structural Bioinformatics:

  • Homology modeling using bacterial or available eukaryotic S18 structures as templates

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to assess structural flexibility and conformational changes

  • Normal mode analysis to identify functionally relevant motion patterns

  • In silico docking with RNA, protein partners, and potential ligands

  • Fragment molecular orbital (FMO) calculations to evaluate interaction energies

Integrated Function Prediction:

  • Machine learning approaches to predict functional sites from sequence and structural features

  • Network analysis of potential protein-protein and protein-RNA interactions

  • Molecular phylogenetics to trace functional divergence events

  • Ancestral sequence reconstruction to infer evolutionary trajectories

A comprehensive bioinformatic pipeline might produce the following integrated insights:

Analytical ApproachKey FindingsFunctional ImplicationsConfidence Score
Conservation analysisHighly conserved RNA-binding motif (aa 40-58)Critical for ribosome function across speciesHigh (99% conservation)
Coevolution detectionCoevolving network between residues 14, 27, 62Potential allosteric regulation siteModerate (statistical coupling score 0.72)
Molecular dynamicsFlexible loop region (aa 80-95)Potential regulatory interaction siteModerate (RMSF > 3.5 Å)
Structural modelingPositively charged surface patchmRNA channel interaction interfaceHigh (electrostatic complementarity score 0.85)
Machine learningPredicted phosphorylation at Ser27Regulatory switch for RNA bindingModerate (prediction score 0.78)
Ancestral reconstructionAcquisition of C-terminal extension in FlorideophycidaeLineage-specific functional adaptationHigh (posterior probability 0.92)

By integrating these computational approaches, researchers can generate testable hypotheses about structure-function relationships in G. tenuistipitata var. liui rps18 and guide experimental design for functional validation.

How should researchers integrate multi-omics data to understand rps18's role in chloroplast function?

Integrating multi-omics data to elucidate rps18's role in chloroplast function requires sophisticated data fusion approaches:

Data Collection Strategy:

  • Genomics: Complete plastid genome sequencing and annotation, focusing on rps18 and interacting genes

  • Transcriptomics: RNA-Seq of total and chloroplast-specific transcripts under various conditions

  • Proteomics: Quantitative proteomics of the chloroplast ribosome and associated factors

  • Interactomics: Co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry (IP-MS)

  • Translatomics: Ribosome profiling to assess translation efficiency of chloroplast genes

  • Metabolomics: Targeted and untargeted approaches to connect translational changes to metabolic outcomes

Data Integration Methods:

  • Implement network-based integration using weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA)

  • Apply multi-block partial least squares (MBPLS) to identify relationships across omics layers

  • Utilize Bayesian network approaches to infer causality between molecular events

  • Develop knowledge graphs incorporating literature-derived information alongside experimental data

Validation Approach:

  • Formulate testable hypotheses derived from integrated analyses

  • Design targeted experiments to verify predicted interactions and functions

  • Implement perturbation studies focused on rps18 and its network partners

  • Develop computational models that predict system responses to rps18 modifications

A multi-omics integration pipeline applied to understanding rps18 function might reveal:

Omics LayerKey ObservationIntegrated FindingExperimental Validation
Genomicsrps18 proximity to photosystem genesPotential co-regulationChloroplast chromosome conformation capture (3C)
TranscriptomicsCoordinated expression of rps18 with stress-responsive genesStress-responsive regulonRT-qPCR validation of co-expression
ProteomicsPost-translational modification patterns changing under stressPTM-mediated regulationSite-directed mutagenesis of modified residues
InteractomicsNovel interaction with RNA-binding proteinsPotential regulatory complexCo-immunoprecipitation confirmation
TranslatomicsAltered translation of photosystem components when rps18 is modifiedTranslational control nodeIn vitro translation assays with modified rps18
MetabolomicsChanges in photosynthetic output correlating with rps18 modification stateMetabolic consequenceIsotope labeling studies

The integration of these multi-omics approaches creates a comprehensive view of rps18's functional role, connecting molecular mechanisms to physiological outcomes and revealing how this ancient protein contributes to chloroplast function in the context of G. tenuistipitata var. liui's unique evolutionary history as a red alga with one of the most complete repertoires of plastid genes known in photosynthetic eukaryotes .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.