Recombinant Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Context

Sulfakinins (SKs) are neuropeptides structurally and functionally analogous to mammalian cholecystokinin (CCK), regulating feeding behavior, energy balance, and metabolic homeostasis in insects . While Gromphadorhina portentosa (Madagascar hissing cockroach) is studied for its adhesive organs and pathogen models , no published data explicitly describe a recombinant SK-1 from this species. Recombinant SKs typically involve heterologous expression of the peptide in bacterial or insect cell systems, followed by purification and functional testing .

Hypothetical Characterization of Recombinant G. portentosa SK-1

Based on conserved SK features:

  • Sequence Prediction: Likely contains a sulfated tyrosine (Y) and amidated C-terminus (e.g., Y(SO₃H)X₅Famide).

  • Receptor Interaction: Would bind a GPCR homologous to D. armandi SKR or B. mori BNGR-A9, activating Ca²⁺/IP₃ pathways .

  • Functional Roles: Potential roles in appetite suppression, trehalose metabolism, and energy balance, as seen in other SK systems .

Gene Cloning and Recombinant Expression

  • Steps:

    1. Isolate SK precursor cDNA via PCR from G. portentosa neural tissue.

    2. Sequence analysis to identify mature peptide(s) and signal peptide cleavage sites.

    3. Recombinant expression in E. coli or insect cells (e.g., Drosophila S2 cells), followed by purification via HPLC or affinity chromatography .

Functional Assays

Assay TypeObjectiveExpected OutcomeReference Method
Feeding BehaviorAssess peptide-induced appetite suppressionReduced food intake post-injection
Metabolic ProfilingMeasure trehalose/glycogen levelsElevated trehalose, decreased glycogen
Receptor BindingDetermine SKR interaction specificityEC₅₀ values in Ca²⁺-responsive systems

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Knowledge Gaps: No existing data on G. portentosa SKs; reliance on homology to Coleoptera or other insect orders .

  • Potential Applications:

    • Pest Control: SK analogs as feeding inhibitors for cockroach-related pests.

    • Model Organism: Leveraging G. portentosa’s established pathogen model to study SK-mediated metabolic regulation.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies based on purchasing method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. For dry ice shipping, contact us in advance; extra fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) is recommended for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
; Sulfakinin-1; GroPo-SK-1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-11
Protein Length
Cytoplasmic domain
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Gromphadorhina portentosa (Madagascan hissing cockroach)
Target Protein Sequence
EQFEDYGHMR F
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Myotropic peptide.
Protein Families
Gastrin/cholecystokinin family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1 and how does it function within the insect neuroendocrine system?

Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1 is a neuropeptide found in Madagascar hissing cockroaches that belongs to the sulfakinin family, structurally and functionally homologous to vertebrate cholecystokinin (CCK). Based on research with related cockroach neuropeptides, sulfakinins likely regulate feeding behavior, digestive enzyme secretion, and gut motility.

Research methodology for characterization typically involves:

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue distribution, particularly in brain-corpus cardiacum and midgut paraneurons

  • ELISA-based quantification in various tissues and hemolymph

  • Physiological assays measuring effects on digestive enzyme activities

Studies of neuropeptides in the American cockroach (Periplaneta americana) demonstrate that related molecules like short neuropeptide F (sNPF) significantly inhibit α-amylase, protease, and lipase activities during starvation . Similar methodological approaches would be valuable for investigating Sulfakinin-1 function in Gromphadorina portentosa.

What expression systems are most appropriate for producing functional recombinant Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1?

The selection of expression systems depends on research objectives and required post-translational modifications. The following table compares suitable expression systems:

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesSuitable for Bioactive Sulfakinin-1
Escherichia coliHigh yield, economical, rapid growthLimited post-translational modificationsSuitable for structural studies only
Insect cells (Sf9, Sf21)Insect-specific modifications, proper foldingHigher cost, complex media requirementsIdeal for fully functional peptide
Mammalian cellsComplete post-translational machineryHighest cost, technical complexityBest for studies requiring native activity

For initial expression studies, the pEXP5NT/TOPO vector system has been successfully used for cockroach allergen expression in E. coli . This system could serve as a starting point for Sulfakinin-1 expression, particularly for structural characterization studies not requiring post-translational modifications.

How can researchers confirm the structural integrity of recombinant Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1?

Verification of structural integrity requires a multi-faceted analytical approach:

  • Mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS or ESI-MS) to confirm:

    • Exact molecular weight

    • Presence of post-translational modifications (particularly tyrosine sulfation)

    • C-terminal amidation status

  • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to evaluate secondary structure elements

  • NMR spectroscopy for detailed three-dimensional structure determination

  • Western blotting using anti-sulfakinin antibodies or epitope tag detection

  • Functional bioassays comparing activity with synthesized native peptide

The validation approach should be tailored to research objectives, with structural integrity confirmed before proceeding to functional studies .

What are the key considerations for designing primers to clone the Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1 gene?

Primer design for Sulfakinin-1 gene amplification requires careful consideration of several factors:

  • Sequence conservation analysis:

    • Alignment of known sulfakinin sequences from related cockroach species

    • Identification of conserved regions for degenerate primer design

    • Analysis of cockroach expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries

  • Optimal primer design parameters:

    • 18-25 nucleotides length

    • 40-60% GC content

    • Melting temperatures (Tm) within 2-5°C of each other

    • Addition of restriction sites with appropriate flanking sequences

    • Consideration of codon optimization for expression system

  • Recommended amplification approach:

    • Initial PCR with degenerate primers

    • Nested PCR for specificity enhancement

    • Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE) for complete sequence determination

The methodology employed for German cockroach allergen identification, using EST clone analysis to obtain cDNA sequences, provides a viable template for Sulfakinin-1 gene isolation .

What purification strategies maximize yield and activity of recombinant Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1?

Effective purification of recombinant Sulfakinin-1 requires a strategic multi-step approach:

  • Initial capture:

    • Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged constructs

    • Glutathione affinity for GST-fusion proteins

  • Tag removal:

    • Site-specific protease cleavage (TEV, Factor Xa, or PreScission)

    • Optimization of cleavage conditions to prevent peptide degradation

  • Polishing steps:

    • Reversed-phase HPLC for hydrophobicity-based separation

    • Size exclusion chromatography for aggregation removal

    • Ion exchange chromatography for charge-based purification

  • Activity preservation considerations:

    • Buffer optimization to prevent aggregation

    • Addition of protease inhibitors throughout purification

    • Lyophilization conditions that maintain structural integrity

Yield and purity should be monitored at each step using SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and mass spectrometry to ensure the final product meets research requirements.

How does recombinant Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1 affect digestive enzyme regulation in comparison to native peptide?

This complex research question requires rigorous experimental design:

  • Experimental methodology:

    • Isolation of midgut tissue from Gromphadorina portentosa

    • Tissue incubation with concentration gradients (10⁻¹⁰-10⁻⁶ M) of:
      a) Recombinant Sulfakinin-1
      b) Synthetic native Sulfakinin-1
      c) Control peptides with modified sequences

    • Measurement of enzyme activities:
      a) α-amylase using starch or p-nitrophenyl substrates
      b) Proteases using azocasein or fluorogenic substrates
      c) Lipases using p-nitrophenyl palmitate

  • Expected experimental outcomes:

    • Dose-dependent inhibition of digestive enzymes

    • Activity comparison between recombinant and native forms

    • Identification of critical structural elements for activity

Research with American cockroach shows that sNPF significantly inhibits digestive enzyme activities during starvation, with activity restored upon refeeding . Similar methodological approaches would be appropriate for investigating Sulfakinin-1 effects.

What molecular mechanisms underlie receptor binding and activation by Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1?

Investigation of receptor mechanisms requires sophisticated molecular and cellular approaches:

  • Receptor identification and characterization:

    • Homology cloning based on known sulfakinin receptors

    • Expression in heterologous systems (HEK293, CHO cells)

    • Pharmacological characterization using competitive binding assays

  • Signaling pathway analysis:

    • G-protein coupling determination (Gq, Gs, Gi)

    • Calcium mobilization assays

    • cAMP measurement

    • ERK phosphorylation analysis

  • Structure-activity relationship studies:

    • Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the peptide

    • Receptor mutant analysis for binding domain identification

    • Fluorescently labeled peptide for binding visualization

The mechanisms of neuropeptide-receptor interactions have been studied in other cockroach species, providing methodological frameworks that can be adapted for Sulfakinin-1 research .

How do post-translational modifications affect the bioactivity of recombinant Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1?

Sulfakinins typically require specific post-translational modifications for full biological activity:

  • Critical modifications to evaluate:

    • Tyrosine sulfation

    • C-terminal amidation

    • Disulfide bond formation (if applicable)

  • Experimental design approach:

    • Production of variant peptides with different modification patterns

    • Comparative receptor binding assays

    • Functional bioassays (feeding regulation, gut motility)

    • Circular dichroism spectroscopy for structural comparison

  • Expected functional differences:

    • Reduced receptor binding affinity for non-sulfated variants

    • Decreased signaling efficacy for non-amidated forms

    • Potential conformational changes affecting receptor recognition

Sulfakinin VariantExpected Receptor BindingBiological ActivityStructural Stability
Fully modifiedHigh affinityFull activityNative conformation
Non-sulfatedReduced affinityPartial activitySimilar to native
Non-amidatedSignificantly reducedMinimal activityC-terminal flexibility
Non-modifiedVery low affinityNegligible activityAltered conformation

This systematic approach allows for precise determination of structure-function relationships critical for understanding Sulfakinin-1 bioactivity .

What methodological approaches can identify cross-reactivity between Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1 and sulfakinins from other species?

Cross-reactivity studies require multiple complementary approaches:

  • Receptor pharmacology:

    • Heterologous expression of sulfakinin receptors from different species

    • Competitive binding assays with radiolabeled or fluorescent peptides

    • Calcium mobilization or cAMP assays to measure activation potency

    • Receptor internalization studies

  • Immunological cross-reactivity:

    • Development of specific antibodies against Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1

    • ELISA and Western blot analysis with sulfakinins from related species

    • Immunoabsorption studies to identify shared epitopes

    • Immunohistochemical tissue staining comparison across species

  • Bioinformatic analysis:

    • Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

    • Molecular modeling of peptide-receptor interactions

    • Prediction of structural conservation and divergence

Research on cockroach allergen cross-reactivity provides methodological guidance, where immunoblot and immunoblot inhibition studies effectively identified shared and unique epitopes between American and German cockroach allergens .

How can researchers design functional assays to evaluate the physiological effects of Gromphadorina portentosa Sulfakinin-1 in vivo?

Comprehensive functional characterization requires multiple physiological assays:

  • Feeding behavior assays:

    • Precise food intake measurement following Sulfakinin-1 injection

    • Analysis of meal size, frequency, and duration

    • Two-choice preference tests to evaluate satiety effects

    • Dose-response relationships and temporal dynamics

  • Digestive physiology:

    • In vivo measurement of digestive enzyme activities following peptide administration

    • Analysis of enzyme gene expression using quantitative RT-PCR

    • Food transit time using colored markers

    • Nutritional parameter analysis (hemolymph trehalose, lipids, amino acids)

  • Electrophysiological approaches:

    • Isolated gut motility recording in organ bath preparations

    • Intracellular recordings from stomatogastric neurons

    • Multi-electrode array recordings from gut neural networks

Research with American cockroach demonstrated that injection of sNPF into the hemocoel led to decreased digestive enzyme activities, providing a methodological template for similar studies with Sulfakinin-1 .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.