Recombinant Haemophilus influenzae Phosphate regulon sensor protein phoR (phoR)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
phoR; HI_1378; Phosphate regulon sensor protein PhoR
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-425
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Haemophilus influenzae (strain ATCC 51907 / DSM 11121 / KW20 / Rd)
Target Names
phoR
Target Protein Sequence
MKKILNFIVEINLAIIISLFTSDFILWFAIILLLILAWHHINEYRLLKYLNLKQDNKFSL LQLGTFSQTEAYHRHQIYKEKCASLRLLSQINKNIKYLPDAIIICQHNGNISWCNSIAPQ MFDFCWDKKVQENIFDVIFYEQFKHYFFSPKKRRPLVLLTYNQRYIEVQSHAYNSHMILV IARDITDMIHLLNSRQKFLSNINHELRTPLTVLQGYLEILADNNIQNPLQKKAIXAMQEQ SQRMEHLLQQFNFLAKIETTSDKDFRKFDMSAMINSLRKDTDILNTYNHHIEFIIQPNII IFGNESQLRSAVSNLIYNAIKHSGKQCHIQIQWETCEQGIKFNVIDNGVGISPQHIPHLT ERFYRVDESRSHLTGGSGLGLAIVKHTLLQYHSHLNIESTETKGSSFSFIIPKRFVISKN NKEIQ
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Recombinant Haemophilus influenzae Phosphate Regulon Sensor Protein PhoR (PhoR): A member of the two-component regulatory system PhoR/PhoB, it plays a crucial role in regulating the expression of phosphate regulon genes. PhoR likely functions as a membrane-associated protein kinase, phosphorylating PhoB in response to environmental cues.

Database Links

KEGG: hin:HI1378

STRING: 71421.HI1378

Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the function of PhoR in Haemophilus influenzae?

PhoR acts as the signaling histidine kinase for the PhoR/PhoB two-component regulatory system that controls expression of phosphate regulon genes in H. influenzae . While the specific PhoR regulon in H. influenzae remains undefined, research in other organisms indicates that this system regulates genes involved in phosphate uptake and utilization. The PhoR/PhoB system responds to environmental phosphate levels, which are present in all body fluids including the middle ear, where concentrations increase during chronic otitis . This sensor kinase likely enables H. influenzae to adapt to changing phosphate conditions during infection, making it an important component of bacterial survival strategies.

How does PhoR contribute to H. influenzae virulence?

In other bacterial species, the phosphate regulon controlled by PhoR contains genes encoding proteins involved in multiple virulence-related functions, including resistance to serum bactericidal activity, response to acid stress, and defense against cationic antimicrobial peptides . Intra-host variation in PhoR could favor H. influenzae immune evasion, persistence, and virulence by promoting phenotypic diversity . This diversity may enhance H. influenzae fitness during infection by enabling adaptive responses to fluctuating environmental conditions and host defenses. Studies have shown that inactivation of genes in the phosphate transport system, the PhoR/PhoB regulatory system, or the phosphate regulon alters strain virulence in various in vitro and in vivo infection models .

What is known about PhoR variation across H. influenzae strains?

Research has documented significant intra-host genomic variation in PhoR among H. influenzae isolates. In one comprehensive study, researchers observed eight distinct PhoR amino acid substitutions or protein truncations across six isolates recovered from just four patients . This variation appears particularly relevant given that H. influenzae exhibits a highly admixed population structure with low core genome nucleotide diversity and evidence of pervasive negative selection . The specific changes in PhoR protein structure likely contribute to functional diversity that allows adaptation to different host environments and immune pressures.

How does PhoR relate to the broader clinical impact of H. influenzae infections?

H. influenzae remains a significant public health burden worldwide despite vaccination efforts against serotype b (Hib) . The protein's variations may contribute to the pathogen's continued success, particularly for non-typeable strains that cause both non-invasive and invasive disease without protection from current vaccines . Understanding PhoR's role becomes increasingly important as multi-drug resistant (MDR) lineages of H. influenzae become more prevalent globally . The phosphate regulatory system may interact with mechanisms of antibiotic resistance or bacterial persistence, making it relevant to clinical treatment strategies and outcomes.

What experimental approaches are recommended for studying PhoR protein function in H. influenzae?

For investigating PhoR function, researchers should consider a multi-faceted approach combining genetic manipulation, structural biology, and functional assays. Begin with recombinant expression of the protein, ideally using a bacterial expression system optimized for membrane proteins, as PhoR is typically membrane-associated. Site-directed mutagenesis targeting conserved histidine residues in the kinase domain will help identify catalytically important sites. For functional characterization, develop phosphorylation assays using purified PhoR and PhoB proteins with radiolabeled ATP to measure kinase activity under varying phosphate concentrations.

Complement these in vitro approaches with in vivo experiments using isogenic mutants. Create deletion mutants (ΔphoR) and complemented strains to assess the impact on phosphate utilization, stress responses, and virulence. RNA-seq analysis comparing wild-type and mutant strains under phosphate-limited and phosphate-rich conditions can help define the PhoR regulon in H. influenzae specifically, allowing comparison with known regulons in other species . Finally, utilize animal infection models to evaluate the role of PhoR in colonization, persistence, and disease progression.

How can researchers investigate the relationship between PhoR variation and phenotypic diversity?

To examine how PhoR variation impacts phenotypic diversity, implement a comprehensive approach focusing on naturally occurring variants identified in clinical isolates. First, sequence phoR from diverse clinical isolates to catalog naturally occurring variations, particularly the eight distinct amino acid substitutions previously identified . Create an isogenic strain collection expressing these variants in a common genetic background to control for other genomic differences.

Evaluate phenotypic consequences through systematic characterization of each variant strain, including:

  • Growth kinetics under varying phosphate concentrations

  • Transcriptional profiling to identify differentially regulated genes

  • Resistance to serum killing, acid stress, and antimicrobial peptides

  • Biofilm formation capacity

  • In vitro infection models using relevant cell types (e.g., middle ear epithelial cells)

These experiments should be conducted under standardized conditions to facilitate direct comparisons. Statistical analysis should account for biological replicates and potential confounding factors. This approach will help establish causative relationships between specific PhoR variations and phenotypic outcomes relevant to pathogenesis .

What analytical methods should be used to resolve data contradictions in PhoR research?

Create a data structure that tracks these atomic facts and their temporal relationships, which allows identification of specific points of contradiction . For example, if one study shows PhoR mutation increasing virulence while another shows decreased virulence, determine whether experimental conditions (bacterial strain, growth conditions, infection model) represent overlapping or distinct validity intervals for these findings .

Implement a four-step contradiction resolution pipeline:

  • Decompose - Break down complex findings into basic assertions

  • Determine - Establish validity intervals for each assertion

  • Contradiction - Identify specific contradicting elements using interval analysis

  • Update - Reconcile by refining validity conditions or designing experiments to resolve discrepancies

This methodical approach helps distinguish between true contradictions and findings that are valid under different specific conditions, leading to more nuanced understanding of PhoR function across varying experimental contexts.

How does PhoR contribute to H. influenzae adaptation during infection?

To investigate PhoR's role in adaptive responses during infection, design longitudinal studies tracking PhoR sequence and expression during natural or experimental infections. Obtain sequential isolates from the same host over time, focusing on transition points like colonization to invasion or acute to chronic infection. Perform whole genome sequencing to identify mutations in phoR and related phosphate regulon genes, complemented by transcriptome and proteome analyses to assess expression changes .

Utilize animal models that recapitulate key aspects of human infection (e.g., middle ear infection models for otitis media) to study PhoR-dependent adaptation in vivo. Sample bacteria at multiple timepoints to track genomic and transcriptomic changes. Use fluorescent reporter constructs linked to PhoR-regulated promoters to visualize activation of the phosphate regulon in real-time during infection .

For human studies, analyze clinical isolates from different infection sites within the same patient to identify site-specific adaptations. Compare isolates from surface colonization versus invasive disease to determine whether PhoR variations correlate with transition to invasiveness. This comprehensive approach will help elucidate how PhoR-mediated environmental sensing contributes to H. influenzae adaptation across different host microenvironments .

What techniques are most effective for studying the structural biology of PhoR?

For structural characterization of H. influenzae PhoR, employ multiple complementary techniques. Begin with protein production through recombinant expression in E. coli, optimizing conditions for membrane protein expression. Consider expressing the cytoplasmic domain separately if the full-length protein proves challenging. For purification, use affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography to ensure homogeneity.

For structure determination, X-ray crystallography remains valuable but requires high-quality crystals. Optimize crystallization conditions using sparse matrix screens, focusing on conditions successful for other histidine kinases. Alternatively, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) offers advantages for membrane proteins without requiring crystallization. For higher-resolution insights into the sensing domain, use nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, particularly suitable for studying dynamic regions and phosphorylation-induced conformational changes.

Complement these approaches with computational methods:

  • Homology modeling based on known structures of homologous proteins

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to study conformational changes during signaling

  • Docking studies to identify potential binding sites for phosphate or other ligands

Finally, employ hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to map conformational changes upon phosphate binding or during autophosphorylation. This multi-technique approach provides comprehensive structural insights informing rational drug design targeting this virulence regulator.

How might PhoR serve as a potential therapeutic target?

PhoR represents a promising therapeutic target due to its essential role in bacterial phosphate homeostasis and virulence regulation. To evaluate its potential, conduct high-throughput screening of compound libraries against recombinant PhoR protein, focusing on molecules that inhibit its autophosphorylation activity or interaction with PhoB. Prioritize compounds that show specificity for bacterial histidine kinases over human kinases to minimize off-target effects.

Validate candidate inhibitors through enzyme kinetics assays and structural studies (co-crystallization with inhibitors) to characterize binding modes. Move promising candidates to cellular assays, evaluating their ability to disrupt phosphate regulation in H. influenzae and impact bacterial survival under phosphate-limited conditions. Importantly, assess inhibitor efficacy against clinical isolates with various PhoR variants to ensure broad-spectrum activity .

For translational potential, evaluate pharmacokinetic properties and in vivo efficacy in animal infection models. Consider combination therapy approaches, testing PhoR inhibitors alongside conventional antibiotics to determine potential synergistic effects, particularly against multi-drug resistant strains . This systematic approach can help establish whether PhoR inhibition represents a viable strategy to combat increasingly resistant H. influenzae infections.

How does genomic context affect PhoR function across H. influenzae lineages?

To understand how genomic context influences PhoR function, perform comparative genomic analyses across the highly admixed H. influenzae population . Analyze the genomic neighborhood of phoR across diverse lineages, identifying co-evolving genes and potential horizontal gene transfer events. Examine synteny of the phosphate regulon and regulatory elements across strains with different levels of virulence or ecological niches.

Implement a systematic approach to characterize the PhoR regulon in representative strains from different lineages through:

  • ChIP-seq analysis to identify PhoB binding sites genome-wide

  • RNA-seq comparing wildtype and ΔphoR mutants under phosphate limitation

  • Proteomics to identify differentially expressed proteins

Look for lineage-specific differences in regulon composition that might explain phenotypic variation. Create hybrid strains by swapping phoR loci between lineages to test the impact of genomic background on PhoR function. Analyze epistatic interactions between phoR and other regulatory systems (e.g., stress response regulators) that might differ between lineages .

This approach will help determine whether PhoR function is conserved across the species or has evolved distinct regulatory roles in different lineages, providing insight into how genomic context shapes bacterial environmental responses and virulence potential.

What is the relationship between PhoR variation and antibiotic resistance?

To investigate connections between PhoR variation and antibiotic resistance, first establish a comprehensive collection of H. influenzae clinical isolates with well-characterized antibiotic susceptibility profiles and fully sequenced phoR genes. Perform correlation analyses between specific PhoR variants and minimum inhibitory concentrations for various antibiotics, with particular attention to multi-drug resistant lineages .

Generate isogenic strains expressing different naturally occurring PhoR variants in a common genetic background, then evaluate antibiotic susceptibility through standardized testing. Complement this with transcriptomic and proteomic analyses comparing resistant and susceptible strains with different PhoR variants, focusing on expression of known resistance determinants. Use chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify whether PhoB directly regulates any resistance-associated genes.

Create ΔphoR mutants in resistant strains to determine whether disrupting phosphate regulation affects resistance phenotypes. Additionally, examine whether phosphate limitation or PhoR activation alters antibiotic efficacy, as nutritional state can influence susceptibility. This systematic characterization will clarify whether PhoR contributes to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance in H. influenzae, potentially identifying new approaches to combat resistant infections .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.