KEGG: hin:HI1073
STRING: 71421.HI1073
E. coli is the most commonly used expression system for recombinant HI_1073 production . When working with this system, researchers should consider:
Expression vector selection: pET series vectors with T7 promoters offer strong induction capabilities
E. coli strain: BL21(DE3) or derivatives are recommended for membrane protein expression
Fusion tags: His-tag fusion at the N-terminus has been successfully employed for HI_1073
Induction conditions: Typically, 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at lower temperatures (16-25°C) improves proper folding
For membrane proteins like HI_1073, alternative systems such as cell-free expression may be considered if E. coli expression results in inclusion bodies or non-functional protein. When optimizing expression conditions, a design of experiments (DoE) approach is recommended over one-factor-at-a-time methods, as it accounts for the complex interactions between experimental variables .
Purification of recombinant HI_1073 with a His-tag can be accomplished through the following protocol:
| Purification Step | Conditions | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cell Lysis | Mechanical disruption (sonication or high-pressure homogenization) in Tris-based buffer with mild detergent | Membrane proteins require detergent for solubilization |
| Detergent Solubilization | 1-2% mild detergent (DDM, LDAO) in Tris buffer, pH 8.0 | Critical for extracting membrane proteins |
| Affinity Chromatography | Ni-NTA resin, imidazole gradient elution | His-tagged HI_1073 binds to Ni-NTA resin |
| Size Exclusion Chromatography | Superdex 200 column, Tris buffer with 0.05-0.1% detergent | Further purifies protein and confirms oligomeric state |
For optimal results, all buffers should contain detergent at concentrations above the critical micelle concentration to maintain protein solubility. Purity assessment by SDS-PAGE should show >90% purity after complete purification .
For optimal stability of purified HI_1073:
Short-term storage (up to one week): Store at 4°C in appropriate buffer
Long-term storage: Store at -20°C or -80°C in buffer containing 50% glycerol or as lyophilized powder
Recommended storage buffer: Tris-based buffer (pH 8.0) with 6% trehalose or 50% glycerol
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this significantly reduces protein stability
When reconstituting lyophilized protein, use deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL, and consider adding glycerol (5-50% final concentration) before aliquoting for long-term storage .
Optimizing experimental conditions for functional studies of HI_1073 requires a systematic approach:
Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology: Rather than changing one variable at a time, implement factorial or response surface methodology designs to identify optimal conditions and interaction effects
Critical parameters to optimize:
Buffer composition (pH range 7.0-8.5)
Ionic strength (150-500 mM NaCl)
Detergent type and concentration
Lipid composition (if reconstituting into liposomes)
Temperature stability range
For example, a central composite design might be used to optimize multiple factors simultaneously:
| Factor | Low Level | Center Point | High Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 7.0 | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| NaCl (mM) | 150 | 300 | 450 |
| Detergent (%) | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.15 |
| Temperature (°C) | 20 | 30 | 40 |
Analysis of the resulting data using response surface methodology can identify optimal conditions that might not be discovered through traditional approaches . Statistical software like JMP, Design-Expert, or R packages can assist in experimental design and data analysis.
Multiple complementary approaches should be employed for comprehensive structural characterization of HI_1073:
Crystallography: Given the membrane nature of HI_1073, lipidic cubic phase (LCP) or bicelle crystallization methods may be more successful than traditional vapor diffusion techniques.
Cryo-EM: Single-particle analysis is increasingly valuable for membrane proteins when crystallization proves challenging.
Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy: Provides information on secondary structure content.
Protocol: Scan 190-260 nm at 20°C in phosphate buffer with 0.05% DDM
Data analysis: Secondary structure estimation using CDNN or BeStSel algorithms
NMR Spectroscopy: For membrane proteins like HI_1073, solid-state NMR may be more appropriate than solution NMR.
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Provides information on protein dynamics and solvent accessibility
Particularly useful for membrane proteins where crystallization is challenging
Each method provides complementary structural information, and researchers should select appropriate methods based on available equipment, expertise, and specific research questions.
Since UPF0382 family proteins like HI_1073 are not fully characterized functionally, multiple approaches may be needed:
Membrane localization confirmation:
Fluorescent protein fusion and microscopy
Subcellular fractionation and western blotting
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Pull-down assays using His-tagged HI_1073
Crosslinking experiments to identify interaction partners
Biolayer interferometry (BLI) or surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for interaction kinetics
Functional assays based on predicted roles:
As a membrane protein, potential roles in transport can be assessed through:
Liposome-based transport assays with fluorescent substrates
Electrophysiology approaches if channel activity is suspected
Comparative analysis:
Functional complementation in knockout models
Heterologous expression and phenotypic analysis
A systematic approach combining multiple methodologies will provide the most comprehensive understanding of HI_1073 function, especially given the limited prior characterization of this protein family.
Membrane proteins like HI_1073 present several specific challenges that can be addressed using advanced techniques:
| Challenge | Solution Strategy | Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Toxicity to expression host | Tight regulation of expression | Use T7-lac promoter with glucose repression; consider C41/C43 E. coli strains specifically developed for toxic membrane proteins |
| Inclusion body formation | Optimize expression conditions | Lower temperature (16-20°C), reduce inducer concentration, co-express with chaperones |
| Low yield | Enhance expression | Screen multiple constructs with various fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, TrxA); use fluorescence-based fusion screening |
| Improper folding | Membrane mimetics | Screen detergents systematically (DDM, LDAO, LMNG); consider nanodiscs or SMALPs for native-like environment |
| Heterogeneity | Advanced purification | Implement tandem affinity purification; consider GFP fusion for monitoring folding and SEC-MALS for assessing homogeneity |
Additionally, computational approaches can guide construct design:
Use disorder prediction algorithms to identify flexible regions
Perform hydropathy analysis to precisely define transmembrane domains
Employ homology modeling to predict structure based on similar proteins
When implementing these strategies, maintain detailed records of all conditions tested and results obtained, as optimization is often empirical and protein-specific.
DoE offers significant advantages over traditional one-factor-at-a-time approaches for optimizing recombinant protein production:
Initial screening phase:
Implement a fractional factorial design to screen multiple factors with minimal experiments
Key factors to include: temperature, inducer concentration, media composition, induction time, and cell density at induction
Optimization phase:
Use response surface methodology (RSM) to fine-tune significant factors identified in screening
Central composite design or Box-Behnken design allows efficient mapping of the response surface
Example DoE for HI_1073 expression optimization:
| Factor | Low Level (-1) | Center Point (0) | High Level (+1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | 16 | 25 | 37 |
| IPTG (mM) | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| OD600 at induction | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Post-induction time (h) | 4 | 12 | 24 |
| Media | Minimal | TB | 2×YT |
Statistical analysis software can generate the experimental runs needed and analyze results to identify optimal conditions and interaction effects that might be missed with traditional approaches .
For poorly characterized proteins like HI_1073, computational approaches can provide valuable insights:
Homology modeling:
Use SWISS-MODEL or I-TASSER to generate structural models based on related proteins
Validate models with PROCHECK, VERIFY3D, or MolProbity
Molecular dynamics simulations:
Simulate protein behavior in membrane environments using GROMACS or NAMD
Analysis of trajectory data can reveal dynamic properties and potential binding sites
Sequence-based function prediction:
Use tools like InterProScan, Pfam, and CATH to identify conserved domains
Employ co-evolution analysis to identify functionally coupled residues
Systems biology approaches:
Analyze genomic context conservation
Identify co-expressed genes to infer functional associations
By integrating these computational predictions with experimental data, researchers can generate testable hypotheses about the structure and function of HI_1073, guiding further experimental design.
| Issue | Possible Causes | Troubleshooting Approaches |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression level | Toxicity, codon bias, improper construct design | Test different E. coli strains (C41/C43, Rosetta); optimize codons; redesign construct |
| Protein in inclusion bodies | Fast expression rate, improper folding | Lower temperature (16°C); reduce inducer concentration; co-express with chaperones |
| Poor solubilization | Inadequate detergent selection | Screen detergent panel (DDM, LDAO, DM, OG); optimize detergent:protein ratio |
| Low affinity binding | Tag inaccessibility, buffer conditions | Change tag position; optimize imidazole concentration; check pH and salt concentration |
| Protein aggregation | Detergent depletion, unstable protein | Maintain detergent above CMC; add stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids); optimize buffer conditions |
Systematic documentation of conditions tested and results is essential for effective troubleshooting. When facing persistent difficulties, consider alternative approaches such as cell-free expression systems or fusion to carrier proteins known to enhance solubility (MBP, SUMO).
Several cutting-edge technologies are revolutionizing membrane protein research:
Cryo-EM advances:
Direct electron detectors and improved image processing allow structure determination of smaller proteins
Application to HI_1073 might require fusion to a larger scaffold protein
Native nanodiscs and SMALPs:
Extract membrane proteins with surrounding native lipids
Preserve native interactions and functional states
Single-molecule techniques:
FRET and optical tweezers to study conformational changes
Single-molecule force spectroscopy to study unfolding dynamics
Integrative structural biology:
Combining multiple techniques (X-ray, NMR, SAXS, crosslinking-MS) for comprehensive structural models
Particularly powerful for challenging membrane proteins
AlphaFold2 and related AI approaches:
Deep learning methods now predict protein structures with high accuracy
Can provide starting models for further refinement and functional studies
Researchers studying HI_1073 should consider these emerging technologies, particularly when traditional approaches yield limited results or when specific questions about dynamics and interactions cannot be addressed by conventional techniques.
The UPF0382 family of membrane proteins, including HI_1073, remains largely uncharacterized. Current knowledge suggests these are small membrane proteins with multiple transmembrane domains, conserved across various bacterial species. The "UPF" designation (Uncharacterized Protein Family) indicates that the function remains unknown or poorly defined.
Key knowledge gaps include:
Physiological role in Haemophilus influenzae
Structural details beyond predicted transmembrane topology
Potential involvement in pathogenicity or antibiotic resistance
Interaction partners and metabolic pathways
These knowledge gaps represent significant opportunities for novel research contributions in this field.
Effective collaboration on HI_1073 research requires integration of multiple expertise areas:
Form a multidisciplinary team including:
Molecular biologists for protein expression and purification
Structural biologists for protein characterization
Computational biologists for sequence and structure prediction
Microbiologists for functional studies in Haemophilus influenzae
Establish clear communication protocols:
Regular team meetings with structured agendas
Shared electronic lab notebooks for experimental documentation
Common data repositories with standardized formats
Implement project management approaches:
Define clear milestones and deliverables
Use Gantt charts to track progress
Assign specific responsibilities based on expertise
Consider ethical and regulatory requirements:
Biosafety considerations for working with Haemophilus influenzae
Proper documentation for potential intellectual property