Recombinant Halobacterium salinarum Cobalt transport protein CbiN (cbiN)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Function

Recombinant Halobacterium salinarum Cobalt transport protein CbiN (cbiN) is a recombinant protein encoded by the cbiN gene (OE_3318R, UniProt ID: B0R610) in Halobacterium salinarum. It functions as a substrate-capture component of an Energy-Coupling Factor (ECF) transporter, facilitating cobalt ion uptake in archaeal systems . ECF transporters typically consist of a membrane-bound ATPase module and a soluble substrate-binding protein, with CbiN likely serving as the latter to bind cobalt for subsequent transmembrane transport .

Production and Purification

CbiN is heterologously expressed in E. coli using recombinant DNA technology. Key steps include:

  1. Cloning: Insertion of the cbiN gene into a plasmid vector.

  2. Expression: Induction of protein synthesis in E. coli under optimized conditions.

  3. Purification: Nickel-affinity chromatography leveraging the N-terminal His-tag, followed by dialysis or lyophilization .

Quality Control: Purity is confirmed via SDS-PAGE, with >90% homogeneity reported .

Current and Potential Uses

Application AreaDescription
Biochemical AssaysStudying cobalt binding kinetics, substrate specificity, or transporter assembly.
ImmunoassaysDetection/quantification via ELISA kits (e.g., CSB-CF537256HTL) .
Structural StudiesX-ray crystallography or NMR to elucidate cobalt-binding mechanisms.
Ecological StudiesInvestigating cobalt metabolism in halophilic archaea under stress conditions .

Limitations: Limited direct functional studies on CbiN exist; most data derive from commercial product specifications and homology to other ECF components .

Comparative Analysis with CbiM

CbiN and CbiM (OE_3319R, B0R611) are adjacent genes in H. salinarum, forming part of the same ECF transporter system. Key differences include:

FeatureCbiN (cbiN)CbiM (cbiM)
Length96 aa220 aa
FunctionSoluble substrate-binding componentMembrane-bound ATPase module
Expression HostE. coli (His-tagged)E. coli (His-tagged)
Purity>90%>90%

CbiM likely couples ATP hydrolysis to cobalt transport, while CbiN binds and delivers the substrate .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have specific format requirements, please indicate them in your order. We will accommodate your request as best as possible.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery timelines.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please communicate this in advance as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%. Customers can use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during the production process. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
cbiN; OE_3318R; Cobalt transport protein CbiN; Energy-coupling factor transporter probable substrate-capture protein CbiN
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-96
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Halobacterium salinarum (strain ATCC 29341 / DSM 671 / R1)
Target Names
cbiN
Target Protein Sequence
MNRWLAAGGILLGALVVFSFVSAGAWGGADGVAGDTITTINPSYEPWFQSLWTPPSGEIE SLLFSIQAAVGGIIIGYYLGRDRPRGQSQDMGSDLP
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
CbiN is a component of the energy-coupling factor (ECF) transporter complex CbiMNOQ, responsible for cobalt import.
Database Links

KEGG: hsl:OE_3318R

Protein Families
CbiN family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is CbiN and what role does it play in cobalt transport?

CbiN is a membrane protein composed of two transmembrane helices connected by an extracytoplasmic loop of 37 amino acid residues. It functions as an auxiliary component that temporarily interacts with the CbiMQO₂ Co²⁺ transporter system in Halobacterium salinarum . CbiN is essential for inducing significant Co²⁺ transport activity, even in simplified systems where it's produced along with only the S component CbiM or as a Cbi(MN) fusion protein . The protein plays a critical role in facilitating metal insertion into the binding pocket through specific loop-loop interactions with CbiM .

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant Halobacterium salinarum proteins?

For halophilic archaeal proteins like those from H. salinarum, homologous or closely related expression systems typically yield better results than heterologous expression in bacteria like E. coli. Haloferax volcanii is often preferred due to its ease of genetic manipulation and ability to properly fold halophilic proteins . When expressing halophilic proteins in E. coli, they frequently form insoluble aggregates or degrade due to improper folding .

Table 1: Comparison of Expression Systems for Halophilic Archaeal Proteins

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesSuitable for CbiN
E. coliWell-established protocols, high yieldPoor folding of halophilic proteins, forms aggregatesLimited success
Haloferax volcaniiProper folding of halophilic proteins, medium to large-scale expressionSlower growth than E. coliRecommended
Native H. salinarumAuthentic post-translational modificationsVery low yields, difficult genetic manipulationNot practical

A typical protocol for expressing halophilic proteins in H. volcanii involves: (1) Cloning the target gene into a vector with appropriate restriction sites, (2) Transformation of H. volcanii by electroporation, (3) Culturing at 43°C in appropriate media with inducer (e.g., L-tryptophan), and (4) Cell harvesting and protein purification .

How can I verify the successful expression and purification of recombinant CbiN?

Verification of recombinant CbiN expression can be achieved through multiple complementary techniques:

  • SDS-PAGE analysis: Purified CbiN should appear as a band corresponding to its predicted molecular weight (approximately 8-10 kDa, though it may migrate anomalously due to its hydrophobic nature).

  • Western blotting: If the recombinant construct includes a tag (e.g., 6xHis-tag), antibodies against the tag can be used for detection.

  • Mass spectrometry: For definitive identification, tryptic digestion followed by LC-MS/MS analysis can confirm the protein identity through peptide matching.

  • Functional assays: Transport activity assays using radioactive ⁵⁷Co²⁺ or fluorescent cobalt indicators can verify that the purified protein retains its native function.

When expressing CbiN in H. volcanii, monitoring culture growth at OD₆₀₀ and optimizing induction time are critical factors affecting yield and quality of the recombinant protein .

What experimental approaches can be used to study the CbiN-CbiM interaction interface?

Multiple complementary approaches have proven effective for investigating the critical interaction interface between CbiN and CbiM:

  • Cysteine-scanning mutagenesis and crosslinking: This approach involves systematically replacing residues at predicted interaction sites with cysteine and then testing for disulfide bond formation between partners. Research has confirmed predicted protein-protein contacts between segments of the CbiN loop and loops in CbiM using this method .

  • Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) analysis: Site-directed spin labeling followed by EPR spectroscopy can reveal the ordered structure of the CbiN loop and detect changes in mobility upon interaction with CbiM .

  • Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR): Using isotope-labeled protein in proteoliposomes, researchers have detected decreased dynamics in inactive forms with CbiN loop deletions compared to wild-type Cbi(MN) .

  • In silico prediction and validation: Computational modeling can predict potential interaction sites that can then be verified experimentally. This approach has successfully identified key contact points between CbiN and CbiM .

Table 2: Advantages and Limitations of Different Interaction Analysis Methods

MethodInformation ProvidedAdvantagesLimitations
Cysteine-scanning mutagenesisDirect evidence of proximityWorks in membrane environmentMay disrupt native structure
EPR with spin labelingDynamics and orientationSensitive to subtle changesRequires specialized equipment
Solid-state NMRAtomic-level interactionsHigh-resolution structural dataComplex sample preparation
In silico modelingPredicted interaction surfacesRapid, guides experimental designRequires validation

How do deletions in the CbiN loop affect cobalt transport activity and protein dynamics?

Experimental evidence demonstrates that the integrity of the CbiN loop is essential for function. Any deletion in the 37-amino acid CbiN loop abolishes transport activity completely . The mechanistic basis for this requirement involves several factors:

  • Structural effects: The N-terminal loop of CbiM (which contains three of four metal ligands) is partially immobilized in wild-type Cbi(MN) but becomes completely immobile in inactive variants with CbiN loop deletions .

  • Dynamic properties: Solid-state NMR has revealed decreased dynamics in the inactive forms with CbiN loop deletions compared to the active wild-type protein .

  • Metal insertion mechanism: The CbiM-CbiN loop-loop interactions appear to facilitate the correct positioning for metal insertion into the binding pocket .

When designing experiments to study these effects, researchers should consider creating a series of deletion variants with varying loop lengths to determine the minimal functional unit, combined with spectroscopic methods to analyze changes in dynamics and structure.

What experimental design principles should be applied when studying CbiN function in different salt concentrations?

When investigating CbiN function across salt gradients, robust experimental design is critical. A systematic approach should include:

  • Define clear research questions: Determine whether you're investigating structural stability, binding affinity, or transport kinetics across salt conditions .

  • Identify variables: The independent variable would be salt concentration, while dependent variables might include protein stability, Co²⁺ binding affinity, or transport rate. Control for confounding factors like pH changes that may occur with varying salt concentrations .

  • Appropriate experimental design: A factorial design would be suitable, testing multiple salt concentrations (e.g., 1M, 2M, 3M, 4M NaCl) against multiple dependent variables .

  • Sample size calculation: Ensure statistical power by calculating required replicates based on expected effect size and variability .

  • Randomization: Randomize the order of experiments to minimize systematic errors .

Table 3: Factorial Design for CbiN Functional Studies Across Salt Concentrations

Salt ConcentrationProtein Stability AssayBinding Affinity AssayTransport Activity Assay
1M NaCl3 replicates3 replicates3 replicates
2M NaCl3 replicates3 replicates3 replicates
3M NaCl3 replicates3 replicates3 replicates
4M NaCl3 replicates3 replicates3 replicates

Remember that H. salinarum is a halophilic archaeon that thrives in environments with high salt concentrations , so protein function may be optimized for these conditions.

How can I design experiments to determine if CbiN functions independently or requires additional cellular factors?

To investigate the dependency of CbiN on other cellular factors, a systematic approach combining in vitro and in vivo methods is recommended:

  • Reconstitution studies: Purify recombinant CbiN and CbiM and reconstitute them into liposomes with varying lipid compositions. Test Co²⁺ transport activity using radioactive tracers or fluorescent indicators. Compare activity with and without additional cellular extracts or purified components .

  • Genetic approaches: Create knockout strains of H. volcanii lacking specific genes potentially involved in CbiN function. Complement these strains with wild-type and mutant variants to assess rescue of function .

  • Protein-protein interaction screening: Use techniques such as pull-down assays, co-immunoprecipitation, or proximity labeling methods to identify proteins that interact with CbiN beyond the known CbiM interaction.

  • Comparative analysis across species: Examine CbiN homologs in related halophilic archaea to identify conserved interaction partners or species-specific requirements.

Previous research has shown that CbiN can induce significant Co²⁺ transport activity even in the absence of CbiQO₂ when produced along with CbiM or as a Cbi(MN) fusion , suggesting some degree of functional independence.

What are common challenges in working with recombinant membrane proteins from Halobacterium salinarum?

Working with halophilic archaeal membrane proteins presents several specific challenges:

  • Salt requirement for stability: Halophilic proteins are adapted to high-salt environments and may denature in low-salt conditions. Maintain appropriate salt concentration (typically 2-4M NaCl) throughout purification and analysis .

  • Detergent selection: Membrane proteins require detergents for solubilization. Test multiple detergents (e.g., DDM, LDAO, Triton X-100) at various concentrations to identify optimal conditions for CbiN stability and activity.

  • Expression challenges: As noted earlier, E. coli often produces halophilic proteins as insoluble aggregates. Using H. volcanii as an expression host is recommended, though expression levels may be lower .

  • Purification complications: Traditional purification techniques may need modification for high-salt conditions. If using affinity chromatography with a 6xHis-tag, ensure that high salt does not interfere with metal-chelate interactions .

  • Functional assays: Transport assays require reconstitution into liposomes or vesicles. Optimize lipid composition and reconstitution protocols specifically for halophilic membrane proteins.

How can contradictory data about CbiN structure-function relationships be resolved?

When facing conflicting data regarding CbiN structure-function relationships, consider these systematic approaches:

  • Methodological differences: Evaluate if contradictions arise from different experimental methods. For example, in vitro reconstitution systems may yield different results than in vivo studies due to missing cofactors or inappropriate membrane environments.

  • Genetic background effects: Results may vary depending on the expression system or genetic background used. Compare experiments performed in different strains or species.

  • Protein fusion effects: If studies used different protein constructs (e.g., with different tags or fusion partners), these modifications might affect function. Conduct parallel experiments with standardized constructs.

  • Environmental conditions: Halophilic proteins are highly sensitive to salt concentration, pH, and temperature. Standardize these parameters across experiments for meaningful comparisons.

  • Data integration approach: Use multiple complementary techniques to build a consensus view. For example, combine genetic, biochemical, and structural data to develop a comprehensive model of CbiN function.

Table 4: Strategy for Resolving Conflicting Data on CbiN Function

Conflict TypeResolution StrategyImplementation
Method-dependent resultsCross-validationApply multiple techniques to the same biological question
System-dependent resultsStandardizationUse consistent expression systems and genetic backgrounds
Construct-dependent resultsSystematic variationTest a series of constructs with controlled modifications
Condition-dependent resultsParameter screeningEstablish activity profiles across relevant conditions

What are promising approaches for studying the dynamics of CbiN-mediated cobalt transport in real-time?

Several cutting-edge techniques offer potential for real-time monitoring of CbiN-mediated cobalt transport:

  • Fluorescent metal sensors: Develop or apply cobalt-specific fluorescent probes that can report on metal transport into liposomes or cells. These could potentially be combined with stopped-flow techniques for millisecond time resolution.

  • Single-molecule FRET: By strategically placing fluorescent labels on CbiN and CbiM, conformational changes during the transport cycle could be monitored in real-time at the single-molecule level.

  • Electrophysiological approaches: If CbiN-CbiM complex transport is electrogenic (involves net charge movement), patch-clamp or solid-supported membrane electrophysiology could provide high time-resolution measurements of transport events.

  • Time-resolved structural methods: Techniques like time-resolved cryo-EM or time-resolved X-ray crystallography could potentially capture different conformational states in the transport cycle.

  • Computational simulations: Molecular dynamics simulations can model the transport process and generate testable hypotheses about intermediates and rate-limiting steps.

The choice of approach depends on specific research questions and available resources, but combining complementary methods often provides the most comprehensive understanding of dynamic processes.

How might CbiN function be affected by post-translational modifications in Halobacterium salinarum?

While specific post-translational modifications (PTMs) of CbiN have not been extensively characterized, research on H. salinarum has revealed that archaeal proteins may undergo various modifications including glycosylation . Potential approaches to investigate PTMs of CbiN include:

  • Mass spectrometry analysis: High-resolution MS/MS analysis of purified native CbiN from H. salinarum compared to recombinant protein expressed in different hosts could identify modifications.

  • Site-directed mutagenesis: Once potential modification sites are identified, mutating these residues and assessing functional consequences would clarify their importance.

  • Inhibitor studies: Using inhibitors of specific PTM pathways in H. salinarum could reveal their impact on CbiN function.

  • Comparative analysis: Examining CbiN homologs across species with different PTM capabilities might highlight conserved modification sites.

H. salinarum was the source of the first example of a non-eukaryal glycoprotein , suggesting that glycosylation might be relevant for CbiN function, particularly for the extracellular loop domain.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.