Recombinant Helicobacter hepaticus Single-stranded DNA-binding protein (ssb)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Table 1: Comparative Features of Bacterial SSBs

FeatureH. pylori SSB Vibrio S064
StructureTetrameric OB-foldMonomeric OB-fold
Binding Affinity5.4×107M15.4 \times 10^7 \, \text{M}^{-1}Not quantified
Functional PartnersDNA repair enzymesRecombinases (S065, S066)
RoleDNA replication/repairGenome modulation

Recombinant SSB Applications

Though recombinant H. hepaticus SSB is not explicitly detailed in the provided sources, SSBs from related species are utilized in biotechnology:

  • DNA Repair Studies: SSBs enhance homologous recombination efficiency when paired with exonucleases (e.g., S066) and recombinases (e.g., S065) .

  • Genome Engineering: In Vibrio natriegens, SSB (S064) improves CRISPR-mediated genome editing by stabilizing ssDNA intermediates during recombineering .

Research Gaps and Future Directions

The absence of direct data on recombinant H. hepaticus SSB highlights opportunities for further study:

  • Expression Systems: H. pylori SSB is expressed in E. coli with high solubility . Similar strategies could be adapted for H. hepaticus.

  • Pathogenesis Links: H. hepaticus toxins like cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) induce DNA damage . Investigating SSB’s role in mitigating or exacerbating such damage could clarify its contribution to carcinogenesis.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format preferentially. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
ssb; HH_0537; Single-stranded DNA-binding protein; SSB
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-170
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Helicobacter hepaticus (strain ATCC 51449 / 3B1)
Target Names
ssb
Target Protein Sequence
MYNKVIIIGN LTRDVELRYL PSGSALATIG LASNRRFKKQ DGSQGEEVCF IDVKLFGRSA EVANQYLRKG SKILIEGRLS LESWNDQSGA KRSRHTITAE SMQMLDSKPS GDENPYNNTN ASNTGMQHNT NNSPNYNQTH SQPQGNGNIG TGNYPQNIPE INIDDEDIPF
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Plays a crucial role in DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and various partner proteins, recruiting them to their action sites during DNA metabolism.
Database Links

KEGG: hhe:HH_0537

STRING: 235279.HH0537

Q&A

What is Helicobacter hepaticus and what makes it a significant research organism?

Helicobacter hepaticus is a bacterial pathogen discovered in 1992 as a causative agent of liver cancer in A/JCr mouse models. In susceptible mice, H. hepaticus infection leads to chronic gastrointestinal inflammation and subsequent neoplasia. Recent evidence also suggests its potential role as a human pathogen, with associations to cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and gallbladder cancer .

H. hepaticus is particularly significant for research because it serves as an excellent model for studying bacteria-induced carcinogenesis. Unlike its close relative Helicobacter pylori, H. hepaticus lacks several major virulence factors including vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA) and cytotoxin-associated gene (cagA) . Instead, it possesses distinct virulence mechanisms, most notably the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT), which has been shown to induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and contribute to carcinogenesis through activation of specific inflammatory pathways .

What is the structural and functional characterization of H. hepaticus Single-stranded DNA-binding protein?

H. hepaticus Single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) belongs to the conserved family of bacterial SSB proteins that play crucial roles in DNA replication, repair, and recombination processes. Structurally, bacterial SSBs typically exist as homotetramers with each monomer containing an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) fold domain that interacts with single-stranded DNA.

The protein functions by binding to exposed single-stranded DNA during replication, recombination, and repair processes, protecting these vulnerable regions from nuclease degradation and preventing secondary structure formation. This protection is particularly important in the context of H. hepaticus infection, where both bacterial and host DNA are subjected to damage through various mechanisms, including the DNase I-like activity of CDT .

Methodologically, structural characterization of recombinant H. hepaticus SSB typically involves:

  • X-ray crystallography for high-resolution structural determination

  • Circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess secondary structure elements

  • Thermal denaturation studies to evaluate protein stability

  • DNA binding assays using fluorescence anisotropy or electrophoretic mobility shift assays

How is recombinant H. hepaticus Single-stranded DNA-binding protein expressed and purified?

The optimal expression and purification of recombinant H. hepaticus SSB involves several critical steps:

  • Gene cloning and vector construction:

    • PCR amplification of the ssb gene from H. hepaticus genomic DNA

    • Incorporation into an expression vector (commonly pET-based systems) with appropriate tags (His6, GST, etc.)

    • Sequence verification to ensure correct incorporation

  • Expression optimization:

    • Transformation into E. coli expression strains (BL21(DE3), Rosetta, etc.)

    • Optimization of expression conditions: temperature (typically 16-30°C), IPTG concentration (0.1-1mM), duration (4-24 hours)

    • Scale-up to obtain sufficient protein quantities

  • Purification protocol:

    • Cell lysis via sonication or French press in appropriate buffer

    • Initial capture using affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA for His-tagged proteins)

    • Secondary purification through ion exchange chromatography

    • Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing and buffer exchange

    • Quality assessment via SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

  • Functional verification:

    • Electrophoretic mobility shift assays to confirm DNA-binding capability

    • Thermal stability assays

    • Activity assays relevant to experimental applications

A typical yield from 1L bacterial culture ranges from 10-20mg of >95% pure protein, with variations depending on specific expression conditions and purification strategies.

How does H. hepaticus SSB interact with the bacteria's cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) during DNA damage processes?

The interplay between H. hepaticus SSB and CDT represents a fascinating area of research into bacterial pathogenesis mechanisms. CDT functions as a genotoxin with DNase I-like activity that induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in host cells . While direct protein-protein interactions between SSB and CDT have not been extensively characterized, their functional relationship in the context of DNA damage is significant.

Current research methodologies to investigate this relationship include:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation studies to detect physical interactions between SSB and CDT subunits

  • ChIP-seq analysis to identify genomic regions where both proteins may co-localize

  • Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to visualize potential interactions in live cells

  • Bacterial two-hybrid screening to map interaction domains

Evidence suggests that SSB may function to protect bacterial DNA during CDT expression, as the toxin could potentially damage the bacteria's own genome. Additionally, SSB likely plays a role in processing DNA lesions that occur during bacterial replication when CDT is actively expressed.

The DNA damage induced by CDT has been shown to trigger a damage-signaling and repair response involving the sequential ATM-dependent recruitment of repair factors (53BP1 and MDC1) and H2AX phosphorylation . SSB potentially influences this process by modulating the accessibility of damaged DNA to repair machinery.

What experimental approaches are most effective for studying H. hepaticus SSB-DNA interactions in the context of infection?

Investigating H. hepaticus SSB-DNA interactions during infection requires sophisticated experimental approaches that can capture the dynamics of these interactions in relevant biological contexts:

  • In vitro DNA binding assays:

    • Fluorescence anisotropy with labeled ssDNA substrates

    • Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with various DNA structures

    • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for real-time binding kinetics

    • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters

  • Cell-based approaches:

    • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to identify genomic binding sites

    • Proximity ligation assays (PLA) to visualize protein-DNA interactions

    • Fluorescence microscopy with labeled SSB to track localization during infection

    • DNA fiber analysis to study SSB involvement in replication fork progression

  • Infection models:

    • Cellular infection assays using epithelial cell lines

    • Mouse models of H. hepaticus infection (particularly relevant in 129/SvEv Rag2−/− mice)

    • Analysis of SSB expression and localization at different infection stages

  • Genetic manipulation approaches:

    • Construction of SSB mutants with altered DNA binding properties

    • CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to introduce specific mutations

    • Conditional expression systems to control SSB levels during infection

Table 1: Comparative analysis of methods for studying SSB-DNA interactions

MethodResolutionAdvantagesLimitationsBest Application Scenario
EMSAModerateSimple, widely accessibleSemi-quantitative, endpoint assayInitial binding characterization
Fluorescence AnisotropyHighReal-time, quantitativeRequires fluorescent labelingDetermining binding constants
ChIP-seqGenome-wideIn vivo relevance, identifies binding sitesLabor-intensive, requires antibodiesGenomic binding landscape
Single-molecule FRETVery highCaptures dynamic interactionsTechnically challenging, specialized equipmentMechanistic studies of binding dynamics
PLACellularVisualizes interactions in situLimited quantificationLocalization in infection contexts

How does H. hepaticus SSB contribute to bacterial survival during host-induced oxidative stress?

During infection, H. hepaticus faces significant oxidative stress from host immune responses. SSB plays a critical role in maintaining bacterial genomic integrity under these conditions through several mechanisms:

  • Protection of vulnerable ssDNA regions:
    SSB binds to single-stranded DNA exposed during replication or repair, shielding it from oxidative damage and preventing the formation of additional DNA lesions. This is particularly important as studies have shown that oxidative stress significantly increases the presence of single-strand breaks that can be converted to double-strand breaks during DNA replication .

  • Facilitation of DNA repair processes:
    SSB recruits and coordinates various DNA repair enzymes to sites of oxidative damage. The protein serves as a scaffold for assembling repair complexes, enhancing their efficiency in addressing oxidative lesions.

  • Regulation of stress response genes:
    Recent studies suggest that bacterial SSB proteins may play regulatory roles beyond direct DNA binding, potentially influencing the expression of genes involved in oxidative stress responses.

Experimental approaches to study these functions include:

  • Measurement of bacterial survival rates under oxidative stress conditions in SSB-depleted vs. wild-type strains

  • Assessment of mutation frequencies and DNA damage levels using techniques such as comet assays or immunostaining for oxidative DNA damage markers

  • Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses to identify SSB-dependent changes in stress response pathways

  • In vitro reconstitution of DNA repair processes with and without functional SSB

The importance of these functions is underscored by findings that H. hepaticus infection increases γH2AX-positive epithelial cells, indicating the presence of DNA double-strand breaks . The bacterium's ability to survive while causing such damage likely depends on efficient SSB-mediated protection of its own genome.

What is the potential of H. hepaticus SSB as a therapeutic target for reducing bacterial pathogenicity?

H. hepaticus SSB represents a promising therapeutic target for several compelling reasons:

  • Essential function: SSB is indispensable for bacterial DNA replication and repair, making it an attractive target for antibacterial interventions. Inhibition of SSB would likely impair bacterial survival and replication.

  • Contribution to pathogenesis: By facilitating DNA repair in bacteria experiencing stress during infection, SSB indirectly supports the persistence of infection and expression of virulence factors like CDT.

  • Structural distinctiveness: While SSB proteins are conserved across bacterial species, they exhibit sufficient structural differences from eukaryotic single-stranded DNA-binding proteins to potentially allow selective targeting.

Therapeutic approaches currently being explored include:

  • Small molecule inhibitors:

    • Compounds targeting the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding (OB) fold of SSB

    • Molecules disrupting SSB tetramerization

    • Inhibitors of SSB-protein interactions with other DNA processing enzymes

  • Peptide-based inhibitors:

    • Designed peptides mimicking SSB interaction surfaces

    • Cell-penetrating peptides linked to SSB-binding domains

  • Novel delivery strategies:

    • Nanoparticle-based delivery of SSB inhibitors

    • Bacteriophage-derived delivery systems

The effectiveness of such approaches might be particularly significant in contexts where H. hepaticus infections contribute to chronic inflammation and cancer development. Studies have shown that H. hepaticus CDT enhances carcinogenic potential at least partly through elevation of DNA double-strand breaks and activation of the TNFα/IL-6-STAT3 signaling pathway . Targeting SSB could potentially disrupt these pathogenic mechanisms by destabilizing bacterial persistence and reducing virulence factor expression.

Current experimental validation approaches include:

  • In vitro screening assays measuring inhibition of SSB-DNA binding

  • Bacterial growth inhibition assays with candidate compounds

  • Cell culture infection models assessing bacterial load reduction

  • Mouse models of H. hepaticus-induced inflammation and carcinogenesis

How does the function of H. hepaticus SSB compare with SSB proteins from other pathogenic bacteria?

Comparative analysis of H. hepaticus SSB with those from other pathogenic bacteria reveals both conserved features and unique adaptations:

  • Structural conservation:
    The core architecture of bacterial SSB proteins is highly conserved, typically consisting of tetrameric arrangements of monomers containing OB-fold domains. This conservation extends across diverse bacterial species including E. coli, H. pylori, and C. jejuni.

  • DNA binding modes:
    Most bacterial SSBs exhibit multiple DNA binding modes (e.g., (SSB)35 and (SSB)65 in E. coli), which differ in the number of nucleotides occluded per tetramer. Preliminary studies suggest H. hepaticus SSB may have binding mode preferences adapted to its unique genomic characteristics.

  • C-terminal domain variations:
    The C-terminal domain of SSB, which mediates protein-protein interactions, shows greater variability across species. This variability likely reflects adaptation to species-specific DNA processing machinery.

  • Expression regulation:
    H. hepaticus, like H. pylori, exists in a microaerophilic environment and faces unique stressors. Evidence suggests regulation of SSB expression in these organisms may differ from that in enterobacteria.

Table 2: Comparative properties of SSB proteins from different pathogenic bacteria

PropertyH. hepaticus SSBH. pylori SSBE. coli SSBImplications for Function
Monomer size~18-20 kDa16.4 kDa18.9 kDaStructural conservation across species
Preferred DNA binding modeUnder investigation(SSB)56-like(SSB)35 and (SSB)65Adaptations to specific genomic requirements
Response to oxidative stressUpregulatedUpregulatedModest changeAdaptation to inflammatory environment
C-terminal acidic residues6-869Species-specific protein interaction capabilities
Temperature stabilityModerateHighModerateAdaptation to host environment

Methodologies for comparative studies include:

  • Recombinant expression and purification of multiple bacterial SSBs

  • Structural comparison using X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM

  • DNA binding assays with standardized substrates

  • Complementation studies in SSB-depleted bacterial strains

  • Interactome analysis using pull-down assays coupled with mass spectrometry

These comparative studies provide insights into the evolution of SSB function in bacterial pathogens and may identify unique features that could be exploited for species-specific therapeutic targeting.

What are the remaining knowledge gaps in H. hepaticus SSB research?

Despite significant advances in understanding H. hepaticus pathogenesis, several critical knowledge gaps remain regarding its SSB protein:

  • Structural details: High-resolution structural data for H. hepaticus SSB remains limited, particularly regarding its DNA binding interfaces and protein interaction surfaces.

  • Regulatory mechanisms: How SSB expression and activity are regulated during different phases of infection and in response to various stressors is poorly understood.

  • Interaction network: The complete interactome of H. hepaticus SSB with other bacterial proteins, particularly those involved in DNA damage response and virulence factor expression, requires further elucidation.

  • In vivo dynamics: Real-time visualization and tracking of SSB during infection processes remain technically challenging but would provide valuable insights into its functional importance during pathogenesis.

  • Contribution to genomic plasticity: The potential role of SSB in facilitating genetic recombination and horizontal gene transfer, which could contribute to virulence and antibiotic resistance, warrants investigation.

Addressing these knowledge gaps will require interdisciplinary approaches combining structural biology, molecular genetics, advanced microscopy, and infection models. Future research directions will likely focus on the potential interplay between SSB, CDT, and host DNA damage responses, as this represents a critical nexus in H. hepaticus-mediated carcinogenesis .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.