Recombinant Helicobacter pylori Ribosome-recycling factor (frr)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Conservation Across Species

RRF homologues are widely distributed in prokaryotes, with H. pylori RRF showing ~64% amino acid identity to E. coli RRF . Its function is conserved:

  • Ribosome Recycling: RRF facilitates ribosome release post-termination, requiring EF-G or RF3 and GTP .

  • Error Prevention: Maintains translational accuracy by preventing misreading of mRNA .

Role in H. pylori

While no direct recombinant studies exist, H. pylori RRF is critical for:

  • Ribosome Maturation: Targeted by regulatory systems (e.g., HsrA) to ensure proper ribosome assembly .

  • Stress Survival: Likely supports translation under acidic gastric conditions, a hallmark of H. pylori habitat .

Functional Assays in Other Bacteria

  • E. coli: Recombinant RRF from Pseudomonas aeruginosa complements temperature-sensitive E. coli mutants .

  • H. pylori: Transcriptional regulation of frr (via HsrA) is linked to ribosome biogenesis and viability .

Genetic Diversity in H. pylori

  • Recombination Hotspot: H. pylori exhibits high intraspecific recombination, potentially influencing frr gene diversity .

  • Sequence Homology: Limited data, but conservation suggests functional stability .

Future Directions

Recombinant H. pylori RRF has not been extensively studied, but its essentiality suggests potential as a target for novel antibiotics. Structural and functional characterization, particularly in the context of H. pylori’s unique genetic diversity, remains a critical research gap .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies based on purchasing method and location. Consult local distributors for specific delivery times. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance for an extra fee.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
frr; HPP12_1222; Ribosome-recycling factor; RRF; Ribosome-releasing factor
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-185
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Helicobacter pylori (strain P12)
Target Names
frr
Target Protein Sequence
MLQAIYNETK DLMQKSIQAL NRDFSTLRSA KVSVNILDHI KVDYYGTPTA LNQVGSVMSL DATTLQISPW EKNLLKEIER SIQEANIGVN PNNDGETIKL FFPPMTSEQR KLIAKDAKAM GEKAKVAVRN IRQDANNQVK KLEKDKEISE DESKKAQEQI QKITDEAIKK IDESVKNKED AILKV
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Releases ribosomes from messenger RNA at the end of protein biosynthesis. May improve translation efficiency by recycling ribosomes.
Database Links
Protein Families
RRF family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the function of Ribosome-recycling factor in bacterial protein synthesis?

Ribosome-recycling factor (RRF), encoded by the frr gene, plays a critical role in the fourth step of protein biosynthesis. It is responsible for the dissociation of ribosomes from mRNA after the termination of translation has occurred. This process essentially "recycles" ribosomes, making them available for subsequent rounds of protein synthesis. Without this function, ribosomes would remain bound to mRNA post-termination, preventing efficient protein synthesis throughout the cell . RRF works in conjunction with either elongation factor G (EF-G) or release factor 3 (RF3) to disassemble the post-termination complex into its constituent components: mRNA, tRNA, and ribosomes, allowing these components to participate in new rounds of translation .

Why is Ribosome-recycling factor considered essential for bacterial viability?

RRF is absolutely essential for bacterial viability as demonstrated through genetic studies. In Escherichia coli, the frr gene encoding RRF has been shown to be critical for cell growth. Experiments with E. coli strain MC1061-2, which carried a frame-shifted frr in the chromosome and a wild-type frr on a temperature-sensitive plasmid, demonstrated temperature-sensitive growth. This strain was unable to segregate its frr-carrying plasmid under plasmid incompatibility pressure, and all thermoresistant colonies that spontaneously formed carried a wild-type frr gene. These observations conclusively established that frr is an essential gene for bacterial cell growth . The essentiality of RRF underscores its fundamental role in protein synthesis and makes it a potential target for antimicrobial development, particularly against pathogens like H. pylori.

What are the optimal conditions for expressing recombinant H. pylori RRF in laboratory settings?

For optimal expression of recombinant H. pylori RRF, researchers should consider the following protocol based on successful expression systems used for other bacterial RRFs:

Storage of purified RRF should follow standard protocols for recombinant proteins, with recommendations to maintain stability by adding 5-50% glycerol and storing at -20°C/-80°C to achieve a shelf life of approximately 6 months for liquid preparations and 12 months for lyophilized forms .

How can one measure the functional activity of recombinant H. pylori RRF?

The functional activity of recombinant H. pylori RRF can be determined using a ribosome recycling assay that measures the conversion of polysomes to monosomes. This methodology has been well-established for other bacterial RRFs and can be adapted for H. pylori RRF:

  • Preparation of Polysome Fraction: Isolate polysomes from bacterial cultures by ultracentrifugation through sucrose gradients.

  • Reaction Mixture Setup: Prepare a reaction mixture containing:

    • Polysome fraction

    • Purified recombinant H. pylori RRF (at varying concentrations for a dose-response curve)

    • Elongation factor G (EF-G)

    • Buffer components (typically containing Tris-HCl pH 7.8, NH₄Cl, MgSO₄, and dithiothreitol)

  • Incubation: Incubate the reaction mixture at physiologically relevant temperature (typically 37°C) for a specified time (30-60 minutes).

  • Analysis by Sucrose Gradient Centrifugation: Layer the reaction mixture on a 15-30% linear sucrose gradient and centrifuge at high speed (e.g., 40,000 rpm) for approximately 1 hour.

  • Quantification: Analyze the ribosomal sedimentation profile by measuring absorbance at 254 nm using a gradient fractionator. Calculate the percentage of polysomes converted to monosomes as a measure of RRF activity:

    RRF Activity=Amount of polysomes converted to monosomesTotal amount of ribosomes×100%\text{RRF Activity} = \frac{\text{Amount of polysomes converted to monosomes}}{\text{Total amount of ribosomes}} \times 100\%

This methodology allows for a quantitative assessment of RRF activity and can be used to compare the relative efficiencies of different RRF variants or to assess the impact of potential inhibitors .

What approaches can be used to investigate the interaction between H. pylori RRF and ribosomes?

Several experimental approaches can be employed to investigate the interaction between H. pylori RRF and ribosomes:

  • Co-sedimentation Assays: Mix purified H. pylori RRF with isolated ribosomes and analyze the complexes by centrifugation through sucrose gradients. RRF that interacts with ribosomes will co-sediment, allowing quantification of binding.

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): Immobilize either RRF or ribosomes on a sensor chip and measure the real-time binding kinetics when the partner molecule flows over the surface. This provides quantitative data on association and dissociation rates.

  • Cryo-electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM): This technique can visualize the RRF-ribosome complex at near-atomic resolution, providing insights into the structural basis of the interaction. While specific data for H. pylori RRF is not available in the search results, this approach has been successfully used for other bacterial RRFs.

  • Cross-linking Studies: Chemical cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry can identify specific contact points between RRF and ribosomal components.

  • Genetic Complementation: Test whether H. pylori RRF can functionally replace RRF in other bacterial species. This approach was successfully used to demonstrate that P. aeruginosa RRF can complement E. coli strains with temperature-sensitive RRF mutations .

  • Mutagenesis Studies: Create targeted mutations in H. pylori RRF based on conserved residues identified through sequence alignments with other bacterial RRFs. Testing these mutants for activity can reveal functionally critical regions. For example, studies with E. coli RRF identified that hydrophobic residues at position 117 are important for RRF stability and function .

How does H. pylori RRF compare structurally and functionally with RRF from other bacterial species?

Comparative analysis of RRF proteins across bacterial species reveals important insights into conservation and specialization:

SpeciesAmino Acid LengthSequence Identity with E. coli RRFKey Functional FeaturesInterspecies Complementation
H. pylori185Not specified in search resultsFull sequence available; conserved functional domains presumedNot reported
E. coli185100% (reference)Essential for viability; well-characterized function in ribosome recyclingReference standard
P. aeruginosaNot specified64%Functional in heterologous ribosome recycling systemsCan complement E. coli temperature-sensitive RRF mutants
T. thermophilusNot specified44% identity, 68% similarityC-terminal domain important for functionWild-type cannot complement E. coli; truncation of C-terminal 5 amino acids confers complementation ability

This comparative analysis highlights several important features:

  • Conservation of Function: Despite sequence variations, the fundamental function of RRF in ribosome recycling is conserved across bacterial species.

  • Species-Specific Adaptations: The inability of some RRFs to complement across species (like T. thermophilus RRF in E. coli) suggests species-specific adaptations to their respective ribosomal machineries.

  • Critical Functional Regions: The C-terminal domain appears to be a modulator of RRF function, as demonstrated by the finding that truncation of the C-terminal five amino acids of T. thermophilus RRF conferred intergeneric complementation activity .

  • Evolutionary Conservation: The gene arrangement of frr and nearby genes (rpsB-tsf-pyrH-frr) is conserved across diverse bacterial species including E. coli, B. subtilis, and even in cyanobacteria (pyrH-frr), suggesting strong evolutionary conservation of this genetic organization .

The specific functional characteristics of H. pylori RRF would require experimental determination using approaches outlined in previous sections.

Can H. pylori RRF function in heterologous systems, and what does this tell us about evolutionary conservation?

While the search results do not provide specific information about whether H. pylori RRF can function in heterologous systems, we can infer potential insights based on data from other bacterial RRFs:

  • Cross-species Functionality: P. aeruginosa RRF has been shown to functionally complement E. coli strains with temperature-sensitive RRF mutations, demonstrating that RRF can function across species boundaries despite sequence differences .

  • Ribosome Specificity: P. aeruginosa RRF was found to be active in heterogeneous ribosome recycling machinery, representing the first case where an RRF homologue was demonstrated to work with ribosomes from a different species .

  • Evolutionary Implications: The ability of RRF to function across species suggests a high degree of conservation in the fundamental aspects of the ribosome recycling mechanism throughout bacterial evolution.

  • Structural Constraints: Studies with T. thermophilus RRF showed that while the native protein could not complement E. coli RRF function, truncation of the C-terminal five amino acids conferred complementation ability. This indicates that species-specific adaptations in certain domains (particularly the C-terminus) can restrict cross-species functionality .

Testing whether H. pylori RRF can function in E. coli or other bacterial systems would require complementation studies using temperature-sensitive RRF mutant strains, similar to those performed with P. aeruginosa RRF. Such experiments would provide valuable insights into the evolutionary conservation and specialization of the ribosome recycling mechanism in H. pylori compared to other bacterial species.

Phylogenetic analysis suggests that RRF homologues found in eukaryotic cells were originally present within the prokaryotic RRF phylogenetic tree, supporting the hypothesis that the ribosome recycling step catalyzed by RRF is specific for prokaryotic cells, and eukaryotic RRF is required primarily for protein synthesis in organelles that evolved from prokaryotic ancestors .

How can studies of H. pylori RRF contribute to understanding antibiotic resistance mechanisms?

Studies of H. pylori RRF can provide significant insights into antibiotic resistance mechanisms through several research approaches:

  • Target Identification: Since RRF is essential for bacterial viability , it represents a potential target for novel antibiotics. Understanding the structure-function relationship of H. pylori RRF could guide the design of specific inhibitors that disrupt protein synthesis in this pathogen.

  • Comparative Sensitivity Studies: Investigating whether structural differences between H. pylori RRF and human mitochondrial RRF homologues can be exploited to develop antibiotics that selectively target bacterial protein synthesis without affecting host cells.

  • Resistance Mechanism Investigation: By generating laboratory mutants of H. pylori with altered RRF proteins that confer resistance to potential RRF inhibitors, researchers can anticipate and understand possible resistance mechanisms that might emerge clinically.

  • Synergistic Antibiotic Approaches: Exploring how inhibition of RRF might enhance the efficacy of existing antibiotics that target other aspects of protein synthesis, such as aminoglycosides or macrolides, which are commonly used against H. pylori infections.

  • Species-Specific Targeting: The fact that RRF functions can differ between bacterial species (as shown by complementation studies ) suggests the possibility of developing species-specific inhibitors that could target H. pylori selectively without disrupting beneficial gut microbiota.

These research directions are particularly important given the increasing antibiotic resistance observed in H. pylori and the need for novel therapeutic approaches to address this significant human pathogen.

What role might H. pylori RRF play in adaptation to different gastric microenvironments?

H. pylori is remarkable for its ability to colonize the harsh acidic environment of the human stomach. The potential role of RRF in adaptation to different gastric microenvironments represents an intriguing research direction:

  • Stress Response Adaptation: Under conditions of environmental stress (such as pH fluctuations, nutrient limitation, or host immune responses), efficient protein synthesis is critical for bacterial adaptation. RRF's essential role in ribosome recycling may be particularly important during these stress responses when rapid reprogramming of the proteome is necessary.

  • Translation Efficiency Under Stress: Research could investigate whether H. pylori RRF has evolved specific features that enhance translation efficiency under the unique stresses encountered in the gastric environment, compared to RRF proteins from bacteria that inhabit less hostile niches.

  • Regulation of RRF Expression: Studies could examine whether H. pylori modulates RRF expression levels in response to changing gastric conditions, potentially enhancing protein synthesis capacity during colonization or stress responses.

  • Protein Quality Control: RRF has been implicated in protein quality control mechanisms in some bacteria, ensuring that ribosomes are properly recycled after encountering problematic mRNAs. This function might be particularly important in H. pylori's adaptation to the gastric environment where protein damage may be elevated.

  • Host-Pathogen Interactions: Investigation into whether H. pylori RRF plays a role in the synthesis of virulence factors that mediate interactions with the host gastric epithelium or immune system, potentially through differential translation efficiency of specific mRNAs.

Experimental approaches to investigate these hypotheses could include:

  • Creating conditional RRF mutants in H. pylori and assessing their ability to survive various gastric conditions

  • Comparing the activity of H. pylori RRF under different pH conditions, salt concentrations, and in the presence of host-derived antimicrobial peptides

  • Analyzing RRF expression levels during different phases of colonization in animal models

What are the current challenges in developing high-throughput assays for screening inhibitors of H. pylori RRF?

Developing high-throughput assays for screening potential inhibitors of H. pylori RRF faces several technical and conceptual challenges that researchers must address:

  • Assay Development Complexity: The standard assay for RRF activity involves measuring the conversion of polysomes to monosomes using sucrose gradient centrifugation . This method is labor-intensive and not amenable to high-throughput screening. Developing simplified assays that maintain physiological relevance is a significant challenge.

  • Protein Purification Issues: Producing sufficient quantities of pure, active H. pylori RRF for high-throughput screening requires optimization of expression and purification protocols. While recombinant expression systems exist , scaling up production while maintaining protein quality requires careful consideration.

  • Requirement for Partner Proteins: RRF functions in conjunction with elongation factor G (EF-G) or release factor 3 (RF3) . A physiologically relevant assay would need to include these partner proteins, adding complexity to assay development and interpretation of results.

  • Specificity Determination: Ensuring that potential inhibitors specifically target RRF rather than other components of the translation machinery requires carefully designed counter-screens and validation assays.

  • Translation to In Vivo Efficacy: Compounds that inhibit RRF activity in vitro may face challenges in penetrating the H. pylori cell envelope or may be subject to efflux, limiting their efficacy in vivo. Additionally, the unique gastric environment may impact compound stability and activity.

Potential solutions to these challenges include:

  • Development of fluorescence-based assays that monitor ribosome-RRF interactions

  • Creation of cell-based reporter systems that indirectly measure RRF activity

  • Use of fragment-based screening approaches that identify building blocks for inhibitor design

  • Implementation of virtual screening methods based on structural information to prioritize compounds for biochemical testing

Addressing these challenges will be essential for the successful development of RRF inhibitors as a novel therapeutic approach against H. pylori infections.

What are the optimal storage and handling conditions for maintaining recombinant H. pylori RRF stability?

To maintain the stability and activity of recombinant H. pylori RRF, researchers should follow these evidence-based storage and handling guidelines:

  • Short-term Storage: For working aliquots, store at 4°C for up to one week .

  • Long-term Storage: For extended storage, maintain the protein at -20°C or preferably at -80°C .

  • Cryoprotection: Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being the default recommendation) to prevent freeze-damage during storage .

  • Aliquoting: Divide the purified protein into small single-use aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which are not recommended for maintaining protein integrity .

  • Reconstitution Protocol: When using lyophilized RRF preparations:

    • Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to bring contents to the bottom

    • Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • Expected Shelf Life:

    • Liquid form: Approximately 6 months at -20°C/-80°C

    • Lyophilized form: Approximately 12 months at -20°C/-80°C

Note that the actual shelf life may vary depending on specific buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the intrinsic stability of the particular preparation .

The purity of recombinant H. pylori RRF should be >85% as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis to ensure reliable experimental results .

How can researchers validate that their recombinant H. pylori RRF retains proper folding and biological activity?

Validating the proper folding and biological activity of recombinant H. pylori RRF is critical for ensuring experimental reliability. Researchers can employ the following methodological approaches:

  • Structural Integrity Assessment:

    • Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy: To verify proper secondary structure elements

    • Intrinsic Fluorescence Spectroscopy: To assess tertiary structure integrity, particularly the environment around tryptophan residues

    • Size Exclusion Chromatography: To confirm the protein exists in the expected oligomeric state and is not aggregated

  • Functional Activity Validation:

    • Polysome Disassembly Assay: The gold standard for RRF activity measurement, quantifying the conversion of polysomes to monosomes as described earlier

    • Cross-species Complementation: Testing whether the recombinant H. pylori RRF can complement temperature-sensitive RRF mutants of E. coli (similar to experiments with P. aeruginosa RRF)

    • Ribosome Binding Assays: Measuring direct binding to ribosomes using filter binding assays or surface plasmon resonance

  • Comparative Analysis:

    • Activity Benchmarking: Comparing the activity of H. pylori RRF with well-characterized RRF from other species (such as E. coli RRF) under identical experimental conditions

    • Dose-Response Relationship: Establishing a dose-response curve for different concentrations of RRF in the polysome disassembly assay to confirm expected biochemical behavior

  • Stability Monitoring:

    • Thermal Shift Assays: To determine the melting temperature (Tm) of the protein, which can serve as a reference for proper folding

    • Activity Retention Over Time: Measuring activity at different time points during storage to establish the practical shelf-life under laboratory conditions

A properly folded and active H. pylori RRF should demonstrate dose-dependent polysome disassembly activity, with efficiency potentially different from but comparable to RRF proteins from other bacterial species when adjusted for experimental conditions.

What are the critical controls needed when studying H. pylori RRF in translation-based experimental systems?

When studying H. pylori RRF in translation-based experimental systems, implementing appropriate controls is essential for experimental validity and proper interpretation of results:

  • Negative Controls:

    • Heat-inactivated RRF: To distinguish between specific RRF activity and potential contaminant effects

    • Buffer-only Control: To establish baseline measurements in activity assays

    • Unrelated Protein Control: A similarly sized and purified protein that should not have RRF activity, to control for non-specific effects

    • RRF with Known Inactivating Mutations: Based on conserved residues identified in other bacterial RRFs, such as the valine at position 117 in E. coli RRF, which when mutated to aspartic acid results in temperature-sensitive function

  • Positive Controls:

    • E. coli RRF: Well-characterized and can serve as a reference standard for activity assays

    • Commercial RRF Preparations: If available, to benchmark activity levels

  • System Validation Controls:

    • EF-G Dependency: Confirming that the observed activity requires the presence of EF-G, as expected for physiological RRF function

    • GTP Requirement: Verifying that the reaction depends on GTP, which is necessary for EF-G function

    • Ribosome Source Control: Testing the system with ribosomes from different species to assess specificity

    • Antibiotic Controls: Using translation inhibitors like fusidic acid (which inhibits EF-G) to confirm the specificity of the observed effects

  • Experimental Condition Controls:

    • Temperature Series: Performing assays at different temperatures to establish optimal conditions and physiological relevance

    • pH Range Testing: Particularly important for H. pylori, which must function in the acidic gastric environment

    • Salt Concentration Variables: To determine ionic strength requirements for optimal activity

  • Time Course Analysis:

    • Reaction Kinetics: Measuring activity at multiple time points to establish the linear range of the assay

    • Component Stability: Assessing the stability of all system components over the experimental timeline

Implementing these controls will help ensure that observed effects are specifically attributable to H. pylori RRF activity and will facilitate meaningful comparisons with RRF proteins from other bacterial species.

How does research on H. pylori RRF contribute to understanding persistent infections and treatment failures?

Research on H. pylori RRF has significant implications for understanding persistent infections and treatment failures, offering several potential insights:

  • Essential Gene Target: Since RRF is essential for bacterial viability, as demonstrated in E. coli , targeting H. pylori RRF represents a potentially novel approach to eliminating persistent infections that have developed resistance to current antibiotic regimens.

  • Stress Response and Persistence: Investigation of how H. pylori regulates RRF expression under antibiotic stress or unfavorable gastric conditions could reveal mechanisms by which the bacterium persists during treatment. If H. pylori modulates translation efficiency through RRF regulation during stress responses, this could contribute to treatment survival.

  • Dormancy and Reactivation: Understanding how RRF functions during transitions between active growth and dormant states could provide insights into H. pylori's ability to establish long-term colonization and potentially reactivate after apparently successful treatment.

  • Protein Synthesis Adaptations: Research into possible H. pylori-specific adaptations in RRF function might reveal how this pathogen optimizes protein synthesis in the harsh gastric environment, potentially explaining its remarkable ability to persist where other bacteria cannot survive.

  • Biofilm Formation: If RRF plays a role in regulating the expression of factors involved in biofilm formation, this could connect to H. pylori's ability to establish persistent infections that resist antibiotic penetration.

The study of RRF in the context of H. pylori challenge models in human volunteers could provide particularly valuable insights into how protein synthesis dynamics influence bacterial adaptation during the establishment of infection and in response to host defense mechanisms or therapeutic interventions.

What considerations are important when designing potential inhibitors of H. pylori RRF for therapeutic development?

When designing potential inhibitors of H. pylori RRF for therapeutic development, researchers should consider several critical factors:

  • Structural Specificity:

    • Target H. pylori-specific features of RRF to minimize effects on beneficial gut microbiota

    • Focus on regions of RRF that differ from human mitochondrial RRF homologues to avoid potential toxicity

    • Utilize structural information from studies on C-terminal domain functionality to develop inhibitors that interfere with species-specific aspects of RRF function

  • Functional Mechanism Targeting:

    • Design inhibitors that disrupt the interaction between RRF and its partner protein EF-G

    • Consider compounds that lock RRF in a conformation that prevents effective binding to ribosomes

    • Target the dynamics of RRF function rather than just static binding

  • Gastric Environment Stability:

    • Develop compounds that remain stable and active in the acidic gastric environment (pH 1-3)

    • Consider the influence of gastric mucus on compound delivery to the site of H. pylori colonization

    • Ensure activity under the microaerophilic conditions in which H. pylori thrives

  • Resistance Development:

    • Anticipate potential resistance mechanisms by analyzing conserved vs. variable regions of RRF

    • Consider dual-targeting approaches that simultaneously inhibit RRF and another essential component of the translation machinery

    • Design inhibitor scaffolds that can be readily modified to counter emerging resistance

  • Delivery Considerations:

    • Develop compounds that can penetrate the H. pylori cell envelope effectively

    • Consider strategies to avoid efflux pump-mediated resistance

    • Evaluate local delivery options to achieve high concentrations at the site of infection

  • Combination Therapy Potential:

    • Assess synergistic effects with existing anti-H. pylori antibiotics

    • Investigate potential to reduce effective dose requirements for current treatments

    • Consider sequential therapy approaches that leverage RRF inhibition to enhance susceptibility to other antibiotics

These considerations should guide rational drug design efforts targeting H. pylori RRF, potentially leading to novel therapeutic options for persistent or resistant H. pylori infections.

How can functional genomics approaches enhance our understanding of H. pylori RRF in the context of infection models?

Functional genomics approaches offer powerful tools to enhance our understanding of H. pylori RRF in infection contexts:

These functional genomics approaches, particularly when combined with the human volunteer challenge model mentioned in the search results , could provide unprecedented insights into how H. pylori utilizes RRF to adapt to the host environment, potentially revealing new vulnerabilities that could be exploited therapeutically.

What emerging technologies could advance our understanding of H. pylori RRF dynamics in living cells?

Several cutting-edge technologies show promise for advancing our understanding of H. pylori RRF dynamics in living cells:

  • Super-resolution Microscopy:

    • Single-molecule localization microscopy (PALM/STORM) to visualize the spatial distribution of RRF within H. pylori cells

    • Structured illumination microscopy (SIM) to observe potential co-localization with ribosomes during different growth phases

    • Live-cell imaging to track RRF dynamics in response to environmental changes

  • Ribosome Profiling Adaptations:

    • Development of H. pylori-specific ribosome profiling protocols to capture the impact of RRF on translation globally

    • Integration with RRF depletion or inhibition to identify mRNAs most affected by altered ribosome recycling

    • Temporal analysis of ribosome occupancy changes during stress response or antibiotic treatment

  • CRISPR-based Technologies:

    • CRISPR interference with tunable repression to create conditional RRF depletion systems

    • CRISPRa approaches to study the impact of RRF overexpression

    • Base editing to introduce specific mutations in the chromosomal frr gene without disrupting expression

  • Single-cell Analysis:

    • Single-cell RNA-seq to identify cell-to-cell variability in frr expression within H. pylori populations

    • Integration with fluorescent reporters to correlate RRF levels with phenotypic heterogeneity

    • Microfluidic approaches to monitor individual bacterial responses to changing conditions

  • In situ Structural Biology:

    • Cryo-electron tomography to visualize RRF-ribosome interactions directly within H. pylori cells

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy to connect RRF localization with ultrastructural features

    • Proximity labeling approaches to map the immediate environment of RRF in living bacteria

  • Biomolecular Condensate Analysis:

    • Investigation of whether RRF participates in phase-separated ribonucleoprotein complexes during stress

    • Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to assess RRF mobility within different cellular compartments

    • Optogenetic tools to manipulate potential biomolecular condensates containing translation components

These technologies, when applied to H. pylori grown under conditions mimicking the gastric environment or in infection models, could provide unprecedented insights into how RRF function is regulated and adapted to support H. pylori persistence in its unique ecological niche.

What are the key unresolved questions regarding the regulation of H. pylori RRF during infection?

Several critical questions regarding the regulation of H. pylori RRF during infection remain unresolved and represent important areas for future research:

  • Expression Regulation:

    • Is frr expression constitutive or regulated in response to environmental conditions in the stomach?

    • Are there H. pylori-specific transcriptional or translational control mechanisms for RRF that differ from other bacteria?

    • How does RRF expression change during acute versus chronic infection phases?

  • Functional Modulation:

    • Is H. pylori RRF activity modulated post-translationally under different stress conditions?

    • Does the extremely acidic environment of the stomach affect RRF structure or function?

    • Are there gastric host factors that directly interact with or influence RRF function?

  • Ribosome Specificity:

    • Has H. pylori RRF evolved specific adaptations for functioning with H. pylori ribosomes in the gastric environment?

    • Can H. pylori RRF function with ribosomes from other bacterial species that may be present in the stomach?

    • Are there strain-specific variations in RRF that correlate with differential colonization abilities?

  • Role in Stress Responses:

    • How does RRF contribute to H. pylori's remarkable ability to survive acid stress?

    • Is RRF involved in the response to host immune defenses during infection?

    • Does RRF play a role in the formation of persister cells that survive antibiotic treatment?

  • Integration with Virulence Mechanisms:

    • Does RRF influence the expression of key virulence factors through effects on translation efficiency?

    • Is there a connection between ribosome recycling efficiency and the development of gastric pathologies?

    • How does RRF function relate to H. pylori's ability to establish long-term colonization?

  • Evolutionary Considerations:

    • How has H. pylori RRF evolved compared to RRF from non-gastric bacteria?

    • Are there specific adaptive changes in RRF that correlate with H. pylori's co-evolution with human hosts?

    • What selective pressures act on the frr gene during chronic infection?

Addressing these questions will require interdisciplinary approaches combining molecular genetics, biochemistry, structural biology, and infection models. The human volunteer challenge model for H. pylori infection presents a particularly valuable opportunity to study RRF regulation in a controlled but authentic infection context.

How might research on H. pylori RRF inform broader understanding of translation regulation in bacterial pathogenesis?

Research on H. pylori RRF has the potential to significantly advance our broader understanding of translation regulation in bacterial pathogenesis through several conceptual frameworks:

  • Niche-Specific Translation Adaptations:

    • H. pylori's unique adaptation to the gastric environment may reveal how translation machinery components evolve to support colonization of extreme niches

    • Comparative studies between H. pylori RRF and RRF from other pathogens could highlight general principles of translation adaptation to host environments

    • Identification of gastric-specific features in RRF function could reveal broader patterns of how bacterial translation responds to specific environmental stressors

  • Translation Efficiency and Virulence:

    • Understanding how ribosome recycling efficiency affects the expression of virulence factors in H. pylori could establish paradigms applicable to other pathogens

    • Investigation of whether RRF function influences the kinetics of adaptation during initial colonization might reveal general principles about translation's role in host adaptation

    • Analysis of whether translation efficiency through optimal RRF function provides competitive advantages in the host environment

  • Stress Response Integration:

    • Elucidation of how H. pylori integrates RRF function with stress responses could reveal conserved mechanisms across pathogens

    • Identification of regulatory networks connecting environmental sensing to translation efficiency through RRF regulation

    • Understanding whether RRF participates in switching between growth and survival states during infection

  • Host-Pathogen Interface:

    • Investigation of whether host factors directly or indirectly modulate RRF function during infection

    • Exploration of how the immune system might target translation processes and how pathogens protect these essential functions

    • Analysis of whether translation efficiency through RRF function influences immune response evasion

  • Therapeutic Strategy Development:

    • Principles learned from targeting H. pylori RRF could inform approaches to targeting translation in other pathogens

    • Understanding resistance mechanisms that might emerge against RRF inhibitors could anticipate challenges in similar therapeutic approaches

    • Development of methodologies to assess translation inhibition in vivo could benefit anti-infective development broadly

  • Evolutionary Considerations:

    • Analysis of how H. pylori RRF has co-evolved with human hosts might reveal broader patterns of pathogen adaptation

    • Comparative genomics across H. pylori strains from different geographic regions could highlight how translation machinery evolves during long-term host adaptation

    • Investigation of horizontal gene transfer and selective pressures on translation components during pathogen evolution

By serving as a model system for studying translation regulation in a highly specialized pathogen, research on H. pylori RRF may establish principles and methodologies that can be applied to understanding the role of translation in pathogenesis across diverse bacterial species.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.