ATP synthase, also known as F1F0-ATPase or Complex V, is a ubiquitous enzyme that produces ATP from ADP, utilizing a proton gradient across a membrane . It is found in bacterial cellular membranes, thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts, and mitochondrial inner membranes in eukaryotes . The enzyme consists of two main parts: F1 and F0, which are connected by central and peripheral stalks . The F1 component is water-soluble and contains the catalytic sites for ATP synthesis, while the F0 component is integrated into the membrane and facilitates proton translocation .
The ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) is a component of the F0 complex . Specifically, the Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) refers to this subunit derived from the bacterium Herpetosiphon aurantiacus . Herpetosiphon aurantiacus is a filamentous, gliding bacterium belonging to the phylum Chloroflexi .
Recombinant ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) from Herpetosiphon aurantiacus is produced for research purposes . It is available in recombinant form, meaning it is synthesized in a host organism rather than being directly extracted from Herpetosiphon aurantiacus . The recombinant protein is often tagged to facilitate purification and detection .
Recombinant Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) can be used in various research applications:
Structural studies High-resolution structures of F1 are available, and structural comparisons of proton and sodium ATP synthases, as well as bacterial and archaeal ATP synthases, are promising research directions .
Drug discovery ATP synthase is a target for drug development, and understanding its structural features can aid in designing new therapies .
Functional studies The catalytic activity of purified and isolated ATP synthase has been demonstrated in limited cases .
F1F0 ATP synthase synthesizes ATP from ADP using a proton or sodium gradient. This enzyme comprises two domains: the extramembraneous catalytic F1 domain and the membrane-embedded proton channel F0 domain, linked by a central and peripheral stalk. ATP synthesis in the F1 catalytic domain is coupled to proton translocation via a rotary mechanism involving the central stalk subunits.
This protein is a component of the F0 channel and forms part of the peripheral stalk, connecting F1 and F0.
KEGG: hau:Haur_4068
STRING: 316274.Haur_4068
What expression systems are most suitable for producing recombinant Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase subunit b?
E. coli is the preferred expression system for recombinant Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase subunit b. Based on successful expression protocols for related ATP synthase components, the following methodological approach is recommended:
Clone the atpF gene (Haur_4068) into a pET expression vector with an N-terminal His₆-tag
Transform into E. coli Rosetta2(DE3) cells for efficient expression of proteins with rare codons
Induce expression at mid-log phase (OD₆₀₀ = 0.6) with 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG
Harvest cells after 4-6 hours expression at 30°C (or overnight at 16°C for improved solubility)
Purify using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography
This approach has been successfully employed for similar proteins and can be adapted specifically for atpF from Herpetosiphon aurantiacus.
What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining stability of recombinant Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase subunit b?
Based on empirical data from characterized recombinant proteins with similar properties, the following storage protocol is recommended:
Short-term storage (up to one week): 4°C in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol
Long-term storage: -20°C or -80°C in aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Buffer composition: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 50% glycerol
Addition of reducing agents (1 mM DTT or 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol) may improve stability
Protein concentration should be maintained at 1-5 mg/mL for optimal stability
It is critical to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this significantly decreases protein activity and integrity.
How does Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase subunit b differ structurally and functionally from homologs in other bacterial species?
While direct structural data for Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase subunit b is limited, comparative analysis with related species reveals significant variations:
| Species | Subunit b Features | Peripheral Stalk Structure | Functional Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Herpetosiphon aurantiacus | Single copy of subunit b per ATP synthase monomer (predicted) | Standard peripheral stalk arrangement (predicted) | Conventional coupling mechanism between F₀ and F₁ |
| Chloroflexus aurantiacus | Four copies of subunit b per complex | Two peripheral stalks | Enhanced stability and possibly altered proton-to-ATP ratio |
| E. coli | Two copies of identical subunit b | Single peripheral stalk | Standard coupling mechanism |
| Yersinia pseudotuberculosis | Two copies of identical subunit b | Single peripheral stalk | Standard coupling mechanism |
| Bacillus PS3 | Two different interfaces of b-subunits with subunit a | Single peripheral stalk with unique interactions | Specific adaptations for thermophilic environment |
The related Chloroflexus aurantiacus, which belongs to the same Chloroflexota phylum, contains an unusual ATP synthase architecture with two peripheral stalks and two proton-conducting a-subunits. These structural modifications create unique proton translocation pathways that potentially double the number of protons translocated per ATP synthesis cycle .
Research suggests that structural variations in ATP synthase from early photosynthetic bacteria like those in the Chloroflexota phylum represent evolutionary adaptations to specific environmental conditions and energy requirements .
What methodological approaches can be employed to investigate the interaction between recombinant Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase subunit b and other components of the ATP synthase complex?
Several complementary approaches are recommended for investigating subunit interactions:
Cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR):
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Functional reconstitution assays:
How can site-directed mutagenesis of Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase subunit b be used to probe its role in the assembly and function of the ATP synthase complex?
Based on structural and functional studies of related ATP synthases, the following site-directed mutagenesis approach is recommended:
Target regions for mutagenesis:
N-terminal transmembrane domain: mutations here likely affect membrane anchoring and interaction with subunit a
Middle coiled-coil region: mutations may disrupt peripheral stalk formation
C-terminal domain: mutations could affect interaction with the F₁ sector
Key residues for mutational analysis:
Conserved charged residues (Arg, Lys, Glu, Asp) that may form salt bridges with other subunits
Hydrophobic residues in the transmembrane domain that interact with the membrane
Residues at predicted interfaces with other subunits based on homology modeling
Functional analysis of mutants:
Express mutant proteins in E. coli
Assess assembly of the ATP synthase complex using blue native PAGE
Measure ATP synthesis and hydrolysis activities using enzyme assays
Analyze proton transport using pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes
Studies on related bacterial ATP synthases have shown that mutations in the N-terminal region of subunit b can be particularly disruptive to assembly and function, as this region makes critical interactions with subunit a .
What approaches can be used to study the oligomeric state of Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase and the stoichiometry of subunit b in the complex?
Determining the precise stoichiometry of subunit b in the Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase complex is crucial, especially considering the unusual four-copy arrangement found in the related Chloroflexus aurantiacus. The following methodological approaches are recommended:
Analytical ultracentrifugation:
Sediment velocity analysis to determine the size and shape of the complex
Equilibrium sedimentation to determine molecular weight and stoichiometry
Native mass spectrometry:
Purify intact ATP synthase complexes in detergent micelles
Transfer to volatile buffers compatible with mass spectrometry
Determine accurate masses of intact complexes and subcomplexes
Calculate subunit stoichiometry from mass measurements
Quantitative protein analysis:
Cryo-EM structural analysis:
How can the proton translocation mechanism of Herpetosiphon aurantiacus ATP synthase be experimentally characterized?
Investigating the proton translocation mechanism requires specialized techniques:
Liposome reconstitution and pH measurements:
Purify intact ATP synthase or reconstitute from purified components
Incorporate into liposomes with pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes
Monitor pH changes during ATP synthesis or hydrolysis
Quantify proton-to-ATP ratios under different conditions
Single-molecule rotation analysis:
Immobilize ATP synthase complexes on surfaces
Attach fluorescent probes or beads to rotating components
Visualize and quantify rotation using fluorescence microscopy
Correlate rotational steps with ATP synthesis events
Structure-based mutational analysis:
Target residues in the proton translocation pathway based on structural homology
Create point mutations and assess their effects on proton translocation
Key targets include conserved acidic residues in subunit a and the essential carboxylate in subunit c
Recent studies on ATP synthases from photosynthetic bacteria reveal unique arrangements of proton inlets and outlets that facilitate efficient energy conversion. The Chloroflexus aurantiacus ATP synthase contains two proton inlets on the periplasmic side and two proton outlets on the cytoplasmic side, which may represent adaptations to the photosynthetic lifestyle .