Recombinant Heterosigma akashiwo Cytochrome c biogenesis protein ccs1 (ccs1)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
Note: While the tag type is determined during production, please inform us of any specific tag requirements; we will prioritize their implementation.
Synonyms
ccs1; Heak293_Cp117; Cytochrome c biogenesis protein Ccs1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-423
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Heterosigma akashiwo (strain NIES-293)
Target Names
ccs1
Target Protein Sequence
MEKIFKILANLKFAIALLLLISITITFGSIIEQDQTLDYYKQNYPLTNPIGGFLTWKVIN MFQLNHIYKNFWFISLLLSLGISLIACTFFQQFPGIKFSRRCYFSNNPRKTDFQTQLKTN LSRNIIYTIISEGYFVFQQKKNFYGTKGIIGRIAPVFVHLSIILILLGSIFASLGGFNSQ ELIGKGEIFHIQNVTSSGPLTKLSQQAIRVNDFWINYYPNNKIKQFYSNLSIINGDGQEV RSKTISVNKPLIYKDLTFYQTDWNLLGLRISHNNKNFQIPVIQTTQNLNKVWLTWLPLES NTSKNLSGETIIINNYKGTIYIYDNNGQLNKKIELSNFIENKNYKLIEFLSVTGIQIKSD PGILFIYFGFGFLMVSTILSYLSFSQVWLGIDYLEQNNIKLTVNAKTNRTKVLALTVRIQ PFL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Essential for the biogenesis of c-type cytochromes (cytochrome c6 and cytochrome f), specifically during heme attachment.
Protein Families
Ccs1/CcsB family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast thylakoid membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the role of ccs1 in cytochrome c biogenesis in Heterosigma akashiwo?

Cytochrome c biogenesis refers to the cellular process by which functional cytochrome c proteins are synthesized, involving the covalent attachment of heme groups to the apo-cytochrome c protein. While specific details about ccs1 in H. akashiwo are not fully characterized, cytochrome c biogenesis proteins typically facilitate the critical step of heme attachment to the CXXCH motif in apocytochrome c. In bacterial systems, the System I pathway (CcmABCDEFGH) is used for cytochrome c biogenesis . H. akashiwo, as a eukaryotic alga, likely employs mechanisms similar to those found in other stramenopiles for cytochrome c assembly within its chloroplasts.

How does the cytochrome c biogenesis pathway in Heterosigma akashiwo compare to pathways in other organisms?

Cytochrome c biogenesis pathways exhibit significant diversity across different domains of life:

  • System I (Ccm) is predominantly found in bacteria and requires the CcmABCDEFGH machinery

  • Some archaea utilize a streamlined version requiring only CcmABCEF components

  • Eukaryotic systems vary, with plants and algae often using distinct mechanisms from those in bacteria

H. akashiwo, as a raphidophyte alga with a complex evolutionary history, likely possesses unique adaptations in its cytochrome c biogenesis pathway, potentially reflecting its stramenopile lineage and specific environmental adaptations. Evolutionary analyses indicate that different organisms acquired these pathways through multiple independent horizontal gene transfer events from different groups of bacteria .

Why is studying recombinant ccs1 from Heterosigma akashiwo important for understanding algal physiology?

H. akashiwo is an ecologically significant raphidophyte that forms harmful algal blooms in coastal waters worldwide . Understanding its cytochrome c biogenesis pathway provides insights into:

  • Energy metabolism regulation in harmful algal bloom species

  • Evolutionary adaptations in chloroplast function

  • Potential targets for ecological management strategies

H. akashiwo contains a chloroplast genome with unique features, including genes not previously reported in other chloroplast genomes . The cytochrome c biogenesis machinery would play an essential role in electron transport processes that underpin both photosynthesis and respiration in this organism.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant H. akashiwo ccs1?

Based on established protocols for cytochrome c biogenesis proteins, the following expression systems have proven effective:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsSpecial Considerations
E. coli with CcmWell-established for cytochrome c production May not reproduce all post-translational modificationsRequires co-expression of System I machinery
Yeast systemsBetter for eukaryotic proteinsMore complex media requirementsConsider P. pastoris for membrane proteins
Cell-free systemsAvoids toxicity issuesLower yieldUseful for initial characterization

When expressing H. akashiwo ccs1, it's critical to consider its potential membrane association and requirement for specific cofactors. The method described for recombinant cytochrome c expression using System I (CcmABCDEFGH) bacterial cytochrome c biogenesis pathway, followed by analysis using cell lysis and heme staining , can be adapted for ccs1 characterization.

What purification strategies optimize yield and functionality of recombinant ccs1?

For optimal purification of functional recombinant ccs1, consider the following strategy:

  • Affinity tags selection: Based on successful approaches with other cytochrome biogenesis proteins, a dual tagging approach with 3X FLAG and twin-Strep sequences has proven effective

  • Membrane protein considerations:

    • Use mild detergents for membrane extraction

    • Consider native purification approaches that maintain lipid associations

    • Implement gradient purification to separate different membrane fractions

  • Functional assessment:

    • Develop spectroscopic assays to confirm proper folding

    • Test thiol reduction activity if ccs1 functions in disulfide bond reduction

    • Verify cofactor binding through spectroscopic analysis

How can researchers confirm the functionality of recombinantly expressed ccs1?

Functional validation requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Heterologous complementation:

    • Express ccs1 in a system lacking endogenous cytochrome c biogenesis capability

    • Assess restoration of cytochrome c maturation (similar to the approach used with archaeal systems )

  • Biochemical characterization:

    • Measure thiol reduction capacity if ccs1 functions in thioredoxin-like activity

    • Assess protein-protein interactions with other components of the biogenesis machinery

    • Quantify heme binding and transfer activities

  • Structural integrity verification:

    • Use circular dichroism to confirm proper secondary structure

    • Employ limited proteolysis to verify domain folding

    • Analyze thermal stability through differential scanning fluorimetry

What biophysical techniques best characterize the structure-function relationship of ccs1?

Advanced biophysical techniques provide critical insights into ccs1 structure and function:

  • X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM for high-resolution structural determination:

    • May require optimization of construct design to improve crystallization

    • Consider using nanobodies to stabilize flexible regions

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):

    • Reveals dynamic regions and conformational changes upon substrate binding

    • Can identify regions involved in protein-protein interactions

  • Spectroscopic methods for heme interaction:

    • UV-visible spectroscopy to monitor heme binding

    • Resonance Raman spectroscopy to characterize heme environment

    • EPR spectroscopy to assess redox properties

  • Computational modeling:

    • Homology modeling based on related cytochrome c biogenesis proteins

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to predict functional dynamics

How can researchers study the protein-protein interactions between ccs1 and other components of the cytochrome c biogenesis machinery?

To investigate the protein interaction network of ccs1:

  • In vivo crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry:

    • Identifies physiological interaction partners

    • Maps interaction interfaces at amino acid resolution

  • Surface plasmon resonance or bio-layer interferometry:

    • Determines binding affinities and kinetics

    • Allows screening of multiple potential interaction partners

  • Co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against tagged versions of ccs1:

    • Confirms interaction in native or near-native conditions

    • Can be coupled with western blotting to identify specific partners

  • Blue native PAGE:

    • Preserves membrane protein complexes

    • Allows size estimation of native complexes containing ccs1

Similar approaches have been used to characterize components of the Ccm system in other organisms .

What are the best practices for analyzing the redox properties of recombinant ccs1?

Since cytochrome c biogenesis involves critical redox chemistry, especially if ccs1 functions in the reduction of disulfide bonds in the CXXCH motif , these analytical approaches are recommended:

  • Redox potential determination:

    • Protein film voltammetry for direct measurement

    • Redox titrations monitored by spectroscopy

    • Comparison with known thioredoxin-like proteins

  • Cysteine redox state analysis:

    • Differential alkylation with mass spectrometry

    • Fluorescent labeling of free thiols

    • DTNB assays for quantification of free thiols

  • Substrate specificity assessment:

    • Insulin reduction assays if ccs1 functions as a disulfide reductase

    • Cytochrome c reduction assays using various cytochrome c substrates

    • Comparison of activity across different growth conditions

How has the ccs1 gene evolved in different strains of Heterosigma akashiwo?

Comparative genomic analysis reveals insights into ccs1 evolution:

H. akashiwo strains from different geographical locations (West Atlantic CCMP452 and West Pacific NIES293) show multiple nucleotide polymorphisms in both coding and intergenic regions of their chloroplast genomes . While specific data on ccs1 variation is not directly provided, this pattern of strain-specific genetic variation likely extends to genes involved in cytochrome c biogenesis.

The chloroplast genome of H. akashiwo contains genes that appear to have been obtained via lateral transfer, suggesting a complex evolutionary history for its chloroplast-associated proteins . This may include components of the cytochrome c biogenesis pathway like ccs1.

What evidence exists for horizontal gene transfer in cytochrome c biogenesis pathways?

Evolutionary analyses indicate:

  • Components of cytochrome c biogenesis machinery are universally conserved across diverse organisms but show patterns consistent with horizontal gene transfer

  • Different clades of Archaea acquired this pathway through multiple independent horizontal gene transfer events from different groups of Bacteria

  • Evidence supports convergent evolution of novel organism-specific cytochrome c biogenesis machinery

The chloroplast genome of H. akashiwo exhibits characteristics suggesting that some genes were acquired through lateral gene transfer , potentially including those involved in cytochrome c biogenesis.

How do isomeric configurations of the H. akashiwo chloroplast genome affect expression of genes like ccs1?

The H. akashiwo chloroplast genome exists in two isomeric configurations resulting from an inversion of single copy domains . This structural feature could impact gene expression in several ways:

  • Regulatory effects:

    • Altered proximity to promoters or regulatory elements

    • Changed DNA topology affecting transcription factor binding

  • Gene dosage effects:

    • Differential copy numbers of genes near inversion boundaries

    • Potential impacts on relative expression levels

  • Replication dynamics:

    • Effects on replication timing and efficiency

    • Potential for replication-transcription conflicts

The fosmid cloning technique revealed that both H. akashiwo strains contain an isomeric chloroplast DNA population , with implications for the regulation of all chloroplast-encoded genes, potentially including those related to cytochrome c biogenesis.

How can researchers overcome difficulties in cloning and expressing membrane-associated proteins like ccs1?

Membrane protein expression presents unique challenges that can be addressed through these strategies:

  • Construct optimization:

    • Test multiple truncation variants to identify minimal functional domains

    • Consider fusion partners that enhance solubility (MBP, SUMO, Trx)

    • Create chimeric constructs with well-expressed homologs

  • Expression condition optimization:

    • Lower induction temperature (16-20°C)

    • Reduce inducer concentration

    • Test specialized expression strains (C41/C43, SHuffle)

  • Alternative approaches:

    • Cell-free expression systems with lipid nanodiscs

    • Split protein complementation

    • Synthetic peptide approaches for specific domains

The fosmid cloning approach used for H. akashiwo chloroplast genome sequencing demonstrates that large genomic fragments can be successfully cloned and may be adapted for expression of difficult proteins like ccs1.

What strategies help resolve conflicting experimental data in cytochrome c biogenesis research?

When faced with contradictory results:

  • Systematic validation across multiple systems:

    • Test in multiple expression hosts

    • Compare results between in vitro and in vivo systems

    • Validate using multiple independent methodologies

  • Consider organism-specific differences:

    • Recognize that cytochrome c biogenesis pathways vary significantly between species

    • Account for environmental and physiological context

  • Quantitative approach:

    • Implement statistical analysis of replicate experiments

    • Establish clear thresholds for biological significance

    • Use controls appropriate for each experimental system

  • Methodological refinement:

    • Critically evaluate assay limitations

    • Develop more sensitive or direct measurement approaches

    • Consider time-dependent effects in dynamic systems

How should researchers design experiments to distinguish the specific role of ccs1 from other cytochrome c biogenesis proteins?

To establish the specific function of ccs1:

  • Genetic approaches:

    • Generate targeted deletions or point mutations

    • Construct chimeric proteins to map functional domains

    • Use conditional expression systems to control timing

  • Biochemical specificity:

    • Develop in vitro reconstitution systems with purified components

    • Test activity with modified substrates to establish specificity

    • Perform order-of-addition experiments to determine pathway sequence

  • Structural studies:

    • Identify substrate binding sites through mutational analysis

    • Map interaction interfaces through crosslinking

    • Determine structures of different functional states

The heterologous expression approach demonstrated with the Ccm machinery provides a valuable framework for testing the specific role of ccs1 through complementation studies.

How can understanding ccs1 function contribute to algal biotechnology applications?

Knowledge of cytochrome c biogenesis in H. akashiwo has several biotechnological implications:

  • Bioremediation and environmental monitoring:

    • Development of biosensors based on cytochrome c activity

    • Engineering algal strains with modified electron transport for enhanced pollutant degradation

    • Creating detection systems for harmful algal blooms

  • Bioenergy applications:

    • Engineering enhanced electron transport for improved biofuel production

    • Optimizing photosynthetic efficiency through cytochrome modifications

    • Developing biological solar cells using algal cytochromes

  • Synthetic biology approaches:

    • Creating modular electron transport components based on ccs1 function

    • Designing orthogonal electron transport chains for specialized metabolic pathways

    • Engineering novel redox enzymes with customized properties

What are the most promising future research directions for cytochrome c biogenesis in algal systems?

Future research should focus on:

  • Systems biology integration:

    • Comprehensive mapping of protein-protein interaction networks

    • Multi-omics approaches to understand regulation under different conditions

    • Mathematical modeling of electron flow through cytochrome systems

  • Ecological relevance:

    • Investigating cytochrome c biogenesis adaptation to environmental stressors

    • Comparing cytochrome systems across harmful algal bloom species

    • Understanding the role of electron transport in bloom formation and toxicity

  • Evolutionary insights:

    • Reconstructing the evolutionary history of cytochrome c biogenesis across algal lineages

    • Identifying signatures of selection in genes like ccs1

    • Understanding the role of horizontal gene transfer in system diversification

  • Technical innovations:

    • Development of algal-specific expression systems

    • In vivo imaging of cytochrome c biogenesis in living algal cells

    • Single-molecule approaches to study dynamic assembly processes

How might climate change affect cytochrome c function in organisms like H. akashiwo?

Climate change factors could significantly impact cytochrome c biogenesis and function:

  • Temperature effects:

    • Altered protein folding and stability of cytochrome c and biogenesis machinery

    • Modified kinetics of electron transport processes

    • Changed expression patterns of biogenesis components

  • Ocean acidification impacts:

    • Altered pH affecting heme chemistry and protein interactions

    • Modified redox potentials affecting electron transport efficiency

    • Potential impacts on metal availability for heme synthesis

  • Adaptive responses:

    • Selection pressure for modified cytochrome c variants

    • Altered regulation of biogenesis pathways

    • Potential for enhanced horizontal gene transfer under stress conditions

Understanding these adaptations could provide valuable insights into H. akashiwo bloom dynamics in changing marine environments.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.