Recombinant Hordeum lechleri Maturase K (matK), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchasing method and location. Consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is requested in advance. Additional charges apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, serving as a guideline for your preparations.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If a specific tag type is required, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
matK; Maturase K; Intron maturase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Hordeum lechleri (Wild barley)
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Typically encoded within the trnK tRNA gene intron. Its function likely involves assisting in the splicing of its own and other chloroplast group II introns.
Protein Families
Intron maturase 2 family, MatK subfamily
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast.

Q&A

What is matK and what is its genomic location in plants?

MatK (Maturase K) is a chloroplast-encoded gene located within the group II intron of trnK (tRNAlys, UUU) in most land plants. It represents the only putative group II intron maturase encoded in the chloroplast genome. The gene produces a protein of approximately 60 kDa that functions as a splicing factor, aiding in the folding and splicing of group II introns within the chloroplast genome . Unlike nuclear-encoded maturases that may be imported into the chloroplast, MatK is synthesized within the organelle itself and appears to be essential for proper processing of certain group II introns, particularly those classified as group IIA introns .

How does matK function in the chloroplast?

MatK functions as a group II intron maturase in the chloroplast, assisting in the splicing of group II introns from RNA transcripts. Studies of the barley mutant albostrians demonstrated that although some group II introns were processed by imported nuclear maturases, at least six plastid genes (trnK, atpF, trnI, trnA, rpl2, and rps12 cis) with group II introns require a chloroplast maturase for splicing . MatK appears to be unique among group II intron maturases in its ability to splice introns other than the one in which it resides, suggesting it functions through a novel splicing mechanism . This function is critical for proper protein translation in the chloroplast, affecting both translation machinery and photosynthesis-related genes.

What transcripts are produced from the matK gene?

Research has revealed two predominant RNA transcripts for matK across land plants. These transcripts exhibit differential regulation depending on plant developmental stage and environmental conditions. For example, transcript levels are significantly decreased in Oryza sativa (rice) plants grown in dark conditions as well as in plants four weeks post-germination . Additionally, some studies have reported evidence of a transcript for matK separate from the trnK precursor, suggesting independent transcriptional regulation of this gene in some contexts . The presence of these discrete transcripts supports the functional importance of matK in chloroplast molecular processes.

Why is matK considered important for plant systematic studies?

The matK gene has proven invaluable in plant systematic and evolutionary studies due to its strong phylogenetic signal. Molecular information from this single gene has produced phylogenies as robust as those derived from several other genes combined . This utility stems from matK's relatively fast evolutionary rate compared to other chloroplast genes, yet with sufficient functional constraints to maintain phylogenetic signal. Despite its high substitution rate at both nucleotide and amino acid levels (which has sometimes led to suggestions it might be a pseudogene), matK appears to maintain its functional role through chemical conservation of amino acids, making it an excellent marker for resolving relationships across different taxonomic levels in plants .

What mechanisms compensate for potentially deleterious indels in matK sequences?

One of the most intriguing aspects of matK evolution is the presence of indels (insertions and deletions) in the open reading frame that are not in multiples of three, which would normally result in frame shifts that destroy the reading frame . Research indicates that some orchids compensate for these potentially deleterious indels through an out-of-frame start codon for matK . This alternative start site realigns the reading frame, allowing for proper translation despite the presence of indels that would otherwise be destructive to gene function. This mechanism represents an unusual evolutionary adaptation that maintains functional integrity while allowing for significant sequence variation.

How does MatK structure differ from other group II intron maturases?

The genetic structure of MatK differs significantly from other group II intron maturases. Most notably, MatK lacks a complete reverse transcriptase (RT) domain and a DNA endonuclease domain, which are typically present in bacterial group II intron maturases such as LtrA . Despite these structural differences, MatK appears to retain sufficient functional domains, particularly remnants of the RT domain and the essential domain X, to maintain its maturase activity. Additionally, bioinformatic analyses suggest the presence of transmembrane domains in the putative MatK amino acid sequence, which could indicate a membrane-associated location for this protein . This structural uniqueness makes MatK an interesting model for studying the minimal requirements for maturase function.

What evidence supports matK as an expressed functional gene rather than a pseudogene?

Several lines of evidence support matK as an expressed functional gene rather than a pseudogene:

  • Identification of RNA transcripts across diverse land plant species

  • Detection of a ~60 kDa protein product in barley using Western blot analysis

  • Conservation of the open reading frame across land plants, despite high substitution rates

  • Presence of matK without trnK in the residual chloroplast genome of non-photosynthetic plants like Epifagus, suggesting essential function independent of trnK

  • Compensation mechanisms for potentially deleterious indels, such as alternative start codons in orchids

  • Chemically conserved amino acid replacements that maintain protein structure/function

These findings collectively contradict previous suggestions that matK might be a pseudogene in some plant lineages, supporting instead its role as an essential functional protein in the chloroplast.

What techniques are most effective for studying matK expression?

Studying matK expression requires a multi-faceted approach addressing both transcription and translation:

For RNA analysis:

  • RT-PCR to detect and amplify matK transcripts from total RNA preparations

  • Northern blot analysis to determine transcript size and abundance

  • RNA-seq for comprehensive transcriptome analysis and splice variant detection

For protein analysis:

  • Generation of synthetic peptide antigens for antibody production against MatK

  • Western blot analysis to detect and quantify the MatK protein

  • Immunoprecipitation to isolate MatK and identify potential interaction partners

Experimental designs should incorporate controls for plant developmental stage and environmental conditions (particularly light exposure), as these factors significantly influence matK expression levels . Comparative analysis across multiple plant species can provide additional insights into conserved expression patterns and regulatory mechanisms.

How should researchers approach recombinant MatK protein production?

Production of recombinant MatK protein presents several technical challenges due to its chloroplast origin and potential membrane association. Based on successful recombinant protein production approaches, researchers should consider:

  • Expression system selection: Insect cell systems (such as Baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells) have proven effective for expressing complex proteins and could be suitable for MatK .

  • Codon optimization: Chloroplast genes like matK use a different codon preference than nuclear genes or heterologous expression systems, necessitating codon optimization for the chosen expression system.

  • Protein solubility: If transmembrane domains are present as predicted, solubility may be an issue. Consider:

    • Using solubility tags such as MBP (maltose-binding protein) or SUMO

    • Including detergents in purification buffers

    • Expressing functional domains separately if full-length protein proves difficult

  • Purification strategy: A multi-step purification process incorporating affinity chromatography (using histidine or other fusion tags) followed by size exclusion chromatography is recommended to achieve >85% purity.

  • Validation: Confirm protein identity using mass spectrometry and functional activity through in vitro splicing assays with group II intron substrates.

What experimental designs are recommended for studying MatK function in vivo?

To study MatK function in vivo, the following experimental approaches are recommended:

  • Comparative analysis of wild-type and mutant plants:

    • Utilize natural mutants like the barley albostrians with disrupted chloroplast translation

    • Employ CRISPR/Cas9 technology for targeted mutagenesis of matK in model plants

    • Analyze group II intron splicing in mutants versus wild-type plants

  • Temporal and spatial expression analysis:

    • Examine matK expression during different developmental stages

    • Compare expression in photosynthetic versus non-photosynthetic tissues

    • Assess responses to environmental stimuli (light/dark transitions, stress conditions)

  • Identification of interaction partners:

    • Perform co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

    • Use yeast two-hybrid or split-GFP approaches for protein interaction studies

    • Conduct RNA immunoprecipitation to identify RNA substrates

  • Localization studies:

    • Generate fusion proteins with fluorescent tags for microscopy

    • Perform immunogold labeling for electron microscopy

    • Conduct subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot analysis

These approaches provide complementary data on MatK function, regulation, and interactions within the chloroplast environment.

How can researchers distinguish between general matK characteristics and species-specific variations?

To distinguish between general matK characteristics and species-specific variations, researchers should implement comparative analyses across diverse plant lineages:

  • Sequence analysis across plant taxonomy:

    • Compare matK sequences from representatives of major plant groups (bryophytes, lycophytes, ferns, gymnosperms, and angiosperms)

    • Identify conserved regions across all lineages (likely critical for function)

    • Map lineage-specific variations to structural models

  • Expression pattern comparison:

    • Standardize experimental conditions across species

    • Assess both transcript and protein levels using identical methods

    • Document species-specific regulatory responses

  • Functional complementation experiments:

    • Test whether matK from one species can rescue function in another species' mutant

    • Identify which domains are essential for cross-species functionality

  • Statistical approaches:

    • Implement phylogenetically informed statistical methods to account for evolutionary relationships

    • Use ancestral state reconstruction to identify evolutionary shifts in matK characteristics

    • Apply tests for selection (dN/dS ratios) across different lineages and protein domains

This multi-faceted approach allows researchers to distinguish universal features of matK biology from adaptations specific to certain plant lineages or environmental conditions.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.