Recombinant GBE1: Recombinant GBE1 refers to the glycogen branching enzyme produced using recombinant DNA technology. This involves inserting the GBE1 gene into a host organism (e.g., bacteria, yeast, or mammalian cells) to produce the enzyme in large quantities . The term "partial" may indicate that the enzyme is a fragment or domain of the full-length GBE1 protein, or that it has undergone some modification or truncation during the recombinant production process.
Function: Glycogen branching enzyme 1 (GBE1) plays an essential role in glycogen biosynthesis by generating α-1,6-glucosidic branches from α-1,4-linked glucose chains, to increase solubility of the glycogen polymer .
GBE1 and Disease: Mutations in the GBE1 gene lead to glycogen storage disorder type IV (GSDIV) or adult polyglucosan body disease (APBD) .
hGBE1 Structure: hGBE1 is an elongated molecule (longest dimension >85 Å) composed of four structural regions: the N-terminal helical segment (aa 43–75), a carbohydrate-binding module 48 (CBM48; aa 76–183), a central catalytic core (aa 184–600) and the C-terminal amylase-like barrel domain (aa 601–702) .
hGBE1 with branching enzyme structures from O. sativa SBE1 and M. tuberculosis GBE highlights the conserved catalytic core housing the active site within a canonical (βα) 6 barrel .
Structural Variability: The different branching enzymes show greater structural variability in the N-terminal region preceding the catalytic core, as well as in two surface-exposed loops of the TIM barrel .
In O. sativa SBE1 and human GBE1 structures, the helical segment precedes the CBM48 module, whereas in M. tuberculosis GBE, the helical segment is replaced by an additional β-sandwich module .
The closer homology of hGBE1 with O. sativa SBE1, whose substrate is starch, than with the bacterial paralog M. tuberculosis GBE, suggests a similar evolutionary conservation in the branching enzyme mechanism for glycogen and starch, both involving a growing linear α1,4-linked glucan chain as substrate .
APBD: At least three mutations in the GBE1 gene have been found to cause adult polyglucosan body disease, a condition that affects the nervous system .
APBD Mutations: These mutations change single protein building blocks (amino acids) in the glycogen branching enzyme . One mutation appears to be more common in affected people with Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry and replaces the amino acid tyrosine with the amino acid serine at position 329 in the enzyme (written Tyr329Ser or Y329S) .
Most mutations that cause adult polyglucosan body disease lead to a deficiency of the enzyme, resulting in glycogen with fewer side chains . These abnormal glycogen molecules, called polyglucosan bodies, accumulate within cells and cause damage . Nerve cells (neurons) appear to be particularly vulnerable to the accumulation of polyglucosan bodies in this disorder, causing reduced sensation, weakness, and other nervous system problems in people with adult polyglucosan body disease .
Equine GBE1 Gene: Identification of DNA markers closely linked to the equine GBE1 gene assists in determining whether a mutation in this gene leads to the GSD IV-like condition .
FISH using BAC clones as probes assigned the equine GBE1 gene to a marker deficient region of ECA26q12→q13 .
Genetic mapping data provides strong molecular genetic support for the candidacy of the GBE1 locus in equine GSD IV .
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Note: Our standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
The tag type is determined during production. Please specify your desired tag type for preferential development.
Essential for normal glycogen accumulation. The α-1,6 branches of glycogen are crucial for enhancing the molecule's solubility.
The horse glycogen branching enzyme (GBE1) is a 699 amino acid protein that catalyzes the formation of α-1,6-glucosidic branches during glycogen synthesis . This enzyme is essential for creating properly branched glycogen molecules by transferring short chains of glucose residues from α-1,4-linked chains to create branch points.
In normal horses, GBE1 functions to:
Add branch points to linear glucose chains
Create appropriately structured glycogen for efficient storage and mobilization
Maintain proper glycogen homeostasis in tissues including liver, cardiac muscle, and skeletal muscle
Support energy metabolism through effective glycogen utilization
The normal enzyme enables efficient glycogenolysis (breakdown of glycogen into glucose), which is critical for maintaining blood glucose levels and providing energy to tissues, particularly in newborn foals .
The primary pathogenic mutation in horse GBE1 is a C to A substitution at base 102 in exon 1, resulting in a premature stop codon (Y34X mutation) . This nonsense mutation truncates the 699 amino acid protein at position 34, completely eliminating enzyme activity.
Inheritance Pattern and Prevalence:
GBED is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait
Approximately 8% of Quarter Horses and 7% of American Paint Horses are carriers
When two carriers are bred, there is a 25% chance of producing an affected foal
The mutation appears limited to Quarter Horse and Paint Horse bloodlines, with possible occurrence in Appaloosas (though unverified)
The original ancestor carrying the mutation likely belonged to Quarter Horse or Paint pedigrees in the early 1900s
Carriers of the mutation have approximately 50% GBE activity compared to normal horses but do not exhibit clinical manifestations of the disease . The complete absence of functional enzyme in homozygotes results in fatal glycogen storage disease.
Expression of recombinant horse GBE1 typically employs bacterial systems, primarily E. coli, due to their efficiency and scalability. Based on approaches used for similar proteins:
E. coli Expression System Protocol:
Gene cloning: The horse GBE1 coding sequence (minus the mutation) is PCR-amplified from genomic DNA or synthesized commercially
Vector construction: The sequence is inserted into an expression vector (pET or pGEX series) with an appropriate tag (His, GST, etc.)
Transformation: The construct is transformed into an E. coli expression strain (BL21(DE3), Rosetta, etc.)
Culture conditions: Optimal expression typically requires:
Temperature: 16-25°C (to prevent inclusion body formation)
IPTG concentration: 0.1-0.5 mM
Induction time: 8-18 hours
Purification: Affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography
This approach, similar to that used for human GBE1 expression , allows production of sufficient quantities of active enzyme for biochemical and structural studies.
Several complementary methods are employed to measure GBE1 activity in research settings:
Iodine Staining Method:
Principle: Measures the decrease in absorbance when amylose-iodine complex is disrupted by branching
Protocol:
Incubate recombinant GBE1 with amylose substrate
Add iodine solution
Measure absorbance decrease at 660 nm
Calculate enzyme activity as ΔA660/min/mg protein
Branching Degree Analysis:
Principle: Determines the ratio of α-1,6 to α-1,4 linkages in the product
Methods:
Enzymatic hydrolysis with debranching enzymes (isoamylase/pullulanase)
HPAEC-PAD (High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection)
NMR spectroscopy for detailed structural analysis
Histochemical Evaluation:
In tissue samples, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining provides qualitative assessment:
Normal tissue: Pink background staining
GBE1-deficient tissue: Large clumps of purple material without pink background
Characterizing recombinant horse GBE1 requires carefully controlled conditions to ensure reliable and reproducible results:
Reaction Parameters Optimization:
| Parameter | Optimization Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.0-8.0 | Typical optimum ~7.0-7.5 for mammalian GBEs |
| Temperature | 25-45°C | Horse GBE1 activity peaks around 37°C |
| Metal ions | 1-10 mM Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, Mn²⁺ | Differential effects on activity |
| Substrate concentration | 0.1-10 mg/mL amylose/amylopectin | Ensure substrate saturation |
| Enzyme concentration | 0.01-1.0 mg/mL | Linear response range |
| Incubation time | 5-60 minutes | Ensure linear product formation |
Analytical Methods for Advanced Characterization:
Kinetic analysis using the iodine staining assay to determine:
Km (typically 0.5-5 mg/mL for amylose)
Vmax
kcat
Catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km)
Glucan chain transfer analysis:
Quantify the average chain length transferred
Determine the preferred substrate chain length
Analyze the spatial distribution of branches
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) for thermal stability analysis:
Measure melting temperature (Tm)
Analyze unfolding transitions
Assess stabilizing/destabilizing effects of substrate binding
Rigorous characterization enables comparison with GBE1 from other species and facilitates structure-function relationship studies .
CRISPR-Cas9 represents a promising approach for correcting the GBE1 mutation in horse cells. Based on recent successful applications:
Key Design Considerations:
sgRNA Design:
Template Design:
Single-stranded donor DNA templates are preferable for point mutations
Include 30-80 nucleotide homology arms flanking the mutation site
Incorporate silent mutations to prevent re-cutting of corrected sequences
Delivery Parameters:
Nucleofection for primary equine fibroblasts
Optimize Cas9:sgRNA:template ratios (typically 1:1:2)
Consider Cas9 nickase approach to reduce off-target effects
Enrichment and Selection Strategy:
Co-transfect with GFP or antibiotic resistance marker
FACS sorting of successfully transfected cells
Single-cell isolation and clonal expansion
Genotyping via sequencing to identify correctly edited clones
Efficiency Determinants:
The distance between the Cas9-mediated double-stranded break (DSB) and the mutation site is a primary determinant for successful homologous recombination rather than DSB efficiency . Optimal design places the DSB within 10-30 bp of the target mutation.
Comparative analysis of GBE1 across species provides insights into evolutionary conservation, functional constraints, and species-specific adaptations:
Cross-Species Sequence Conservation:
| Species | Sequence Identity to Horse GBE1 | Key Functional Domain Conservation |
|---|---|---|
| Human | ~90% | Catalytic domain: 95% |
| Cattle | ~92% | N-terminal domain: 93% |
| Mouse | ~85% | C-terminal domain: 90% |
| Zebrafish | ~70% | Active site residues: 98% |
| Bacterial GBEs | ~30-40% | Carbohydrate binding module: variable |
Functional Differences Across Species:
Substrate specificity:
Enzyme kinetics:
Post-translational modifications:
Mammalian GBE1 enzymes contain conserved glycosylation sites absent in bacterial orthologues
Phosphorylation patterns differ significantly across mammalian species
This comparative approach aids in understanding the structure-function relationships and evolutionary adaptations of GBE1 across different taxonomic groups .
Developing therapeutic strategies for GBED requires multifaceted approaches to identify intervention points:
High-Throughput Screening Approaches:
Small molecule screening:
Chemical chaperones to stabilize mutant protein
Nonsense suppression compounds to read through premature stop codons
Protein stabilizing agents to enhance residual enzyme activity
Genome-wide modifier screens:
CRISPR library screening to identify genetic modifiers
RNA interference to identify compensatory pathways
Transcriptomic profiling to discover gene network adaptations
Pathway-Based Intervention Strategies:
Glycogen metabolism bypass:
Targeted supplementation with alternative energy substrates
Manipulation of glucose homeostasis pathways
Activation of complementary metabolic pathways
Proteostasis network modulation:
Endoplasmic reticulum stress reduction
Proteasome inhibition to enhance protein stability
Autophagy modulation to manage abnormal glycogen accumulation
Advanced Gene Therapy Approaches:
AAV-mediated gene delivery:
Liver and muscle-specific serotypes
Promoter optimization for tissue-specific expression
Codon optimization for enhanced expression
Base editing technology:
C-to-G base editors for direct correction of the C102A mutation
Prime editing for precise nucleotide replacement
Hybrid systems with decreased off-target effects
These methodological approaches provide a framework for developing potential therapeutic interventions for GBED, transitioning from fundamental understanding of the disease mechanism to applied therapeutic development .
Producing high-quality recombinant horse GBE1 requires optimized purification protocols:
Bacterial Expression and Purification Protocol:
Expression optimization:
Culture in terrific broth (TB) medium
Reduce temperature to 18°C after induction
Extend expression time to 16-20 hours
Supplement with 0.1% glucose to reduce basal expression
Sequential purification strategy:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged protein
Ion exchange chromatography (IEX) to remove charged contaminants
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) for final polishing
Yield: typically 5-10 mg purified protein per liter of culture
Quality control assessments:
SDS-PAGE (>95% purity)
Western blot confirmation
Mass spectrometry verification
Activity assay (minimum specific activity threshold)
Alternative Expression Systems Comparison:
| Expression System | Advantages | Disadvantages | Typical Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, low cost, rapid | No post-translational modifications | 5-10 mg/L |
| Insect cells | Better folding, some PTMs | Higher cost, more complex | 2-5 mg/L |
| Mammalian cells | Native PTMs, proper folding | Highest cost, lowest yield | 0.5-2 mg/L |
| Yeast | Scalable, some PTMs | Different glycosylation pattern | 3-8 mg/L |
The selection of expression system should be guided by the specific research requirements, particularly whether post-translational modifications are critical for the planned experiments .
Multiple complementary analytical approaches provide insights into structural differences between wild-type and mutant GBE1:
Biophysical Characterization Methods:
Advanced Structural Biology Approaches:
X-ray crystallography:
Atomic-level structure determination
Active site architecture analysis
Substrate binding pocket characterization
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
Structure of larger complexes
Conformational states visualization
Protein-substrate interaction analysis
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy:
Dynamic properties in solution
Ligand binding site mapping
Local structural perturbations identification
These techniques, when applied in combination, provide comprehensive insights into how mutations affect protein structure, dynamics, and function, potentially guiding rational therapeutic design .
Developing representative in vitro models is crucial for understanding GBED pathophysiology:
Primary Cell Culture Systems:
Primary equine hepatocyte isolation and culture:
Perfusion-based isolation technique
Sandwich culture format for maintaining differentiation
Viability assessment: >85% viable cells required
Functional tests: albumin secretion, urea production
Skeletal muscle primary culture:
Satellite cell isolation from muscle biopsies
Differentiation into myotubes (7-10 days)
Fusion index assessment: >60% nuclei in multinucleated cells
Contractility testing for functional analysis
Advanced 3D Culture Systems:
Equine liver organoids:
Isolation of hepatic progenitor cells
Culture in Matrigel with defined growth factors
Development timeline: 10-14 days
Functional assessment: CYP450 activity, glycogen accumulation
Skeletal muscle tissue engineering:
Fibrin-based hydrogel as scaffold
Aligned myotube formation
Electrical stimulation for maturation
Force generation measurement
iPSC-Derived Model Systems:
Generation of equine induced pluripotent stem cells:
Reprogramming factors: Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc
Characterization: pluripotency markers, differentiation capacity
Karyotype stability assessment
Directed differentiation to affected cell types:
Hepatocyte-like cells (21-28 days)
Cardiomyocytes (14-21 days)
Skeletal muscle cells (14-28 days)
These in vitro models enable systematic investigation of GBE1 deficiency effects on cellular function, glycogen metabolism, and cell viability under controlled conditions .
Accurate detection of GBED carriers is essential for breeding management and disease prevention:
DNA-Based Testing Methods:
PCR-RFLP (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism):
Amplification of GBE1 exon 1 region
Restriction enzyme digestion: creating diagnostic fragment patterns
Gel electrophoresis visualization
Sensitivity/specificity: >99% for both
TaqMan SNP genotyping assay:
Allele-specific fluorescent probes
Real-time PCR detection
Automated allele calling
Throughput: 96-384 samples per run
Next-generation sequencing panel:
Targeted sequencing of GBE1 and related genes
Variant calling pipeline
Coverage depth: minimum 50X recommended
Additional variants detected: expanded analysis capability
Sample Collection and Processing:
Hair bulb sampling:
10-15 hairs with intact roots
Air-dry sample storage
DNA yield: 10-50 ng/μl typical
Sample stability: stable at room temperature for weeks
Whole blood sampling:
5-10 ml in EDTA tubes
Refrigerated storage (4°C for up to 1 week)
DNA yield: 50-200 ng/μl typical
Higher quality DNA for advanced applications
Testing Accuracy Metrics:
| Test Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Turnaround Time | Cost Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCR-RFLP | >99% | >99% | 2-3 days | $35-75 |
| TaqMan | 99.9% | 99.9% | 1-2 days | $45-100 |
| NGS Panel | >99.9% | >99.9% | 5-10 days | $100-250 |
Regular testing of breeding stock in Quarter Horse and American Paint Horse bloodlines is recommended, with approximately 8% of Quarter Horses and 7% of Paint Horses being carriers of the mutation .
Structural analysis of horse GBE1 provides critical insights for developing effective enzyme replacement therapies:
Structure-Function Relationships:
Catalytic domain architecture:
Essential residues for substrate binding
Active site configuration
Conformational changes during catalysis
Important structural features:
N-terminal domain: regulatory function
TIM barrel fold: catalytic core
C-terminal domain: substrate recognition
Post-translational modification sites:
Glycosylation: affects stability and half-life
Phosphorylation: potential regulatory mechanism
Disulfide bonds: structural stability
ERT Design Considerations:
Protein engineering approaches:
Site-directed mutagenesis to enhance stability
Fusion proteins for tissue targeting
PEGylation to extend circulation half-life
Formulation optimization:
Excipients for stability enhancement
Lyophilization compatibility
Storage conditions validation
Tissue targeting strategies:
Liver-specific targeting ligands
Muscle-targeting peptides
Cellular uptake enhancement modifications
This structural understanding guides rational design of enzyme replacement therapeutics with improved stability, activity, and tissue-specific targeting properties for GBED treatment .
Comprehensive analysis of glycogen structure in GBED-affected tissues requires multiple analytical approaches:
Microscopy-Based Methods:
Electron microscopy:
Sample preparation: glutaraldehyde fixation followed by osmium tetroxide
Magnification: 20,000-50,000×
Key observations: abnormal glycogen α-particles, reduced branching
Quantification: size distribution, particle density
Immunofluorescence microscopy:
Glycogen-specific antibodies or periodic acid-Schiff staining
Counterstaining for cellular structures
Co-localization with organelle markers
Quantification: glycogen content and distribution
Biochemical Structure Analysis:
Enzymatic debranching analysis:
Sequential treatment with isoamylase and pullulanase
Chain length distribution by HPAEC-PAD
Normal vs. GBED comparison: significantly longer chains in GBED
Methylation analysis:
Permethylation of hydroxyl groups
GC-MS analysis of methylated alditol acetates
Branching degree calculation: ratio of 2,3,6-tri-O-methyl glucose to 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl glucose
Physical Property Characterization:
Dynamic light scattering:
Hydrodynamic radius measurement
Polydispersity assessment
Comparison of size distributions
Sedimentation analysis:
Analytical ultracentrifugation
Sedimentation coefficient determination
Molecular weight estimation
These methods collectively provide comprehensive characterization of the structural abnormalities in glycogen from GBED-affected tissues, connecting molecular defects to functional consequences .
Advanced genomic approaches enable comprehensive understanding of GBE1 mutation prevalence and population dynamics:
Population Genomics Strategies:
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS):
High-density SNP arrays (670K-2M markers)
Analysis of linkage disequilibrium patterns
Identification of selection signatures around GBE1 locus
Haplotype block analysis for inheritance patterns
Whole genome sequencing (WGS):
Coverage depth: 30-60X recommended
Variant calling pipeline optimization
Structural variant detection
Sequence context analysis of the GBE1 mutation region
Targeted sequencing approaches:
Amplicon-based sequencing of GBE1 and flanking regions
Multiplexed analysis of hundreds to thousands of samples
Coverage depth: >100X for high confidence genotyping
Cost-effective population screening
Breed Distribution and Ancestry Analysis:
| Breed | Carrier Frequency | Related Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Quarter Horse | ~8% | Higher in certain bloodlines |
| American Paint Horse | ~7% | Similar distribution to QH |
| Appaloosa | Unknown (suspected) | Limited testing to date |
| Thoroughbred | Not detected | No evidence of mutation |
| Other breeds | Not detected | Mutation appears breed-specific |
Genetic Counseling Applications:
Carrier probability calculations:
Based on pedigree analysis
Incorporation of genetic test results
Bayesian statistical approaches
Breeding program recommendations:
Selective testing strategies
Carrier × non-carrier breeding management
Population-level impact assessment
These advanced genomic approaches provide critical information for breed registries, veterinarians, and horse breeders to manage GBED risk while preserving genetic diversity .
Heterozygous carriers of the GBE1 mutation show approximately 50% enzyme activity but remain clinically normal, suggesting compensatory mechanisms that could be therapeutic targets:
Multi-Omics Integration Approaches:
Transcriptomics (RNA-Seq):
Differential gene expression analysis
Tissue-specific expression patterns
Alternative splicing analysis
Long non-coding RNA profiling
Proteomics:
SWATH-MS for protein quantification
Phosphoproteomics for signaling pathway analysis
Protein-protein interaction networks
Protein stability and turnover assessment
Metabolomics:
Targeted glycolysis/gluconeogenesis metabolites
Untargeted metabolic profiling
Stable isotope tracing for flux analysis
Integration with transcriptome and proteome data
Functional Validation Methods:
siRNA/shRNA knockdown experiments:
Target validation in primary equine cells
Phenotypic rescue assessment
Dose-dependent responses
Combination knockdowns for pathway analysis
CRISPR activation/interference:
CRISPRa for upregulating compensatory genes
CRISPRi for validating pathway components
Multiplexed screens for synergistic effects
Inducible systems for temporal control
Metabolic flux analysis:
13C-glucose tracing experiments
Glycogen synthesis/degradation rates
Compensatory metabolic pathway identification
Energy homeostasis mechanisms
These approaches could reveal how heterozygotes compensate for reduced GBE1 activity, potentially identifying pathways that could be therapeutically targeted in homozygous affected animals .