Recombinant Human Nucleolar transcription factor 1 (UBTF)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
If the delivery form is liquid, the default storage buffer is a Tris/PBS-based buffer containing 5%-50% glycerol.
Note: If you have specific requirements for the glycerol content, please indicate them when placing your order.
If the delivery form is lyophilized powder, the buffer used before lyophilization is a Tris/PBS-based buffer containing 6% Trehalose.

Form
Liquid or Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have specific requirements for the format, please indicate them when placing your order, and we will prepare the product according to your needs.
Lead Time
Delivery times may vary depending on the purchasing method or location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery times.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend briefly centrifuging the vial before opening to ensure the contents are at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%. Customers can use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, the shelf life of the liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the shelf life of the lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
N-terminal 6xHis-tagged
Synonyms
UBTF; UBF; UBF1; Nucleolar transcription factor 1; Autoantigen NOR-90; Upstream-binding factor 1; UBF-1
Datasheet & Coa
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-764aa
Mol. Weight
93.4kDa
Protein Length
Full Length
Purity
Greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE.
Research Area
Epigenetics and Nuclear Signaling
Source
in vitro E.coli expression system
Species
Homo sapiens (Human)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
MNGEADCPTDLEMAAPKGQDRWSQEDMLTLLECMKNNLPSNDSSKFKTTESHMDWEKVAFKDFSGDMCKLKWVEISNEVRKFRTLTELILDAQEHVKNPYKGKKLKKHPDFPKKPLTPYFRFFMEKRAKYAKLHPEMSNLDLTKILSKKYKELPEKKKMKYIQDFQREKQEFERNLARFREDHPDLIQNAKKSDIPEKPKTPQQLWYTHEKKVYLKVRPDATTKEVKDSLGKQWSQLSDKKRLKWIHKALEQRKEYEEIMRDYIQKHPELNISEEGITKSTLTKAERQLKDKFDGRPTKPPPNSYSLYCAELMANMKDVPSTERMVLCSQQWKLLSQKEKDAYHKKCDQKKKDYEVELLRFLESLPEEEQQRVLGEEKMLNINKKQATSPASKKPAQEGGKGGSEKPKRPVSAMFIFSEEKRRQLQEERPELSESELTRLLARMWNDLSEKKKAKYKAREAALKAQSERKPGGEREERGKLPESPKRAEEIWQQSVIGDYLARFKNDRVKALKAMEMTWNNMEKKEKLMWIKKAAEDQKRYERELSEMRAPPAATNSSKKMKFQGEPKKPPMNGYQKFSQELLSNGELNHLPLKERMVEIGSRWQRISQSQKEHYKKLAEEQQKQYKVHLDLWVKSLSPQDRAAYKEYISNKRKSMTKLRGPNPKSSRTTLQSKSESEEDDEEDEDDEDEDEEEEDDENGDSSEDGGDSSESSSEDESEDGDENEEDDEDEDDDEDDDEDEDNESEGSSSSSSSSGDSSDSDSN
Note: The complete sequence including tag sequence, target protein sequence and linker sequence could be provided upon request.
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein recognizes the ribosomal RNA gene promoter and activates transcription mediated by RNA polymerase I. This activation occurs through cooperative interactions with the transcription factor SL1/TIF-IB complex. It binds specifically to the upstream control element.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. TP53INP2 promotes ribosome biogenesis by facilitating rRNA synthesis within the nucleolus. PMID: 27172002
  2. A study demonstrated that HMG box 1, the linker region between the HMG boxes and the C-terminal acidic region (AR), and the AR cooperatively regulate the nucleolar localization of UBF. PMID: 28874518
  3. In seven unrelated individuals exhibiting developmental regression starting at 2.5-7 years, researchers identified a heterozygous variant, c.628G>A in UBTF, encoding p.Glu210Lys in UBF. This variant occurred de novo in all cases. PMID: 28777933
  4. RINT-1 interacts with MSP58 and UBF within nucleoli and plays a role in ribosomal gene transcription. PMID: 27530925
  5. This study provides compelling evidence supporting the notion that HBx-elicited and c-Myc-mediated increases in UBF levels contribute to oncogenic progression in hepatic cells by boosting rDNA transcription and ribosome biogenesis. PMID: 25890091
  6. These results suggest that UBF can inhibit gene expression from viral DNA before its replication. PMID: 25965800
  7. Research has revealed a novel role for UBTF1 and UBTF2 in maintaining genome stability by coordinating the expression of highly transcribed Pol I (UBTF1 activity) and Pol II genes (UBTF2 activity). PMID: 25452314
  8. p14ARF fails to prevent E7-mediated UBF1 phosphorylation but may facilitate nucleolar pRb inactivation by targeting E7 to the nucleolus. PMID: 24798431
  9. PIP2 depletion reduces Pol I transcription. PMID: 23591814
  10. UBF is widely expressed in human multiple fetal tissues, and its expression level is very high in HL-60 cells. PMID: 21162312
  11. Downregulation of RUNX2 expression reduces the localization of HDAC1 to the nucleolar periphery and also decreases the association between HDAC1 and UBF. PMID: 22393235
  12. hALP binds the upstream binding factor (UBF) in vivo and in vitro. PMID: 21177859
  13. Depletion of upstream binding factor (UBF; an rRNA transcription factor) decreased the chromatin binding affinity of B23, leading to an increase in histone density at the r-chromatin. PMID: 20713446
  14. The three-dimensional solution structure of the first high mobility group (HMG) box domain in upstream binding factor has been determined by multidimensional NMR. PMID: 11969401
  15. Researchers have identified an interaction between UBF and TAF1, a factor involved in the transcription of cell cycle and growth regulatory genes. Coimmunoprecipitation and protein-protein interaction assays confirmed that TAF1 binds to UBF. PMID: 12498690
  16. The DNA binding affinity of UBF's fifth box domain (HMG box 5) has been found to be much weaker than that of the first HMG box domain (HMG box 1). PMID: 12590579
  17. Data show that both UBF1 and UBF2 activate RNA polymerase II-regulated, beta-catenin-responsive promoters. PMID: 12748295
  18. Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc activated transcription from the UBF promoter. PMID: 15282543
  19. Results suggest that extensive binding of UBF is responsible for the formation and maintenance of the secondary constriction at active NORs, and that UBF mediates the recruitment of the pol I machinery to nucleoli independently of promoter elements. PMID: 15598984
  20. Data suggest that the A state of human upstream binding factor HMG Box1 could represent a potential folding intermediate on the protein folding pathway. PMID: 15752694
  21. A potential protein-folding pathway is proposed for upstream binding factor HMG box 1 domain based on the early stages of its pH 2.1 unfolded state characterized by multidimensional heteronuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. PMID: 15924431
  22. SL1 directs preinitiation complex formation, functioning in core promoter binding, RNA polymerase I recruitment, and UBF stabilization. PMID: 15970593
  23. A model for CAST/hPAF49 function is proposed, in which the network of interactions of Pol I-specific subunits with UBF facilitates conformational changes of the polymerase, leading to stabilization of the Pol I-template complex and subsequent activation of transcription. PMID: 16809778
  24. UBF activates transcription in the transition between initiation and elongation, specifically during promoter escape by RNA polymerase I (Pol I). PMID: 16858408
  25. Upon overexpression of p14ARF, UBF was found to be hypophosphorylated, making it unable to efficiently recruit the transcription complex. These findings define a new p53-independent pathway that could regulate the cell cycle through the negative control of rRNA transcription. PMID: 16924243
  26. GdmCl-induced equilibrium unfolding transition of HMG box 5 of hUBF was monitored by both circular dichroism and fluorescence spectra. A cooperative two-state unfolding process was observed. PMID: 17260958
  27. Potential sites in hUBF HMG box 5 that may interact with the first bromodomain of TAF1 were proposed. PMID: 17505112
  28. Transcription factor UBF binds extensively across rDNA throughout the cell cycle, resulting in a specialized form of chromatin that is characteristic of active nucleolar organizer regions. PMID: 17699751
  29. Researchers observed a small but significant difference between the emerging daughter cells in the number of UBF-loaded NORs. PMID: 18502146
  30. Researchers propose that UBF is recruited to the replication compartments to facilitate the replication of HSV-1 DNA. PMID: 19088274
  31. The established differential localization of UBF in nucleoli of HeLa cells has functional significance. It reflects both the level of rRNA synthesis activities and the architectural role of UBF in nucleoli of these cells. PMID: 19393134
  32. These results suggest a fluid helix-turn-helix folding model of hUBF Box-5. PMID: 19452555
  33. The central repeated domain of treacle binds with RNA polymerase I, while the treacle C-terminus is involved in rDNA promoter recognition and UBF recruitment. PMID: 19527688

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 12511

OMIM: 600673

KEGG: hsa:7343

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000302640

UniGene: Hs.89781

Subcellular Location
Nucleus, nucleolus.

Q&A

What is the primary function of UBTF in cellular biology?

UBTF plays a crucial role in ribosomal RNA (rRNA) synthesis, nucleolar integrity, and cell survival. It functions by recognizing the ribosomal RNA gene promoter and activating transcription mediated by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) through cooperative interactions with the transcription factor SL1/TIF-IB complex. UBTF binds specifically to the upstream control element and can activate Pol I promoter escape . As a nucleolar protein containing nonspecific high-mobility group (HMG) boxes, it contributes to DNA bending, which is essential for proper transcriptional regulation .

What are the known isoforms of UBTF and how do they differ functionally?

UBTF has two primary isoforms: UBTF1 and UBTF2. UBTF1 is particularly important as it facilitates the recruitment of RNA polymerase I (Pol I) for ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription and is integral in ribosome biogenesis . While both isoforms share structural similarities, they have distinct functional roles in regulating ribosomal gene expression. UBTF1 is considered the more active isoform in promoting transcription and plays a more direct role in recruiting the transcriptional machinery to rDNA promoters .

How is UBTF post-translationally modified and what impact do these modifications have?

UBTF undergoes various post-translational modifications that regulate its activity. One significant modification is phosphorylation, which can be mediated by PIK3CA . This phosphorylation enhances UBTF's ability to bind DNA and promote transcription. The phosphorylation status of UBTF is dynamically regulated throughout the cell cycle and in response to various cellular stresses, allowing for precise control of ribosomal RNA synthesis under different physiological conditions .

What is the significance of UBTF tandem duplications (UBTF-TDs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)?

UBTF tandem duplications represent a recurrent alteration in both pediatric and adult AML that defines a distinct molecular subtype with specific genetic features and clinical outcomes. UBTF-TDs are significantly associated with trisomy 8, FLT3-internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD), and WT1 mutations . In pediatric AML, UBTF-TDs are linked to poor prognosis, while in adult AML they remain rare (approximately 1.2% of cases) but are enriched in younger patients (median age 41 years) and associated with MDS-related morphology and significantly lower hemoglobin and platelet levels .

What are the molecular characteristics of UBTF tandem duplications and how do they affect protein function?

UBTF-TDs show remarkable variability in size, ranging from 39 to more than 900 nucleotides. The most frequent duplications are 48 base pairs (n=18), 51 base pairs (n=10), and 54 base pairs (n=6), collectively accounting for 58% of all UBTF-TDs . All identified duplications lead to in-frame insertions within exon 13 of UBTF, with a common minimal duplicated region of 27 nucleotides shared by nearly all patients. At the amino acid level, this region encodes the leucine-rich ELLTRLA motif (Glu 436-Leu 437-Leu 438-Thr 439-Arg 440-Leu 441-Ala 442) in the HMG4 domain . These structural alterations likely affect the DNA-binding capacity of UBTF and its interaction with other transcription factors, potentially altering ribosomal RNA synthesis rates in leukemic cells.

How does the UBTF E210K mutation contribute to UBTF Neuroregression Syndrome (UNS)?

The recurrent de novo dominant mutation in UBTF (c.628G>A, p.Glu210Lys) located on chromosome 17 has been identified as the causative factor in UBTF Neuroregression Syndrome . At the cellular level, this variant results in increased pre-rRNA levels, DNA damage, and apoptosis in fibroblasts from affected individuals. These cellular disruptions are proposed to contribute to the delayed intellectual and behavioral development observed in UNS patients. The mutation occurs in the HMG-box 2 domain of UBTF, likely affecting its DNA-binding properties and subsequently disrupting normal nucleolar function and ribosome biogenesis critical for neuronal development and maintenance .

What techniques are most effective for detecting UBTF tandem duplications in clinical samples?

High-resolution fragment analysis has proven effective for detecting UBTF-TDs in large cohorts. In a study screening 4,247 newly diagnosed adult AML and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients, this technique successfully identified 52 cases with UBTF-TDs . For confirmation and detailed characterization of UBTF-TDs, researchers should consider employing:

  • PCR amplification of the exon 13 region followed by fragment analysis

  • Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) or targeted next-generation sequencing

  • Whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) to verify RNA transcripts, particularly for large duplications that may affect splicing

  • Sanger sequencing for precise determination of duplication boundaries

For instance, WTS was used to verify that a large 598 bp duplication spanning exons 12-14 led to an exon13-exon13 fused RNA transcript, confirming the in-frame nature of the insertion despite its size not being a multiple of three .

What experimental models are suitable for studying UBTF function and pathogenic variants?

Several experimental models can be employed to study UBTF function and its pathogenic variants:

  • Cell line models: Established leukemia cell lines can be modified using CRISPR-Cas9 to introduce UBTF-TDs or other mutations.

  • Patient-derived xenografts (PDX): AML samples from patients with UBTF-TDs can be transplanted into immunodeficient mice to study leukemia development and response to treatments.

  • Primary patient samples: Fibroblasts from UNS patients have been used to study the cellular consequences of the E210K mutation, revealing increased pre-rRNA levels, DNA damage, and apoptosis .

  • In vitro transcription assays: Recombinant UBTF proteins (wild-type and mutants) can be used in cell-free systems to assess their impact on RNA polymerase I activity.

  • Structural studies: Techniques such as X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy can provide insights into how mutations affect UBTF protein structure and DNA binding.

What are the recommended protocols for using recombinant UBTF in biochemical assays?

When using recombinant UBTF in biochemical assays, researchers should consider the following protocol recommendations:

  • Protein selection: Recombinant Human UBTF1 protein is available in various forms, including as fragments (e.g., aa 551-650) expressed in wheat germ or as full-length protein (aa 1-764) with N-terminal 10xHis-Sumo tags expressed in E. coli systems .

  • Storage and handling: Store at -20°C and avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles to maintain protein activity. For lyophilized preparations, reconstitution in appropriate buffers (typically Tris/PBS-based) is required .

  • Application-specific considerations:

    • For ELISA and Western blotting applications, protein purity should be >90% as determined by SDS-PAGE .

    • DNA-binding assays should account for UBTF's preference for ribosomal gene promoters.

    • Interaction studies with SL1/TIF-IB complex components require carefully controlled buffer conditions.

  • Controls: Include wild-type UBTF alongside mutant variants for comparative analyses, particularly when studying the effects of tandem duplications or point mutations.

How does the presence of UBTF-TDs influence treatment response and outcomes in AML patients?

What is the spectrum of neurological manifestations in UBTF Neuroregression Syndrome?

UBTF Neuroregression Syndrome (UNS) presents with a complex spectrum of neurological manifestations that typically emerge between ages 2-4 years, though later childhood onset has been reported . The clinical presentation includes:

How can the genetics of UBTF alterations be integrated into diagnostic algorithms for AML and neurological disorders?

Integration of UBTF alterations into diagnostic algorithms requires different approaches for AML and neurological disorders:

For AML:

  • Screen for UBTF-TDs in younger AML patients, particularly those with:

    • MDS-related morphology

    • Trisomy 8

    • FLT3-ITD mutations

    • WT1 mutations

    • No other identified driver mutations

  • Utilize high-resolution fragment analysis as an initial screening method, followed by confirmatory sequencing for positive cases.

  • Incorporate UBTF-TD status into risk stratification models, particularly for patients currently classified as intermediate risk by ELN 2022 criteria.

For Neurological Disorders:

  • Consider UBTF genetic testing for children presenting with:

    • Developmental regression between ages 2-4 years

    • Speech and language difficulties

    • Gait ataxia and hypotonia

    • Behavioral changes (hyperactivity, impulsivity, repetitive behaviors)

  • The only diagnostic criterion for UBTF Neuroregression Syndrome currently is the presence of a pathogenic UBTF variant in HMG-box 2, specifically the c.628G>A (p.Glu210Lys) mutation .

  • Rule out other neurological causes before proceeding to genetic testing for UBTF variants.

What are the potential therapeutic targets based on UBTF dysfunction in AML and neurological disorders?

Understanding UBTF dysfunction opens several avenues for targeted therapeutic approaches:

For AML with UBTF-TDs:

  • Targeting ribosome biogenesis pathways, as UBTF alterations may lead to dysregulated rRNA synthesis

  • Developing specific inhibitors for the downstream effectors activated by UBTF-TDs

  • Exploring synthetic lethal interactions with other commonly co-occurring mutations (FLT3-ITD, WT1)

  • Considering more intensive treatment approaches given the poorer response to standard chemotherapy

For UBTF Neuroregression Syndrome:

  • Addressing increased pre-rRNA levels and associated cellular stress

  • Developing neuroprotective strategies to mitigate DNA damage and apoptosis in neurons

  • Testing approaches to modulate nucleolar function and ribosome biogenesis

  • Exploring targeted therapies to address specific neurological symptoms (seizures, behavioral manifestations)

How might single-cell technologies advance our understanding of UBTF function in normal development and disease?

Single-cell technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to understand UBTF function:

  • Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) could reveal cell type-specific effects of UBTF alterations in:

    • Hematopoietic differentiation in normal and leukemic cells

    • Neuronal development and function in UNS models

  • Single-cell ATAC-seq could identify changes in chromatin accessibility at ribosomal DNA loci and other UBTF targets.

  • Spatial transcriptomics could map the regional distribution of UBTF expression and activity in:

    • Bone marrow niches in normal and leukemic conditions

    • Brain regions affected in UNS, correlating with neurological symptoms

  • CUT&Tag or CUT&RUN approaches could precisely map UBTF binding sites genome-wide in different cell types and disease states.

These technologies would help elucidate how UBTF alterations affect cellular heterogeneity and identify potential therapeutic vulnerabilities in subpopulations of cells.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.