GPR141 demonstrates a tissue-specific expression pattern primarily concentrated in cells of the immune system. Recent research indicates high GPR141 messenger RNA levels are expressed predominantly in myeloid-lineage cells, including:
Neutrophils (CD11b+ Gr1+)
Monocytes (CD11b+ Gr1-Ly6C+ and CD11b+ Gr1-Ly6C-)
Macrophages (F4/80+)
This expression profile suggests specialized functions in immune regulation and potential involvement in inflammatory or immune response pathways. Interestingly, beyond the immune system, aberrant expression of GPR141 has been identified in different breast cancer subtypes, with particularly high alteration frequency observed in breast invasive mixed mucinous carcinoma (4% altered out of 25 cases) and breast invasive ductal carcinoma (2.23% in 1660 cases) .
Multiple experimental systems and reagents are available for investigating GPR141:
Genetic Models:
Gpr141-/- knockout mice have been independently generated and used to study the role of GPR141 in immune responses and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
siRNA-mediated knockdown of GPR141 in cancer cell lines (e.g., ZR-75-1 cells) has been employed to assess its role in proliferation and migration
Expression Systems:
For recombinant protein production, various expression systems have been validated:
| Expression System | Source | Application |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli | Bacterial expression | Structural studies, antibody production |
| Yeast | Eukaryotic expression | Post-translational modifications |
| Baculovirus | Insect cell expression | Functional studies |
| Mammalian cells (HEK293T) | Human cell expression | Native conformation studies |
Plasmid Resources:
GPR141-Tango plasmid (#66318) available through Addgene for PRESTO-Tango assays to study GPCR activation via arrestin translocation
Reagents:
Commercial antibodies (unconjugated, HRP-conjugated, FITC-conjugated, biotin-conjugated) for detection of human GPR141
Recombinant proteins (full-length and partial) for both human and mouse GPR141
Recent research has demonstrated that GPR141 functions as a negative regulator of immune responses by controlling the functions of monocytes and dendritic cells. In an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model, which mimics aspects of multiple sclerosis, GPR141 plays a significant immunomodulatory role.
Key findings from studies with Gpr141-/- mice include:
These findings collectively suggest that targeting GPR141 may represent a potential therapeutic approach for modulating chronic inflammatory diseases through its effects on myeloid cell function and subsequent T cell activation.
Recent studies have identified a previously unknown role for GPR141 in cancer biology, particularly in breast cancer. Increased GPR141 expression has been associated with enhanced migratory behavior and tumor growth through several mechanisms:
Correlation with poor prognosis: Aberrant expression of GPR141 in different breast cancer subtypes corresponds with poorer clinical outcomes
Effects on epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT): GPR141 overexpression stimulates migration through:
Impact on cell cycle progression: GPR141 overexpression leads to:
Molecular mechanism involving p-mTOR/p53 axis:
GPR141 promotes breast cancer cell tumorigenesis via the p-mTOR/p53 pathway
Increased activation of p-mTOR1 and reduced p53 expression levels
E3 ubiquitin ligase Cullin1 partly mediates p53 degradation via proteasomal pathway
Phosphorylated form of 40S ribosome protein S6 (ps6, a p-mTOR1 substrate) forms a complex with Cullin1
Reversal of effects through GPR141 silencing:
These findings suggest that modulating GPR141 expression could provide a novel therapeutic approach for regulating breast cancer progression and metastasis.
p-mTOR/p53 Pathway:
GPR141 overexpression increases activation of p-mTOR1 while reducing p53 expression
Treatment with rapamycin (p-mTOR1 inhibitor) restores p53 expression in GPR141 overexpressed cells
This suggests GPR141 promotes cancer cell proliferation through p53 degradation mediated by Cullin1 interaction and elevated p-mTOR1 levels
EMT Signaling:
Cell Cycle Regulation:
Immune Signaling in Myeloid Cells:
The identification of these pathways provides potential targets for therapeutic intervention in conditions where GPR141 signaling is dysregulated, such as in cancer or inflammatory diseases.
Multiple expression systems have been successfully employed for producing recombinant GPR141, each with distinct advantages depending on the intended application:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Best Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, simple culture conditions | Limited post-translational modifications, potential improper folding of transmembrane domains | Antigen production for antibody generation, partial protein domains |
| Yeast | Eukaryotic post-translational modifications, higher yields than mammalian systems | Glycosylation patterns differ from mammalian cells | Functional studies requiring basic post-translational modifications |
| Baculovirus/Insect cells | Better protein folding for complex proteins, moderate yields | More complex than bacterial systems | Structural studies, protein-protein interaction studies |
| Mammalian cells (HEK293T) | Native-like post-translational modifications, proper folding | Lower yields, higher cost, more complex manipulation | Functional studies requiring authentic human modifications |
For GPR141 specifically, commercially available recombinant proteins have been produced in several systems:
E. coli expression: Utilized for producing both full-length and partial GPR141 proteins with His-tags
Mammalian expression: HEK293T cells used to produce GPR141 with tags such as C-Myc/DDK
For optimal results in structural studies, insect cell or mammalian expression systems are generally preferred for full-length GPR141 due to the complex transmembrane topology of GPCRs.
When studying the effects of GPR141 deletion or suppression, a comprehensive validation approach is essential. Based on published research methodologies, the following techniques have proven effective:
1. Molecular Validation:
Western blotting: To confirm reduction in GPR141 protein expression
Genomic PCR: For confirmation of gene targeting in knockout models
2. Functional Validation Assays:
For Cancer Cell Studies:
Colony formation assay: To assess proliferative capacity
Cell viability assay: MTT or similar assays to measure metabolic activity
Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry: To evaluate cell cycle progression
Transwell migration assay: To assess migratory capacity
For Immune Cell Studies:
Cytokine production measurement: ELISA or flow cytometry-based detection of IFN-γ, IL-17A, IL-6
Immune cell infiltration analysis: Flow cytometry to assess cell populations in tissues
T cell activation assays: Co-culture of GPR141-deficient dendritic cells with antigen-specific T cells
3. Signaling Pathway Analysis:
Phosphorylation status of mTOR pathway components: Western blotting for p-mTOR and downstream targets like phosphorylated S6
p53 expression and downstream targets: Analysis of p21, p27 levels
4. In vivo Validation:
Disease models: Such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis for immune function studies
Xenograft tumor models: For cancer-related studies
A comprehensive validation approach using multiple techniques provides more robust evidence for GPR141's role in the biological process under investigation.
As an orphan receptor, identifying the endogenous ligand(s) for GPR141 represents a significant research challenge. Several complementary approaches can be employed:
1. Computational Methods:
Homology modeling based on structurally characterized GPCRs
Virtual screening of compound libraries targeting the predicted ligand-binding domain
Phylogenetic analysis to identify related receptors with known ligands as starting points
2. High-throughput Screening Platforms:
PRESTO-Tango system: The GPR141-Tango plasmid (available through Addgene, #66318) enables screening via a transcriptional output following arrestin translocation
Calcium mobilization assays: Using GPR141-expressing cells loaded with calcium-sensitive dyes
GTPγS binding assays: To measure G protein activation upon receptor stimulation
β-arrestin recruitment assays: Using enzyme complementation or BRET-based approaches
3. Tissue/Cell-Specific Approaches:
Extraction and fractionation of bioactive components from tissues with high GPR141 expression (myeloid cells)
Testing supernatants from activated immune cells on GPR141-expressing reporter cells
Screening cytokines and chemokines relevant to myeloid cell function
4. Candidate-Based Testing:
Based on GPR141's role in immune regulation, testing known immunomodulatory molecules
Given its expression in myeloid cells, examining myeloid cell-derived factors
Testing molecules involved in the p-mTOR/p53 pathway given its downstream effects
5. Validation Approaches:
Dose-response relationships for candidate ligands
Competition binding assays
Functional selectivity (biased signaling) assessment
Knockout/knockdown studies to confirm specificity
The identification of GPR141's endogenous ligand(s) would significantly advance our understanding of its physiological role and potentially open new therapeutic avenues for inflammatory diseases and cancer.
Based on recent publications, several effective methodological approaches have been established for investigating GPR141's immunoregulatory functions:
1. In Vivo Disease Models:
Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE): A well-established model for multiple sclerosis that has successfully revealed GPR141's role in regulating neuroinflammation
Other potential disease models:
Collagen-induced arthritis for studying autoimmune joint inflammation
DSS-induced colitis for intestinal inflammation
LPS challenge for acute inflammatory responses
2. Ex Vivo Cellular Assays:
Antigen-specific T cell stimulation: Co-culture of GPR141-deficient dendritic cells with antigen-specific T cells to measure:
Myeloid cell functional assays:
Phagocytosis capacity of neutrophils and macrophages
Oxidative burst activity
Cytokine/chemokine production profiles
Migration and chemotaxis assays
3. Cell-Type Specific Analysis:
Flow cytometry panels for detailed immune profiling:
4. Molecular and Signaling Analysis:
Transcriptomics: RNA-seq of isolated immune cell populations from wild-type vs. GPR141-deficient animals
Proteomics: Phosphoproteomic analysis to identify signaling pathways affected by GPR141 deficiency
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): To identify transcriptional targets regulated by GPR141 signaling
5. Human Translational Studies:
Analysis of GPR141 expression in patient samples from autoimmune diseases
Correlation of expression levels with disease severity or therapeutic response
Ex vivo studies using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells
These methodological approaches provide a comprehensive framework for investigating GPR141's role in immune regulation and identifying potential therapeutic applications.
GPCRs, including GPR141, present several unique challenges for expression and purification:
1. Membrane Protein Expression Issues:
Low expression levels: GPCRs often express poorly compared to soluble proteins
Toxicity to host cells: Overexpression can disrupt membrane integrity
Improper folding: The complex transmembrane topology requires specialized folding machinery
Solutions:
Use of specialized expression vectors with inducible promoters
Codon optimization for the expression host
Fusion tags that enhance expression (e.g., BRIL, T4 lysozyme)
Expression as truncated constructs focusing on specific domains
2. Purification Challenges:
Detergent selection: Critical for maintaining protein stability and function
Lipid requirements: Many GPCRs require specific lipids for stability
Protein instability: GPCRs often rapidly denature once removed from the membrane
Solutions:
Screening multiple detergents and lipid combinations
Use of lipid nanodiscs or other membrane mimetics
Addition of stabilizing ligands during purification
3. Functional Validation Difficulties:
Lack of known ligands: As an orphan receptor, functional validation is complicated
Complex signaling outputs: GPCRs can couple to multiple G proteins and other effectors
Solutions:
Use of constitutive activity assays
Arrestin recruitment assays that don't require ligand binding
4. Specific Recommendations for GPR141:
Based on commercial products, E. coli expression has been successful for producing partial constructs (e.g., amino acids 153-183)
Full-length GPR141 (1-305 aa) has been successfully expressed in both E. coli and mammalian systems
For functional studies, HEK293T expression appears most effective
Reconstitution buffer recommendations: Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0
When designing experiments to investigate GPR141 in disease models, several key considerations can enhance the quality and translational value of the research:
1. Model Selection and Validation:
Choose appropriate disease models based on GPR141 expression patterns:
Validate model relevance:
Confirm GPR141 expression in relevant tissues/cells in the chosen model
Compare expression patterns between human disease and animal model
2. Controls and Experimental Design:
Use multiple control groups:
Wild-type littermates as genetic controls
Sham or vehicle-treated controls for intervention studies
Consider both positive and negative controls for pharmacological studies
Statistical considerations:
Perform power calculations to determine appropriate sample sizes
Plan for stratified randomization when appropriate
Consider blinded assessment of outcomes
3. Phenotypic Analysis:
Multi-parameter assessment:
Clinical scoring systems appropriate to the disease model
Histopathological evaluation with quantitative scoring
Molecular and cellular analyses (flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, etc.)
Temporal dynamics:
Assess outcomes at multiple time points
Consider both acute and chronic phases of disease
4. Molecular Mechanisms:
Pathway analysis:
Rescue experiments:
5. Translational Considerations:
Correlate with human data when possible:
Expression of GPR141 in human disease samples
Genetic association studies (SNPs, expression QTLs)
Consider therapeutic implications:
Test potential interventions targeting GPR141 or its downstream pathways
Evaluate biomarkers that could predict response to such interventions
By incorporating these considerations into experimental design, researchers can enhance the rigor and translational potential of studies investigating GPR141's role in disease processes.
Based on recent findings and current gaps in knowledge, several promising research directions for GPR141 warrant further investigation:
1. Therapeutic Development:
Immune modulation: Since GPR141 functions as a negative regulator of immune responses, developing agonists could potentially treat inflammatory and autoimmune conditions
Cancer therapeutics: As GPR141 promotes breast cancer progression, antagonists or silencing strategies might represent novel anti-cancer approaches
2. Ligand Discovery:
Using modern high-throughput screening approaches and the PRESTO-Tango system to identify the endogenous ligand(s) for this orphan receptor
Investigating whether GPR141 functions constitutively or requires specific activating signals in different cell types
3. Signaling Network Mapping:
Comprehensive characterization of GPR141 coupling preferences to different G protein subtypes
Identification of the complete set of downstream effectors and signaling pathways in different cell types
Understanding the interplay between GPR141 and other myeloid cell receptors
4. Structural Biology:
Determination of GPR141's three-dimensional structure through crystallography or cryo-EM
Structure-based design of selective modulators
Investigation of potential dimerization or oligomerization behaviors
5. Expanded Disease Relevance:
Beyond EAE and breast cancer, exploring GPR141's role in other inflammatory conditions and cancer types
Investigating potential functions in metabolic diseases given the importance of GPCRs in metabolic regulation
Examining possible roles in infectious diseases, particularly those involving myeloid cell responses
6. Translational Research:
Development of biomarkers based on GPR141 expression or activity
Patient stratification strategies for potential GPR141-targeting therapeutics
Investigation of GPR141 polymorphisms and their association with disease susceptibility or progression
These emerging areas represent significant opportunities for advancing our understanding of GPR141 biology and developing novel therapeutic approaches for conditions involving dysregulated immune responses or aberrant cell proliferation.
The integration of GPR141 research with other scientific disciplines offers promising opportunities for more comprehensive insights:
1. Systems Biology Integration:
Network analysis incorporating GPR141 into broader signaling networks
Multi-omics approaches (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) to understand GPR141's position in cellular systems
Mathematical modeling of GPR141-mediated pathways to predict responses to perturbations
2. Immunology and Cancer Biology Interface:
Exploration of GPR141's dual roles in immune regulation and cancer progression
Investigation of GPR141's effects on tumor microenvironment and immune evasion
Potential development of immunotherapeutic approaches targeting GPR141
3. Computational Biology and Artificial Intelligence:
Machine learning approaches to predict GPR141 ligands based on structural modeling
Network inference algorithms to identify hidden connections between GPR141 and other cellular systems
Virtual screening for GPR141 modulators with desired functional profiles
4. Precision Medicine Applications:
Development of GPR141 expression signatures as biomarkers for disease stratification
Pharmacogenomic studies to identify genetic variants affecting response to potential GPR141-targeting therapies
Integration of GPR141 data into clinical decision support systems
5. Drug Delivery and Medicinal Chemistry:
Design of selective GPR141 modulators with optimal pharmacokinetic properties
Development of targeted delivery systems for GPR141-modulating compounds to specific cell types
Exploration of biased ligands that selectively activate beneficial signaling pathways
6. Evolutionary Biology:
Comparative analysis of GPR141 across species to understand evolutionary conservation and divergence
Identification of species-specific differences in function that might inform translational research
Understanding of how GPR141's role evolved in immune regulation
By fostering collaborations across these disciplines, researchers can develop more comprehensive approaches to understanding GPR141's biology and leveraging this knowledge for therapeutic development.