Proline/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 1 (PSRC1) is a microtubule-associated protein regulated by p53 transcription. The protein contains distinct functional domains with unique properties:
The C-terminal domain binds to the mitotic spindle
The regulatory N-terminal domain controls the C-terminal domain's ability to bind to microtubules
The N-terminal domain determines the cellular activity of the PSRC1 protein
PSRC1's promoter contains a putative p53-binding motif that is responsible for p53-mediated gene suppression, establishing an important regulatory relationship between p53 and PSRC1 expression .
PSRC1 demonstrates significant differential expression between normal and cancerous tissues, particularly in lung cancer. Based on comprehensive analysis:
PSRC1 expression is significantly higher in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) tissues compared to normal lung tissues
Similar elevated expression is observed in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC)
This elevated expression pattern has been consistently verified in multiple datasets, including The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)
Immunohistochemical validation in 150 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma confirmed these expression differences
Besides lung cancer, PSRC1 has been found to be overexpressed in colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and oral squamous cell carcinoma, suggesting its broad involvement in various cancers .
For accurate and reproducible assessment of PSRC1 expression in tissue samples, researchers should employ a standardized semi-quantitative scoring system:
| Parameter | Score | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Staining Intensity | 0 | Negative staining |
| 1 | Mild staining | |
| 2 | Moderate staining | |
| 3 | Strong staining | |
| Percentage of Immunopositive Cells | 0 | 0% |
| 1 | 1-25% | |
| 2 | 26-50% | |
| 3 | 51-75% | |
| 4 | 76-100% |
The final score is calculated by multiplying the staining intensity by the percentage of stained cells, yielding a range of 0-12. For analytical purposes, scores can be categorized as:
Evaluation should be performed under 400× optical microscopy by independent pathologists with appropriate positive and negative controls run in parallel .
For experimental investigations requiring recombinant PSRC1, researchers can employ the following production method:
Use an E. coli expression system for recombinant production
Express the target gene encoding E2-T215
Add a His tag at the C-terminus for purification purposes
This approach enables the generation of pure recombinant PSRC1 protein suitable for functional studies, antibody production, and protein-protein interaction analyses .
When investigating PSRC1 function, researchers should address several methodological challenges:
Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of PSRC1 on cellular phenotypes
Controlling for p53 status in experimental models since PSRC1 is regulated by p53
Accounting for tissue-specific expression patterns and functions
Developing appropriate knockout or knockdown models that avoid compensatory mechanisms
Establishing physiologically relevant experimental conditions that recapitulate in vivo environments
Addressing these challenges requires careful experimental design with appropriate controls and validation across multiple experimental systems.
Effective investigation of PSRC1's role in cancer progression requires robust experimental design that establishes causal relationships. Based on best practices in experimental design:
Variable Definition and Control:
True Experimental Design Implementation:
In vitro Functional Studies:
PSRC1 gene silencing via siRNA or CRISPR-Cas9
Overexpression using expression vectors with standardized promoters
Rescue experiments to confirm specificity of observed phenotypes
In vivo Model Systems:
Xenograft models with modulated PSRC1 expression
Patient-derived xenografts to preserve tumor heterogeneity
Genetically engineered mouse models when appropriate
This systematic approach allows for rigorous testing of hypotheses about PSRC1's mechanistic roles in cancer progression while minimizing experimental bias and confounding factors .
PSRC1 expression demonstrates significant correlations with clinical outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), offering valuable prognostic information:
T1/T2 stage (p = 0.013)
N0 stage (p = 0.03)
M0 stage (p = 0.012)
Pathological stages I/II/III (p = 0.005)
Patients aged >65 years (p = 0.003)
Interestingly, these prognostic correlations were specific to LUAD and were not observed in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), highlighting the importance of tumor-type specificity in PSRC1 research .
For comprehensive analysis of PSRC1-associated gene networks, researchers should implement the following bioinformatic approaches:
Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA):
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA):
Functional Annotation:
Visualization Techniques:
Generate volcano plots and heat maps to visualize differential expression
Network graphs to display protein-protein interactions
Enrichment plots to demonstrate pathway activation or suppression
These approaches enable researchers to uncover the biological mechanisms through which PSRC1 influences cancer development and progression, potentially revealing novel therapeutic targets.
To investigate PSRC1's relationship with immune infiltration in the tumor microenvironment, researchers should implement the following methodological approach:
Single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA):
Immunoinfiltration Analysis Pipeline:
Validation Approaches:
Multiplex immunohistochemistry on tissue sections
Flow cytometry analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Spatial transcriptomics to preserve information about cellular locations
Functional Validation:
Co-culture experiments with immune cells and cancer cells with modulated PSRC1 expression
Cytokine profiling to assess immune regulatory effects
In vivo models with immune-competent animals
This multifaceted approach can reveal how PSRC1 expression influences the immune landscape within tumors, potentially informing immunotherapy strategies for patients with PSRC1-overexpressing cancers.
When evaluating PSRC1 as a prognostic biomarker, researchers should address several critical methodological considerations:
Patient Cohort Selection:
Expression Analysis Methods:
Statistical Analysis Approach:
Validation Strategies:
Internal validation with bootstrapping or cross-validation
External validation in independent patient cohorts
Prospective validation when possible
Comparative analysis with established prognostic markers
Reporting Standards:
Adhere to REMARK (REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies) guidelines
Report hazard ratios with confidence intervals
Disclose all tested hypotheses to address multiple testing issues
Provide detailed methodological descriptions for reproducibility
Implementing these considerations ensures robust assessment of PSRC1 as a prognostic biomarker, potentially leading to its clinical application in patient stratification and treatment decision-making.