Recombinant Human Sal-like protein 1 (SALL1), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Production and Quality Control

Recombinant SALL1 is synthesized using codon-optimized DNA sequences cloned into expression vectors.

  • Expression Hosts:

    • E. coli: Cost-effective for large-scale production but lacks post-translational modifications .

    • Mammalian cells: Suitable for producing natively folded proteins but with lower yields .

  • Purification: Affinity chromatography using His-tag or Flag-tag systems ensures high specificity .

  • Stability: Stable for 12 months at ≤−70°C with minimized freeze-thaw cycles .

Zinc Finger Domains

SALL1 contains C2H2-type zinc finger motifs critical for DNA binding. Studies show:

  • The 7th–10th C-terminal zinc fingers bind A/T-rich sequences in pericentric heterochromatin, mediating nuclear localization .

  • Subregions (e.g., CNE3) regulate tissue-specific enhancer activity, particularly in prosencephalon development .

Developmental Roles

  • Kidney Morphogenesis: SALL1 directs ureteric bud invasion in metanephric mesenchyme, with knockout models showing renal agenesis .

  • Neural Patterning: A 443 bp conserved noncoding element (CNE) near SALL1 acts as a forebrain-specific enhancer in chick embryos .

Applications in Research

  • Mechanistic Studies: Used to explore SALL1’s interaction with heterochromatin and transcriptional targets .

  • Disease Modeling: Facilitates functional assays for Townes-Brocks syndrome, linked to SALL1 haploinsufficiency .

  • Protein-Protein Interaction: Tagged variants enable pull-down assays to identify binding partners .

Research Limitations

  • Partial Sequence: Truncated forms may lack full-length functional domains, necessitating validation against endogenous SALL1 .

  • Post-Translational Modifications: E. coli-derived protein lacks mammalian-specific modifications, limiting某些生理 relevance .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have a specific format requirement, please include it in your order notes. We will prepare your order accordingly.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery time information.
Note: Our proteins are typically shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance, as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents are at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration between 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard final concentration of glycerol is 50%, which can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, storage temperature, and the protein's intrinsic stability.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is essential for multiple use. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
HSal1; Sal like protein 1; Sal-1; Sal-like protein 1; Sal1; SALL1; SALL1_HUMAN; Spalt-like transcription factor 1; TBS; Zinc finger protein 794; Zinc finger protein SALL1; Zinc finger protein Spalt-1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Homo sapiens (Human)
Target Names
SALL1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Sal-like protein 1 (SALL1) is a transcriptional repressor involved in organogenesis. It plays a crucial role in ureteric bud invasion during kidney development.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. SALL1 mutations may cause Townes-Brocks Syndrome. PMID: 29395072
  2. Inhibition of SALL1 is correlated with reduced levels of CDH1, a key contributor to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. PMID: 24292671
  3. The quantity and quality of SALL1 transcripts are important for SALL1 function and determine the phenotype and mode of inheritance of allelic SALL1-related disorders. PMID: 23069192
  4. A report describes a family with features of Townes-Brocks Syndrome (TBS) in which a novel 149 kb deletion spanning the SALL1 gene was identified using high-resolution cytogenetics SNP microarray. PMID: 22308078
  5. Sall1 has been identified as a novel component of the transcriptional network that regulates stem cell pluripotency. PMID: 21062744
  6. Sall1 induces angiogenesis by stimulating VEGF-A promoter activity. PMID: 19942929
  7. Mutations in SALL1 are associated with Townes-Brocks Syndrome. The protein is a transcriptional repressor that interacts with TRF1/PIN2 and localizes to pericentromeric heterochromatin. PMID: 11751684
  8. Binding of proteins SALL1, UBE2I, and SUMO-1 has been reported. PMID: 12200128
  9. Sall1 enhances the canonical Wnt signaling pathway by localizing to heterochromatin. PMID: 15158448
  10. Analysis of SALL1 mutations in Townes-Brocks Syndrome. PMID: 16088922
  11. Sall1 is essential for ureteric bud invasion, the initial key step in metanephros development. PMID: 16221172
  12. There is a distinct contribution of SALL1 gene function to mouse and human embryonic development. PMID: 16429401
  13. Data demonstrate that SALL1 contains two repression domains, one located at the extreme N-terminus of the protein and the other in the central region. PMID: 16443351
  14. SALL1 is a potential target gene for SIX1 during kidney development. PMID: 16670092
  15. An enhancer element is present within the SALL1 gene. PMID: 17426652
  16. The SALL1 gene, mutations of which result in the Townes-Brocks phenotype, is expressed in the developing kidney. PMID: 17910067
  17. SALL1 and GLI3 may play roles in limb malformation and are affected by nonsense-mediated decay. PMID: 18000979
  18. An analysis of one sporadic case of Townes-Brocks syndrome for SALL1 gene mutations and a review of the relevant literature. PMID: 18280297
  19. A truncated SALL1 protein is expressed in cells derived from a TBS patient. PMID: 18470945
  20. This case highlights the importance of examining all children with Townes-Brocks Syndrome (TBS) for ophthalmic abnormalities. PMID: 19005989
  21. Familial transmission of Goldenhar syndrome is not attributed to mutations in SALL1. PMID: 19213029

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 10524

OMIM: 107480

KEGG: hsa:6299

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000251020

UniGene: Hs.135787

Involvement In Disease
Townes-Brocks syndrome 1 (TBS1)
Protein Families
Sal C2H2-type zinc-finger protein family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Highest levels in kidney. Lower levels in adult brain (enriched in corpus callosum, lower expression in substantia nigra) and liver.

Q&A

What is SALL1 and what are its primary biological functions?

SALL1 is a transcription factor belonging to the Spalt-like (SALL) family, with four homologs (SALL1-4) identified in both humans and mice . It functions as a critical regulator of organogenesis and cellular identity, particularly in the developing central nervous system (CNS) . SALL1 plays an essential role in neural tube closure during embryonic development, as demonstrated in knockout mouse models .

Importantly, SALL1 serves as a highly specific marker and functional regulator of microglia identity, being exclusively expressed by microglia within the hematopoietic system and adult CNS . Unlike other microglial markers, SALL1 is the first to specifically identify bona fide microglia and distinguish them from CNS-infiltrating monocytes in meninges or perivascular areas . SALL1 acts as both a transcriptional activator and repressor in microglial cells, enforcing microglia-specific gene expression patterns .

How is SALL1 expression regulated in cellular contexts?

SALL1 expression is tightly regulated through a complex transcriptional network. In microglia, SALL1 expression is controlled by a microglia-specific super-enhancer (SE) . The TGFβ-SMAD signaling pathway plays a crucial role in this regulation, with SMAD4 binding directly to the SALL1 super-enhancer to drive its expression . This regulatory mechanism appears to be evolutionarily conserved, as TGFβ and SMAD homologs (Dpp and Mad, respectively) are required for cell-specific expression of Spalt in Drosophila wing development .

The pioneer transcription factor PU.1 is essential for establishing chromatin accessibility at SALL1 regulatory elements, as evidenced by the presence of PU.1 binding motifs in a high fraction of SALL1 peaks identified by ChIP-seq analysis . This hierarchical transcription factor network ensures the cell-type specific expression of SALL1 in microglia.

What are the optimal conditions for expression and purification of recombinant SALL1?

Recombinant human SALL1 protein can be successfully expressed using mammalian expression systems. The protocol typically involves:

  • Construct design: A DNA sequence encoding human SALL1 is cloned into an appropriate expression vector, often including an epitope tag (such as Flag) for purification and detection .

  • Host selection: Mammalian expression systems are preferred for proper folding and post-translational modifications of SALL1 .

  • Purification: Affinity chromatography using the epitope tag, followed by additional purification steps as needed.

  • Quality control: SDS-PAGE analysis to confirm purity, typically aiming for >90% purity .

  • Storage: The purified protein is optimally stored in Tris-based buffer containing 50% glycerol to maintain stability .

The choice of expression system and purification strategy should be tailored to the specific research application, considering factors such as protein folding requirements, functional activity, and downstream applications.

How can SALL1 binding sites be identified genome-wide?

Genome-wide identification of SALL1 binding sites typically employs chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq). The methodology includes:

  • Chromatin preparation from microglia or other SALL1-expressing cells.

  • Immunoprecipitation using validated SALL1-specific antibodies.

  • Sequencing library preparation and next-generation sequencing.

  • Computational analysis to identify binding peaks and associated genomic features.

Advanced analytical approaches can enhance the identification of authentic binding sites:

  • Machine learning frameworks such as DeepSTARR can be applied to derive nucleotide contribution scores for specific DNA elements using DeepLIFT, revealing SALL1 binding preferences for AT-rich sequences containing TATT motifs along with nearby clusters corresponding to motifs recognized by PU.1, C/EBP, and SMAD factors .

  • Comparative genetic approaches analyzing strain-specific SALL1 binding patterns (as demonstrated with C57BL/6J, PWK, and SPRET mice) can identify over 40,000 strain-specific peaks, allowing systematic interrogation of motif mutations using tools like MAGGIE to prioritize motifs contributing to differential binding .

These approaches have revealed that SALL1 preferentially binds to regions containing the MEF recognition motif with an AATA core sequence .

What genetic approaches are effective for studying SALL1 function in vivo?

Several genetic strategies have proven effective for investigating SALL1 function:

  • Conventional knockout models: Complete deletion of Sall1 in mice has revealed its essential role in neural tube closure . Various genetic backgrounds (129SV/J-DBA/2, 129SV/J-NZW, and 129SV/J-CD1) have been used to study strain-specific effects of Sall1 deficiency .

  • Cell-type specific targeting: The Sall1 locus can be exploited for inducible gene targeting specifically in microglia of adult mice, achieving highly efficient recombination under steady-state conditions . This approach allows for:

    • Temporal control of gene deletion

    • Cell-type specificity in targeting only microglia

    • High efficiency of recombination

  • Enhancer knockout (EKO) models: Disruption of the microglia-specific super-enhancer results in selective loss of Sall1 expression in microglia, enabling investigation of enhancer-dependent regulation .

  • Point mutation models: Introduction of specific mutations (such as those identified in human disorders) can elucidate structure-function relationships and disease mechanisms .

These genetic approaches provide complementary insights into SALL1 function across different biological contexts.

How does SALL1 coordinate with other transcription factors to regulate microglia identity?

SALL1 functions within a complex transcriptional network to establish and maintain microglia identity through several mechanisms:

  • Functional interaction with SMAD signaling: SALL1 and SMAD4 exhibit a bidirectional regulatory relationship where:

    • SMAD4 binds to the Sall1 super-enhancer and is required for Sall1 expression

    • SALL1 in turn promotes binding and function of SMAD4 at microglia-specific enhancers

    • SALL1 simultaneously suppresses inappropriate binding of SMAD4 to enhancers of genes that could disrupt microglia identity

  • Cooperation with pioneer factors: PU.1 functions as an essential pioneer transcription factor required for SALL1 binding, evidenced by the significant association between PU.1 motif mutations and differential SALL1 binding across mouse strains .

  • Dual activator/repressor functions: SALL1 acts as both a transcriptional activator and repressor, with genome-wide binding analysis and enhancer knockout models demonstrating its role in maintaining the microglia-specific transcriptional program .

  • Dependency on CSF-1R signaling: SALL1-expressing microglia depend on macrophage colony stimulating factor receptor (Csf-1R) signaling for their development and maintenance in the adult CNS .

This coordinated transcriptional regulation ensures precise control of microglia-specific gene expression and functional identity.

What are the molecular mechanisms of SALL1 mutations in human disorders?

Mutations in SALL1 are associated with Townes-Brocks syndrome (TBS), a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by multiple congenital anomalies. The molecular mechanisms of SALL1 mutations include:

  • Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD): Nonsense mutations in SALL1 can trigger NMD, a quality control mechanism that degrades mRNAs containing premature termination codons. For example:

    • The c.3175 C>T (p.Q1059X) variant shows ~75% reduction in protein expression compared to wild type

    • The c.3160 C>T (p.R1054*) variant produces a mutant transcript constituting only 43% of normal transcript levels, suggesting partial NMD

  • Truncated protein effects: Different mutations produce truncated SALL1 proteins with distinct functional characteristics:

    • The c.3175 C>T (p.Q1059X) variant results in a protein lacking the fourth double zinc finger and beta-catenin binding domains

    • The c.694 C>T (p.Q232X) variant causes a substantial reduction in molecular weight (~140 kDa) but leads to a significant increase in expression level by approximately 220% relative to wild type

  • Altered subcellular localization: While wild-type SALL1 is primarily nuclear, mutant proteins (c.3175 C>T and c.694 C>T) show aberrant localization in both nucleus and cytoplasm .

  • Genotype-phenotype correlations: The severity of clinical manifestations depends on whether mutations are heterozygous or homozygous:

    • Heterozygous carriers of p.R1054* can be unaffected, suggesting the truncated protein retains partial function

    • Homozygous p.R1054* mutations cause a much more severe phenotype than individuals with only one functional copy of SALL1

These findings suggest a complex interplay between haploinsufficiency and dominant-negative effects in SALL1-related disorders.

How can bioinformatic approaches enhance SALL1 functional analysis?

Advanced bioinformatic approaches have significantly expanded our understanding of SALL1 function:

  • Machine learning for binding site prediction:

    • The convolutional neural network framework DeepSTARR can analyze DNA sequences within ATAC peaks to identify determinants of SALL1 binding

    • DeepLIFT analysis derives nucleotide contribution scores for specific DNA elements, revealing SALL1's preference for AT-rich sequences containing TATT motifs in proximity to PU.1, C/EBP and SMAD factor binding sites

  • Comparative genomics for binding motif validation:

    • Analysis of >40 million SNPs and InDels distinguishing C57BL/6J from PWK and SPRET mice identified >40,000 strain-specific SALL1 binding peaks

    • The MAGGIE tool associates changes in epigenomic features at homologous sequences with motif mutations to prioritize functionally important motifs

    • This approach confirmed the importance of the MEF recognition motif containing the AATA core SALL1 recognition sequence

  • Integration of multi-omic datasets:

    • Combining SALL1 ChIP-seq with ATAC-seq data identifies accessible chromatin regions bound by SALL1

    • Integration with transcriptomic data from enhancer knockout models links SALL1 binding to gene expression changes

    • Analysis of shared and distinct binding patterns with other transcription factors reveals combinatorial regulation

These computational approaches provide mechanistic insights into SALL1 function that complement traditional experimental methods.

What are common challenges in working with recombinant SALL1 and how can they be addressed?

Researchers working with recombinant SALL1 may encounter several challenges:

  • Protein solubility and stability:

    • Challenge: SALL1 contains multiple zinc finger domains that can affect solubility

    • Solution: Optimize buffer conditions (such as Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol) , consider partial constructs focusing on specific domains

  • Protein purity assessment:

    • Challenge: Ensuring high purity for functional studies

    • Solution: Rigorous quality control using SDS-PAGE (aiming for >90% purity) , consider additional purification steps if needed

  • Functional activity verification:

    • Challenge: Confirming that recombinant SALL1 retains DNA-binding activity

    • Solution: Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) using validated SALL1 binding sequences, especially those containing AT-rich motifs with TATT or AATA cores

  • Storage and handling:

    • Challenge: Maintaining protein stability during storage

    • Solution: Store in appropriate buffer conditions (Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol) , aliquot to avoid freeze-thaw cycles

  • Specificity in functional assays:

    • Challenge: Distinguishing direct SALL1 effects from indirect consequences

    • Solution: Include appropriate controls, such as mutant versions lacking DNA-binding capacity or with altered subcellular localization

These methodological considerations are essential for generating reliable data with recombinant SALL1 proteins.

How can researchers validate the specificity and functionality of SALL1 antibodies?

Validating SALL1 antibodies is critical for ensuring reliable experimental outcomes:

  • Western blot validation:

    • Test antibody against recombinant SALL1 protein with known molecular weight

    • Confirm specificity using SALL1 knockout or knockdown samples as negative controls

    • Examine both full-length and truncated variants to understand epitope recognition

  • Immunofluorescence validation:

    • Verify proper nuclear localization in wild-type cells (SALL1 is predominantly nuclear)

    • Confirm absence of signal in SALL1-deficient cells

    • Compare with known patterns of aberrant localization for mutant proteins (both nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution)

  • ChIP-seq validation:

    • Confirm enrichment at known SALL1 binding sites

    • Verify motif enrichment consistent with SALL1 binding preferences (AT-rich sequences with TATT or AATA cores)

    • Compare binding patterns across different genetic backgrounds to identify consistent peaks

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Test potential cross-reactivity with other SALL family members (SALL2-4)

    • Evaluate specificity in tissues known to express multiple SALL proteins

Proper antibody validation ensures accurate interpretation of experimental results involving SALL1.

What are emerging areas of investigation regarding SALL1 function?

Several promising research directions are emerging in the SALL1 field:

  • Single-cell resolution studies:

    • Investigating SALL1 expression and function in microglial subpopulations

    • Examining dynamic changes in SALL1-dependent transcriptional networks during development and disease

  • Structural biology approaches:

    • Determining high-resolution structures of SALL1 DNA-binding domains in complex with target sequences

    • Elucidating the structural basis for SALL1 interactions with cofactors like SMAD4

  • SALL1 in neurodevelopmental disorders:

    • Exploring the potential role of SALL1 variants in conditions beyond Townes-Brocks syndrome

    • Investigating how SALL1 dysfunction in microglia might contribute to neurological disorders

  • Therapeutic targeting:

    • Developing approaches to modulate SALL1 activity for potential therapeutic applications

    • Exploring SALL1-dependent pathways as targets for neuroinflammatory conditions

  • Comparative analysis across species:

    • Investigating conservation and divergence of SALL1 function across evolutionary lineages

    • Exploring species-specific aspects of SALL1 regulation and target gene repertoires

These research directions promise to expand our understanding of SALL1 biology and its implications for human health and disease.

How might advances in genomic technologies enhance our understanding of SALL1?

Emerging genomic technologies offer new opportunities to deepen our understanding of SALL1:

  • Single-cell multi-omics:

    • Integration of scRNA-seq, scATAC-seq, and spatial transcriptomics to map SALL1 activity across cellular states

    • Correlation of SALL1 expression with chromatin accessibility and target gene activation at single-cell resolution

  • CRISPR screening approaches:

    • Systematic perturbation of SALL1 binding sites to identify functionally important regulatory elements

    • Combinatorial CRISPR screens targeting SALL1 with interacting transcription factors to map genetic interactions

  • Long-read sequencing technologies:

    • Improved characterization of complex structural variants affecting SALL1 regulatory elements

    • Better annotation of SALL1 isoforms and their functional differences

  • Chromatin conformation capture:

    • HiC and related techniques to map long-range interactions between SALL1-bound enhancers and target promoters

    • Identification of SALL1-dependent chromatin architectural changes

  • Proteomics approaches:

    • Proximity labeling techniques to identify SALL1 protein interaction networks in different cellular contexts

    • Phosphoproteomics to map posttranslational modifications regulating SALL1 activity

These technological advances will likely provide unprecedented insights into the mechanisms through which SALL1 regulates cellular identity and function.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.