Recombinant human TSLP is produced in either E. coli or HEK293 cells, yielding distinct isoforms:
Two isoforms exist naturally:
lfTSLP (long form): Expressed in heart, liver, and prostate (159 aa).
sfTSLP (short form): Expressed in keratinocytes and mucosal tissues (63 aa) .
TSLP activates immune cells via the TSLPR/IL-7Rα receptor complex, leading to:
TSLP activates STAT3/STAT5 and MAPK pathways (ERK, p38, JNK) independently of JAK kinases .
System | Advantages | Limitations |
---|---|---|
E. coli | High yield, cost-effective | Non-glycosylated; reduced bioactivity? |
HEK293 | Glycosylated; native folding | Lower yield; higher production costs |
Recombinant TSLP activity is typically validated using cell proliferation assays, phosphorylation studies, and dendritic cell (DC) maturation assays. For example:
Proliferation assays: Transfect cells with TSLPR and IL-7Rα subunits (e.g., Ba/F3 cell lines) and measure growth in response to TSLP using MTT or BrdU incorporation .
Phosphorylation studies: Monitor Stat3 and Stat5 activation via Western blotting in TSLPR/IL-7Rα-expressing cells, as TSLP binding induces receptor dimerization and downstream signaling .
DC maturation assays: Treat monocytes or CD11c+ DCs with TSLP and assess upregulation of CD40, CD80, and CD86 via flow cytometry, alongside chemokine release (e.g., CCL22) using ELISA .
Alanine scanning and molecular docking are critical for identifying residues critical for TSLP-receptor interactions. For example:
Alanine scanning: Systematically replace amino acids in the TSLP-binding region of antibodies (e.g., T6 antibody) to identify residues essential for affinity .
Docking tools: Use mCSM-PPI2 or GEO-PPI to predict binding energy changes and prioritize mutations (e.g., F→V substitutions to enhance hydrophobic interactions) .
Fragment-based screening: Virtually screen small-molecule libraries (e.g., Maybridge or ZoBio fragments) to identify compounds that disrupt TSLP:TSLPR interactions, as validated via biochemical assays .
TSLP’s ligand-receptor dissociation explains this paradox:
Tumor-derived TSLP: Overexpressed in HNSCC epithelial cells but insufficiently activates DCs due to low receptor expression (TSLPR/IL-7Rα) in tumor-infiltrating DCs .
Stromal microenvironment: Adjacent non-tumor epithelial cells may express TSLP in response to chronic inflammation (e.g., oral lichen planus), independent of tumor biology .
Survival analysis: No association between TSLP levels and recurrence-free survival, suggesting TSLP’s role may be context-dependent (e.g., tumor differentiation vs. immune evasion) .
Key Contradiction: While TSLP promotes Th2 responses in allergy, its tumor-promoting vs. -protective effects remain unresolved, necessitating context-specific studies .
TSLP signals via a heterodimeric receptor complex:
Human/mouse TSLPR: A novel hemopoietin receptor subunit paired with IL-7Rα .
Receptor expression: Co-localized on monocytes, DCs, and basophils in humans; limited on T/B cells .
Species differences: Mouse TSLP binds TSLPR alone, while human TSLP requires IL-7Rα for signaling, explaining divergent functional roles (e.g., B cell development) .
Species | Receptor Subunits | Critical Residues for Binding |
---|---|---|
Human | TSLPR + IL-7Rα | TSLPR: extracellular domain residues |
Mouse | TSLPR alone | N/A (IL-7Rα not required) |
Fragment-based virtual screening and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are effective:
Fragment libraries: Screen Maybridge/ZoBio fragments for binding to TSLP’s receptor-binding site (e.g., hydrophobic pockets near H-bond donors) .
Markov State Models (MSMs): Use unbiased MD to model binding pathways and identify transient intermediates, prioritizing fragments that stabilize unbound states .
Biochemical validation: Test top fragments (e.g., pyrimidine derivatives) in a BLI-based TSLP:TSLPR binding assay or alkaline phosphatase fusion protein assay .
Case Study: Four fragments reduced binding by >25% at mM concentrations, highlighting the feasibility of small-molecule TSLP inhibitors .
TSLP’s role in B cells is context-dependent:
Fetal B cell development: Promotes B220+/IgM+ B cell maturation in fetal liver, unlike IL-7 (which supports pre-B cells) .
Autoimmunity: Elevated TSLP in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) drives B cell activation, autoantibody production, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia .
Cancer: TSLPR mutations in B cell leukemia highlight TSLP’s oncogenic potential, requiring careful evaluation of therapeutic targeting .
Key residues include hydrophobic and polar interactions:
TSLP: Tyr29, Gln159 (N-terminal domain) mediate receptor binding .
TSLPR: Extracellular domain residues (e.g., Arg123, Glu167) stabilize TSLP via H-bonding and charge interactions .
Targeting strategies:
Residue (TSLP) | Role in Binding | Targeting Approach |
---|---|---|
Tyr29 | Hydrophobic core | Antibody N-terminal binding |
Gln159 | H-bond with TSLPR | Small-molecule fragment screening |
In vitro polarization: Treat CD4+ T cells with TSLP + DCs to induce IL-4/IL-13 production, measured via intracellular cytokine staining .
In vivo models: Use TSLP transgenic mice or ovalbumin-induced asthma models to assess airway hyperresponsiveness and eosinophil infiltration .
Mechanistic studies: Block TSLP (e.g., AMG157 antibody) to dissect its role in Th2 cytokine production vs. DC maturation .
Model | Readout | TSLP’s Role |
---|---|---|
In vitro (T cells) | IL-4/IL-13 (FACS) | Direct Th2 polarization |
In vivo (asthma) | Eosinophils (BALF) | Indirect via DC-driven Th2 |
Tumor vs. microenvironment origin: TSLP overexpression in HNSCC epithelial cells vs. stromal inflammation complicates interpretation .
Receptor expression: Limited TSLPR/IL-7Rα on tumor-infiltrating DCs in HNSCC, reducing functional impact .
Context-dependent effects: TSLP may promote Th2 immunity in allergy but suppress Th1/Th17 in cancer, requiring organ-specific models .
Spatial transcriptomics: Map TSLP expression in tumor vs. stromal compartments.
Receptor knockout models: Use TSLPR−/− mice to isolate TSLP’s direct vs. indirect effects.
Surface marker analysis: Treat CD11c+ DCs with TSLP and quantify CD40/CD80/CD86 via flow cytometry (gating on CD11c+CD14− cells) .
T cell activation assays: Co-culture TSLP-treated DCs with allogenic T cells and measure IFN-γ/IL-4 production to assess Th2 skewing .
Chemokine profiling: Use Luminex assays to detect CCL22, CCL17, and CXCL12, which recruit T cells and eosinophils .