KEGG: vg:4156335
Recombinant IIV3-124R protein is typically expressed using E. coli expression systems. The production process involves cloning the coding sequence into an expression vector that incorporates an N-terminal histidine tag (His-tag) for purification purposes . For genomic DNA extraction, IIV-3 infected mosquito larvae are first ground with a Tekmar Tissuemizer in deionized water and filtered through a 400 mesh to remove large insect parts. The filtrate is then layered on a continuous HS-40 Ludox gradient and centrifuged for isolation . For recombinant protein expression, the DNA is typically digested with appropriate restriction enzymes, cloned into plasmid vectors (such as pUC19), and grown in Escherichia coli . The resulting protein is purified using affinity chromatography techniques that take advantage of the His-tag.
Based on its amino acid sequence and typical storage conditions, the IIV3-124R protein has the following properties:
| Property | Value/Description |
|---|---|
| Length | 236 amino acids |
| Molecular Weight | Approximately 25-30 kDa (estimated) |
| Recommended Storage | -20°C to -80°C |
| Storage Buffer | Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol |
| Stability | Unstable with repeated freeze-thaw cycles |
| Working Condition | Can be stored at 4°C for up to one week |
| Recombinant Form | Often includes an N-terminal His-tag |
The protein contains regions with repeated sequences, particularly "LAVSPLAVSPLAVSPL" which appears as a triplet repeat within the sequence .
For optimal expression of recombinant IIV3-124R in E. coli, researchers should consider the following parameters:
Vector selection: Use expression vectors with strong promoters such as T7 or tac promoters.
E. coli strain optimization: BL21(DE3) or Rosetta strains are recommended for efficient expression of viral proteins.
Induction conditions: Typically, IPTG concentrations of 0.5-1.0 mM at OD600 of 0.6-0.8 yield good expression.
Temperature considerations: Lowering the induction temperature to 18-25°C may increase the solubility of the expressed protein.
Expression time: Optimal expression is usually achieved after 4-6 hours of induction at 37°C or overnight induction at lower temperatures.
After harvesting the cells, lysis can be performed using sonication or pressure-based homogenization in a buffer containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of the recombinant protein. Purification can then be achieved using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography, taking advantage of the His-tag .
The most effective purification strategy for recombinant His-tagged IIV3-124R typically involves a multi-step approach:
Initial capture using IMAC (Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography):
Use Ni-NTA or Co-NTA resins with a binding buffer containing 20-50 mM imidazole
Elute with an imidazole gradient (100-250 mM)
Secondary purification:
Size exclusion chromatography to separate monomeric protein from aggregates
Ion exchange chromatography based on the protein's theoretical pI
Buffer optimization:
Final formulation in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol for stability
pH adjustment to maintain protein stability (typically pH 7.5-8.0)
Purification should be performed at 4°C to minimize protein degradation, and the final product should be aliquoted to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can significantly impact protein integrity .
Verification of recombinant IIV3-124R identity and purity should include multiple analytical techniques:
SDS-PAGE analysis: To assess protein purity and approximate molecular weight
Western blotting: Using anti-His antibodies to confirm the presence of the tagged protein
Mass spectrometry:
Peptide mass fingerprinting for protein identification
Intact mass analysis to confirm the full-length protein
N-terminal sequencing: To verify the correct start of the protein
Dynamic light scattering: To assess homogeneity and detect aggregation
Circular dichroism: To evaluate secondary structure
Researchers should aim for >90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis for most functional studies .
The function of IIV3-124R in the viral life cycle remains largely uncharacterized, which presents significant research opportunities. Based on studies of related iridoviruses, potential functions may include:
Structural component: It may serve as a capsid or envelope protein contributing to virion structure.
Host interaction: The protein may be involved in host cell recognition, attachment, or entry.
Immune evasion: It could potentially play a role in modulating host immune responses.
Replication: The protein might participate in viral genome replication or assembly.
Understanding the function of IIV3-124R could provide insights into the virus's pathogenicity and host range. Comparative analysis with other iridovirus proteins may offer clues to its role, particularly given that some iridescent viruses like IIV6 have demonstrated insecticidal activities in various pest species including Lepidoptera and Coleoptera .
Comparative analysis of IIV3-124R with homologous proteins in other invertebrate iridescent viruses reveals interesting evolutionary patterns:
| Virus | Protein | Sequence Similarity | Key Differences | Hosts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIV-3 | 124R | Reference | - | Mosquitoes (O. taeniorhynchus) |
| IIV-6 | Similar ORFs | Low-moderate | More diverse host range | Multiple insect species |
| Other IIVs | Homologs | Variable | Host-specific adaptations | Various invertebrates |
Research focusing on comparative genomics and proteomics between IIV-3 and IIV-6 is particularly valuable, as IIV-6 has been shown to infect a broader range of pest insect species and has been explored for potential biopesticide applications. Recombinant IIV-6 variants incorporating insect toxin genes (such as the scorpion toxin AaIT) have demonstrated enhanced insecticidal activities against pests including Helicoverpa armigera, Lymantria dispar, and Tenebrio molitor .
To investigate potential protein-protein interactions involving IIV3-124R, researchers can employ multiple complementary techniques:
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Construct bait plasmids containing IIV3-124R fused to DNA-binding domains
Screen against prey libraries from relevant host cells
Co-immunoprecipitation:
Use anti-His antibodies to pull down recombinant IIV3-124R
Identify interacting partners by mass spectrometry
Proximity labeling techniques:
BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins to identify proximal proteins in relevant cell types
TurboID for rapid labeling of interacting proteins
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR):
Immobilize purified IIV3-124R on sensor chips
Measure binding kinetics with potential partner proteins
Protein crosslinking mass spectrometry:
Identify interaction interfaces at amino acid resolution
Map structural relationships between protein complexes
These methods can help elucidate the role of IIV3-124R in viral replication and host interactions, potentially revealing new targets for antiviral intervention or biotechnological applications.
For functional characterization of IIV3-124R, researchers should consider these cell-based assays:
Infection models:
Mosquito cell lines (C6/36, Aag2) for native host studies
Other insect cell lines to assess host range
Localization studies:
Fluorescent protein fusions (GFP-IIV3-124R) for live-cell imaging
Immunofluorescence with anti-His or custom antibodies in fixed cells
Overexpression and knockdown studies:
Transient expression to assess cytopathic effects
CRISPR interference for genetic knockdown during viral infection
Binding assays:
Flow cytometry to measure cell surface binding
Cell fractionation to determine subcellular localization
Reporter systems:
Luciferase-based assays to monitor effects on host gene expression
Split reporter systems to visualize protein-protein interactions
Selecting appropriate cell lines that support IIV-3 replication is crucial for meaningful functional studies. The recombinant protein approach can complement virus infection studies to dissect specific protein functions.
Structural characterization of IIV3-124R would significantly advance understanding of its function through:
X-ray crystallography:
High-resolution structural determination requires:
Protein at >95% purity
Concentrations of 5-15 mg/mL
Screening numerous crystallization conditions
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Single-particle analysis for structure determination
In situ localization within virions
NMR spectroscopy:
For dynamic regions and intrinsically disordered segments
Requires isotope-labeled protein expression (15N, 13C)
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS):
Low-resolution envelope determination
Analysis of conformational states in solution
Computational approaches:
AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold predictions
Molecular dynamics simulations to study flexibility
These structural insights would facilitate structure-based hypotheses about IIV3-124R function and potentially reveal similarities to proteins of known function, despite limited sequence homology.
While IIV3-124R remains functionally uncharacterized, several potential biotechnological applications can be explored:
Biopesticide development:
Diagnostic applications:
Development of antibodies against IIV3-124R for virus detection
ELISA-based diagnostic kits for environmental monitoring
Vector control strategies:
Exploration of IIV3-124R as a mosquito control agent
Assessment of effects on vector competence in disease transmission
Protein engineering platforms:
Use as a scaffold for presenting antigens or functional domains
Design of chimeric proteins with enhanced stability or functionality
Research exploring these applications would benefit from comparative studies with better-characterized iridescent viruses like IIV6, which has demonstrated potential as a biological control agent when modified with recombinant DNA technology .
Researchers often encounter several technical challenges when working with recombinant IIV3-124R:
| Challenge | Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression levels | Codon bias, protein toxicity | Optimize codon usage, use tightly regulated expression systems |
| Protein insolubility | Improper folding, hydrophobic regions | Lower induction temperature, use solubility tags (SUMO, MBP) |
| Protein degradation | Proteolytic cleavage | Include protease inhibitors, optimize buffer conditions |
| Aggregation | Improper folding, high concentration | Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, arginine), optimize purification |
| Loss of activity after storage | Freeze-thaw damage | Store in 50% glycerol, make single-use aliquots |
For optimal results, recombinant IIV3-124R should be stored at -20°C/-80°C with 5-50% glycerol as a cryoprotectant. Working aliquots can be kept at 4°C for up to one week, but repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they significantly reduce protein integrity .
Proper validation of antibodies against IIV3-124R requires a systematic approach:
Initial validation:
Western blot analysis using recombinant protein as a positive control
Testing against lysates from IIV-3-infected cells vs. uninfected controls
Specificity testing:
Pre-absorption with recombinant protein to demonstrate specificity
Testing against related iridescent virus proteins to assess cross-reactivity
Application-specific validation:
For immunofluorescence: co-localization studies with tagged recombinant protein
For immunoprecipitation: recovery efficiency using spiked recombinant protein
For ELISA: standard curves using purified recombinant protein
Knockout/knockdown controls:
Genetic knockdown systems to verify signal specificity
Heterologous expression systems as positive controls
Commercial antibodies should be assessed using at least three independent validation methods before use in critical experiments.
When studying IIV3-124R in insect cell systems, researchers should address these key considerations:
Cell line selection:
Natural host cells (Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus-derived) for physiological relevance
Commonly used insect cell lines (Sf9, High Five, S2) for experimental tractability
Expression systems:
Baculovirus expression for high-level protein production
Inducible systems to control expression timing and levels
Physiological conditions:
Temperature optimization (20-28°C range for most insect cells)
Appropriate media formulations for specific insect cell types
Viral infection controls:
Comparison with other iridescent virus proteins (e.g., from IIV6)
Time-course studies to capture dynamic processes
Functional readouts:
Cytopathic effect monitoring
Host gene expression changes
Cell cycle and apoptosis measurements
Experiments should include appropriate positive controls (known IIV proteins) and negative controls (unrelated viral or cellular proteins) to ensure result specificity and interpretability.
Several cutting-edge approaches could significantly advance IIV3-124R research:
Comparative genomics:
Pan-genome analysis of IIV-3 isolates from different geographic regions
Evolutionary analysis of 124R homologs across the Iridoviridae family
Transcriptomics:
RNA-seq analysis of host responses to recombinant IIV3-124R
Temporal expression profiling during infection
Proteomics:
Interactome mapping using proximity labeling followed by mass spectrometry
Post-translational modification profiling
Functional genomics:
CRISPR screens to identify host factors interacting with IIV3-124R
Transposon mutagenesis to map essential domains
Single-cell approaches:
Single-cell RNA-seq to characterize heterogeneity in host responses
Mass cytometry for protein-level single-cell analysis
These approaches could be integrated with datasets like FluPRINT, which demonstrates how multi-dimensional biological measurements, including mass cytometry combined with multiple high-dimensional biological measurements, can reveal heterogeneity of immune system responses .
Strategic modifications to IIV3-124R could enhance its research utility:
Fusion partners:
Fluorescent proteins (GFP, mCherry) for localization studies
Affinity tags beyond His-tag (FLAG, GST) for alternative purification strategies
Split reporter systems for interaction studies
Domain engineering:
Truncation constructs to identify functional domains
Chimeric proteins with homologous regions from other iridescent viruses
Stability enhancements:
Surface entropy reduction for crystallization
Disulfide engineering for increased thermostability
Functionality additions:
Expression optimization:
Codon optimization for specific expression systems
Removal of cryptic splice sites or regulatory elements
Successful engineering approaches could draw inspiration from recombinant IIV6 constructs that have incorporated green fluorescent protein (GFP) or scorpion toxins to create viruses with enhanced features for biological control applications .
Progress in IIV3-124R research could be accelerated through interdisciplinary collaborations:
Structural biology and computational approaches:
Integration of experimental structural data with AI prediction tools
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict functional sites
Vector biology and epidemiology:
Assessment of IIV-3 prevalence in wild mosquito populations
Evaluation of effects on vector competence for disease transmission
Agricultural and environmental sciences:
Field studies of modified IIV3-124R constructs for pest management
Environmental impact assessments
Systems biology:
Network analysis to position IIV3-124R in host-pathogen interaction networks
Multi-omics integration for comprehensive functional characterization
Synthetic biology:
Design of synthetic variants with engineered functions
Development of genetic circuits incorporating IIV3-124R regulatory elements
These interdisciplinary approaches could help bridge gaps between basic research on IIV3-124R and potential applications in vector control, agriculture, or biotechnology.