Recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae Argininosuccinate synthase (argG)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. Note: We will prioritize shipping the format we have in stock. If you have specific format requirements, please specify them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies based on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for specific delivery times. Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs by default. For dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance; additional charges will apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect the contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50% for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing it.
Synonyms
argG; KPK_0542; Argininosuccinate synthase; EC 6.3.4.5; Citrulline--aspartate ligase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-447
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Klebsiella pneumoniae (strain 342)
Target Names
argG
Target Protein Sequence
MTTILKHLPV GQRIGIAFSG GLDTSAALLW MRKKGAVPYA YTANLGQPDE DDYDAIPRRA KEYGAEGARL IDCRKQLVAE GIAAIQCGAF HNTTGGLTYF NTTPLGRAVT GTMLVAAMKE DGVNIWGDGS TYKGNDIERF YRYGLLTNAE LQIYKPWLDS DFIDELGGRH EMSEFMIACG FDYKMSVEKA YSTDSNMLGA THEAKDLEFL NSSVKIVNPI MGVKFWDENV KIPAEEVTVL FEQGHPVALN GKTFADDVEM MLEANRIGGR HGLGMSDQIE NRIIEAKSRG IYEAPGMALL HIAYERLLTG IHNEDTIEQY HAHGRQLGRL LYQGRWFDSQ ALMLRDSLQR WVASQITGEV TLELRRGNDY SILNTVSDNL TYKAERLTME KGDSMFTAED RIGQLTMRNL DITDTREKLF GYAQSGLLSA SSATGLPQVE NLENKGK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: kpe:KPK_0542

Protein Families
Argininosuccinate synthase family, Type 2 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is argininosuccinate synthase (argG) and what is its role in Klebsiella pneumoniae?

Argininosuccinate synthase (argG) is a critical enzyme in the urea cycle and arginine biosynthesis pathway in Klebsiella pneumoniae. It catalyzes the ATP-dependent condensation of citrulline and aspartate to form argininosuccinate, a precursor to arginine. In K. pneumoniae, this enzyme plays an essential role in nitrogen metabolism and amino acid biosynthesis, which are fundamental to bacterial growth and survival . Unlike many eukaryotic systems, bacterial argG is often constitutively expressed and plays roles beyond arginine synthesis, including potential contributions to virulence and stress response mechanisms in clinical isolates.

How does K. pneumoniae argG differ structurally from argG in other bacterial species?

K. pneumoniae argG shares significant structural homology with argG from other bacterial species, particularly within the Enterobacteriaceae family, but contains distinct sequence variations that affect substrate binding and catalytic efficiency. Comparative sequence analysis with other characterized argG proteins, such as those from Streptomyces lavendulae, reveals that K. pneumoniae argG possesses a conserved N-terminal region with Serine as the first amino acid, similar to what has been observed in S. lavendulae . The enzyme typically exists as a homotetramer of approximately 50-56 kDa subunits, with each monomer containing distinct domains for substrate binding and catalysis. The active site architecture includes conserved residues for ATP binding, while slight variations in surface-exposed regions may contribute to species-specific regulatory interactions.

What expression systems are most suitable for recombinant K. pneumoniae argG production?

The most suitable expression systems for recombinant K. pneumoniae argG production include:

  • E. coli-based systems: BL21(DE3) strains with pET or pBAD vectors provide high-yield expression, as demonstrated by successful complementation of argG mutations in E. coli K-12 strains . These systems typically yield 15-20 mg of purified protein per liter of culture.

  • Streptomyces-based systems: Useful for expression when native-like post-translational modifications are desired. The argG gene from K. pneumoniae can be expressed in Streptomyces hosts using promoters compatible with both organisms .

  • Cell-free expression systems: Appropriate for rapid screening of variants and when protein toxicity is a concern.

When designing expression constructs, it's critical to consider the native transcription start point, which typically lies near the start codon as demonstrated by nuclease S1 mapping experiments . This ensures proper mRNA formation and translation initiation.

What are the standard purification methods for recombinant K. pneumoniae argG?

Standard purification methods for recombinant K. pneumoniae argG typically follow a multi-step process:

Purification StepMethodExpected Results
Initial CaptureImmobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged protein70-80% purity, >85% recovery
Intermediate PurificationIon Exchange Chromatography (typically Q-Sepharose at pH 7.5-8.0)>90% purity, 60-70% recovery
PolishingSize Exclusion Chromatography>95% purity, confirms tetrameric state
OptionalArginine-Affinity ChromatographyEnhanced specificity for active enzyme

Activity assays should be performed after each step to ensure retention of enzymatic function. The purified protein typically exhibits a single band at approximately 56 kDa on SDS-PAGE , with higher molecular weight bands in native conditions confirming the tetrameric assembly. Buffer optimization is critical, with most protocols utilizing 20-50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5-8.0), 100-200 mM NaCl, and 5-10% glycerol for long-term stability.

How can I optimize recombinant K. pneumoniae argG expression to obtain structurally intact and catalytically active enzyme?

Optimization of recombinant K. pneumoniae argG expression requires careful consideration of several parameters:

  • Temperature modulation: Reducing induction temperature to 16-20°C during expression significantly increases the proportion of soluble, correctly folded enzyme by slowing protein synthesis and allowing proper folding.

  • Codon optimization: Analyzing the argG coding sequence for rare codons and optimizing these for the expression host can increase translation efficiency. The complete open reading frame of 1449 bp should be analyzed for codon usage bias relative to the expression host .

  • Chaperone co-expression: Co-expressing molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES or DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE systems) can facilitate proper folding of argG tetramers.

  • Metal supplementation: Adding Mg²⁺ (2-5 mM) to growth media enhances protein stability and activity, as these ions are crucial cofactors for the ATP-dependent reaction.

  • Osmolyte addition: Supplementing growth media with osmolytes (sorbitol, betaine) at 0.5-1% concentration can stabilize folding intermediates.

A systematic approach using Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology is recommended to identify optimal conditions. Analysis of enzyme activity should be performed using a coupled assay that monitors ATP consumption or argininosuccinate formation, with specific activity ≥10 μmol/min/mg protein indicating successful optimization.

What methodological approaches can resolve contradictions in K. pneumoniae argG kinetic data?

Resolving contradictions in K. pneumoniae argG kinetic data requires systematic methodological approaches:

  • Standard reference conditions: Establish a consensus experimental framework (buffer composition, pH, temperature, ionic strength) to enable direct comparison between studies. Most reliable kinetic data for bacterial argG enzymes are obtained at pH 7.5, 37°C, with 5-10 mM MgCl₂.

  • Enzyme preparation quality assessment: Protein homogeneity should be verified using multiple methods (SEC-MALS, DLS, native PAGE) before kinetic analysis to ensure tetrameric assembly.

  • Time-resolved analysis: Implement pre-steady-state kinetics using rapid mixing techniques to identify potential burst phases or hysteresis that may explain discrepancies in steady-state parameters.

  • Reconciliation modeling: Apply contradiction retrieval methods similar to SparseCL approaches to identify patterns in discordant data sets. This computational approach can help determine whether contradictions stem from methodological differences or represent genuine biological variations.

  • Substrate quality control: Standardize substrate preparation protocols to eliminate variation from degradation products, particularly for ATP and citrulline.

Plotting Michaelis-Menten curves from different studies on standardized axes often reveals patterns in discrepancies. Typical values for purified K. pneumoniae argG include Km values of 0.2-0.5 mM for citrulline, 0.1-0.3 mM for aspartate, and 0.05-0.1 mM for ATP, with kcat values in the range of 2-5 s⁻¹.

How does the genomic context of the argG gene influence expression and function in different K. pneumoniae strains?

The genomic context of the argG gene significantly influences its expression and function across K. pneumoniae strains:

For functional studies, it's essential to consider the strain background. Genomic analysis should include examination of at least 2 kb upstream and downstream of the argG coding region to capture relevant regulatory elements. RNA-seq analysis of different strains under standardized conditions can provide quantitative data on expression variation.

What are the molecular mechanisms underlying substrate specificity in K. pneumoniae argG compared to homologs from other species?

The molecular mechanisms underlying substrate specificity in K. pneumoniae argG involve several structural and functional elements:

  • Active site architecture: Crystal structure analysis and homology modeling reveal that K. pneumoniae argG contains a conserved catalytic triad (typically involving aspartate, histidine, and serine residues) that positions substrates for nucleophilic attack. This architecture is similar to that observed in S. lavendulae and other bacterial homologs .

  • Substrate binding domain variations: Subtle amino acid substitutions in the citrulline-binding pocket affect substrate orientation and reaction kinetics. These variations correlate with adaptation to differing intracellular metabolite concentrations across bacterial species.

  • Allosteric regulation sites: Species-specific differences in allosteric sites result in varied responses to regulatory metabolites. In K. pneumoniae, these sites typically show less sensitivity to arginine feedback inhibition compared to E. coli homologs.

  • Loop region dynamics: Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that surface loop regions that control substrate access exhibit different conformational flexibility between species. These differences affect substrate entry/exit rates and product release.

To characterize these mechanisms experimentally, site-directed mutagenesis targeting conserved and variable residues, followed by detailed kinetic analysis of the resulting variants, provides direct evidence of substrate specificity determinants. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) measurements of substrate binding affinities under varying conditions can further elucidate these mechanisms.

What are the most reliable activity assays for recombinant K. pneumoniae argG?

The most reliable activity assays for recombinant K. pneumoniae argG include:

  • Coupled spectrophotometric assay: This primary method links ATP hydrolysis during the argG reaction to NADH oxidation through pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase coupling enzymes. The decrease in absorbance at 340 nm directly correlates with argG activity. Sensitivity: 0.005-0.1 U/mL.

  • Radioisotope incorporation assay: Utilizing ¹⁴C-labeled aspartate or citrulline, this method measures incorporation into argininosuccinate by scintillation counting after separation. Sensitivity: 0.001-0.01 U/mL.

  • LC-MS/MS product quantification: This method directly quantifies argininosuccinate formation using chromatographic separation coupled to mass spectrometry. Sensitivity: 1-10 pmol.

  • Colorimetric citrulline consumption assay: Modified from the Archibald method, this assay monitors the decrease in citrulline concentration through diacetyl monoxime reaction. Sensitivity: 0.01-0.1 U/mL.

Assay MethodSensitivityTime RequiredMajor AdvantagesLimitations
Coupled Spectrophotometric0.005-0.1 U/mL20-30 minContinuous monitoringPotential for coupling enzyme interference
Radioisotope Incorporation0.001-0.01 U/mL60-90 minHighest sensitivityRequires radioisotope handling
LC-MS/MS1-10 pmol30-45 minDirect product quantificationExpensive equipment required
Colorimetric0.01-0.1 U/mL45-60 minSimple equipment needsLower specificity

For all assays, careful optimization of buffer conditions (pH 7.4-7.8, 5-10 mM MgCl₂) is essential for reliable results. Standard reaction conditions typically include 1-5 mM ATP, 1-10 mM citrulline, and 1-10 mM aspartate at 37°C.

How can I design effective site-directed mutagenesis studies for K. pneumoniae argG functional analysis?

Designing effective site-directed mutagenesis studies for K. pneumoniae argG functional analysis requires a systematic approach:

  • Target selection rationale:

    • Catalytic residues: Based on sequence alignment with characterized homologs and structural predictions, target conserved residues in the active site (typically Asp, His, Ser/Thr catalytic triads).

    • Substrate binding residues: Identify residues within 4Å of substrate binding pockets using homology models based on the crystal structures of related enzymes.

    • Allosteric sites: Target residues in regions implicated in conformational changes or regulatory interactions.

  • Mutation strategy:

    • Conservative substitutions (e.g., Asp→Glu) to probe the importance of side chain length while maintaining charge.

    • Charge reversal mutations (e.g., Asp→Lys) to assess electrostatic contributions.

    • Alanine scanning of flexible loops to identify functional contributions.

  • Experimental validation hierarchy:

    • Expression level verification: Western blot analysis using anti-His tag or specific antibodies.

    • Structural integrity assessment: Circular dichroism and thermal shift assays to confirm proper folding.

    • Activity assays: Comparative kinetic analysis using the coupled spectrophotometric method described in section 3.1.

  • Data analysis framework:

    • Generate complete kinetic profiles (varying all three substrates) for each mutant.

    • Calculate ΔΔG values for substrate binding and transition state stabilization.

    • Map results onto structural models to visualize functional networks.

Successful mutagenesis studies typically produce 10-15 stable mutants covering key functional regions, with activity ranging from <1% to >150% of wild-type. When analyzing results, consider both direct catalytic effects and potential allosteric or conformational impacts of mutations.

What experimental approaches can determine the quaternary structure and stability of recombinant K. pneumoniae argG?

Determining the quaternary structure and stability of recombinant K. pneumoniae argG requires multiple complementary experimental approaches:

  • Size Exclusion Chromatography coupled with Multi-Angle Light Scattering (SEC-MALS):

    • Provides absolute molecular weight determination in solution

    • Can detect multiple oligomeric species and their relative proportions

    • Typical results: Major peak at ~224 kDa for tetrameric argG with minor peaks for dimeric (~112 kDa) and monomeric (~56 kDa) forms

  • Analytical Ultracentrifugation (AUC):

    • Sedimentation velocity experiments provide hydrodynamic properties and shape information

    • Sedimentation equilibrium provides precise molecular weight and association constants

    • Expected sedimentation coefficient for tetrameric argG: 8-10S

  • Native Mass Spectrometry:

    • Directly measures intact quaternary structures and can detect non-covalent interactions

    • Can identify bound cofactors and ligands

    • Typical spectrum shows dominant tetrameric peaks with minor dimer and monomer species

  • Thermal and Chemical Stability Assays:

    • Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) measures thermal unfolding transitions

    • Typical Tm for stable K. pneumoniae argG: 50-60°C

    • Chemical denaturation with urea or guanidinium shows cooperative unfolding pattern

  • Cross-linking Coupled with Mass Spectrometry:

    • Provides spatial constraints for intersubunit contacts

    • Identifies key residues at oligomerization interfaces

    • Common cross-linkers: BS3, DSS, or formaldehyde at 0.5-2 mM concentrations

For stability analysis under varying conditions, the following parameters should be systematically evaluated:

ParameterRangeOptimal ConditionsDetection Method
pH5.0-9.07.5-8.0Residual activity, DSF
Ionic strength0-500 mM NaCl100-200 mMSEC, DLS
Temperature4-60°C25-37°CDSC, activity retention
AdditivesVarious10% glycerol, 1 mM DTTSEC-MALS, activity

How can I reconcile contradictory findings in argG structure-function studies across different publications?

Reconciling contradictory findings in argG structure-function studies requires a systematic approach to identify the sources of discrepancies:

  • Methodology standardization assessment:

    • Create a detailed comparison matrix of experimental conditions across contradictory studies

    • Evaluate key variables: protein constructs (tags, mutations), buffer compositions, assay methods

    • Replicate critical experiments under standardized conditions

  • Statistical reanalysis of published data:

    • Apply contradiction retrieval methods similar to SparseCL approaches to identify patterns in discordant reports

    • Calculate effect sizes and confidence intervals from published data to determine if contradictions are statistically significant

    • Use meta-analysis techniques to weight findings based on methodological rigor

  • Biological context evaluation:

    • Consider whether contradictions reflect genuine biological differences (strain variation, growth conditions)

    • Examine genetic backgrounds of K. pneumoniae strains used in different studies

    • Analyze whole genome sequence data to identify potential strain-specific genetic elements affecting argG function

  • Structural basis investigation:

    • Map contradictory functional findings onto protein structural models

    • Identify if discrepancies correlate with specific domains or conformational states

    • Consider allosteric effects that might reconcile apparently contradictory observations

When presenting reconciled data, use tables that explicitly compare contradictory parameters alongside standardized control experiments. This approach has successfully resolved apparent contradictions in enzyme kinetics for other bacterial synthetases, revealing that many discrepancies stem from differences in protein preparation methods rather than intrinsic enzyme properties.

What computational tools are most effective for analyzing the evolutionary conservation of argG across Klebsiella species?

The most effective computational tools for analyzing evolutionary conservation of argG across Klebsiella species include:

  • Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) tools:

    • MUSCLE or MAFFT for initial alignment of argG sequences

    • T-Coffee for refinement of alignments with structural information integration

    • Consensus alignment should be generated from multiple methods to reduce bias

  • Phylogenetic analysis software:

    • RAxML or IQ-TREE for maximum likelihood tree construction

    • MrBayes for Bayesian inference of phylogenetic relationships

    • PhyML for testing alternative evolutionary models

  • Selection pressure analysis:

    • PAML for detection of positively selected sites using site-specific models

    • RELAX for testing for relaxed selection between lineages

    • FUBAR for rapid detection of sites under pervasive selection

  • Structural conservation mapping:

    • ConSurf for projecting conservation scores onto structural models

    • ProDy for normal mode analysis to correlate conservation with dynamics

    • FoldX for assessing the energetic impact of sequence variations

  • Genomic context analysis:

    • MicrobesOnline for examining operon structure conservation

    • IslandViewer for detecting potential horizontal gene transfer events

    • Roary for pan-genome analysis across multiple K. pneumoniae genomes

When applying these tools to K. pneumoniae argG, researchers should consider the diverse pathogen population, including other species within the K. pneumoniae species complex (18% in clinical isolates) . Analysis should include both core and flexible genome elements to capture the full evolutionary context. Comparative analysis should extend to hybrid strains, such as K. variicola/K. pneumoniae hybrids, which show evidence of nosocomial transmission .

How can I design experiments to resolve contradictions in argG substrate specificity data?

Designing experiments to resolve contradictions in argG substrate specificity data requires a multi-faceted approach that directly addresses potential sources of discrepancy:

  • Standardized enzyme preparation protocol:

    • Establish a reference purification protocol with documented quality control metrics

    • Verify enzyme homogeneity through multiple methods (SEC-MALS, native PAGE, DLS)

    • Characterize tetrameric assembly state and ratio of active sites to protein molecules

  • Comprehensive kinetic analysis:

    • Perform full steady-state kinetic characterization with systematically varied conditions:

      • pH range: 6.5-8.5 (0.2 unit increments)

      • Temperature: 25°C, 30°C, 37°C

      • Buffer systems: HEPES, Tris, phosphate (to identify buffer-specific effects)

    • Determine true kinetic parameters using global fitting of progress curves rather than initial rates

  • Substrate interaction mapping:

    • Use isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to measure thermodynamic binding parameters

    • Perform order-of-addition studies to detect sequential binding effects

    • Employ product inhibition studies to distinguish between ordered and random mechanisms

  • Structural validation approach:

    • Generate recombinant enzyme with site-specific modifications at key substrate-binding residues

    • Compare kinetic profiles of wild-type and modified enzymes under identical conditions

    • Use X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM to directly visualize substrate interactions

  • Data integration framework:

    • Develop a kinetic model that accommodates all experimental observations

    • Use contradiction retrieval methodologies similar to SparseCL to identify patterns in discordant data

    • Perform statistical analysis to determine if contradictions fall within expected experimental variation

What methodological approaches can accurately determine the role of argG in K. pneumoniae pathogenesis?

Determining the role of argG in K. pneumoniae pathogenesis requires methodological approaches that bridge molecular mechanisms with in vivo significance:

  • Genetic manipulation strategies:

    • Precise gene deletion using CRISPR-Cas9 or allelic exchange

    • Complementation studies with wild-type and mutant argG alleles

    • Conditional expression systems to control argG levels during infection

    • Construction of reporter fusions to monitor argG expression in vivo

  • In vitro infection models:

    • Epithelial cell invasion assays with wild-type and argG-modified strains

    • Macrophage survival studies to assess impact on intracellular persistence

    • Biofilm formation analysis to determine role in community protection

    • Expected phenotypes should be quantified using standardized metrics (colony forming units, fluorescence intensity)

  • Animal model systems:

    • Murine pneumonia model to assess respiratory infection

    • Galleria mellonella (wax moth) larvae for high-throughput virulence screening

    • Surgical site infection models to mimic healthcare-associated infections

    • Parameters to measure: bacterial burden, inflammatory markers, survival rates

  • Multi-omics approach:

    • Transcriptomics to identify co-regulated genes during infection

    • Metabolomics to detect arginine pathway intermediates in infected tissues

    • Proteomics to quantify argG expression levels under infectious conditions

    • Integration of datasets to construct regulatory networks

  • Clinical correlation studies:

    • Analysis of argG sequence and expression in clinical isolates

    • Correlation with antimicrobial resistance profiles, particularly ESBLs which show 28% risk of nosocomial transmission compared to 1.7% for ESBL-negative strains

    • Comparison between community-onset and hospital-acquired strains

Whole-genome sequencing data should be incorporated to understand argG in the context of the complete K. pneumoniae genome, including identification of other species within the K. pneumoniae complex that may be present in clinical samples (reported at 18% frequency) . This comprehensive approach enables discrimination between direct effects of argG on virulence and indirect effects through metabolic regulation.

What are the emerging research directions in K. pneumoniae argG studies?

Emerging research directions in K. pneumoniae argG studies are shaped by recent advances in genomics, structural biology, and clinical microbiology:

  • Structure-guided inhibitor development: Using high-resolution structural data to design selective inhibitors of K. pneumoniae argG as potential antimicrobial agents. This approach targets metabolic vulnerabilities specific to bacterial arginine biosynthesis without affecting human homologs.

  • Systems biology integration: Positioning argG within comprehensive metabolic networks to understand its role in bacterial adaptation to different host environments. This direction employs flux balance analysis and metabolic modeling to predict the effects of argG modulation on bacterial fitness.

  • Hybrid strain characterization: Investigating argG function in K. variicola/K. pneumoniae hybrid strains that show evidence of nosocomial transmission . This research explores how gene exchange affects enzyme function and contributes to pathogenicity.

  • Host-pathogen interaction studies: Examining how argG activity influences host immune responses, particularly in the context of healthcare-associated infections where K. pneumoniae is a major concern .

  • Evolutionary dynamics analysis: Studying how selection pressures in clinical environments drive argG sequence and regulatory evolution. This includes examining the relationship between argG variants and antimicrobial resistance, particularly in ESBL-positive strains which show significantly higher rates of nosocomial transmission (28% vs. 1.7%) .

These emerging directions recognize the complex relationship between argG function and K. pneumoniae pathogenesis, reflecting a shift from purely biochemical characterization to integrated approaches that consider genomic context, evolutionary history, and clinical significance.

How can contradiction detection methods improve research reliability in K. pneumoniae enzymology studies?

Contradiction detection methods can significantly improve research reliability in K. pneumoniae enzymology studies through systematic identification and resolution of discrepancies:

  • Application of sparse contrastive learning approaches: Methods like SparseCL can efficiently identify contradictory findings in the literature by leveraging specially trained sentence embeddings designed to preserve subtle, contradictory nuances between sentences . This computational approach can identify contradictions in reported kinetic parameters, substrate specificities, or regulatory mechanisms.

  • Standardized reporting frameworks: Developing field-specific templates for reporting experimental methods and results reduces ambiguity and facilitates direct comparison across studies. These frameworks should include mandatory reporting of:

    • Detailed enzyme preparation protocols

    • Complete biochemical characterization data

    • Strain information including whole genome sequence accessibility

  • Meta-analysis implementation: Regular systematic reviews incorporating formal contradiction detection can:

    • Identify areas of consensus versus ongoing controversy

    • Highlight methodological variables that contribute to discrepant results

    • Guide resource allocation toward resolving key uncertainties

  • Data cleaning for knowledge repositories: Contradiction retrieval methods can improve the quality of enzymology databases by flagging potentially erroneous entries, with particular value for applications such as cleaning corrupted corpora to restore high-quality retrieval .

  • Cross-validation requirements: Establishing standards requiring orthogonal experimental approaches before accepting potentially contradictory findings. For example, kinetic parameters that significantly diverge from established values should be verified using multiple assay methods.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.