KEGG: kpe:KPK_3930
What is Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1 (mtnC)?
Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1 (mtnC) is an enzyme classified as EC 3.1.3.77, also known as 2,3-diketo-5-methylthio-1-phosphopentane phosphatase . This full-length protein consists of 229 amino acids and plays a role in the methionine salvage pathway. Recent research has identified it as a potential virulence factor due to its interaction with human plasminogen at the bacterial outer membrane surface . The protein is encoded by the mtnC gene in K. pneumoniae and has been characterized in strain ATCC 700721/MGH 78578, with Uniprot accession number A6T673 .
How does Enolase-phosphatase E1 contribute to Klebsiella pneumoniae pathogenicity?
Enolase-phosphatase E1 contributes to K. pneumoniae pathogenicity through multiple mechanisms:
It functions as a plasminogen-binding protein on the outer membrane of K. pneumoniae, enabling the bacterium to interact with the host plasminogen system
This interaction potentially allows K. pneumoniae to exploit host plasminogen for tissue invasion and dissemination during infection
The protein is part of a broader set of plasminogen-binding factors that include phosphoglucomutase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase
By activating plasminogen, K. pneumoniae may enhance its ability to penetrate tissue barriers and establish systemic infections
This mechanism is particularly significant in the context of nosocomial pneumonia and severe sepsis, where K. pneumoniae is a major causative agent
How should Recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1 be stored and reconstituted for optimal experimental use?
For optimal experimental use, follow these storage and reconstitution guidelines:
Storage: Store at -20°C for routine use or -80°C for extended storage periods
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can compromise protein integrity
Shelf life: Liquid form maintains stability for approximately 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized form remains stable for up to 12 months
Reconstitution protocol:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (recommended default is 50%)
Prepare working aliquots and store at appropriate temperature based on timeline of experiments
What methods can be used to detect and characterize the interaction between Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-like protein and human plasminogen?
Multiple complementary methodologies can be employed to investigate this interaction:
Electron microscopy: Provides visual confirmation of the interaction at the bacterial surface level and localizes the protein on the outer membrane
Two-dimensional electrophoresis: Separates bacterial membrane proteins for subsequent identification of plasminogen-binding proteins
Immunoblotting: Detects specific protein-protein interactions using antibodies against either the bacterial protein or plasminogen
Peptide fragmentation fingerprinting: Identifies specific proteins involved in the interaction through mass spectrometry analysis
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): Quantifies binding kinetics and affinity parameters in real-time
Pull-down assays: Isolates protein complexes using immobilized plasminogen as bait
These techniques have successfully demonstrated that K. pneumoniae interacts with human plasminogen through an enolase-like protein present on its outer membrane .
What is the recommended protocol for cultivating Klebsiella pneumoniae for protein expression studies?
For optimal cultivation of K. pneumoniae for protein expression studies, follow this protocol:
Revive frozen bacterial stocks:
Prepare starter culture:
Main culture preparation:
For minimal medium cultivation (if required):
Harvest cells by centrifugation (4,000-5,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C)
Process immediately for protein extraction or flash-freeze cell pellets and store at -80°C
This protocol can be adapted based on specific experimental requirements and expression systems.
How can we differentiate between the cytoplasmic and membrane-associated forms of Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1 in experimental settings?
Differentiating between cytoplasmic and membrane-associated forms requires careful experimental design:
Subcellular fractionation approach:
Prepare cell lysates under gentle conditions to preserve native protein localization
Separate cytoplasmic, periplasmic, inner membrane, and outer membrane fractions through differential centrifugation
Confirm fraction purity using established marker proteins for each compartment
Immunolocalization methods:
Use immunogold electron microscopy to visualize protein localization at high resolution
Apply immunofluorescence microscopy with membrane-impermeable vs. permeable fixation conditions
Surface biotinylation:
Label surface-exposed proteins with membrane-impermeable biotinylation reagents
Recover biotinylated proteins with streptavidin and identify by immunoblotting
Protease accessibility assays:
Treat intact cells with proteases that cannot penetrate the membrane
Compare digestion patterns with whole cell lysates
Research has shown that while enolase-like proteins are primarily cytoplasmic enzymes, a subset localizes to the outer membrane where they can interact with host plasminogen, suggesting a "moonlighting" function in virulence .
What are the key considerations when designing inhibitors targeting Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1 for therapeutic purposes?
When designing inhibitors against K. pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1, researchers should consider:
Structural specificity:
Target unique structural features not present in human homologs to minimize off-target effects
Focus on the catalytic site for enzymatic inhibition or on surface-exposed regions for blocking plasminogen binding
Inhibition strategy selection:
Competitive inhibitors that mimic substrate binding
Allosteric inhibitors that alter protein conformation
Covalent modifiers that permanently inactivate the enzyme
Delivery challenges:
Designing molecules that can penetrate the bacterial outer membrane
For surface-exposed targets, considering accessibility in the context of capsule and other surface structures
Resistance development:
Evaluating the potential for resistance through target mutation
Considering dual-targeting approaches to reduce resistance development
In vivo efficacy:
Testing inhibitors in physiologically relevant infection models
Evaluating pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution
This approach addresses both the enzymatic function and the virulence role of the protein, potentially offering new avenues for antimicrobial development against K. pneumoniae infections.
How do techniques for genomic DNA extraction from Klebsiella pneumoniae influence downstream analysis of the mtnC gene?
The genomic DNA extraction method can significantly impact downstream analysis of the mtnC gene:
DNA quality considerations:
Purity: Contamination with polysaccharides from the K. pneumoniae capsule can inhibit PCR and restriction enzymes
Integrity: Shearing during extraction may affect long-range PCR and genome assembly
Yield: Low yields may limit applications requiring substantial DNA amounts
Method-specific impacts:
Protocol recommendations:
Potential pitfalls:
Hypermucoviscous strains may require additional processing steps
Antibiotic-resistant strains may carry plasmids that should be preserved or separated based on research objectives
Proper DNA extraction is critical for accurate characterization of the mtnC gene, especially when comparing strains with different virulence profiles or when performing functional studies .
How do you reconcile conflicting data regarding the subcellular localization of Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1?
Conflicting data on subcellular localization can be reconciled through several analytical approaches:
Methodological differences evaluation:
Different fractionation techniques may yield varying results due to cross-contamination
Some detection methods may have insufficient sensitivity for low-abundance forms
Standardize protocols across laboratories for comparative analysis
Growth condition analysis:
The protein's localization may dynamically change based on growth phase
Environmental conditions (pH, oxygen, nutrient availability) may trigger relocalization
Systematically test multiple conditions to establish a localization profile
Strain variation assessment:
Compare localization across clinical and reference strains
Sequence the mtnC gene and promoter regions to identify variants affecting localization
Consider horizontal gene transfer and mobile genetic elements
"Moonlighting protein" framework:
Accept that the protein genuinely functions in multiple cellular compartments
Investigate mechanisms of protein export in the absence of signal peptides
Examine potential post-translational modifications controlling localization
Research on similar proteins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa supports the dual localization model, where enolase-like proteins function both as cytoplasmic enzymes and as membrane-associated virulence factors .
What factors contribute to variability in enzymatic activity of Recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1 across different studies?
Several factors can explain variability in reported enzymatic activities:
Expression system differences:
Mammalian cell-derived protein (as in commercial preparations) may have different post-translational modifications than bacterial expression systems
Codon optimization for expression hosts can affect protein folding and activity
Fusion tags may influence enzyme conformation and substrate accessibility
Purification and storage variables:
Assay condition variations:
Buffer composition, pH, temperature, and ionic strength affect catalytic efficiency
Substrate quality, concentration, and preparation methods influence kinetic parameters
Presence/absence of cofactors or activators can dramatically alter activity measurements
Reporting inconsistencies:
Different activity units and normalization methods complicate cross-study comparisons
Incomplete reporting of experimental conditions limits reproducibility
To address these issues, researchers should standardize assay conditions, fully document methodologies, and include appropriate controls when comparing enzymatic activities across different preparations or studies.
How does Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1 compare functionally with similar proteins in other pathogenic bacteria?
Comparative analysis reveals important functional similarities and differences:
Key functional observations:
Conservation of plasminogen binding:
Most pathogenic bacteria express enolase-like proteins that bind plasminogen
This property appears to be a conserved virulence mechanism across species
Localization patterns:
All species show some degree of surface exposure of these typically cytoplasmic enzymes
The mechanisms of membrane translocation remain poorly understood in the absence of canonical signal peptides
Species-specific adaptations:
This comparative analysis highlights the evolutionary conservation of enolase-phosphatase E1 as both a metabolic enzyme and a virulence factor across pathogenic bacteria.
What experimental approaches can differentiate between the enzymatic activity of Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1 and its role in plasminogen binding?
To differentiate between these dual functions, researchers can employ:
Site-directed mutagenesis approach:
Identify and mutate residues critical for enzymatic activity but not plasminogen binding (and vice versa)
Characterize mutant proteins for both functions independently
Create a functional map correlating protein regions with specific activities
Domain separation studies:
Express and purify individual domains or fragments of the protein
Test each domain for enzymatic activity and plasminogen binding
Identify the minimal fragments required for each function
Competitive inhibition experiments:
Develop specific inhibitors that block either the catalytic site or plasminogen-binding motifs
Test inhibitors in both biochemical assays and infection models
Assess correlation between inhibition of each function and pathogenicity
Structural biology approaches:
Solve crystal structures of the protein alone and in complex with substrate/plasminogen
Identify structural changes associated with each function
Use molecular dynamics simulations to model functional states
These approaches would help establish whether the dual functions can be selectively targeted, which has important implications for therapeutic development .
What emerging techniques show promise for studying the role of Enolase-phosphatase E1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae pathogenesis?
Several cutting-edge approaches hold significant promise:
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing:
Create precise mutations in the mtnC gene to study function
Generate reporter fusions to monitor expression and localization in real-time
Develop tunable expression systems to study dosage effects
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize protein localization with nanometer precision
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) to connect molecular localization with ultrastructural context
Live-cell imaging to track dynamic relocalization during infection
Systems biology approaches:
Multi-omics integration combining genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics data
Network analysis to place Enolase-phosphatase E1 in the context of virulence pathways
Machine learning to identify patterns associated with virulence across clinical isolates
Infection models:
Organoid cultures to study host-pathogen interactions in physiologically relevant systems
Microfluidic devices to simulate host environments and analyze bacterial responses
In vivo imaging of fluorescently-tagged proteins during infection
Structural biology innovations:
Cryo-electron microscopy to visualize protein-protein interactions at near-atomic resolution
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify binding interfaces
AlphaFold and other AI-based structure prediction tools to model protein interactions
These approaches will provide more comprehensive insights into how Enolase-phosphatase E1 contributes to K. pneumoniae pathogenesis, potentially revealing new therapeutic targets.
How might understanding the dual role of Klebsiella pneumoniae Enolase-phosphatase E1 inform new therapeutic strategies?
Understanding this dual functionality opens several therapeutic avenues:
Anti-virulence approaches:
Develop compounds that specifically block plasminogen binding without affecting enzymatic activity
Design peptide mimetics that compete with the enzyme for plasminogen binding sites
Generate antibodies targeting surface-exposed epitopes to prevent host interaction
Metabolic targeting strategies:
Inhibit the enzymatic function to disrupt bacterial metabolism
Design prodrugs activated by Enolase-phosphatase E1 to deliver antimicrobials specifically to K. pneumoniae
Combine with other metabolic inhibitors for synergistic effects
Immunotherapeutic potential:
Develop vaccines targeting surface-exposed Enolase-phosphatase E1
Use the protein as a diagnostic marker for K. pneumoniae infections
Create immunomodulatory treatments that enhance host response against this virulence factor
Combination therapy design:
Target Enolase-phosphatase E1 alongside membrane permeability to enhance antibiotic efficacy
Combine with biofilm inhibitors to address multiple aspects of K. pneumoniae pathogenesis
Integrate with conventional antibiotics for enhanced clearance
These approaches represent a shift from traditional antibiotic strategies toward targeted anti-virulence therapies, potentially addressing the growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance in K. pneumoniae infections.