Recombinant Lachancea thermotolerans Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD (+)] (GPD)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
GPD; Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD(+)]; EC 1.1.1.8
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-411
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Lachancea thermotolerans (Yeast) (Kluyveromyces thermotolerans)
Target Names
GPD
Target Protein Sequence
MFSISRITRT SSFTTQFRAL YRFKHSARKL QSIPFSIYKK MSAADRLNQT HDILSESVQA VENPFKVTVI GSGNWGTTIS KVVAENAALR PHLFVKRVDM WVFEETVDGQ KLTEIINTKH QNVKYLPNID LPENLVANPD LVSAVKDADI LVFNIPHQFL PRIVSQLQGN IKKDARAISC LKGFDVSKDG VKLLSTYVTE KLGITCGALS GANLAPEVAK ENWSETTVAY ELPKDFKGEG KDVDHAVLKA LFHRPYFHVN VIDDVAGISV AGALKNVVAL GCGFVEGLGW GNNASAAIQR VGLGEIIKFG QMFFPDSRVE TYYQESAGVA DLITTCSGGR NVRVATHMAK TGKSAEECEK ELLNGQSAQV FTHVRRSTSG WPSAVRPMNS FCSRPFTRLS TRTLLWTLCQ T
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the metabolic role of Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in L. thermotolerans?

Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD(+)] plays a crucial role in the redox balance of L. thermotolerans during fermentation. Unlike Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where glycerol production primarily serves as a redox valve to eliminate excess cytosolic NADH under anaerobic conditions, L. thermotolerans shows distinct metabolic strategies for maintaining NADH/NAD+ balance . GPD catalyzes the reduction of dihydroxyacetone phosphate to glycerol-3-phosphate with the concurrent oxidation of NADH to NAD+. This represents one pathway through which L. thermotolerans can regenerate NAD+ under fermentative conditions, alongside its unique ability to produce significant quantities of lactic acid .

How does L. thermotolerans GPD expression correlate with other metabolic pathways?

The expression of GPD in L. thermotolerans appears to have complex relationships with other metabolic pathways. Multiple linear regression analyses and correlations have identified significant relationships between glycerol production (which involves GPD activity) and other metabolites. Notably, negative correlations exist between ethanol and glycerol levels, while relationships between lactic acid and glycerol vary depending on the genetic group of L. thermotolerans . These relationships suggest that different L. thermotolerans strains may employ diverse metabolic strategies involving GPD to maintain redox balance during fermentation.

Do different genetic groups of L. thermotolerans show variation in GPD activity?

Yes, L. thermotolerans strains from different genetic groups show significant phenotypic differentiation in metabolite production, including glycerol, which is directly linked to GPD activity . Linear discriminant analysis of metabolic profiles has revealed clear separation between genetic groups such as 'Canada trees' and 'Domestic 1' from other groups . This suggests that GPD activity and regulation likely vary among different L. thermotolerans populations, reflecting their adaptation to diverse ecological niches and potential domestication events.

How does oxygen availability affect GPD expression and activity in L. thermotolerans?

Transcriptomic analyses have revealed that L. thermotolerans responds to anaerobic conditions by upregulating genes involved in glycolysis and fermentation while simultaneously downregulating the tricarboxylic acid cycle and pentose phosphate pathway . Under oxygen deprivation, L. thermotolerans shifts toward higher lactic acid production, which may compete with the glycerol production pathway for pyruvate and redox balance . This suggests that GPD expression and activity are likely influenced by oxygen availability, with potential regulatory cross-talk between pathways involving LDH and GPD enzymes to maintain redox homeostasis under varying oxygen conditions.

What molecular mechanisms underlie the differential regulation of GPD in anthropised versus wild L. thermotolerans strains?

Anthropised L. thermotolerans strains (those adapted to human-associated environments like winemaking) show notable genomic and phenomic differentiation compared to wild strains . Whole-genome sequencing of 145 L. thermotolerans strains has identified six well-defined groups primarily delineated by ecological origin, with anthropised strains showing lower genetic diversity due to selective pressure in the winemaking environment . The adaptation to fermentative environments has led to modifications in genes involved in alternative carbon source metabolism. While specific information about GPD regulation is not detailed, it's likely that similar selective pressures have shaped GPD expression patterns in anthropised strains, potentially contributing to their enhanced fermentative capabilities.

How does recombinant expression or modification of GPD affect carbon flux distribution in L. thermotolerans?

Engineering GPD expression could significantly alter carbon flux distribution in L. thermotolerans. One approach involves creating a cofactor competing system through expression of heterologous NADPH-dependent enzymes , which could redirect carbon flux by altering the availability of redox cofactors. Modifying GPD expression would likely affect the balance between glycerol production and other pathways competing for dihydroxyacetone phosphate or NAD+/NADH. Given L. thermotolerans' unique ability to produce both ethanol and lactic acid during fermentation, engineered changes in GPD could have complex effects on this three-way metabolic balance, potentially allowing researchers to tune the production of these metabolites for specific research applications.

What expression systems are most suitable for producing recombinant L. thermotolerans GPD?

When expressing recombinant L. thermotolerans GPD, researchers should consider systems that accommodate the unique characteristics of this yeast. While there are no direct reports of recombinant L. thermotolerans GPD expression in the provided literature, general principles suggest that E. coli systems with tags for enhanced solubility would be appropriate for basic characterization. For more advanced functional studies, expression in other yeast systems like S. cerevisiae might better preserve proper folding and post-translational modifications. When designing expression constructs, researchers should consider that L. thermotolerans has experienced adaptation to different environments , so codon optimization may be necessary depending on the expression host. Additionally, expression conditions should account for potential cofactor requirements and protein stability factors.

What analytical methods are most effective for assessing the impact of GPD modifications on L. thermotolerans metabolism?

A comprehensive analysis of GPD modifications requires multiple analytical approaches. Untargeted metabolomics has successfully revealed strain-level differences in L. thermotolerans volatile compound production and would be valuable for detecting broad metabolic shifts resulting from GPD modifications. Targeted analysis of primary metabolites (ethanol, glycerol, lactic acid, acetic acid) using HPLC or enzymatic assays enables quantitative assessment of major carbon flux changes. Transcriptomic analysis, which has previously revealed how L. thermotolerans responds to anaerobic conditions , would help identify regulatory effects of GPD modifications. For in-depth understanding, isotope labeling experiments could track carbon flux redistributions, while enzyme assays using purified recombinant GPD would establish kinetic parameters and substrate specificities.

How can genome editing technologies be optimized for GPD modification in L. thermotolerans?

While the literature does not specifically address genome editing in L. thermotolerans, developing effective protocols for this species would be critical for GPD research. CRISPR-Cas9 systems would need optimization for L. thermotolerans, considering factors such as promoter selection for Cas9 expression, guide RNA design accounting for this species' genomic features, and appropriate selection markers. Researchers might leverage information from L. thermotolerans' phylogenetic relationship to other yeasts where CRISPR systems have been established. The highly conserved nature of L. thermotolerans mitochondrial genome suggests that genomic tools developed for related species might require significant adaptation. Preliminary work should focus on transformation efficiency optimization and verification of editing precision before attempting complex GPD modifications.

How might GPD engineering affect L. thermotolerans' potential for mixed-culture fermentations?

Engineering GPD in L. thermotolerans could significantly impact its performance in mixed fermentations with S. cerevisiae, which are common in winemaking. L. thermotolerans shows distinct metabolic behavior when co-cultured with S. cerevisiae , and modifying GPD could affect these interactions. Enhanced GPD activity might increase glycerol production, potentially improving mouthfeel in wines while altering the balance of lactic acid production that contributes to acidity management. Since L. thermotolerans strains already show genetic group-specific correlations between glycerol and other metabolites , engineered GPD variants could be designed to enhance beneficial traits for specific fermentation objectives. The impact on competition dynamics would be an important research consideration, as altered carbon flux might affect L. thermotolerans persistence in mixed cultures.

What evolutionary insights might be gained from studying GPD variations across L. thermotolerans populations?

Studying GPD variations across the six well-defined genetic groups of L. thermotolerans could provide valuable insights into how this enzyme has evolved under different selective pressures . Anthropised strains show adaptation to winemaking environments through modifications in genes involved in carbon metabolism , and GPD likely plays a role in this adaptation. Comparative analysis of GPD sequences, expression patterns, and enzyme kinetics across strains from diverse origins could reveal how evolutionary processes have shaped central carbon metabolism in this species. Such research might identify natural GPD variants with enhanced properties and illuminate the molecular basis for L. thermotolerans' unique metabolic capabilities, including its ability to produce significant lactic acid alongside ethanol during fermentation .

How does L. thermotolerans GPD activity compare with lactate dehydrogenase activity under various fermentation conditions?

L. thermotolerans possesses three isoenzymes of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)—Ldh1, Ldh2, and Ldh3, with Ldh2 expression levels correlating most strongly with lactic acid accumulation . The relationship between GPD and LDH activities appears to be complex and strain-dependent. While some L. thermotolerans genetic groups show negative correlations between glycerol (linked to GPD activity) and lactate production, others show positive correlations or no significant relationship . Under anaerobic conditions, all three ldh homologs are upregulated , suggesting a shift toward lactic acid production that may compete with glycerol production for redox balance.

This complex relationship likely reflects different evolutionary strategies for managing redox balance, where some strains might preferentially use LDH while others rely more on GPD. The potential regulatory cross-talk between these pathways represents an important area for future research, particularly how factors like oxygen availability and nitrogen concentration affect the relative activities of these enzymes and the resulting metabolite profiles.

What insights can comparative genomics provide about the evolution of GPD in the Lachancea genus?

Comparative genomic analysis reveals that L. thermotolerans has a highly conserved mitochondrial genome with coding regions characterized by low rates of nonsynonymous substitution compared to related species like L. kluyveri . This suggests strong purifying selection on mitochondrial genes, which may indirectly affect GPD function through mitochondrial-nuclear interactions and respiratory capacity.

The anthropisation process in L. thermotolerans has led to genomic changes that enhance fitness in fermentative environments, including modifications in genes for assimilating alternative carbon sources . A fascinating hypothesis emerged from recent research suggesting that lactic acid production in the Saccharomyces-Lachancea lineage may be an anthropisation signature linked to winemaking, resulting from the loss of respiratory chain complex I and evolutionary preference for fermentation even in the presence of oxygen . This context suggests that GPD evolution in L. thermotolerans likely reflects adaptation to fermentative metabolism, potentially with unique characteristics compared to other yeasts.

What are the most promising approaches for engineering L. thermotolerans GPD to enhance specific metabolic outcomes?

For researchers seeking to engineer L. thermotolerans GPD, several approaches warrant investigation. Directed evolution of GPD could generate variants with altered kinetic properties or cofactor preferences. Structure-guided mutagenesis targeting the cofactor binding site might alter NADH affinity or enable the enzyme to utilize NADPH. Promoter engineering could modify GPD expression levels or response to environmental cues, leveraging information about transcriptional differences between strains with varying production of metabolites .

How might understanding L. thermotolerans GPD contribute to broader knowledge of yeast metabolic diversity?

L. thermotolerans occupies a unique position in yeast metabolism, combining alcoholic fermentation with significant lactic acid production—a feature rare among yeasts . Understanding how GPD functions within this distinctive metabolic network could provide insights into the evolution of diverse fermentation strategies across yeasts. The species shows clear signs of domestication and allopatric differentiation , making it an excellent model for studying how metabolism adapts to different environments.

Research on L. thermotolerans GPD could reveal alternative strategies for managing redox balance beyond the canonical pathways described in S. cerevisiae. The apparent difference in the metabolic link between glycerol and acetate production compared to S. cerevisiae suggests unexplored metabolic architectures. These insights could ultimately lead to new paradigms in our understanding of yeast central carbon metabolism, particularly how different pathways for NAD+ regeneration can coexist and be regulated within a single organism.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.