This protein binds to 16S rRNA, playing a crucial role in 30S ribosomal subunit assembly and potentially influencing the 16S rRNA conformation at the A site.
KEGG: lpl:lp_2216
STRING: 220668.lp_2216
The 30S ribosomal protein S14 (rpsN) is an essential component of the small (30S) ribosomal subunit in bacteria. It plays a critical role in the assembly of the 30S subunit and contributes to its structural integrity. Research has demonstrated that S14 is involved in the assembly process but may not be required once the 30S subunit has been properly assembled . The protein is part of the translation machinery that facilitates protein synthesis by helping to coordinate the interaction between mRNA and tRNA molecules. Evolutionary studies suggest that S14 may have evolved to adapt bacteria to zinc-limited environments through the replacement of zinc-binding motifs with zinc-independent sequences .
Several expression systems can be used to produce recombinant S14 protein, each with distinct advantages:
E. coli and yeast systems: These offer the best yields and shorter turnaround times for S14 expression, making them preferred choices for high-throughput studies .
Insect cells with baculovirus: This system provides many of the posttranslational modifications necessary for correct protein folding or activity retention .
Mammalian cells: Similar to insect cells, mammalian expression systems can provide appropriate posttranslational modifications .
Lactobacillus plantarum: Using the pSIP vector system with inducible promoters allows for controlled expression of recombinant proteins. The highest protein yields have been reported when cells are induced with 50 ng/mL SppIP (sakacin inducer peptide) at optimal temperatures .
The choice of expression system should be guided by research requirements, particularly concerning protein yield, folding, and functional activity.
Optimal induction conditions for recombinant protein expression in L. plantarum using the pSIP vector system include:
Inducer concentration: 50 ng/mL of sakacin inducer peptide (SppIP) has been shown to provide efficient induction for recombinant protein expression .
Temperature: Induction at 37°C is commonly used, although some studies report optimal expression at 30°C under anaerobic conditions .
Induction timing: Adding the inducer when the culture reaches an OD600 of 0.3 is recommended .
Induction duration: Optimal expression levels are typically achieved after 6-10 hours of induction .
Under these conditions, the pSIP411 vector has been reported to produce up to 1800 Miller Unit equivalents of β-glucuronidase, representing an 87-fold induction. Similarly, the pSIP407 vector produced aminopeptidase-N at a specific activity of 3.5 U/mg of protein, constituting up to 40% of the total intracellular protein content .
To maintain stability and activity of recombinant S14 protein:
Storage temperature: Store at -20°C/-80°C for optimal shelf life .
Formulation: Lyophilized form generally has a longer shelf life (12 months) compared to liquid form (6 months) .
Reconstitution: Reconstitute protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL .
Glycerol addition: Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) before aliquoting for long-term storage .
Handling: Avoid repeated freezing and thawing; store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week .
Centrifugation: Briefly centrifuge vials prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom .
These storage recommendations are based on standard protein biochemistry practices and have been validated for recombinant ribosomal proteins.
Codon optimization significantly enhances the expression efficiency of recombinant proteins in heterologous systems like L. plantarum. When expressing foreign genes in L. plantarum, researchers have found that adapting the codons according to the host's codon usage bias improves translation efficiency . This optimization is particularly important for proteins with complex structures or those from evolutionarily distant organisms.
For the expression of recombinant S14 protein, the following codon optimization strategies have proven effective:
Analyzing the codon usage bias of L. plantarum to identify preferred codons
Replacing rare codons in the target gene with those commonly used by the host
Optimizing the GC content to match that of the host organism
Eliminating potential mRNA secondary structures that might impede translation
Research has shown that such optimization can increase protein yield by several fold and improve the surface display of recombinant proteins in L. plantarum . For example, a study on SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression demonstrated that codon-optimized sequences could be efficiently expressed on the surface of recombinant L. plantarum and exhibited high antigenicity .
S14 has evolved as a key factor in bacterial adaptation to zinc-limited environments. Evolutionary analysis indicates that some bacteria have replaced zinc-binding motifs in S14 with zinc-independent sequences, resulting in different S14 variants (C+ and C- types) . This adaptation has significant implications for recombinant protein studies:
Expression conditions: When expressing recombinant S14 in different bacterial hosts, researchers should consider the zinc requirements of the particular S14 variant.
Structural studies: The presence or absence of zinc-binding motifs affects protein folding and stability, which must be accounted for in structural analyses.
Functional complementation: Studies show that bacterial ribosomes exhibit varying levels of tolerance to S14 replacement, suggesting evolutionary adaptability of the ribosomal machinery .
Experimental design: Researchers should control zinc levels in media when studying S14 function or expression to account for potential zinc-dependent effects.
Understanding these zinc-dependent adaptations provides insight into the evolutionary pressures shaping bacterial ribosomal proteins and offers opportunities for engineering S14 variants with specific properties.
Flow cytometry offers a powerful tool for quantifying surface expression of recombinant proteins in L. plantarum, as demonstrated in studies of various surface-displayed antigens . The methodology involves:
Protocol for flow cytometric analysis of surface-displayed proteins:
Culture and induce recombinant L. plantarum as per established protocols
Harvest approximately 1 × 10^6 CFU of bacteria
Wash cells and block with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 hour
Incubate with primary antibody specific to the target protein overnight at 4°C
Wash three times with PBS containing 0.2% Tween-20
Incubate with fluorophore-labeled secondary antibody (e.g., PE-labeled) for 1.5 hours under light-protected conditions
Important methodological considerations:
Antibody selection: Choose antibodies with high specificity to minimize background signal
Controls: Include non-transformed L. plantarum to establish baseline fluorescence
Washing steps: Thorough washing is essential to remove unbound antibodies
Gating strategy: Properly gate bacterial populations to exclude debris and aggregates
Quantification: Express results as percentage of positive cells or mean fluorescence intensity
Using this approach, researchers have demonstrated that recombinant L. plantarum strains can achieve surface expression rates of approximately 37.5% for target proteins, compared to 2.5% background in parental strains .
Enhancing stability and antigenicity of recombinant proteins in L. plantarum requires multifaceted approaches:
Genetic strategies:
Signal peptide optimization: Using endogenous signal peptides (e.g., signal peptide 1320) can improve protein secretion and surface display .
Fusion partners: Incorporating stabilizing domains or targeting peptides (such as DCpep) can enhance surface anchoring .
Codon optimization: Adapting the coding sequence to match L. plantarum codon bias significantly improves expression and proper folding .
Expression conditions:
Temperature control: Maintaining optimal induction temperature (30-37°C) preserves protein structure .
pH stability: Recombinant proteins expressed in L. plantarum can maintain stability at low pH (even pH 1.5), which is advantageous for oral delivery applications .
Salt concentration: High salt tolerance has been demonstrated for certain recombinant proteins expressed in L. plantarum .
Structural enhancements:
Surface anchoring motifs: Using cell wall-binding domains from L. plantarum improves surface display efficiency.
Protein engineering: Strategic mutations can enhance thermostability or pH resistance.
Studies have shown that recombinant proteins expressed in L. plantarum using these strategies can maintain stability under harsh conditions (50°C, pH 1.5, high salt) and retain their antigenic properties, making them suitable candidates for various biotechnological applications .
The role of S14 in 30S ribosomal subunit assembly varies across prokaryotic systems, reflecting evolutionary adaptations to different ecological niches:
Functional differences:
In standard prokaryotic models, S14 and S3 are crucial for 30S subunit assembly, as evidenced by the inability of ribosomes deficient in these proteins to reconstitute properly .
Supplementation with pure S3 and S14 enhances the activity of reconstituted ribosomal products, indicating their role in optimizing ribosomal function .
Once the 30S subunit is properly assembled, S14 may not be required for maintaining structural integrity, suggesting a primarily assembly-specific function .
Evolutionary adaptations:
Different bacterial species show variations in S14 sequence and structure, particularly in zinc-binding motifs .
Some bacteria possess both C+ (zinc-binding) and C- (zinc-independent) types of S14, suggesting functional redundancy or specialization .
Horizontal gene transfer likely contributed to the spread of C- type S14 variants, indicating selective advantages in certain environments .
Experimental evidence:
Studies with Bacillus subtilis have successfully constructed strains in which native S14 genes were replaced with heterologous S14 from other species, demonstrating the functional conservation of this protein across species boundaries .
The bacterial ribosome shows tolerance to S14 replacement, although growth rates may be affected depending on the source of the heterologous S14 .
Understanding these differences is crucial for researchers working with recombinant S14 proteins, as the functionality of S14 from one species may not be fully replicated when expressed in a different bacterial host.
L. plantarum offers several promoter systems for recombinant protein expression, each with distinct characteristics suitable for different research applications:
| Promoter Type | Example | Expression Level | Inducibility | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constitutive Endogenous | P₁₆ₛ, Pldh, Ptuf | Moderate to High | No | Simple expression without induction, continuous production | Cannot control expression timing, potential metabolic burden |
| Synthetic Constitutive | 16S rRNA-based library | Variable (titratable) | No | Tunable expression levels, predictable strength | Fixed expression level once selected |
| Inducible (pSIP system) | pSIP411 (PsppA) | Very High (up to 40% of intracellular protein) | Yes (SppIP, 50 ng/mL) | Tight regulation, dose-dependent control, high yields | Requires inducer addition, potential leakiness |
| Heterologous Promoters | P₄₈ from S. typhimurium | Very High (5× higher than P₂₃) | Variable | Higher expression than native promoters | Potential cross-reactivity with host systems |
The pSIP vector system, based on quorum sensing-regulated bacteriocin operons from L. sakei, offers particularly robust inducible expression. When induced with 50 ng/mL of sakacin inducer peptide (SppIP), the pSIP411 vector has demonstrated production of 1800 Miller Unit equivalents of β-glucuronidase, representing an 87-fold induction over baseline . Similarly, the pSIP407 vector produced aminopeptidase-N at levels constituting up to 40% of the total intracellular protein content .
For researchers requiring fine-tuned expression levels, synthetic promoter libraries based on the 16S rRNA promoter template provide a range of constitutive expression strengths . These systems allow selection of the appropriate expression level for the target protein, balancing protein yield against potential toxicity or metabolic burden.
Comprehensive validation of recombinant S14 expression in L. plantarum requires multiple complementary techniques:
Western Blot Analysis:
Use antibodies specific to the target protein or attached tags (e.g., HA tag)
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Quantify expression levels using densitometry of protein bands
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM):
Visualize surface-displayed proteins directly
Compare morphology of recombinant bacteria with parental strains
Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA):
Detect surface-displayed proteins using fluorescently labeled antibodies
Assess distribution and accessibility of recombinant proteins
Flow Cytometry:
Quantify percentage of bacterial cells expressing the target protein
Measure expression levels across the population
Compare with non-transformed controls (typically showing <3% background)
Functional Assays:
Assess biological activity of the recombinant protein
May include binding assays, enzymatic activity tests, or immunological responses
Confirms not just expression but functional integrity
PCR and Sequencing:
Verify genetic integration and sequence integrity
Confirm stability of the construct during culture and passage
Using this multi-technique approach, researchers can comprehensively validate both the expression and proper conformation of recombinant S14 protein. For example, studies with recombinant L. plantarum expressing viral proteins have demonstrated expression rates of approximately 37.5% using flow cytometry and confirmed correct surface localization through TEM and immunofluorescence .