Recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum L-rhamnose isomerase (rhaA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
rhaA; lp_3593; L-rhamnose isomerase; EC 5.3.1.14
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-427
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Lactobacillus plantarum (strain ATCC BAA-793 / NCIMB 8826 / WCFS1)
Target Names
rhaA
Target Protein Sequence
MVKTDEVEKA YQVAKERYAE IGVDTEKAME ALKKVKLSVH CWQGDDIHGF LNPDQELTGG IGVSGDYPGI ARTPDQLTGD LHEALSLIPG SHKVALHTLY AVTDKKKDFN EVGPEDFKYW VDWAKQEGIG LDMNPTFFSH PMVKHNFTLA SPEKSVRDYW IEVGKKSREI ANYFGQELGQ QSVNNFWIPD GFKDNPIDKQ APRERLIESL DEVFAKKYDE KNTIEAVEGK LFGTGIESYT VGSHLFYNNY AISRGKLWTI DAGHWHPTED VSDKFSAFMP FGKGLMLHVS RPIRWDSDHV VIFDEALQRI TRSLVRDNEL ERTNIGLDFF DATINRVSAW VIGARATQKA LLQAMLAPID DLKKAELNYD FTKRLAVTEE LKSFPFGAVW DEFCLKNNTP VGTDWLDEIH NYEQKVQFPR DKKVVTE
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: lpl:lp_3593

STRING: 220668.lp_3593

Protein Families
Rhamnose isomerase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant L. plantarum production?

Recombinant L. plantarum expression relies heavily on shuttle vector systems with appropriate selection markers. For environmental safety and antibiotic-free selection, researchers commonly employ genetic complementation systems using auxotrophic strains. The alr gene deletion strain NC8Δ is particularly effective as it allows for antibiotic-free screening. This strain automatically degrades when the recombinant bacterium enters the external environment, preventing environmental contamination while maintaining stable expression . E. coli-Lactobacillus shuttle expression vectors using aspartic acid-β-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (asd) and alanine racemase (alr) genes as antibiotic-free screening markers have demonstrated excellent efficacy in L. plantarum expression systems .

How do surface display systems function in L. plantarum recombinant protein expression?

Surface display systems in L. plantarum utilize anchoring proteins that facilitate the presentation of target proteins on the bacterial cell surface. The polyglutamate synthase A (pgsA) derived from Bacillus subtilis serves as an effective surface display element in L. plantarum. When fused with target proteins, pgsA anchors them to the cell surface, allowing for direct interaction with the external environment . For L-rhamnose isomerase applications, this surface display approach would enable direct enzymatic activity assays without protein extraction and could potentially enhance enzyme stability.

What are the typical yields of recombinant protein when expressed in L. plantarum?

Protein yields in recombinant L. plantarum systems vary based on the expression vector, promoter strength, and cultivation conditions. Based on comparable research with recombinant L. plantarum expressing viral antigens, effective expression can be verified through immunoblotting and flow cytometry analysis . For optimal enzyme production like L-rhamnose isomerase, expression efficiency can be maximized through strategic promoter selection and optimization of growth parameters such as temperature, pH, and medium composition.

How can I verify successful expression of recombinant proteins in L. plantarum?

Multiple complementary techniques should be employed to confirm successful expression:

  • Immunoblotting: Bacterial cell lysates obtained through sonication or freeze-thaw cycles can be analyzed using specific antibodies against your target protein. This technique confirms both expression and approximate molecular weight .

  • Flow cytometry: For surface-displayed proteins, flow cytometry with fluorescent-conjugated antibodies provides quantitative assessment of expression levels and confirms proper surface localization .

  • Indirect immunofluorescence: This technique provides visual confirmation of protein expression and localization on the bacterial surface through fluorescence microscopy .

Verification MethodApplicationAdvantagesLimitations
ImmunoblottingProtein expression confirmationDetects both soluble and insoluble formsSemi-quantitative
Flow cytometrySurface display quantificationQuantitative, high-throughputRequires surface accessibility
ImmunofluorescenceLocalization visualizationProvides spatial informationLower throughput

What strategies can enhance the functional activity of recombinant enzymes in L. plantarum?

For enzymes like L-rhamnose isomerase, functional activity can be optimized through several approaches:

  • Codon optimization: Adapting the gene sequence to the codon usage bias of L. plantarum improves translation efficiency and protein yield.

  • Signal peptide selection: For secreted or surface-displayed enzymes, selecting an appropriate signal peptide from L. plantarum enhances translocation efficiency.

  • Expression vector design: Utilizing strong constitutive promoters like the pgsA promoter or inducible systems for controlled expression timing .

  • Host strain selection: L. plantarum strains vary in their metabolic capabilities and protein processing machinery. Strain selection should be guided by specific enzyme requirements and intended applications.

How can genomic and metabolomic approaches advance recombinant L. plantarum enzyme research?

Genomic and metabolomic analyses provide powerful insights into enzyme function and optimization:

  • Genome-wide analysis: Identifying related genes and potential regulatory elements that may affect recombinant enzyme expression and activity. This approach has been successfully used to identify functional genes (such as nucleoside hydrolase genes) in L. plantarum strains with specific metabolic capabilities .

  • Metabolomics: Characterizing metabolic changes resulting from recombinant enzyme expression helps understand downstream effects and potential applications. For instance, metabolomic analysis has revealed how L. plantarum influences nucleoside uptake and hydrolysis through specific enzymatic pathways .

  • Heterologous expression and gene knockout studies: These complementary approaches confirm the functional role of specific genes, as demonstrated in studies validating enzyme function through both expression in alternative hosts (e.g., E. coli) and targeted gene deletion in the native L. plantarum .

What in vivo models are appropriate for testing recombinant L. plantarum enzyme applications?

The selection of appropriate animal models depends on the specific research objectives:

  • Mouse models: Widely used for preliminary studies but may present challenges due to physiological differences from humans. Consider strain-specific responses when designing experiments .

  • Specialized models: For specific metabolic conditions, models like hyperuricemic geese have demonstrated effectiveness in studying L. plantarum effects on metabolic disorders .

When designing in vivo experiments, researchers should:

  • Establish clear baseline measurements before intervention

  • Include appropriate control groups (empty vector controls)

  • Determine optimal administration routes (oral gavage is common for L. plantarum)

  • Select relevant endpoints and biomarkers for enzyme activity assessment

How should immunological responses to recombinant L. plantarum be evaluated?

Comprehensive immunological assessment includes:

  • Humoral immunity: Measure specific antibody production (IgG, IgG1, IgG2a in serum; IgA in mucosal surfaces) at multiple timepoints using ELISA .

  • Cellular immunity: Evaluate T-cell responses through assessment of CD4+ and CD8+ cell proliferation and cytokine production in relevant tissues like spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes .

  • Mucosal immunity: For gut-associated applications, analyze immune responses in Peyer's patches and intestinal segments through immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry .

What are optimal sampling timepoints for evaluating recombinant L. plantarum effects?

Based on established protocols with recombinant L. plantarum, critical sampling timepoints include:

  • Baseline (before administration)

  • 2 weeks after primary administration

  • 2 weeks after booster administration (if applicable)

  • Long-term assessment (e.g., 10 weeks after primary administration)

This timeline captures both immediate responses and sustained effects of recombinant L. plantarum interventions.

How can I address inconsistent expression levels of recombinant proteins in L. plantarum?

Inconsistent expression may result from:

  • Plasmid instability: Verify plasmid retention through PCR analysis of cultures grown with and without selection pressure.

  • Promoter variability: Test multiple promoters with different strengths and regulation patterns.

  • Growth conditions: Optimize temperature, pH, and media composition for both bacterial growth and protein expression.

  • Protein toxicity: If the recombinant protein is toxic to the host, consider inducible expression systems or lower-copy-number vectors.

What strategies can overcome poor enzymatic activity of recombinant L-rhamnose isomerase?

When enzymatic activity is lower than expected:

  • Verify protein folding: Improper folding may result from rapid expression or unsuitable conditions. Adjust growth temperature (often lower temperatures improve folding) and consider co-expression of chaperones.

  • Check for inhibitory factors: Components in the growth media or cell lysate may inhibit enzyme activity. Purify the enzyme using appropriate chromatography methods before activity assessment.

  • Optimize reaction conditions: Systematically test different pH values, temperatures, and cofactor concentrations to identify optimal reaction conditions.

  • Evaluate protein modifications: Post-translational modifications may differ between native and recombinant systems. Analysis by mass spectrometry can identify these differences.

How can microbial interactions affect recombinant L. plantarum performance in complex environments?

In complex biological systems, recombinant L. plantarum interacts with resident microbiota:

  • Competitive dynamics: L. plantarum administration can alter gut microbial composition, increasing beneficial bacteria while reducing potentially harmful species. For example, L. plantarum administration has been shown to increase Lactobacillaceae abundance while decreasing Staphylococcus in animal models .

  • Metabolic interactions: Recombinant enzymes may influence host metabolism through changing available substrates. This has been demonstrated in studies where L. plantarum affected nucleoside metabolism through specific enzymatic pathways .

  • Host response considerations: Host factors can modulate recombinant L. plantarum colonization and activity. Account for variations in host response when interpreting experimental results.

How might genome editing technologies enhance recombinant L. plantarum enzyme production?

CRISPR-Cas9 and other genome editing technologies offer promising approaches for:

  • Chromosomal integration: Moving from plasmid-based expression to chromosomal integration of target genes for enhanced stability.

  • Metabolic engineering: Modifying competing pathways to channel metabolic resources toward enzyme production.

  • Regulatory element optimization: Fine-tuning expression through precise modification of promoters and ribosome binding sites.

  • Multiplex engineering: Simultaneous modification of multiple genetic elements to create optimized production strains.

What are emerging applications for recombinant L. plantarum enzyme systems?

Recombinant L. plantarum expressing enzymes like L-rhamnose isomerase has potential applications in:

  • Biocatalysis: Development of whole-cell biocatalysts for industrial production of rare sugars and other compounds.

  • Metabolic disorder management: Similar to how L. plantarum SQ001 has shown promise in managing hyperuricemia , engineered strains could address specific metabolic disorders.

  • Intestinal microbiome modulation: Recombinant enzymes could alter substrate availability in the gut, potentially reshaping microbial communities toward healthier profiles.

  • Vaccine development platforms: Building on successful expression of antigens on L. plantarum surfaces , enzyme-antigen fusions could enable novel vaccine approaches.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.