KEGG: lpl:lp_2032
STRING: 220668.lp_2032
TruB in L. plantarum catalyzes the isomerization of uridine to pseudouridine at position 55 in the TΨC loop of tRNA molecules. This post-transcriptional modification is critical for maintaining proper tRNA tertiary structure and stability. Methodologically, researchers can investigate this function by:
Conducting comparative genomic analysis between L. plantarum strains
Performing gene knockout experiments and observing phenotypic changes
Using RNA-seq to analyze changes in tRNA populations in truB-deficient strains
Employing radioactive labeling of tRNAs followed by thin-layer chromatography to detect pseudouridine formation
The enzyme's function can be further understood within the context of L. plantarum's adaptation mechanisms, as this bacterium contains multiple nucleoside hydrolysis-related enzymes that play roles in nucleoside metabolism .
Expression patterns of truB can vary significantly among L. plantarum strains, particularly those isolated from different ecological niches. To investigate these differences methodologically:
Use quantitative PCR to measure relative expression levels across strains
Perform Western blot analysis using anti-truB antibodies to quantify protein levels
Employ reporter gene fusions (e.g., truB promoter-GFP) to monitor expression in different conditions
Analyze RNA-seq data across multiple strains to identify regulatory patterns
When investigating strain differences, consider that L. plantarum strains show considerable genomic diversity, as evidenced by studies that have isolated functional strains from diverse sources such as HUA geese .
For successful cloning and expression of L. plantarum truB, researchers should follow these methodological steps:
Design primers with appropriate restriction sites based on the published L. plantarum genome
Amplify the truB gene using high-fidelity PCR
Clone the gene into a suitable expression vector (e.g., pWCF vectors have been successfully used for L. plantarum recombinant proteins )
Transform into an appropriate expression host (E. coli for initial cloning, followed by L. plantarum)
Verify correct insertion by sequencing and restriction digestion
Optimize expression conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, time)
For higher yields, researchers may employ the strategy demonstrated with other L. plantarum recombinant proteins, where sonication and freeze-thaw cycles have been effective for protein extraction .
To achieve optimal functional expression of recombinant truB, implement this methodological approach:
Test multiple promoter systems (constitutive vs. inducible)
Evaluate different signal peptides for protein targeting
Optimize codon usage for L. plantarum
Test various growth temperatures (25-37°C) and induction periods
Evaluate media composition effects on expression levels
Compare different cell lysis methods (sonication vs. enzymatic vs. mechanical disruption)
Based on successful expression of other recombinant proteins in L. plantarum, researchers should consider incorporating a verification method such as immunoblotting or flow cytometry to confirm expression, as demonstrated in the expression of influenza virus antigens in L. plantarum .
For precise measurement of recombinant truB enzymatic activity, employ these methodological approaches:
In vitro pseudouridylation assay:
| Component | Concentration | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Purified recombinant truB | 0.1-1 μM | Enzyme |
| Substrate tRNA | 1-5 μM | Target molecule |
| Buffer (Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) | 50 mM | Maintain pH |
| MgCl₂ | 5 mM | Cofactor |
| DTT | 2 mM | Maintain reducing environment |
| Incubation temperature | 37°C | Optimal enzyme activity |
| Incubation time | 30-60 min | Allow reaction completion |
Use HPLC analysis to quantify pseudouridine formation
Employ tritium release assays with [³H]UTP-labeled tRNAs
Utilize mass spectrometry to identify modified nucleosides
These approaches can be combined with the analytical methods used for characterizing other L. plantarum recombinant proteins, where immunoblotting and flow cytometry have successfully verified functional expression .
To investigate truB-substrate interactions in L. plantarum, implement these methodological approaches:
Cross-linking studies: UV cross-linking of truB with radiolabeled tRNA substrates
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA): Titrate increasing amounts of purified truB with constant tRNA concentration
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): Measure real-time binding kinetics between truB and various tRNA substrates
Structural studies: X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM of truB-tRNA complexes
Mutational analysis: Site-directed mutagenesis of key residues in truB followed by binding assays
When analyzing the interactions, researchers can draw parallels with nucleoside hydrolase interactions in L. plantarum, where specific enzymes like IunH have been shown to participate in nucleoside metabolism pathways .
The genetic background significantly impacts truB expression and function. To methodically investigate these effects:
Compare expression in various L. plantarum strains with different genetic backgrounds
Analyze expression in deletion strains lacking related RNA modification enzymes
Evaluate expression in strains with different metabolic capacities
Test complementation of truB-deficient strains with recombinant truB variants
Consider the approaches used in L. plantarum recombinant studies where strain NC8Δ has been successfully employed as an expression host for recombinant proteins .
For optimal expression of truB in L. plantarum, these vector systems and methodological considerations are recommended:
pWCF vector system: Has demonstrated success with other recombinant proteins in L. plantarum
pSIP expression vectors: Offer inducible expression with tight regulation
pNZ8148 vector: Provides NICE system compatibility for controlled expression
Key methodological considerations include:
Selection of appropriate antibiotic resistance markers
Inclusion of species-specific origin of replication
Choice of constitutive vs. inducible promoters
Addition of secretion signals if extracellular expression is desired
Incorporation of epitope tags for detection and purification
The pWCF vector system has been validated for successful expression of recombinant proteins in L. plantarum, as demonstrated in immunological studies .
For CRISPR-Cas9 based investigation of truB in L. plantarum, implement this methodological workflow:
Design phase:
Identify target sequences within truB gene
Design sgRNAs with minimal off-target effects
Select appropriate Cas9 variant (SpCas9 or SaCas9)
Design repair templates for precise gene editing
Implementation phase:
Clone sgRNAs into CRISPR vector
Transform constructs into L. plantarum
Screen transformants for successful editing
Verify edits by sequencing
Functional analysis:
Create point mutations in catalytic residues
Generate domain deletions
Introduce reporter tags for localization studies
Create conditional knockdowns using inducible promoters
This approach can be integrated with the techniques used for genetic manipulation of other L. plantarum genes, where targeted modifications have successfully altered functional properties .
When encountering inconsistent truB activity, implement this systematic troubleshooting methodology:
Protein expression verification:
Confirm expression by Western blot with anti-truB antibodies
Verify protein solubility in different fractions
Assess protein degradation patterns
Activity optimization:
Test multiple buffer compositions for optimal activity
Evaluate cofactor requirements and concentrations
Analyze temperature and pH dependencies
Examine enzyme stability under various storage conditions
Substrate considerations:
Ensure tRNA substrates are properly folded
Test multiple tRNA species as substrates
Examine potential inhibitors in the reaction mixture
Similar troubleshooting approaches have been successfully applied to other recombinant L. plantarum proteins, where flow cytometry and immunoblotting were used to verify proper expression .
To methodically reconcile contradictory results between in vitro and in vivo truB studies:
Systematic comparison:
| Parameter | In vitro system | In vivo system | Potential reconciliation approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzyme concentration | Typically higher | Physiological | Dilution series to match physiological levels |
| Substrate accessibility | Unrestricted | Competed for | Add competitor molecules to in vitro reactions |
| Cofactor availability | Controlled | Variable | Manipulate cofactor concentrations |
| Post-translational modifications | Often absent | Present | Purify native enzyme for comparison |
| Cellular compartmentalization | Absent | Present | Study in membrane mimetics or cell extracts |
Examine differences in tRNA folding states between the two systems
Consider the impact of cellular factors absent in purified systems
Analyze the role of potential regulatory proteins in vivo
When interpreting conflicting results, researchers can draw insights from studies on other L. plantarum enzymes, where both in vitro and in vivo approaches have revealed complementary aspects of enzyme function .
For comprehensive computational analysis of truB sequence and function, employ these methodological tools:
Multiple sequence alignment tools:
MUSCLE or CLUSTAL for basic alignment
T-Coffee for improved accuracy with distant homologs
MAFFT for large-scale alignments
Evolutionary analysis:
MEGA for phylogenetic tree construction
Consurf for mapping evolutionary conservation onto protein structure
PAML for detecting positive selection
Structure prediction:
AlphaFold2 for accurate 3D structure prediction
SWISS-MODEL for homology modeling
I-TASSER for ab initio and template-based modeling
Functional domain prediction:
InterProScan for integrated domain analysis
NCBI Conserved Domain Database
Pfam for protein family identification
These computational approaches can complement experimental methods used in L. plantarum studies, where genome-wide analyses have successfully identified functional domains in enzymes involved in nucleoside metabolism .
To methodically investigate how truB-mediated tRNA modifications influence L. plantarum stress responses:
Experimental design approach:
Generate truB overexpression and knockout strains
Expose strains to various stressors (acid, oxidative, temperature, osmotic)
Measure growth kinetics under stress conditions
Analyze tRNA modification profiles using mass spectrometry
Perform transcriptome and proteome analysis of stress response genes
Phenotypic characterization:
Assess biofilm formation capabilities
Measure survival rates under extreme conditions
Evaluate metabolic shifts using metabolomics
Analyze membrane integrity and morphological changes
This research direction can build upon observations that L. plantarum strains modulate gene expression and enzyme activity in response to environmental conditions, as demonstrated in studies of its role in hyperuricemia .
Recent methodological advances in structural biology have enhanced our understanding of truB function through:
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
Enables visualization of truB-tRNA complexes at near-atomic resolution
Allows analysis of conformational changes during catalysis
Reveals dynamic aspects of enzyme-substrate interactions
X-ray crystallography enhancements:
Serial femtosecond crystallography captures transient states
Room-temperature crystallography provides physiologically relevant structures
Neutron crystallography offers insights into hydrogen bonding networks
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) applications:
Residue-specific dynamics of truB during catalysis
Identification of flexible regions involved in substrate recognition
Characterization of weak, transient interactions with tRNAs
Integrative structural biology approaches:
Combining multiple techniques (cryo-EM, X-ray, NMR, mass spectrometry)
Computational modeling to integrate diverse experimental data
Molecular dynamics simulations to explore conformational landscapes
These structural biology techniques complement experimental approaches used to characterize other L. plantarum proteins, where protein structure has been linked to functional properties .
To methodically investigate the relationship between truB activity and L. plantarum environmental adaptation:
Comparative analysis framework:
Isolate L. plantarum strains from diverse environments (dairy, fermented vegetables, GI tract)
Sequence and compare truB genes across isolates
Measure truB expression levels under conditions mimicking natural habitats
Correlate tRNA modification patterns with environmental parameters
Adaptation markers:
Growth rates in environment-specific media
Metabolic profiling under different conditions
Competitive fitness in mixed cultures
Stress resistance correlations with truB activity levels
This research approach aligns with observations that L. plantarum strains show environment-specific adaptations, as seen in strains isolated from hyperuricemic geese that demonstrated specific metabolic capabilities .